@article{51316,
  abstract     = {{<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Right-wing populism has strongly polarizing effects in politics, education and science—a problem which this article aims to adress. Instead of claiming a demarcation between science and education on the one hand and right-wing populist ideology on the other, we initially focus on continuities. At the same time, we are concerned with finding a critical distance towards right-wing populism. Using the theoretical framework of boundary-work we therefore analyse a case of right-wing populist educational and scientific efforts. Boundary-work can occur in an institutional, content-related and epistemic dimension. While we identify strong continuities in the institutional and content-related dimensions, we see the main difference in the epistemic dimension. In conclusion, we use the results of our analysis to develop a critical position as scientists and educationists towards right-wing populism, drawing consequences for the epistemic, content-related and institutional dimensions.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Haker, Christoph and Otterspeer, Lukas}},
  issn         = {{2364-0014}},
  journal      = {{Zeitschrift für Weiterbildungsforschung}},
  keywords     = {{General Earth and Planetary Sciences, General Environmental Science}},
  number       = {{3}},
  pages        = {{357--376}},
  title        = {{{Neither demarcation nor confrontation. Finding a critical position towards right-wing populism}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s40955-020-00174-z}},
  volume       = {{43}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}