@article{54707,
  abstract     = {{<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title>
	  <jats:p>How do we switch between “playing along” and treating robots as technical agents? We propose interaction breakdowns to help solve this “social artifact puzzle”: Breaks cause changes from fluid interaction to explicit reasoning and interaction with the raw artifact. These changes are closely linked to understanding the technical architecture and could be used to design better human–robot interaction (HRI).</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Wrede, Britta and Vollmer, Anna-Lisa and Krach, Sören}},
  issn         = {{0140-525X}},
  journal      = {{Behavioral and Brain Sciences}},
  publisher    = {{Cambridge University Press (CUP)}},
  title        = {{{On the potentials of interaction breakdowns for HRI}}},
  doi          = {{10.1017/s0140525x22001674}},
  volume       = {{46}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

@article{28944,
  abstract     = {{Visual conscious perception could be grounded in a nonconscious sensorimotor domain. Although invisible, information can be processed up to the level of response activation. Moreover, these nonconscious processes are modified by actual intentions. This notion bridges a gap in the theoretical framework of O'Regan & Noë.}},
  author       = {{Ansorge, Ulrich and Scharlau, Ingrid and Heumann, Manfred and Klotz, Werner}},
  issn         = {{0140-525X}},
  journal      = {{Behavioral and Brain Sciences}},
  pages        = {{974--975}},
  title        = {{{Visual conscious perception could be grounded in a nonconscious sensorimotor domain}}},
  doi          = {{10.1017/s0140525x01230118}},
  volume       = {{24}},
  year         = {{2001}},
}

