---
_id: '22394'
abstract:
- lang: eng
text: Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to present Design Rules for additive
manufacturing and a method for their development. Design/methodology/approach
– First, a process-independent method for the development of Design Rules was
worked out. Therefore, geometrical standard elements and attributes that characterize
the elements’ shapes have been defined. Next, the standard elements have been
manufactured with different attribute values with Laser Sintering, Laser Melting
and Fused Deposition Modeling, and their geometrical quality was examined. From
the results, Design Rules for additive manufacturing were derived and summarized
in a catalogue. Findings – Due to the process independent method, Design Rules
were developed that apply for the different considered additive manufacturing
technologies equally. These Design Rules are completely function-independent and
easily transferable to individual part designs. Research limitations/implications
– The developed Design Rules can only apply for the considered boundary conditions.
To extend the Design Rules’ validity, their applicability should be proven for
other boundary conditions. Practical implications – The developed Design Rules
practically support the design of technical parts. Additionally they can be used
for training and teaching in the field of “design for additive manufacturing”.
Originality/value – The developed Design Rules constitute a first step toward
general Design Rules for Additive Manufacturing. Thus, they might form a suitable
basis for further scientific approaches, and the Design Rules can be used to set
up teaching documentations for lessons and seminars.
author:
- first_name: Guido
full_name: dell'Aere, Guido
last_name: dell'Aere
- first_name: Detmar
full_name: Zimmer, Detmar
id: '604'
last_name: Zimmer
citation:
ama: dell’Aere G, Zimmer D. On design for Additive Manufacturing - evaluating geometrical
limitations. Rapid Prototyping Journal. 2015;21(6):662-670. doi:10.1108/RPJ-06-2013-0060
apa: dell’Aere, G., & Zimmer, D. (2015). On design for Additive Manufacturing
- evaluating geometrical limitations. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 21(6),
662–670. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-06-2013-0060
bibtex: '@article{dell’Aere_Zimmer_2015, title={On design for Additive Manufacturing
- evaluating geometrical limitations}, volume={21}, DOI={10.1108/RPJ-06-2013-0060},
number={6}, journal={Rapid Prototyping Journal}, publisher={Emerald Group Publishing
Limited}, author={dell’Aere, Guido and Zimmer, Detmar}, year={2015}, pages={662–670}
}'
chicago: 'Aere, Guido dell’, and Detmar Zimmer. “On Design for Additive Manufacturing
- Evaluating Geometrical Limitations.” Rapid Prototyping Journal 21, no.
6 (2015): 662–70. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-06-2013-0060.'
ieee: G. dell’Aere and D. Zimmer, “On design for Additive Manufacturing - evaluating
geometrical limitations,” Rapid Prototyping Journal, vol. 21, no. 6, pp.
662–670, 2015.
mla: dell’Aere, Guido, and Detmar Zimmer. “On Design for Additive Manufacturing
- Evaluating Geometrical Limitations.” Rapid Prototyping Journal, vol.
21, no. 6, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2015, pp. 662–70, doi:10.1108/RPJ-06-2013-0060.
short: G. dell’Aere, D. Zimmer, Rapid Prototyping Journal 21 (2015) 662–670.
date_created: 2021-06-15T11:09:20Z
date_updated: 2022-01-06T06:55:32Z
department:
- _id: '9'
- _id: '146'
- _id: '219'
- _id: '624'
doi: 10.1108/RPJ-06-2013-0060
intvolume: ' 21'
issue: '6'
language:
- iso: eng
page: 662-670
publication: Rapid Prototyping Journal
publication_identifier:
isbn:
- 1355-2546
publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited
status: public
title: On design for Additive Manufacturing - evaluating geometrical limitations
type: journal_article
user_id: '38077'
volume: 21
year: '2015'
...
---
_id: '21683'
abstract:
- lang: eng
text: Purpose – This paper aims to present a methodology to help end-users to find
appropriate part candidates for the use of the additive manufacturing (AM) technology.
These shall be capable of bringing AM into their businesses. The concept furthermore
includes approaches for redesigning current available parts and helps to estimate
the economic implications of the use of the technology. Design/methodology/approach
– The approach starts to discuss general economic aspects for the successful use
of AM. While describing the introduction of new technologies into existing businesses,
the importance of an appropriate part selection for AM is pointed out. A methodology
for a part selection process is presented, and the different criteria are developed.
An approach for a redesign of the selected parts, including the gathering of requirements,
is given based on different sample parts. A variation of criteria to include measures
for product piracy is highlighted. Findings – The methodology has proven applicability
in several research and industry projects in aerospace applications. Independent
part selections from experts analyzed within a project of the European Space Agency
had a 90 per cent overlap with the results. It allows companies with only basic
AM knowledge to start a part screening for applicable AM candidates in their own
company with a reasonable effort. Originality/value – The methodology for the
redesign process helps to identify the main functions of the products targeted
and the relevant environment, so one can benefit from the various advantages that
AM has to offer. The selection methodology helps to ask the right questions and
to reduce the effort.
author:
- first_name: C.
full_name: Lindemann, C.
last_name: Lindemann
- first_name: U.
full_name: Jahnke, U.
last_name: Jahnke
- first_name: T.
full_name: Reiher, T.
last_name: Reiher
- first_name: R.
full_name: Koch, R.
last_name: Koch
citation:
ama: 'Lindemann C, Jahnke U, Reiher T, Koch R. Towards a sustainable and economic
selection of part candidates for Additive Manufacturing. In: Rapid Prototyping
Journal. Vol 21. Emerald; 2015:216-227. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-12-2014-0179'
apa: Lindemann, C., Jahnke, U., Reiher, T., & Koch, R. (2015). Towards a sustainable
and economic selection of part candidates for Additive Manufacturing. In Rapid
Prototyping Journal (Vol. 21, pp. 216–227). Emerald. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-12-2014-0179
bibtex: '@inproceedings{Lindemann_Jahnke_Reiher_Koch_2015, title={Towards a sustainable
and economic selection of part candidates for Additive Manufacturing}, volume={21},
DOI={https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-12-2014-0179},
number={2}, booktitle={Rapid Prototyping Journal}, publisher={Emerald}, author={Lindemann,
C. and Jahnke, U. and Reiher, T. and Koch, R.}, year={2015}, pages={216–227} }'
chicago: Lindemann, C., U. Jahnke, T. Reiher, and R. Koch. “Towards a Sustainable
and Economic Selection of Part Candidates for Additive Manufacturing.” In Rapid
Prototyping Journal, 21:216–27. Emerald, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-12-2014-0179.
ieee: C. Lindemann, U. Jahnke, T. Reiher, and R. Koch, “Towards a sustainable and
economic selection of part candidates for Additive Manufacturing,” in Rapid
Prototyping Journal, 2015, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 216–227.
mla: Lindemann, C., et al. “Towards a Sustainable and Economic Selection of Part
Candidates for Additive Manufacturing.” Rapid Prototyping Journal, vol.
21, no. 2, Emerald, 2015, pp. 216–27, doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-12-2014-0179.
short: 'C. Lindemann, U. Jahnke, T. Reiher, R. Koch, in: Rapid Prototyping Journal,
Emerald, 2015, pp. 216–227.'
date_created: 2021-04-21T07:22:24Z
date_updated: 2022-01-06T06:55:10Z
department:
- _id: '144'
- _id: '219'
- _id: '624'
doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-12-2014-0179
intvolume: ' 21'
issue: '2'
language:
- iso: eng
page: 216-227
publication: Rapid Prototyping Journal
publication_identifier:
isbn:
- 1355-2546
publisher: Emerald
status: public
title: Towards a sustainable and economic selection of part candidates for Additive
Manufacturing
type: conference
user_id: '55833'
volume: 21
year: '2015'
...