@article{55578,
  abstract     = {{<jats:p> Abstract: There is ample theoretical and empirical support for the idea that both conscious and unconscious volitional processes, predecisional and postdecisional aspects, and the aspect of having or not having self-access play a role in procrastination episodes. The unconscious volitional processes, predecisional aspects, and the aspect of self-access are yet rather under-researched. If they are considered, however, procrastination can be understood on an even deeper level and treated more sustainably. Moreover, considering these aspects opens up a humanistic perspective on procrastination episodes, thereby, putting procrastination and procrastination interventions in the bigger picture of self-actualization, self-alienation, and self-growth. </jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Klingsieck, Katrin B.}},
  issn         = {{1016-9040}},
  journal      = {{European Psychologist}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{123--135}},
  publisher    = {{Hogrefe Publishing Group}},
  title        = {{{Procrastination – Having, or Not Having Self-Access, That Is the Question}}},
  doi          = {{10.1027/1016-9040/a000528}},
  volume       = {{29}},
  year         = {{2024}},
}

@article{29123,
  abstract     = {{<jats:p> Procrastination is a well-known phenomenon that often entails negative outcomes with regard to performance and subjective well-being. In an attempt to understand the (alarming) character of procrastination, a large body of research on the causes, correlates, and consequences of procrastination has been accumulating over the last 40 years. The aim of this paper is to provide a systematic characterization of the trends in procrastination research and to suggest future directions for research and practice. The systematic characterization comprises a comparison of procrastination to functional forms of delay (referred to as strategic delay) and a presentation of the theoretical approaches to explaining procrastination. The future directions suggested pertain to the development of a differentiated understanding of procrastination and of integral interventions. </jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Klingsieck, Katrin B.}},
  issn         = {{1016-9040}},
  journal      = {{European Psychologist}},
  pages        = {{24--34}},
  title        = {{{Procrastination}}},
  doi          = {{10.1027/1016-9040/a000138}},
  year         = {{2013}},
}

@article{46938,
  abstract     = {{<jats:p> Procrastination is a well-known phenomenon that often entails negative outcomes with regard to performance and subjective well-being. In an attempt to understand the (alarming) character of procrastination, a large body of research on the causes, correlates, and consequences of procrastination has been accumulating over the last 40 years. The aim of this paper is to provide a systematic characterization of the trends in procrastination research and to suggest future directions for research and practice. The systematic characterization comprises a comparison of procrastination to functional forms of delay (referred to as strategic delay) and a presentation of the theoretical approaches to explaining procrastination. The future directions suggested pertain to the development of a differentiated understanding of procrastination and of integral interventions. </jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Klingsieck, Katrin B.}},
  issn         = {{1016-9040}},
  journal      = {{European Psychologist}},
  keywords     = {{General Psychology, Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{24--34}},
  publisher    = {{Hogrefe Publishing Group}},
  title        = {{{Procrastination: When Good Things Don’t Come to Those Who Wait}}},
  doi          = {{10.1027/1016-9040/a000138}},
  volume       = {{18}},
  year         = {{2013}},
}