[{"main_file_link":[{"open_access":"1","url":"https://www.oneducation.net/no-09_december-2020/reply-against-latour-on-the-questionable-foundations-of-post-critical-pedagogy/"}],"doi":"10.17899/on_ed.2020.9.16","title":"Against Latour – On the Questionable Foundations of Post-Critical Pedagogy","author":[{"first_name":"Christoph","full_name":"Haker, Christoph","id":"104448","last_name":"Haker"},{"first_name":"Lukas","full_name":"Otterspeer, Lukas","last_name":"Otterspeer"}],"date_created":"2024-02-12T12:17:56Z","volume":3,"date_updated":"2024-02-12T12:18:45Z","oa":"1","citation":{"chicago":"Haker, Christoph, and Lukas Otterspeer. “Against Latour – On the Questionable Foundations of Post-Critical Pedagogy.” <i>On Education. Journal for Research and Debate</i> 3, no. 9 (2021). <a href=\"https://doi.org/10.17899/on_ed.2020.9.16\">https://doi.org/10.17899/on_ed.2020.9.16</a>.","ieee":"C. Haker and L. Otterspeer, “Against Latour – On the Questionable Foundations of Post-Critical Pedagogy,” <i>On Education. Journal for Research and Debate</i>, vol. 3, no. 9, 2021, doi: <a href=\"https://doi.org/10.17899/on_ed.2020.9.16\">10.17899/on_ed.2020.9.16</a>.","ama":"Haker C, Otterspeer L. Against Latour – On the Questionable Foundations of Post-Critical Pedagogy. <i>On Education Journal for Research and Debate</i>. 2021;3(9). doi:<a href=\"https://doi.org/10.17899/on_ed.2020.9.16\">10.17899/on_ed.2020.9.16</a>","bibtex":"@article{Haker_Otterspeer_2021, title={Against Latour – On the Questionable Foundations of Post-Critical Pedagogy}, volume={3}, DOI={<a href=\"https://doi.org/10.17899/on_ed.2020.9.16\">10.17899/on_ed.2020.9.16</a>}, number={9}, journal={On Education. Journal for Research and Debate}, author={Haker, Christoph and Otterspeer, Lukas}, year={2021} }","short":"C. Haker, L. Otterspeer, On Education. Journal for Research and Debate 3 (2021).","mla":"Haker, Christoph, and Lukas Otterspeer. “Against Latour – On the Questionable Foundations of Post-Critical Pedagogy.” <i>On Education. Journal for Research and Debate</i>, vol. 3, no. 9, 2021, doi:<a href=\"https://doi.org/10.17899/on_ed.2020.9.16\">10.17899/on_ed.2020.9.16</a>.","apa":"Haker, C., &#38; Otterspeer, L. (2021). Against Latour – On the Questionable Foundations of Post-Critical Pedagogy. <i>On Education. Journal for Research and Debate</i>, <i>3</i>(9). <a href=\"https://doi.org/10.17899/on_ed.2020.9.16\">https://doi.org/10.17899/on_ed.2020.9.16</a>"},"intvolume":"         3","year":"2021","issue":"9","publication_status":"published","publication_identifier":{"issn":["2571-7855"]},"language":[{"iso":"eng"}],"user_id":"104448","department":[{"_id":"477"}],"_id":"51315","status":"public","abstract":[{"lang":"eng","text":"<jats:p>Critique has run out of steam – this diagnosis by Bruno Latour is crucial for the “Manifesto for post-critical education” as well as for the on_education issue “The Fatique of Critique?”. With this essay, we contradict Latour's diagnosis. Latour’s polemic against critique is based firstly on a questionable diagnosis of our time and secondly on a general and programmatic critique of sociology. Against that, we bring out two main points. The first insight highlights that change is initially dependent on variations that can only arise from a negation of the existing. The second insight comes from the sociology of critique, which paradoxically sees success in the failure of critique.</jats:p>"}],"type":"journal_article","publication":"On Education. Journal for Research and Debate"}]