@article{6097,
  author       = {{Tünnermann, Jan and Scharlau, Ingrid}},
  issn         = {{1895-1171}},
  journal      = {{Advances in Cognitive Psychology}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{39 -- 50}},
  publisher    = {{University of Finance and Management in Warsaw}},
  title        = {{{Poking Left To Be Right? A Model-Based Analysis of Temporal Order Judged by Mice}}},
  doi          = {{10.5709/acp-0237-0}},
  volume       = {{14}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@article{6071,
  abstract     = {{Particular differences between an object and its surrounding cause salience, guide attention, and improve performance in various tasks. While much research has been dedicated to identifying which feature dimensions contribute to salience, much less regard has been paid to the quantitative strength of the salience caused by feature differences. Only a few studies systematically related salience effects to a common salience measure, and they are partly outdated in the light of new findings on the time course of salience effects. We propose Bundesen’s Theory of Visual Attention (TV A) as a theoretical basis for measuring salience and introduce an empirical and modeling approach to link this theory to data retrieved from temporal-order judgments. With this procedure, TV A becomes applicable to a broad range of salience-related stimulus material. Three experiments with orientation pop-out displays demonstrate the feasibility of the method. A 4th experiment substantiates its applicability t}},
  author       = {{Krüger, Alexander and Tünnermann, Jan and Scharlau, Ingrid}},
  issn         = {{1895-1171}},
  journal      = {{Advances in Cognitive Psychology}},
  keywords     = {{salience, visual attention, Bayesian inference, theory of visual attention, computational modeling, Visual Attention, Computational Modeling, Inference, Judgment, Statistical Probability}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{20 -- 38}},
  title        = {{{Fast and conspicuous? Quantifying salience with the theory of visual attention.}}},
  doi          = {{10.5709/acp-0184-1}},
  volume       = {{12}},
  year         = {{2016}},
}

@article{6091,
  abstract     = {{In the present article, the role of endogenous feature-specific orienting for conscious and unconscious vision is reviewed. We start with an overview of orienting. We proceed with a review of masking research, and the definition of the criteria of experimental protocols that demonstrate endogenous and exogenous orienting, respectively. Against this background of criteria, we assess studies of unconscious orienting and come to the conclusion that so far studies of unconscious orienting demonstrated endogenous feature-specific orienting. The review closes with a discussion of the role of unconscious orienting in action control. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)}},
  author       = {{Ansorge, Ulrich and Horstmann, Gernot and Scharlau, Ingrid}},
  issn         = {{1895-1171}},
  journal      = {{Advances in Cognitive Psychology}},
  keywords     = {{visual input, awareness, conscious, orientation, visual perception, Awareness, Consciousness States, Perceptual Orientation, Visual Perception, Blindsight}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{108 -- 119}},
  title        = {{{Top-down contingent feature-specific orienting with and without awareness of the visual input.}}},
  volume       = {{7}},
  year         = {{2011}},
}

@article{6087,
  abstract     = {{Visual backward masking is frequently used to study the temporal dynamics of visual perception. These dynamics may include the temporal features of conscious percepts, as suggested, for instance, by the asynchronous-updating model (Neumann, 1982) and perceptual-retouch theory (Bachmann, 1994). These models predict that the perceptual latency of a visual backward mask is shorter than that of a like reference stimulus that was not preceded by a masked stimulus. The prediction has been confirmed by studies using temporal-order judgments: For certain asynchronies between mask and reference stimulus, temporal-order reversals are quite frequent (e.g. Scharlau, & Neumann, 2003a). However, it may be argued that these reversals were due to a response bias in favour of the mask rather than true temporal-perceptual effects. I introduce two measures for assessing latency effects that (1) are not prone to such a response bias, (2) allow to quantify the latency gain, and (3) extend the perceptual e}},
  author       = {{Scharlau, Ingrid}},
  issn         = {{1895-1171}},
  journal      = {{Advances in Cognitive Psychology}},
  keywords     = {{temporal processes, prime mask interaction, perceptual consequences, masked information, visual backward masking, visual perception, Temporal Lobe, Visual Masking, Visual Perception, Consequence}},
  number       = {{1-2}},
  pages        = {{241 -- 255}},
  title        = {{{Temporal processes in prime-mask interaction: Assessing perceptual consequences of masked information.}}},
  volume       = {{3}},
  year         = {{2007}},
}

@article{6092,
  abstract     = {{The topic of the present edition is visual masking paradigms-as powerful tool for demonstrating the processing of nonconscious visual information. In the present issue one article presents an improved methodology for disentangling perceptual and temporal influences in markers. Another paper demonstrates that preemptive control, or DPS, mediates the allocation of attention towards possible targets. One of the contributions specify conditions under which DPS-like effects are found as opposed to conditions under which stimulus-driven effects are found. A study of two illusions which the prime may cause in a trailing stimulus, a temporal pre-dating of the mask and a perception of motion in later stimuli adjacent to the prime is presented in the issue. Another contribution addresses how the percept of a stimulus is altered by a temporal and spatial interplay of two backward masks or of one forward mask and two backwards masks. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)}},
  author       = {{Scharlau, Ingrid and Ansorge, Ulrich and Breitmeyer, Bruno G.}},
  issn         = {{1895-1171}},
  journal      = {{Advances in Cognitive Psychology}},
  keywords     = {{visual masking, visual information, attention, stimulus-driven effects, motion perception, Attention, Illusions (Perception), Motion Perception, Visual Masking}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{1 -- 5}},
  title        = {{{Trends and styles in visual masking.}}},
  volume       = {{2}},
  year         = {{2006}},
}

@article{6077,
  abstract     = {{The phenomena of illusory line motion and perceptual latency priming are both assumed to reflect a facilitation of perceptual latency. The explanation of illusory line motion presupposes that attention is distributed in a gradient fashion whereas this is not a necessary part of the explanation of perceptual latency priming. Two experiments test whether an attentional gradient is present in perceptual latency priming. Evidence for a gradient was found within 2.5° of visual angle around the attended location, but not at a distance of 5° and more. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)}},
  author       = {{Scharlau, Ingrid and Horstmann, Gernot}},
  issn         = {{1895-1171}},
  journal      = {{Advances in Cognitive Psychology}},
  keywords     = {{perceptual latency priming, illusory line motion, attention, visual angle, Illusions (Perception), Priming, Visual Field, Visual Perception, Visual Attention, Spatial Orientation (Perception)}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{87 -- 97}},
  title        = {{{Perceptual latency priming and illusory line motion: Facilitation by gradients of attention?}}},
  volume       = {{2}},
  year         = {{2006}},
}