@article{48682,
  abstract     = {{The present study investigates participants' performance in two different mental body-rotation tasks (MBRTs) under conditions in which dynamic stability is challenged in two different balancing conditions: active balance control (Experiment 1), where participants actively maneuver, and re-active balance control (Experiment 2), where participants react to an external perturbation. The two MBRTs induced either an object-based spatial transformation (based on a same-different judgment) or an egocentric transformation (based on a left-right judgment). In Experiment 1, 48 participants were tested while standing on an even ground (low balancing requirements) or on a balance board (high balancing requirements). In Experiment 2, 32 participants performed while either standing still on a vibration plate or with the vibration plate moving in a low (20 Hz) or high (180 Hz) frequency. In both experiments, the results for response time and response error revealed effects of rotation angle and type of task. An effect of balancing condition was only observed for response error in Experiment 1. More precisely, response times and response errors increased for higher rotation angles. Also, performance was better for egocentric than for object-based spatial transformations. However, the different challenges to dynamic stability in Experiments 1 and 2 did not influence performance in the two MBRTs (except for response errors in Experiment 1) nor in a control condition (Experiment 1) without mental rotation.}},
  author       = {{Budde, Kirsten and Weigelt, Matthias}},
  issn         = {{0167-9457}},
  journal      = {{Human Movement Science}},
  keywords     = {{Mental rotation, Balance control, Perturbation, Embodiment}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier BV}},
  title        = {{{No effects of different perturbations on the performance in a mental body-rotation task (MBRT) with egocentric perspective transformations and object-based transformations}}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.humov.2023.103156}},
  volume       = {{92}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

@article{37466,
  abstract     = {{Typically, head fakes in basketball are generated to, and actually do, deteriorate performance on the side of the observer. However, potential costs at the side of the producer of a fake action have only rarely been investigated before. It is thus not clear yet if the benefit (i.e., slowed reactions in the observer) of performing a head fake is overestimated due to concurrently arising fake production costs (i.e., slowed performance in the producer of a head fake). Therefore, we studied potential head-fake production costs with two experiments. Novice participants were asked to generate passes to the left or right side, either with or without head fakes. In Experiment 1, these actions were determined by an auditory stimulus (i.e., a 440 Hz or 1200 Hz sinus or jigsaw wave). After an interstimulus interval (ISI) of either 0 ms, 800 ms, or 1500 ms, which served the preparation of the action, the cued action had to be executed. In Experiment 2, passing to the left or right, either with or without a head fake, was determined by a visual stimulus (i.e., a player with a red or blue jersey defending either the right or left side). After an ISI of either 0 ms, 400 ms, 800 ms, or 1200 ms, the cued action had to be executed. In both experiments, we observed higher reaction times (RTs) for passes with head fakes as compared to passes without head fakes for no and an intermediate preparation interval (from ISI 0 ms to 800 ms), but no difference for a long preparation interval (for an ISI of 1200 ms and 1500 ms). Both experiments show that generating fake actions produces performance costs, however, these costs can be overcome by a longer preparation phase before movement execution.}},
  author       = {{Güldenpenning, Iris and Weigelt, Matthias and Böer, Nils Tobias and Kunde, Wilfried}},
  issn         = {{0167-9457}},
  journal      = {{Human Movement Science}},
  keywords     = {{Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, General Medicine, Biophysics}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier BV}},
  title        = {{{Producing deceptive actions in sports: The costs of generating head fakes in basketball}}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.humov.2022.103045}},
  volume       = {{87}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

@article{32455,
  author       = {{Haines, Mackenzie and Murray, Amanda M. and Glaviano, Neal R. and Gokeler, Alli and Norte, Grant E.}},
  issn         = {{0167-9457}},
  journal      = {{Human Movement Science}},
  keywords     = {{Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, General Medicine, Biophysics}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier BV}},
  title        = {{{Restricting ankle dorsiflexion does not mitigate the benefits of external focus of attention on landing biomechanics in healthy females}}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.humov.2020.102719}},
  volume       = {{74}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{37824,
  author       = {{Memmert, Daniel and Noël, Benjamin and Machlitt, Daniel and van der Kamp, John and Weigelt, Matthias}},
  issn         = {{0167-9457}},
  journal      = {{Human Movement Science}},
  keywords     = {{Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, General Medicine, Biophysics}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier BV}},
  title        = {{{The role of different directions of attention on the extent of implicit perception in soccer penalty kicking}}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.humov.2020.102586}},
  volume       = {{70}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{45125,
  author       = {{Haines, Mackenzie and Murray, Amanda M. and Glaviano, Neal R. and Gokeler, Alli and Norte, Grant E.}},
  issn         = {{0167-9457}},
  journal      = {{Human Movement Science}},
  keywords     = {{Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, General Medicine, Biophysics}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier BV}},
  title        = {{{Restricting ankle dorsiflexion does not mitigate the benefits of external focus of attention on landing biomechanics in healthy females}}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.humov.2020.102719}},
  volume       = {{74}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{48703,
  author       = {{Zobe, Christina and Krause, Daniel and Blischke, Klaus}},
  issn         = {{0167-9457}},
  journal      = {{Human Movement Science}},
  keywords     = {{Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, General Medicine, Biophysics}},
  pages        = {{529--540}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier BV}},
  title        = {{{Dissociative effects of normative feedback on motor automaticity and motor accuracy in learning an arm movement sequence}}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.humov.2019.06.004}},
  volume       = {{66}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@article{48708,
  author       = {{Agethen, Manfred and Krause, Daniel}},
  issn         = {{0167-9457}},
  journal      = {{Human Movement Science}},
  keywords     = {{Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, General Medicine, Biophysics}},
  pages        = {{71--83}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier BV}},
  title        = {{{Effects of bandwidth feedback on the automatization of an arm movement sequence}}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.humov.2015.11.005}},
  volume       = {{45}},
  year         = {{2015}},
}

@article{48711,
  author       = {{Krause, Daniel and Kobow, Sven}},
  issn         = {{0167-9457}},
  journal      = {{Human Movement Science}},
  keywords     = {{Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, General Medicine, Biophysics}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{314--327}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier BV}},
  title        = {{{Effects of model orientation on the visuomotor imitation of arm movements: The role of mental rotation}}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.humov.2012.10.001}},
  volume       = {{32}},
  year         = {{2013}},
}