---
_id: '51315'
abstract:
- lang: eng
  text: <jats:p>Critique has run out of steam – this diagnosis by Bruno Latour is
    crucial for the “Manifesto for post-critical education” as well as for the on_education
    issue “The Fatique of Critique?”. With this essay, we contradict Latour's diagnosis.
    Latour’s polemic against critique is based firstly on a questionable diagnosis
    of our time and secondly on a general and programmatic critique of sociology.
    Against that, we bring out two main points. The first insight highlights that
    change is initially dependent on variations that can only arise from a negation
    of the existing. The second insight comes from the sociology of critique, which
    paradoxically sees success in the failure of critique.</jats:p>
author:
- first_name: Christoph
  full_name: Haker, Christoph
  id: '104448'
  last_name: Haker
- first_name: Lukas
  full_name: Otterspeer, Lukas
  last_name: Otterspeer
citation:
  ama: Haker C, Otterspeer L. Against Latour – On the Questionable Foundations of
    Post-Critical Pedagogy. <i>On Education Journal for Research and Debate</i>. 2021;3(9).
    doi:<a href="https://doi.org/10.17899/on_ed.2020.9.16">10.17899/on_ed.2020.9.16</a>
  apa: Haker, C., &#38; Otterspeer, L. (2021). Against Latour – On the Questionable
    Foundations of Post-Critical Pedagogy. <i>On Education. Journal for Research and
    Debate</i>, <i>3</i>(9). <a href="https://doi.org/10.17899/on_ed.2020.9.16">https://doi.org/10.17899/on_ed.2020.9.16</a>
  bibtex: '@article{Haker_Otterspeer_2021, title={Against Latour – On the Questionable
    Foundations of Post-Critical Pedagogy}, volume={3}, DOI={<a href="https://doi.org/10.17899/on_ed.2020.9.16">10.17899/on_ed.2020.9.16</a>},
    number={9}, journal={On Education. Journal for Research and Debate}, author={Haker,
    Christoph and Otterspeer, Lukas}, year={2021} }'
  chicago: Haker, Christoph, and Lukas Otterspeer. “Against Latour – On the Questionable
    Foundations of Post-Critical Pedagogy.” <i>On Education. Journal for Research
    and Debate</i> 3, no. 9 (2021). <a href="https://doi.org/10.17899/on_ed.2020.9.16">https://doi.org/10.17899/on_ed.2020.9.16</a>.
  ieee: 'C. Haker and L. Otterspeer, “Against Latour – On the Questionable Foundations
    of Post-Critical Pedagogy,” <i>On Education. Journal for Research and Debate</i>,
    vol. 3, no. 9, 2021, doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.17899/on_ed.2020.9.16">10.17899/on_ed.2020.9.16</a>.'
  mla: Haker, Christoph, and Lukas Otterspeer. “Against Latour – On the Questionable
    Foundations of Post-Critical Pedagogy.” <i>On Education. Journal for Research
    and Debate</i>, vol. 3, no. 9, 2021, doi:<a href="https://doi.org/10.17899/on_ed.2020.9.16">10.17899/on_ed.2020.9.16</a>.
  short: C. Haker, L. Otterspeer, On Education. Journal for Research and Debate 3
    (2021).
date_created: 2024-02-12T12:17:56Z
date_updated: 2024-02-12T12:18:45Z
department:
- _id: '477'
doi: 10.17899/on_ed.2020.9.16
intvolume: '         3'
issue: '9'
language:
- iso: eng
main_file_link:
- open_access: '1'
  url: https://www.oneducation.net/no-09_december-2020/reply-against-latour-on-the-questionable-foundations-of-post-critical-pedagogy/
oa: '1'
publication: On Education. Journal for Research and Debate
publication_identifier:
  issn:
  - 2571-7855
publication_status: published
status: public
title: Against Latour – On the Questionable Foundations of Post-Critical Pedagogy
type: journal_article
user_id: '104448'
volume: 3
year: '2021'
...