@inproceedings{16363,
  author       = {{Hansmeier, Tim and Kaufmann, Paul and Platzner, Marco}},
  booktitle    = {{GECCO '20: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion}},
  isbn         = {{978-1-4503-7127-8}},
  location     = {{Cancún, Mexico}},
  pages        = {{125--126}},
  publisher    = {{Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)}},
  title        = {{{Enabling XCSF to Cope with Dynamic Environments via an Adaptive Error Threshold}}},
  doi          = {{10.1145/3377929.3389968}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@inproceedings{16400,
  abstract     = {{Softwarization facilitates the introduction of smart
manufacturing applications in the industry. Manifold devices
such as machine computers, Industrial IoT devices, tablets,
smartphones and smart glasses are integrated into factory networks
to enable shop floor digitalization and big data analysis. To
handle the increasing number of devices and the resulting traffic,
a flexible and scalable factory network is necessary which can be
realized using softwarization technologies like Network Function
Virtualization (NFV). However, the security risks increase with
the increasing number of new devices, so that cyber security must
also be considered in NFV-based networks.

Therefore, extending our previous work, we showcase threat
detection using a cloud-native NFV-driven intrusion detection
system (IDS) that is integrated in our industrial-specific network
services. As a result of the threat detection, the affected network
service is put into quarantine via automatic network reconfiguration.
We use the 5GTANGO service platform to deploy our
developed network services on Kubernetes and to initiate the
network reconfiguration.}},
  author       = {{Müller, Marcel and Behnke, Daniel and Bök, Patrick-Benjamin and Schneider, Stefan Balthasar and Peuster, Manuel and Karl, Holger}},
  booktitle    = {{IEEE Conference on Network Softwarization (NetSoft) Demo Track}},
  location     = {{Ghent, Belgium}},
  publisher    = {{IEEE}},
  title        = {{{Cloud-Native Threat Detection and Containment for Smart Manufacturing}}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@inproceedings{13868,
  author       = {{Pukrop, Simon and Mäcker, Alexander and Meyer auf der Heide, Friedhelm}},
  booktitle    = {{Proceedings of the 46th International Conference on Current Trends in Theory and Practice of Computer Science (SOFSEM)}},
  title        = {{{Approximating Weighted Completion Time for Order Scheduling with Setup Times}}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@inproceedings{13584,
  author       = {{Szopinski, Daniel and Schoormann, Thorsten and Kundisch, Dennis}},
  booktitle    = {{Proceedings of the 53rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS)}},
  location     = {{Maui, Hawaii}},
  title        = {{{Criteria as a prelude for guiding taxonomy evaluation}}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@misc{16940,
  author       = {{Relard, Sebastian}},
  title        = {{{Experimente in der Wirtschaftsinfromatik zu Kreativität - Ein systematischer Literaturüberblick und Implikationen für Geschäftsmodellmodellierungstools}}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@misc{16941,
  author       = {{Kemadjou, Rostand Ndoumi}},
  title        = {{{Visualisierung von Taxonomien: Ein systematischer Überblick}}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@misc{15769,
  author       = {{Wolfförster, Lukas}},
  title        = {{{Taxonomie zu Taxonomie-Nutzungsgründen}}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@misc{20790,
  author       = {{Patzer, Christfof}},
  title        = {{{Entwicklung und Vergleich von Messkriterien anhand statistischer Methoden zur Optimierung der Leistungserbringung im IT-Unternehmen Diebold Nixdorf im Global Service Delivery Management}}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@misc{19765,
  author       = {{Dowbysch, Michael}},
  title        = {{{Beziehungen innerhalb und zwischen Geschäftsmodellen: Systematische Analyse durch Geschäftsmodell-Modellierungssprachen}}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@inbook{32152,
  abstract     = {{Formiert sich eine Disziplin „Schreibwissenschaft“? Wir versuchen, die Form, den Gegenstand und mögliche Ziele des Feldes zu beschreiben, aus dem sich aktuell so etwas wie eine Disziplin zu bilden scheint. Nach einer Vergewisserung, was in der Wissenschaftssoziologie überhaupt unter Disziplin verstanden wird, arbeiten wir Spezifika einer Schreibwissenschaft als einer Practical Art heraus und diskutieren dann, welche Türen sich mit der Institutionalisierung einer Disziplin möglicherweise öffnen werden und welche sich vielleicht schließen.}},
  author       = {{Girgensohn, Katrin and Haacke, Stefanie and Karsten, Andrea}},
  booktitle    = {{Schreibwissenschaft - eine neue Disziplin: Diskursübergreifende Perspektiven}},
  editor       = {{Huemer, Birgit and Doleschal, Ursula and Wiederkehr, Ruth and Girgensohn, Katrin and Dengscherz, Sabine and Brinkschulte, Melanie and Mertlitsch, Carmen}},
  isbn         = {{978-3-205-20974-4}},
  pages        = {{25 -- 47}},
  publisher    = {{Böhlau}},
  title        = {{{Disziplin Schreibwissenschaft? Kritische Überlegungen zur Entwicklung einer „Practical Art“}}},
  doi          = {{10.7767/9783205209768.25}},
  volume       = {{2}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{32442,
  abstract     = {{<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Electroencephalographic (EEG) research indicates changes in adults’ low frequency bands of frontoparietal brain areas executing different balance tasks with increasing postural demands. However, this issue is unsolved for adolescents when performing the same balance task with increasing difficulty. Therefore, we examined the effects of a progressively increasing balance task difficulty on balance performance and brain activity in adolescents. Thirteen healthy adolescents aged 16–17 year performed tests in bipedal upright stance on a balance board with six progressively increasing levels of task difficulty. Postural sway and cortical activity were recorded simultaneously using a pressure sensitive measuring system and EEG. The power spectrum was analyzed for theta (4–7 Hz) and alpha-2 (10–12 Hz) frequency bands in pre-defined frontal, central, and parietal clusters of electrocortical sources. Repeated measures analysis of variance (rmANOVA) showed a significant main effect of task difficulty for postural sway (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; 0.001; <jats:italic>d</jats:italic> = 6.36). Concomitantly, the power spectrum changed in frontal, bilateral central, and bilateral parietal clusters. RmANOVAs revealed significant main effects of task difficulty for theta band power in the frontal (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; 0.001, <jats:italic>d</jats:italic> = 1.80) and both central clusters (left: <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; 0.001, <jats:italic>d</jats:italic> = 1.49; right: <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; 0.001, <jats:italic>d</jats:italic> = 1.42) as well as for alpha-2 band power in both parietal clusters (left: <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; 0.001, <jats:italic>d</jats:italic> = 1.39; right: <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; 0.001, <jats:italic>d</jats:italic> = 1.05) and in the central right cluster (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.005, <jats:italic>d</jats:italic> = 0.92). Increases in theta band power (frontal, central) and decreases in alpha-2 power (central, parietal) with increasing balance task difficulty may reflect increased attentional processes and/or error monitoring as well as increased sensory information processing due to increasing postural demands. In general, our findings are mostly in agreement with studies conducted in adults. Similar to adult studies, our data with adolescents indicated the involvement of frontoparietal brain areas in the regulation of postural control. In addition, we detected that activity of selected brain areas (e.g., bilateral central) changed with increasing postural demands.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Gebel, Arnd and Lehmann, Tim and Granacher, Urs}},
  issn         = {{0014-4819}},
  journal      = {{Experimental Brain Research}},
  keywords     = {{General Neuroscience}},
  number       = {{5}},
  pages        = {{1323--1333}},
  publisher    = {{Springer Science and Business Media LLC}},
  title        = {{{Balance task difficulty affects postural sway and cortical activity in healthy adolescents}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s00221-020-05810-1}},
  volume       = {{238}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{20690,
  abstract     = {{The Enlightenment is well known for its critical analysis of the Bible. Though the Renaissance sources have been acknowledged as an inspiration of this movement, the Querelle des Femmes and its critique of the Bible has never been considered as a possible catalyst for the enlightened philosophical discourse. For centuries women have fought against interpretations of the Bible.This paper argues that the Querelle des Femmes criticized the Bible not only because of its patriarchal content but also criticized philosophical thinking that, for supporting the views from the Bible and its misogynist stance, misusing the instruments of rational philosophy. Arguments from 1400-1750, from Nogarola to Du Châtelet proof women philosophers’ fight in favour of a critique of the bible from a rational point of view, reflecting also on the status of what it meant, to argue rationally.}},
  author       = {{Hagengruber, Ruth}},
  isbn         = {{ISBN 978-88-7000-877-7}},
  journal      = {{Dianoia 31, no. XXV}},
  keywords     = {{Keywords: Bible critics, Isotta Nogarola, Querelle des femmes, Enlightenment, Émilie Du Châtelet.}},
  location     = {{Bologna }},
  pages        = {{331--353}},
  title        = {{{Pressure on Enlightenment. Bible Critics from Nogarola to Du Châtelet}}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{13770,
  author       = {{Karl, Holger and Kundisch, Dennis and Meyer auf der Heide, Friedhelm and Wehrheim, Heike}},
  journal      = {{Business & Information Systems Engineering}},
  number       = {{6}},
  pages        = {{467--481}},
  publisher    = {{Springer}},
  title        = {{{A Case for a New IT Ecosystem: On-The-Fly Computing}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s12599-019-00627-x}},
  volume       = {{62}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{32456,
  author       = {{Letafatkar, Amir and Rabiei, Pouya and Ghanati, Hadi Abbaszadeh and Khosrokiani, Zohre and Ghahremani, Naji and Gokeler, Alli}},
  issn         = {{1824-7490}},
  journal      = {{Sport Sciences for Health}},
  keywords     = {{Orthopedics and Sports Medicine}},
  number       = {{4}},
  pages        = {{737--745}},
  publisher    = {{Springer Science and Business Media LLC}},
  title        = {{{Training athletes with an external attentional focus enhances athletic performance during countermovement jump}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s11332-020-00652-4}},
  volume       = {{16}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{34489,
  abstract     = {{<jats:p>Zusammenfassung. Positive Einstellungen zu Inklusion gelten als zentraler Erfolgsfaktor für die Entwicklung eines inklusiven Schulsystems. Die vorliegende Studie prüft die Validität dreier gängiger deutschsprachiger Messinstrumente zur Erfassung von Einstellungen zu Inklusion in einer unabhängigen Stichprobe: SACIE, EFI-L und KIESEL. Zur Validierung herangezogene externe Konstrukte sind Selbstwirksamkeit und die Big Five Persönlichkeitsfaktoren. Die Ergebnisse einer Befragung von 556 Lehrkräften und Lehramtsstudierenden (Alter: M‍( SD) = 26.48 (12.67); 70 % weiblich) mit Blick auf die Inklusion von Kindern mit Förderschwerpunkt Lernen (SPF-L) zeigen eine weitgehend gute Replizierbarkeit der Faktorstrukturen der Instrumente. Die Faktorkorrelationen über die Instrumente hinweg lagen zwischen |.61| und |.96| (nur Attitude Subskala des SACIE). Alle Subskalen zeigen vergleichbare Zusammenhänge mit Selbstwirksamkeit und den Big Five Persönlichkeitsfaktoren. Zwar weisen Unterschiede in den Effektstärken darauf hin, dass die Instrumente je spezifische Aspekte von Inklusion betonen, insgesamt rechtfertigen die Ergebnisse jedoch die Annahme, dass das zugrundeliegende Konzept von Einstellungen bezüglich Inklusion weitgehend überlappt.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Gorges, Julia and Grumbach, Jasmin and Micheel, Sabrina A. and Neumann, Phillip}},
  issn         = {{2190-622X}},
  journal      = {{Diagnostica}},
  keywords     = {{Inklusion, Einstellungen, Inclusion, BiFoKi}},
  number       = {{4}},
  pages        = {{235--245}},
  publisher    = {{Hogrefe Publishing Group}},
  title        = {{{Erfassung von Einstellungen zu Inklusion mit SACIE, EFI-L und KIESEL}}},
  doi          = {{10.1026/0012-1924/a000253}},
  volume       = {{66}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@inbook{34490,
  abstract     = {{In diesem Beitrag wird die Frage diskutiert, ob und welche diagnostischen Konzepte in einem inklusiven Schulsystem umgesetzt werden können und sollten und welche Konsequenzen sich daraus für die Erforschung inklusiver Modelle und Praktiken ergeben. Einem historischen Abriss über die Entwicklung unterschiedlicher diagnostischer Perspektiven hinsichtlich der Feststellung sonderpädagogischen Unterstützungsbedarfs folgt eine kritische Diskussion unter den Stichworten Statusdiagnostik versus Prozessdiagnostik. Vor diesem Hintergrund werden Einsatzbereiche, Vorzüge und Nachteile von formellen und informellen Verfahren aus inklusions- und sonderpädagogischer Perspektive betrachtet. Anschließend erfolgt eine Systematisierung unterschiedlicher Zielsetzungen (sonder-)pädagogischer Diagnostik unter besonderer Berücksichtigung ihrer Einsatzbereiche und Umsetzungsformen. Deren möglicher Informationsgehalt sowie die jeweiligen Konsequenzen für empirische Studien in der Bildungsforschung werden zum Abschluss diskutiert.
}},
  author       = {{Neumann, Phillip and Lütje-Klose, Birgit}},
  booktitle    = {{Schüler*innen mit sonderpädagogischem Förderbedarf in Schulleistungserhebungen}},
  editor       = {{Gresch, Cornelia and Kuhl, Poldi and Grosche, Michael and Sälzer, Christine and Stanat, Petra}},
  isbn         = {{9783658276072}},
  keywords     = {{Inklusion, Diagnostik, Kategorisierung, De-Kategorisierung}},
  pages        = {{3--28}},
  publisher    = {{Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden}},
  title        = {{{Diagnostik in inklusiven Schulen – zwischen Stigmatisierung, Etikettierungs-Ressourcen-Dilemma und förderorientierter Handlungsplanung}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/978-3-658-27608-9_1}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{34488,
  author       = {{Wild, Elke and Lütje-Klose, Birgit and Gorges, Julia and Neumann, Phillip and Grüter, Sandra and Weber, Antonia and Goldan, Janka}},
  issn         = {{1431-2859}},
  journal      = {{SEMINAR - Lehrerbildung und Schule}},
  keywords     = {{BiFoKi, Inklusion, Fortbildung, Schulentwicklung, Kooperation, Eltern, Schule-Eltern-Kooperation, Bildungspartnerschaften}},
  number       = {{4}},
  pages        = {{56--68}},
  title        = {{{Kooperation als Schlüssel - Das "Bielefelder Fortbildungskonzept zur Kooperation an inklusiven Schulen" (BiFoKi)}}},
  volume       = {{26}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{32043,
  author       = {{Albers, Timm and Weltzien, Dörte and Ali-Tani, Caroline and Döther, Sabrina and Söhnen, Sarah Aileen and Verhoeven, Nadja}},
  journal      = {{QfI - Qualifizierung für Inklusion. Online-Zeitschrift zur Forschung über Aus-, Fort- und Weiterbildung pädagogischer Fachkräfte}},
  number       = {{3}},
  title        = {{{Herausforderungen inklusiver Bildung in Kita-Teams – Konzipierung eines individualisierten Curriculums für Weiterbildung und Prozessbegleitung}}},
  doi          = {{10.21248/qfi.44}},
  volume       = {{2}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@inbook{32029,
  author       = {{Albers, Timm and Lichtblau, Michael}},
  booktitle    = {{Kooperation von KiTa und Grundschule ; Band 2: Digitalisierung, Inklusion und Mehrsprachigkeit}},
  isbn         = {{3556082039}},
  publisher    = {{{Carl Link, 2020}}},
  title        = {{{Transitionsprozess im Kontext von Inklusion: Theoretische und empirische Zugänge zur Gestaltung des Übergangs vom Elementar- in den Primarbereich}}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{27117,
  abstract     = {{Through co-occurrence analysis of 1139 documents (1964-2018) we identified trends in the discussions about the implementation of student teaching evaluation (SET). We found that: (1) Attention to SET originated in the US in the 1970s, spreading to German-speaking countries in the mid-1990s and continuing in China and Latin America in the early 2000s. (2) SET is commonly viewed as a control tool deserving methodological improvement, while bias is debated in the US. We also found local trajectories: (3) Whereas in the US and Latin America SET is primarily seen as a management tool, German-speaking and Chinese authors reflect more on improving teaching. Chinese scholars consider SET a valid instrument for state control associated with artificial intelligence. Also, (4) SET is commonly used in medical education in the US and the German-speaking region and in physical education in China. We conclude that SET is discussed cross-nationally but affected by national path dependencies.}},
  author       = {{Pineda, Pedro and Steinhardt, Isabel}},
  issn         = {{1356-2517}},
  journal      = {{Teaching in Higher Education}},
  keywords     = {{academic discourse, bibliometric review, quality assurance, student evaluation of teaching, teaching evaluation}},
  pages        = {{1--21}},
  title        = {{{The Debate on student evaluations of teaching: global convergence confronts higher education traditions}}},
  doi          = {{10.1080/13562517.2020.1863351}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}