@book{34702,
  editor       = {{Hagengruber, Ruth Edith}},
  isbn         = {{9783030899202}},
  issn         = {{2523-8760}},
  keywords     = {{Émilie Du Châtelet, History of Science, Kant, Newton, Maupertuis, Voltaire}},
  publisher    = {{Springer International Publishing}},
  title        = {{{Époque Émilienne}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/978-3-030-89921-9}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@inbook{34705,
  abstract     = {{n 1789, Eberhard repudiated Kant’s claim expressed in the first edition of his Critique of Pure Reason to have delivered a new, namely transcendental turn in philosophy, as he was able to retrace our cognition to the origin of phenomena instead of delivering a “merely logical deduction”. Eberhard holds that there was nothing new, but all delivered in Leibniz and Wolff; to prove his claim he refers to a quote from Du Châtelet, taken from a paragraph where she determines the right understanding as to be able “to penetrate to the origin of phenomena”. This paper brings Du Châtelet into discourse with Kant via this Eberhard quote. In its first part, it investigates the use of her quote in the Kant-Eberhard controversy. The second part serves to ground the quote in Du Châtelet’s epistemology. It lays out how to understand Du Châtelet’s claim to penetrate to the origin of phenomena. Du Châtelet’s claim to have renewed philosophy must be taken seriously, and it is helpful for rethinking the German philosophical development from the rationalists to Kant through including Du Châtelet’s theory of cognition.}},
  author       = {{Hagengruber, Ruth Edith}},
  booktitle    = {{Époque Émilienne Philosophy and Science in the Age of Émilie Du Châtelet (1706-1749)}},
  editor       = {{Hagengruber, Ruth Edith}},
  isbn         = {{9783030899202}},
  issn         = {{2523-8760}},
  keywords     = {{Émilie Du Châtelet, History of Science, Newton, Kant, Eberhard, Wolff, Leibniz}},
  pages        = {{57--84}},
  publisher    = {{Springer International Publishing}},
  title        = {{{Du Châtelet and Kant: Claiming the Renewal of Philosophy}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/978-3-030-89921-9_3}},
  volume       = {{10}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@article{20690,
  abstract     = {{The Enlightenment is well known for its critical analysis of the Bible. Though the Renaissance sources have been acknowledged as an inspiration of this movement, the Querelle des Femmes and its critique of the Bible has never been considered as a possible catalyst for the enlightened philosophical discourse. For centuries women have fought against interpretations of the Bible.This paper argues that the Querelle des Femmes criticized the Bible not only because of its patriarchal content but also criticized philosophical thinking that, for supporting the views from the Bible and its misogynist stance, misusing the instruments of rational philosophy. Arguments from 1400-1750, from Nogarola to Du Châtelet proof women philosophers’ fight in favour of a critique of the bible from a rational point of view, reflecting also on the status of what it meant, to argue rationally.}},
  author       = {{Hagengruber, Ruth}},
  isbn         = {{ISBN 978-88-7000-877-7}},
  journal      = {{Dianoia 31, no. XXV}},
  keywords     = {{Keywords: Bible critics, Isotta Nogarola, Querelle des femmes, Enlightenment, Émilie Du Châtelet.}},
  location     = {{Bologna }},
  pages        = {{331--353}},
  title        = {{{Pressure on Enlightenment. Bible Critics from Nogarola to Du Châtelet}}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@book{12085,
  abstract     = {{In diesem Band werden neueste Forschungen zur Physikerin, Mathematikerin und Philosophin Emilie Du Châtelet (1706-1749) vorgestellt. Emilie Du Châtelet genoss in der deutschen Aufklärung eine hohe Reputation. Sie verband Leibniz Metaphysik mit der Physik von Newton und gelangte zu erstaunlichen Ergebnissen, die die Physik auf den Weg zu Einsteins Energieformel führte. Ihre Werke wurden sofort ins Deutsche übersetzt, Kant nimmt in seiner ersten Dissertation von 1747 auf sie Bezug. Die Sammlung stellt Texte vor, die den Einfluss der deutschen Aufklärung auf Du Châtelets und Du Châtelets Einfluss auf die deutsche Philosophie diskutieren. Die großen Namen der Epoche stehen hier zur Debatte, Leibniz, Wolff, Boskovic, Euler, Friedrich II, Voltaire, La Mettrie und viele weitere Größen der Aufklärung werden in ihrem Zusammenhang mit Du Châtelet vorgestellt. }},
  editor       = {{Hagengruber, Ruth and Hecht, Hartmut}},
  isbn         = {{ISBN 978-3-658-14022-9}},
  keywords     = {{Emilie Du Châtelet, Immanuel Kant, Leibniz, Aufklärung, Christian Wolff, Luise Gottsched}},
  pages        = {{420}},
  publisher    = {{Springer}},
  title        = {{{Emilie Du Châtelet und die deutsche Aufklärung}}},
  volume       = {{3 }},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@article{12933,
  abstract     = {{Abstract · Émilie Du Châtelet (1706-1749), Laura Bassi (1711-1778), and Luise Gottsched (1713-1762) were three philosophers and scientists of outstanding im-portance in their epoch. However, the attribution of importance and reputation to women’s intellectual achievements in this period is a case of its own. This paper investigates the methodical attempt of 18th century historiography, presenting the example of Jakob Brucker and his Pinacoteca to relocate intellectual women in his history of philosophy and science. The relative integration of women into the 18th century intellectual sphere is the starting point of this methodical investigation to retrace its ‘why and how’.
Keywords : Emilie Du Châtelet, Luise Gottsched, Laura Bassi, History, Philoso-phy, Science.}},
  author       = {{Hagengruber, Ruth}},
  journal      = {{Bruniana & Campanelliana}},
  keywords     = {{Keywords : Emilie Du Châtelet, Luise Gottsched, Laura Bassi, History, Philosophy, Science.}},
  number       = {{Studi 18}},
  publisher    = {{Fabrizio Serra Roma Pisa }},
  title        = {{{Relocating Women in the History of Philosophy and Science. Emilie Du Châtelet (1706-1749), Laura Bassi (1711-1778), and Luise Gottsched (1713-1762) in Brucker’s Pinacotheca}}},
  volume       = {{Suppl XLIII}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}