[{"status":"public","page":"529-540","publisher":"Elsevier","_id":"23891","user_id":"9938","volume":66,"citation":{"ieee":"C. Zobe, D. Krause, and K. Blischke, “Dissociative effects of normative feedback on motor automaticity and motor accuracy in learning an arm movement sequence,” <i>Human Movement Science</i>, vol. 66, pp. 529–540, 2019, doi: <a href=\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2019.06.004\">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2019.06.004</a>.","apa":"Zobe, C., Krause, D., &#38; Blischke, K. (2019). Dissociative effects of normative feedback on motor automaticity and motor accuracy in learning an arm movement sequence. <i>Human Movement Science</i>, <i>66</i>, 529–540. <a href=\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2019.06.004\">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2019.06.004</a>","chicago":"Zobe, Christina, Daniel Krause, and Klaus Blischke. “Dissociative Effects of Normative Feedback on Motor Automaticity and Motor Accuracy in Learning an Arm Movement Sequence.” <i>Human Movement Science</i> 66 (2019): 529–40. <a href=\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2019.06.004\">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2019.06.004</a>.","short":"C. Zobe, D. Krause, K. Blischke, Human Movement Science 66 (2019) 529–540.","mla":"Zobe, Christina, et al. “Dissociative Effects of Normative Feedback on Motor Automaticity and Motor Accuracy in Learning an Arm Movement Sequence.” <i>Human Movement Science</i>, vol. 66, Elsevier, 2019, pp. 529–40, doi:<a href=\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2019.06.004\">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2019.06.004</a>.","bibtex":"@article{Zobe_Krause_Blischke_2019, title={Dissociative effects of normative feedback on motor automaticity and motor accuracy in learning an arm movement sequence}, volume={66}, DOI={<a href=\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2019.06.004\">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2019.06.004</a>}, journal={Human Movement Science}, publisher={Elsevier}, author={Zobe, Christina and Krause, Daniel and Blischke, Klaus}, year={2019}, pages={529–540} }","ama":"Zobe C, Krause D, Blischke K. Dissociative effects of normative feedback on motor automaticity and motor accuracy in learning an arm movement sequence. <i>Human Movement Science</i>. 2019;66:529-540. doi:<a href=\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2019.06.004\">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2019.06.004</a>"},"year":"2019","title":"Dissociative effects of normative feedback on motor automaticity and motor accuracy in learning an arm movement sequence","author":[{"first_name":"Christina","last_name":"Zobe","full_name":"Zobe, Christina","id":"9938"},{"full_name":"Krause, Daniel","first_name":"Daniel","last_name":"Krause"},{"full_name":"Blischke, Klaus","first_name":"Klaus","last_name":"Blischke"}],"publication_status":"published","date_updated":"2024-09-19T11:17:53Z","article_type":"original","intvolume":"        66","main_file_link":[{"url":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0167945718307681?via%3Dihub"}],"language":[{"iso":"eng"}],"doi":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2019.06.004","publication":"Human Movement Science","abstract":[{"text":"Within a pre-post-design, we scrutinized the effects of normative augmented feedback with positive and negative valence on learning motor accuracy, consistency as well as automaticity by means of a dual-task paradigm. Forty-two healthy physical education students were instructed to produce an arm-movement sequence as precisely as possible with regard to three spatial reversal points within a time limit of 1200 ms. Twenty-eight practiced an elbow-extension-flexion-sequence (690 trials) and 14 participants were tested as a control group without feedback practice. Valence of normative feedback was systematically manipulated by means of reference lines in a visual feedback display. The reference lines indicated performance of a putative peer-group either to be superior (negative valence, Normative-Negative-Group) or inferior (positive valence, Normative-Positive-Group) to participants’ actual performance.\r\n\r\nAs a result, dual-task costs (n-back error) significantly decreased solely in the Normative-Positive-Group, p = .003, η2p = .51, but in no other group. Surprisingly, the mean absolute error for the motor task significantly decreased (i.e., precision increased) only in the Normative-Negative-Group with a large effect size, but in none of the other groups. Motor consistency was not significantly affected by the valence of normative feedback. According to the hypotheses of error-provoked attentional control, positive feedback-valence appears to enhance skill automatization, while – unexpectedly – only negative feedback-valence seems to enhance movement precision, which may be explained by effects of feedback valence on the learners aspiration level.","lang":"eng"}],"date_created":"2021-09-07T14:13:23Z","type":"journal_article","keyword":["Augmented feedback Automaticity Dual task Motor learning"],"department":[{"_id":"17"},{"_id":"320"}]}]