@article{61799,
  abstract     = {{<jats:p>Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is rapidly becoming a viable tool to enhance productivity and act as a catalyst for innovation across various sectors. Its ability to perform tasks that have traditionally required human judgment and creativity is transforming knowledge and creative work. Yet it also raises concerns and implications that could reshape the very landscape of knowledge and creative work. In this editorial, we undertake an in-depth examination of both the opportunities and challenges presented by GenAI for future IS research.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Benbya, Hind and Strich, Franz and Tamm, Toomas}},
  issn         = {{1536-9323}},
  journal      = {{Journal of the Association for Information Systems}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{23--36}},
  publisher    = {{Association for Information Systems}},
  title        = {{{Navigating Generative Artificial Intelligence Promises and Perils for Knowledge and Creative Work}}},
  doi          = {{10.17705/1jais.00861}},
  volume       = {{25}},
  year         = {{2024}},
}

@article{61803,
  abstract     = {{<jats:p>Artificial intelligence (AI) systems in the workplace increasingly substitute for employees’ tasks, responsibilities, and decision-making. Consequently, employees must relinquish core activities of their work processes without the ability to interact with the AI system (e.g., to influence decision-making processes or adapt or overrule decision-making outcomes). To deepen our understanding of how substitutive decision-making AI systems affect employees’ professional role identity and how employees adapt their identity in response to the system, we conducted an in-depth case study of a company in the area of loan consulting. We qualitatively analyzed more than 60 interviews with employees and managers. Our research contributes to the literature on IS and identity by disclosing mechanisms through which employees strengthen and protect their professional role identity despite being unable to directly interact with the AI system. Further, we highlight the boundary conditions for introducing an AI system and contribute to the body of empirical research on the potential downsides of AI.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Strich, Franz and Mayer, Anne-Sophie and Fiedler, Marina}},
  issn         = {{1536-9323}},
  journal      = {{Journal of the Association for Information Systems}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{304--324}},
  publisher    = {{Association for Information Systems}},
  title        = {{{What Do I Do in a World of Artificial Intelligence? Investigating the Impact of Substitutive Decision-Making AI Systems on Employees' Professional Role Identity}}},
  doi          = {{10.17705/1jais.00663}},
  volume       = {{22}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}