@article{43094,
  abstract     = {{<jats:p />}},
  author       = {{Heck, Tamara and Steinhardt, Isabel and Rahal, Rima-Maria and Schubotz, Moritz and Scholl, Dominik and Behrens, Sarah}},
  issn         = {{2367-7163}},
  journal      = {{Research Ideas and Outcomes}},
  keywords     = {{Open Science}},
  publisher    = {{Pensoft Publishers}},
  title        = {{{Bootstrapping the Open Science culture: The fellowship approach}}},
  doi          = {{10.3897/rio.9.e103675}},
  volume       = {{9}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

@article{34132,
  abstract     = {{<jats:p>How can Knowledge In/Equity be addressed in qualitative research by taking the idea of Open Science into account? Two projects from the Open Science Fellows Programme by Wikimedia Deutschland will be used to illustrate how Open Science practices can succeed in qualitative research, thereby reducing In/Equity. In this context, In/Equity is considered as a fair and equal representation of people, their knowledge and insights and comprehends questions about how epistemic, structural, institutional and personal biases generate and shape knowledge as guidance. Three questions guide this approach: firstly, what do we understand by In/Equity in the context of knowledge production in these projects? Secondly, who will be involved in knowledge generation and to what extent will they be valued or unvalued? Thirdly, how can data be made accessible for re-use to enable true participation and sharing?</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Steinhardt, Isabel and Kruschick, Felicitas}},
  issn         = {{2367-7163}},
  journal      = {{Research Ideas and Outcomes}},
  keywords     = {{Open Science, Knowledge Equity, Qualitative Methods}},
  publisher    = {{Pensoft Publishers}},
  title        = {{{Knowledge Equity and Open Science in qualitative research – Practical research considerations}}},
  doi          = {{10.3897/rio.8.e86387}},
  volume       = {{8}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@article{36524,
  abstract     = {{<jats:p>How can Knowledge In/Equity be addressed in qualitative research by taking the idea of Open Science into account? Two projects from the Open Science Fellows Programme by Wikimedia Deutschland will be used to illustrate how Open Science practices can succeed in qualitative research, thereby reducing In/Equity. In this context, In/Equity is considered as a fair and equal representation of people, their knowledge and insights and comprehends questions about how epistemic, structural, institutional and personal biases generate and shape knowledge as guidance. Three questions guide this approach: firstly, what do we understand by In/Equity in the context of knowledge production in these projects? Secondly, who will be involved in knowledge generation and to what extent will they be valued or unvalued? Thirdly, how can data be made accessible for re-use to enable true participation and sharing?</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Steinhardt, Isabel and Kruschick, Felicitas}},
  issn         = {{2367-7163}},
  journal      = {{Research Ideas and Outcomes}},
  keywords     = {{Open Science, Knowledge Equity, Qualitative Methods}},
  pages        = {{e86387}},
  publisher    = {{Pensoft Publishers}},
  title        = {{{Knowledge Equity and Open Science in qualitative research – Practical research considerations}}},
  doi          = {{10.3897/rio.8.e86387}},
  volume       = {{8}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@article{21257,
  abstract     = {{<jats:p>Digital data on tangible and intangible cultural assets is an essential part of daily life, communication and experience. It has a lasting influence on the perception of cultural identity as well as on the interactions between research, the cultural economy and society. Throughout the last three decades, many cultural heritage institutions have contributed a wealth of digital representations of cultural assets (2D digital reproductions of paintings, sheet music, 3D digital models of sculptures, monuments, rooms, buildings), audio-visual data (music, film, stage performances), and procedural research data such as encoding and annotation formats. The long-term preservation and FAIR availability of research data from the cultural heritage domain is fundamentally important, not only for future academic success in the humanities but also for the cultural identity of individuals and society as a whole. Up to now, no coordinated effort for professional research data management on a national level exists in Germany. NFDI4Culture aims to fill this gap and create a user-centered, research-driven infrastructure that will cover a broad range of research domains from musicology, art history and architecture to performance, theatre, film, and media studies.</jats:p>
          <jats:p>The research landscape addressed by the consortium is characterized by strong institutional differentiation. Research units in the consortium's community of interest comprise university institutes, art colleges, academies, galleries, libraries, archives and museums. This diverse landscape is also characterized by an abundance of research objects, methodologies and a great potential for data-driven research. In a unique effort carried out by the applicant and co-applicants of this proposal and ten academic societies, this community is interconnected for the first time through a federated approach that is ideally suited to the needs of the participating researchers. To promote collaboration within the NFDI, to share knowledge and technology and to provide extensive support for its users have been the guiding principles of the consortium from the beginning and will be at the heart of all workflows and decision-making processes. Thanks to these principles, NFDI4Culture has gathered strong support ranging from individual researchers to high-level cultural heritage organizations such as the UNESCO, the International Council of Museums, the Open Knowledge Foundation and Wikimedia. On this basis, NFDI4Culture will take innovative measures that promote a cultural change towards a more reflective and sustainable handling of research data and at the same time boost qualification and professionalization in data-driven research in the domain of cultural heritage. This will create a long-lasting impact on science, cultural economy and society as a whole.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Altenhöner, Reinhard and Blümel, Ina and Boehm, Franziska and Bove, Jens and Bicher, Katrin and Bracht, Christian and Brand, Ortrun and Dieckmann, Lisa and Effinger, Maria and Hagener, Malte and Hammes, Andrea and Heller, Lambert and Kailus, Angela and Kohle, Hubertus and Ludwig, Jens and Münzmay, Andreas and Pittroff, Sarah and Razum, Matthias and Röwenstrunk, Daniel and Sack, Harald and Simon, Holger and Schmidt, Dörte and Schrade, Torsten and Walzel, Annika-Valeska and Wiermann, Barbara}},
  issn         = {{2367-7163}},
  journal      = {{Research Ideas and Outcomes}},
  title        = {{{NFDI4Culture - Consortium for research data on material and immaterial cultural heritage}}},
  doi          = {{10.3897/rio.6.e57036}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{47476,
  abstract     = {{Digital data on tangible and intangible cultural assets is an essential part of daily life, communication and experience. It has a lasting influence on the perception of cultural identity as well as on the interactions between research, the cultural economy and society. Throughout the last three decades, many cultural heritage institutions have contributed a wealth of digital representations of cultural assets (2D digital reproductions of paintings, sheet music, 3D digital models of sculptures, monuments, rooms, buildings), audio-visual data (music, film, stage performances), and procedural research data such as encoding and annotation formats. The long-term preservation and FAIR availability of research data from the cultural heritage domain is fundamentally important, not only for future academic success in the humanities but also for the cultural identity of individuals and society as a whole. Up to now, no coordinated effort for professional research data management on a national level exists in Germany. NFDI4Culture aims to fill this gap and create a user-centered, research-driven infrastructure that will cover a broad range of research domains from musicology, art history and architecture to performance, theatre, film, and media studies.</jats:p>
          <jats:p>The research landscape addressed by the consortium is characterized by strong institutional differentiation. Research units in the consortium's community of interest comprise university institutes, art colleges, academies, galleries, libraries, archives and museums. This diverse landscape is also characterized by an abundance of research objects, methodologies and a great potential for data-driven research. In a unique effort carried out by the applicant and co-applicants of this proposal and ten academic societies, this community is interconnected for the first time through a federated approach that is ideally suited to the needs of the participating researchers. To promote collaboration within the NFDI, to share knowledge and technology and to provide extensive support for its users have been the guiding principles of the consortium from the beginning and will be at the heart of all workflows and decision-making processes. Thanks to these principles, NFDI4Culture has gathered strong support ranging from individual researchers to high-level cultural heritage organizations such as the UNESCO, the International Council of Museums, the Open Knowledge Foundation and Wikimedia. On this basis, NFDI4Culture will take innovative measures that promote a cultural change towards a more reflective and sustainable handling of research data and at the same time boost qualification and professionalization in data-driven research in the domain of cultural heritage. This will create a long-lasting impact on science, cultural economy and society as a whole.}},
  author       = {{Altenhöner, Reinhard and Blümel, Ina and Boehm, Franziska and Bove, Jens and Bicher, Katrin and Bracht, Christian and Brand, Ortrun and Dieckmann, Lisa and Effinger, Maria and Hagener, Malte and Hammes, Andrea and Heller, Lambert and Kailus, Angela and Kohle, Hubertus and Ludwig, Jens and Münzmay, Andreas and Pittroff, Sarah and Razum, Matthias and Röwenstrunk, Daniel and Sack, Harald and Simon, Holger and Schmidt, Dörte and Schrade, Torsten and Walzel, Annika-Valeska and Wiermann, Barbara}},
  issn         = {{2367-7163}},
  journal      = {{Research Ideas and Outcomes}},
  keywords     = {{Research Data Management}},
  publisher    = {{Pensoft Publishers}},
  title        = {{{NFDI4Culture - Consortium for research data on material and immaterial cultural heritage}}},
  doi          = {{10.3897/rio.6.e57036}},
  volume       = {{6}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}