@inproceedings{55337,
  abstract     = {{As AI is more and more pervasive in everyday life, humans have an increasing demand to understand its behavior and decisions. Most research on explainable AI builds on the premise that there is one ideal explanation to be found. In fact, however, everyday explanations are co-constructed in a dialogue between the person explaining (the explainer) and the specific person being explained to (the explainee). In this paper, we introduce a first corpus of dialogical explanations to enable NLP research on how humans explain as well as on how AI can learn to imitate this process. The corpus consists of 65 transcribed English dialogues from the Wired video series 5 Levels, explaining 13 topics to five explainees of different proficiency. All 1550 dialogue turns have been manually labeled by five independent professionals for the topic discussed as well as for the dialogue act and the explanation move performed. We analyze linguistic patterns of explainers and explainees, and we explore differences across proficiency levels. BERT-based baseline results indicate that sequence information helps predicting topics, acts, and moves effectively.}},
  author       = {{Wachsmuth, Henning and Alshomary, Milad}},
  booktitle    = {{Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Computational Linguistics}},
  editor       = {{Calzolari, Nicoletta and Huang, Chu-Ren and Kim, Hansaem and Pustejovsky, James and Wanner, Leo and Choi, Key-Sun and Ryu, Pum-Mo and Chen, Hsin-Hsi and Donatelli, Lucia and Ji, Heng and Kurohashi, Sadao and Paggio, Patrizia and Xue, Nianwen and Kim, Seokhwan and Hahm, Younggyun and He, Zhong and Lee, Tony Kyungil and Santus, Enrico and Bond, Francis and Na, Seung-Hoon}},
  pages        = {{344–354}},
  publisher    = {{International Committee on Computational Linguistics}},
  title        = {{{“Mama Always Had a Way of Explaining Things So I Could Understand”: A Dialogue Corpus for Learning to Construct Explanations}}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@inbook{55603,
  author       = {{Vöing, Nerea}},
  booktitle    = {{Hochschullehre erforschen Innovative Impulse für das Scholarship of Teaching and Learning}},
  editor       = {{Fahr, Uwe and Kenner, Alessandra and Angenent, Holger and Eßer-Lüghausen, Alexandra}},
  pages        = {{363--386}},
  publisher    = {{Springer Link}},
  title        = {{{Wirksamkeit von SoTL im Rahmen hochschuldidaktischer Weiterbildung auf die Weiterentwicklung der (Lehr-)Kompetenz. Das Vertiefungsmodul im Paderborner Zertifikatsprogramm}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/978-3-658-34185-5}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@inbook{38066,
  author       = {{Steigerwald, Jörn}},
  booktitle    = {{Im-Materiell. Kulturerbe-Studien für Eva-Maria Seng zum 60. Geburtstag}},
  editor       = {{Harnack, Maria}},
  pages        = {{59--72}},
  publisher    = {{De Gruyter}},
  title        = {{{Die Vergegenwärtigung höfischer Lustbarkeiten: André Félibiens 'Divertissements de Versailles' (1674/1676)}}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@inbook{49553,
  author       = {{Steigerwald, Jörn}},
  booktitle    = {{La Forme idéale à la Renaissance / Forma ideale durante il Rinascimento}},
  editor       = {{Frommel, Sabine and Pfisterer, Ulrich}},
  pages        = {{167--178}},
  publisher    = {{Campisano Editore}},
  title        = {{{Problematisches Sehen illusionärer Schönheit: die Armida-Episode in Torquato Tassos 'Gerusalemme liberata'}}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@inbook{38069,
  author       = {{Steigerwald, Jörn}},
  booktitle    = {{ZwischenSpielZeit. Das Theater der Frühaufklärung (1680-1730)}},
  editor       = {{Steigerwald, Jörn and Süwolto, Leonie}},
  publisher    = {{Brill / Fink}},
  title        = {{{Die Geburt der italienischen Liebestragödie. Scipione Maffeis 'Merope'.}}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@inbook{38072,
  author       = {{Steigerwald, Jörn}},
  booktitle    = {{Theater-Transfers. Akkulturationen des europäischen Dramas in Gottscheds 'Deutscher Schaubühne'}},
  editor       = {{Süwolto, Leonie}},
  pages        = {{233--253}},
  title        = {{{Der Zorn des ehrlichen Mannes. Die Neudeutung von Molières 'Misanthrope' in der 'Deutschen Schaubühne}}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@inbook{39048,
  author       = {{Süwolto, Leonie}},
  booktitle    = {{ZwischenSpielZeit. Das Theater der Frühaufklärung (1680-1740)}},
  editor       = {{Süwolto, Leonie and Steigerwald, Jörn}},
  pages        = {{251--269}},
  publisher    = {{Fink }},
  title        = {{{Transformationen des Heroismus in der Tragödie der Frühaufklärung. Geschlechterpoetik in Luise Gottscheds ‚Panthea‘.}}},
  volume       = {{1}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@inbook{50336,
  author       = {{Puscher, Sahra}},
  booktitle    = {{ZwischenSpielZeit. Das Theater der Frühaufklärung (1680-1730)}},
  editor       = {{Süwolto, Leonie  and Steigerwald, Jörn}},
  isbn         = {{9783770567447}},
  pages        = {{219--251}},
  publisher    = {{Brill / Fink}},
  title        = {{{Elegische Liebestragödie. Johann Elias Schlegels "Die Trojanerinnen" (1737/47)}}},
  doi          = {{10.30965/9783846767443}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@article{37240,
  author       = {{Wallmeier, Nadine}},
  journal      = {{Praxis Deutsch}},
  title        = {{{Man nehme... den Konjunktiv. Verbformen in Kochrezepten}}},
  volume       = {{291}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@book{37428,
  editor       = {{Wallmeier, Nadine and Langhanke, Robert and Merten, Marie-Luis}},
  publisher    = {{Olms}},
  title        = {{{Regionales Sprechen und Schreiben}}},
  volume       = {{7}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@inbook{37434,
  author       = {{Bender, Michael and Bubenhofer, Noah and Dreesen, Philipp and Georgi, Christopher and Rüdiger, Jan Oliver and Vogel, Friedemann}},
  booktitle    = {{Diskurse – digital}},
  pages        = {{137–157}},
  publisher    = {{De Gruyter}},
  title        = {{{Techniken und Praktiken der Verdatung}}},
  doi          = {{10.1515/9783110721447-007}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@article{37444,
  abstract     = {{<jats:p> Zusammenfassung. Im vorliegenden Beitrag wird das Screening zur Erfassung des Leseverständnisses für die Klassen 6 – 7 (SELV 6 – 7) vorgestellt, welches Leseverständnis während des Lesens mittels der Maze-Prozedur erfasst. Der Test liegt in einer Print- (SELV-P) und Digitalversion (SELV-D) vor. Es wurden 5 Paralleltestformen entwickelt. Zwei Studien zur Überprüfung der Reliabilität und Validität in den Klassen 6 und 7 werden präsentiert, wobei drei verschiedene Maze-Scorings (1: korrekt, 2: korrekt-inkorrekt, 3: korrekt / bearbeitet) einander gegenübergestellt werden. Studie 1 (SELV-P, n = 222, davon 85 6. Klasse) zeigt, dass die 4 Formen (ohne Form 3) die gleiche Fähigkeit messen, jedoch mit unterschiedlichen Mittelwerten. Der Einsatz als Lernverlauf-Messinstrument erscheint somit mit separaten Normen je Form möglich. Die Paralleltest- und Retestreliabilität dieser 4 Formen ist unter Verwendung von Score 1 und 2 ausreichend hoch, nicht aber bei Score 3. In Studie 2 (SELV-D, n = 345, davon 150 6. Klasse) wurde nur Form 1 betrachtet, die unter Verwendung aller 3 Scores die Kriterien der diskriminanten und konvergenten Validität erfüllt. </jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Seifert, Susanne and Maitz, Katharina and Riedl, Sylvia and Neumaier, Arnold and Stoff, Ilona and Gasteiger-Klicpera, und Barbara}},
  issn         = {{0012-1924}},
  journal      = {{Diagnostica}},
  keywords     = {{Clinical Psychology}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{101--112}},
  publisher    = {{Hogrefe Publishing Group}},
  title        = {{{Screening zur Erfassung des Leseverständnisses in den           Klassen 6 – 7 (SELV 6 – 7)}}},
  doi          = {{10.1026/0012-1924/a000289}},
  volume       = {{68}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@inbook{37448,
  author       = {{Seifert, Susanne and Paleczek, Lisa and Gasteiger-Klicpera, Barbara}},
  booktitle    = {{Handbuch der sonderpädagogischen Diagnostik. Einführung in die Status- und Prozessdiagnostik sowie Förderplanung}},
  editor       = {{Gebhardt, Markus and Scheer, David}},
  publisher    = {{Regensburger Beiträge zur Inklusions- und Sonderpädagogik}},
  title        = {{{Diagnostik und Differenzierung}}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@article{37447,
  abstract     = {{<jats:p> Zusammenfassung. Instrumente zur Messung von Gesundheitskompetenz bei Jugendlichen basieren auf sehr heterogenen Definitionen und Konzepten. Zudem können sie grundsätzlich in subjektive (Selbsteinschätzungs–) und objektive (die Performanz messende) Verfahren unterteilt werden. In der vorliegenden Studie wurden 2 subjektive (eHEALS; Kurzform des HLS-EU-Q16) und ein objektives Messinstrument (Claim) von 471 Jugendlichen der 6. und 7. Klassenstufe (Durchschnittsalter 13.04 Jahre; 49 % Mädchen; 63 % Familiensprache Deutsch) bearbeitet und auf ihren wechselseitigen Zusammenhang, den Zusammenhang mit kognitiven und Lesefähigkeiten, sowie Unterschiede in Bezug auf Geschlecht und Familiensprache untersucht. Das objektive Verfahren korrelierte nicht mit den subjektiven Verfahren. Dies bestätigt die Annahme, dass sie aufgrund der Messperspektive unterschiedliche Indikatorenausprägungen von Gesundheitskompetenz erfassen. Korrelationen mit Lese- und kognitiven Fähigkeiten zeigten sich nur beim objektiven Instrument, wohingegen die Selbsteinschätzungsinstrumente diese Aspekte der Gesundheitskompetenz nicht abbilden. Unterschiede hinsichtlich des Geschlechts und der Familiensprache zeigten sich insbesondere beim objektiven Instrument, allerdings sind Antwortverzerrungen bei Selbsteinschätzungen möglich. Die spezifischen Vor- und Nachteile von subjektiven und objektiven Verfahren sollten bei der Instrumentenauswahl berücksichtigt werden. </jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Seifert, Susanne and Maitz, Katharina and Pendl, Dominik and Gasteiger-Klicpera, Barbara}},
  issn         = {{0012-1924}},
  journal      = {{Diagnostica}},
  keywords     = {{Clinical Psychology}},
  number       = {{4}},
  pages        = {{197--208}},
  publisher    = {{Hogrefe Publishing Group}},
  title        = {{{Vergleich unterschiedlicher Instrumente zur Messung von Gesundheitskompetenz           im Zusammenhang mit Lesekompetenz und kognitiven Fähigkeiten von           Jugendlichen}}},
  doi          = {{10.1026/0012-1924/a000297}},
  volume       = {{68}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@article{37446,
  author       = {{Seifert, Susanne and Paleczek, Lisa}},
  issn         = {{0883-0355}},
  journal      = {{International Journal of Educational Research}},
  keywords     = {{Education}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier BV}},
  title        = {{{Comparing tablet and print mode of a german reading comprehension test in grade 3: Influence of test order, gender and language}}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.ijer.2022.101948}},
  volume       = {{113}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@article{37441,
  abstract     = {{<jats:p>The present study investigates eight Grade-4 classes (9- to 12-year-olds, 52.1% girls) who worked on at least 10 lessons using project RegioDiff material. The study focuses on one of these lessons (including nine text passages and corresponding tasks) and on students with low (19 students, percentile &lt;15) and high reading skills (29 students, percentile &gt; 70). While students were working with the material, screencasts were recorded (30h). The construct “task performance” (processing time, response accuracy, and task engagement) was then analysed using the screencasts.&#x0D;
The analysis revealed that the two groups differed significantly in the processing time of two tasks, but not in the total time spent on all nine tasks. Significant differences were revealed also for general task engagement. Task engagement was highly correlated with processing time. Participants with higher reading skills spent more time on the tasks and were more engaged than participants with lower reading skills. However, we did not find any differences in terms of answer accuracy. This indicates that task difficulty and student reading skills were well matched.&#x0D;
The study also shows how tasks may be adapted or augmented in order to match the learning environment more closely to student learning needs.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Paleczek, Lisa and Ender, Daniela and Kogler, Andrea and Seifert, Susanne}},
  issn         = {{2048-8645}},
  journal      = {{European Conference on e-Learning}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{338--347}},
  publisher    = {{Academic Conferences International Ltd}},
  title        = {{{Comparing Student high and low Reading Performance with Differentiated Digital Reading Materials}}},
  doi          = {{10.34190/ecel.21.1.680}},
  volume       = {{21}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@article{37438,
  abstract     = {{<jats:p> This paper investigates the implementation of a reading program designed for third grade elementary school classrooms in Austria. Using a mixed-methods approach, lesson types were identified, respective class compositions analyzed, and the effects on students’ reading gains examined. The results show that the lesson types seem to reflect learner group needs as students in the different lesson types profited similarly from the reading program. This supports the hypothesis that reading is a highly individualized process and leads to the conclusion that the instructional approach of the reading program investigated supports teachers in conducting reading lessons tailored to their students’ needs. </jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Kulmhofer-Bommer, Andrea and Seifert, Susanne and Paleczek, Lisa and Gasteiger-Klicpera, Barbara}},
  issn         = {{0022-0574}},
  journal      = {{Journal of Education}},
  keywords     = {{Education}},
  publisher    = {{SAGE Publications}},
  title        = {{{Bending and Bowing: How Teachers Adapt a Vocabulary-Based Reading Program to Their Students Needs}}},
  doi          = {{10.1177/00220574221112627}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@article{37440,
  author       = {{Paleczek, Lisa and Ender, Daniela and Berger, Jessica and Prinz, Katharina and Seifert, Susanne}},
  issn         = {{0883-0355}},
  journal      = {{International Journal of Educational Research}},
  keywords     = {{Education}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier BV}},
  title        = {{{A feasibility study of digital content use in inclusive, Austrian primary school practice}}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.ijer.2022.101938}},
  volume       = {{112}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@article{37470,
  abstract     = {{<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>When the COVID-19 pandemic began, many universities switched to fully online teaching. This unexpected switching to online teaching was challenging for both teachers and students, and restrictions that were put in place because of pandemic made this challenge even greater. However, new ways of teaching might also open new opportunities for students’ learning. The research question driving our study was as follows: how do students regulate their learning and specifically their choice of resources and peer learning in university mathematics classes that are fully taught online as offered during the COVID-19 pandemic? We report on a longitudinal, qualitative study in which students recorded a brief audio diary twice a week over one whole semester (14 weeks). We focused on three students who completed 70 interviews in total and finished the semester with varying degrees of success. The results show how the students structured their studying (e.g., the roles that deadlines or synchronous teaching events played). They illustrate the strengths and limitations of digital materials provided by the lecturer and the use of complementary media. Further, the pandemic uncovered the double-edged role of simple, often anonymous exchanges (e.g., via Discord servers), with few binding forces for either side, and the significance of stable learning partnerships for students’ success. Our research highlights aspects that should be focal points when comparing traditional instruction and online instruction during the pandemic from a self-regulatory perspective. Practical implications refer to how these aspects can be combined sensibly in fully online courses, but also in blended learning contexts.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Liebendörfer, Michael and Kempen, Leander and Schukajlow, Stanislaw}},
  issn         = {{1863-9690}},
  journal      = {{ZDM – Mathematics Education}},
  keywords     = {{General Mathematics, Education}},
  publisher    = {{Springer Science and Business Media LLC}},
  title        = {{{First-year university students' self-regulated learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative longitudinal study}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s11858-022-01444-5}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@inbook{33524,
  author       = {{Rezat, Sara}},
  booktitle    = {{12 Perspektiven auf den Deutschunterricht. Wissenswertes für Deutschlehrkräfte. }},
  editor       = {{Franken, Anna Ulrike and Pertzel, Eva}},
  pages        = {{177--214}},
  publisher    = {{Ministerium für Schule und Bildung des Landes NRW/QUA-LiS NRW}},
  title        = {{{ Texte im Deutschunterricht.}}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}