TY - JOUR
AB - Abstract. Procrastination is the irrational delay of an intended task and is common among students. A delay can only be defined as procrastination when it is voluntary, the action was intended but not implemented, and the delay is accompanied by subjective discomfort. Established scales of procrastination cover mainly behavioral aspects but have neglected the emotional aspect. This inaccuracy concerning the construct validity might entail misconceptions of procrastination. Accordingly, we developed and validated the Behavioral and Emotional Academic Procrastination Scale (BEPS), which covers all aspects of the definition of procrastination. The 6-item scale measuring self-reported academic procrastination was tested in three studies. Study 1 ( N = 239) evaluated the psychometric qualities of the BEPS, indicating good item characteristics and internal consistency. Study 2 ( N = 1,441) used confirmatory factor analysis and revealed two correlated factors: one covering the behavioral aspect and the other reflecting the emotional aspect. Measurement invariance was shown through longitudinal and multigroup confirmatory factor analyses. Study 3 ( N = 234) provided evidence for the scale’s convergent validity through correlations with established procrastination scales, self-efficacy, and neuroticism. The BEPS thus economically operationalizes all characteristics of academic procrastination and appears to be a reliable and valid self-report measure.
AU - Bobe, Julia
AU - Schnettler, Theresa
AU - Scheunemann, Anne
AU - Fries, Stefan
AU - Bäulke, Lisa
AU - Thies, Daniel O.
AU - Dresel, Markus
AU - Leutner, Detlev
AU - Wirth, Joachim
AU - Klingsieck, Katrin B.
AU - Grunschel, Carola
ID - 35415
JF - European Journal of Psychological Assessment
KW - Applied Psychology
SN - 1015-5759
TI - Delaying Academic Tasks and Feeling Bad About It
ER -
TY - JOUR
AB - Abstract. Academic writing is a complex and demanding activity that plays an important role in self-regulated learning settings within higher education. Self-efficacy and self-regulation are crucial factors for success and failure in academic writing. Because of the lack of adequate instruments, assessment of these factors is still limited. This paper introduces a scale for the assessment of self-efficacy for self-regulation of academic writing (SSAW). We deductively developed the SSAW scale and then conducted three studies in order to test and validate the scale. The first study ( N = 121) resulted in a brief scale with good psychometric properties. The second study ( N = 660) showed the scale’s factorial validity. The third study ( N = 188) provided evidence for the convergent validity of the SSAW scale. In sum, these studies yield a reliable, valid, and economic scale. The results are discussed with regard to the usefulness of the SSAW scale for research and practice in higher education.
AU - Golombek, Christiane
AU - Klingsieck, Katrin B.
AU - Scharlau, Ingrid
ID - 28992
IS - 5
JF - European Journal of Psychological Assessment
SN - 1015-5759
TI - Assessing Self-Efficacy for Self-Regulation of Academic Writing: Development and validation of a scale
VL - 35
ER -