@article{12929,
  author       = {{Bräuer, Sebastian and Plenter, Florian and Klör, Benjamin and Monhof, Markus and Beverungen, Daniel and Becker, Jörg}},
  issn         = {{2198-3402}},
  journal      = {{Business Research}},
  title        = {{{Transactions for trading used electric vehicle batteries: theoretical underpinning and information systems design principles}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s40685-019-0091-9}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@article{14905,
  abstract     = {{A key premise underlying most of the economic literature is that rational decision-makers will choose dominant strategies over dominated alternatives. However, prior literature in various disciplines including business, psychology, and economics document a series of phenomena associated with violations of the dominance principle in decision-making. In this comprehensive review, we discuss conditions under which people violate the dominance principle in decision-making. When presenting violations of dominance in empirical and experimental studies, we differentiate between absolute, statewise, and stochastic (first- and second-order) violations of dominance. Furthermore, we categorize the literature by the leading causes for dominance violations: framing, reference points, certainty effects, bounded rationality, and emotional responses.}},
  author       = {{Kourouxous, Thomas and Bauer, Thomas}},
  issn         = {{2198-3402}},
  journal      = {{Business Research}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{209--239}},
  title        = {{{Violations of Dominance in Decision-Making}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s40685-019-0093-7}},
  volume       = {{12}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@article{47908,
  abstract     = {{<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>In this paper, we propose a binomial approach to modeling sequential R&amp;D investments. More specifically, we present a compound real options approach, simplifying the existing valuation methodology. Based upon the same set of assumptions as prior models, we show that the number of computational steps for valuing any compound option can be reduced to a single step. We demonstrate the applicability of our approach using the real-world example of valuing a new drug application. Overall, our work provides a heuristic framework for fostering the adoption of binomial compound option valuation techniques in R&amp;D management.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Hauschild, Bastian and Reimsbach, Daniel}},
  issn         = {{2198-3402}},
  journal      = {{Business Research}},
  keywords     = {{Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{39--59}},
  publisher    = {{Springer Science and Business Media LLC}},
  title        = {{{Modeling sequential R&amp;D investments: a binomial compound option approach}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s40685-014-0017-5}},
  volume       = {{8}},
  year         = {{2014}},
}

@article{14918,
  author       = {{Maßbaum, Alexandra and Sureth-Sloane, Caren}},
  issn         = {{2198-3402}},
  journal      = {{Business Research}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{147--169}},
  title        = {{{Thin Capitalization Rules and Entrepreneurial Capital Structure Decisions}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/bf03342708}},
  volume       = {{2}},
  year         = {{2014}},
}

@article{14914,
  author       = {{Albers, Sönke and Sureth, Caren}},
  issn         = {{2198-3402}},
  journal      = {{Business Research}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{131--132}},
  title        = {{{Editorial: What Is and What Is Not a Substantial Contribution?}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/bf03342734}},
  volume       = {{5}},
  year         = {{2012}},
}