@article{47572,
  abstract     = {{<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Due to high energy‐intensive processes and a dependence on carbon‐based materials, the process industry plays a major role in climate change. Therefore, the substitution of fossil resources by bio‐based resources is indispensable. This leads to challenges arising from accompanying changes of the type, amount and location of resources. At the same time, transformable production systems are currently in the focus of research addressing the required flexibility. These systems which consist of modular production and logistics units offer the possibility to adapt flexibly in volatile conditions within dynamic supply chains. Hence, this work compiles elements for environmental sustainability, which minimize the carbon footprint in the process industry: transformable production systems, the utilization of bio‐based resources, carbon dioxide and renewable energy as well as the application of these elements in decentral production networks. Finally, possible use cases are determined based on the combination of these elements through a multi‐criteria analysis.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Pannok, Maik and Finkbeiner, Marco and Fasel, Henrik and Riese, Julia and Lier, Stefan}},
  issn         = {{2196-9744}},
  journal      = {{ChemBioEng Reviews}},
  keywords     = {{Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Filtration and Separation, Process Chemistry and Technology, Biochemistry, Chemical Engineering (miscellaneous), Bioengineering}},
  number       = {{6}},
  pages        = {{216--228}},
  publisher    = {{Wiley}},
  title        = {{{Transformable Decentral Production for Local Economies with Minimized Carbon Footprint}}},
  doi          = {{10.1002/cben.202000008}},
  volume       = {{7}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{47582,
  abstract     = {{<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Modeling of heat and mass transfer in fixed‐bed reactors for heterogeneously catalyzed gas phase reactions is possible using different methods. Homogeneous and heterogeneous continuum models as well as particle resolved modeling of fixed‐bed reactors show high potential for application. Considering those approaches, advantages and disadvantages as well as underlying assumptions and boundary conditions are discussed. Additionally, methods for experimental validation are presented and discussed focusing on the two‐dimensional homogeneous models.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Stegehake, Carolin and Riese, Julia and Grünewald, Marcus}},
  issn         = {{2196-9744}},
  journal      = {{ChemBioEng Reviews}},
  keywords     = {{Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Filtration and Separation, Process Chemistry and Technology, Biochemistry, Chemical Engineering (miscellaneous), Bioengineering}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{28--44}},
  publisher    = {{Wiley}},
  title        = {{{Modeling and Validating Fixed‐Bed Reactors: A State‐of‐the‐Art Review}}},
  doi          = {{10.1002/cben.201900002}},
  volume       = {{6}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}