@inproceedings{54916,
  abstract     = {{Reputation systems for companies to rate each other's performance are largely unexplored in research and hardly available in practice. However, these systems are relevant for prospective buyers to find a trustworthy seller. This observation applies especially to short-lived business relationships where fulfilling the performance promise is subject to a high degree of uncertainty. This paper explores the value of a reputation system for a business-to-business (B2B) context and focuses on three novel solutions for designing reputation systems. These solutions include selling ratings, conducting ratings as payments, and employing a counter-rating mechanism. We interview buyers to fathom the added value of these solutions in different contexts. Our findings suggest that such a system is useful for companies acting in less transparent markets and also helps when companies already have a good market overview. Depending on the market conditions and business context, the perceived value of the proposed system varies.}},
  author       = {{Hemmrich, Simon and Schäfer, Jannika Marie and Hansmeier, Philipp and Beverungen, Daniel}},
  booktitle    = {{Proceedings of the 57th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences}},
  keywords     = {{Electronic Marketing, business-to-business, new design approach, reputation systems, value for buyers.}},
  location     = {{Honolulu}},
  title        = {{{The Value of Reputation Systems in Business Contexts–A Qualitative Study Taking the View of Buyers}}},
  year         = {{2024}},
}

@inproceedings{56918,
  abstract     = {{Joint value creation of organizations in ecosystems have a high failure rate, stressing the need for tools that enable the alignment of business models through visual inquiry. However, existing visual inquiry tools rarely consider recent design knowledge or ecosystem understanding. This leads to dissatisfied users and impedes the full realization of ecosystems’ potential. This short paper proposes an archaeological design science approach for enhancing the design of visual inquiry tools (e.g., a canvas) for ecosystems. Preliminary findings reveal 24 relevant artifacts, and shortcomings in the creation of conceptual models and rigorous evaluations. The proposed research process aims to develop design principles for more effective tools to bridge the gap between visual inquiry tools and ecosystems. This research contributes to design science research by reutilizing design knowledge and further developing the archaeological design approach. It also offers valuable information to practitioners about existing business model tools for the creation of ecosystems.}},
  author       = {{Vorbohle, Christian}},
  booktitle    = {{Proceedings of the Thirty-Second European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2024)}},
  keywords     = {{Design Science Research, Design Archaeology, Canvas Analysis, Business Model Tools}},
  location     = {{Paphos, Cyprus}},
  title        = {{{Bridging Boundaries: Enhancing Visual Inquiry Tools for Ecosystems through Design Archaeology}}},
  year         = {{2024}},
}

@article{48517,
  author       = {{Hubner-Benz, Sylvia and Baum, Matthias}},
  issn         = {{1742-5360}},
  journal      = {{International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing}},
  keywords     = {{Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management, Business and International Management}},
  number       = {{1}},
  publisher    = {{Inderscience Publishers}},
  title        = {{{What predicts effectuation preferences Disentangling individual and environmental factors and illuminating decision criteria}}},
  doi          = {{10.1504/ijev.2023.129283}},
  volume       = {{15}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

@article{48512,
  author       = {{Deng, Wei and Hubner-Benz, Sylvia and Frese, Michael and Song, Zhaoli}},
  issn         = {{1075-4253}},
  journal      = {{Journal of International Management}},
  keywords     = {{Strategy and Management, Finance, Business and International Management}},
  number       = {{3}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier BV}},
  title        = {{{Different ways lead to ambidexterity: Configurations for team innovation across China, India, and Singapore}}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.intman.2023.101027}},
  volume       = {{29}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

@article{48900,
  author       = {{Diederich, Sarah and Iseke, Anja and Pull, Kerstin and Schneider, Martin}},
  issn         = {{0958-5192}},
  journal      = {{The International Journal of Human Resource Management}},
  keywords     = {{Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management, Business and International Management, Industrial relations}},
  pages        = {{1--29}},
  publisher    = {{Informa UK Limited}},
  title        = {{{Role (in-)congruity and the Catch 22 for female executives: how stereotyping contributes to the gender pay gap at top executive level}}},
  doi          = {{10.1080/09585192.2023.2273331}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

@article{49446,
  author       = {{Diederich, Sarah and Iseke, Anja and Pull, Kerstin and Schneider, Martin}},
  issn         = {{0958-5192}},
  journal      = {{The International Journal of Human Resource Management}},
  keywords     = {{Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management, Business and International Management, Industrial relations}},
  pages        = {{1--29}},
  publisher    = {{Informa UK Limited}},
  title        = {{{Role (in-)congruity and the Catch 22 for female executives: how stereotyping contributes to the gender pay gap at top executive level}}},
  doi          = {{10.1080/09585192.2023.2273331}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

@article{53226,
  author       = {{Marín, Raquel and Santos-Arteaga, Francisco J. and Tavana, Madjid and Di Caprio, Debora}},
  issn         = {{2444-569X}},
  journal      = {{Journal of Innovation & Knowledge}},
  keywords     = {{Management of Technology and Innovation, Marketing, Economics and Econometrics, Business and International Management}},
  number       = {{4}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier BV}},
  title        = {{{Value Chain digitalization and technological development as innovation catalysts in small and medium-sized enterprises}}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.jik.2023.100454}},
  volume       = {{8}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

@article{53224,
  author       = {{Santos-Arteaga, Francisco J. and Di Caprio, Debora and Tavana, Madjid}},
  issn         = {{0040-1625}},
  journal      = {{Technological Forecasting and Social Change}},
  keywords     = {{Management of Technology and Innovation, Applied Psychology, Business and International Management}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier BV}},
  title        = {{{A combinatorial data envelopment analysis with uncertain interval data with application to ICT evaluation}}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122510}},
  volume       = {{191}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

@inproceedings{49785,
  abstract     = {{Reputation is indispensable for online business since it supports customers in their buying decisions and
allows sellers to justify premium prices. While IS research has investigated reputation systems mainly
as review systems on online platforms for business-to-consumer (B2C) transactions, no proper solutions
have been developed for business-to-business (B2B) transactions yet. We use blockchain technology to
propose a new class of reputation systems that apply ratings as voluntary bonus payments: Before a
transaction is performed, customers commit to pay a bonus that is granted if a service provider has
performed a service properly. As opposed to rival reputation systems that build on cumulated ratings
or reviews, our system enables monetized reputation mechanisms that are inextricably linked with online
transactions. We expect this system class to provide more trustworthy ratings, which might reduce
agency costs and serve quality providers to establish a reputation towards new customers, building on
second-order trust.}},
  author       = {{Hemmrich, Simon}},
  booktitle    = {{Proceedings of 31st European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2023)}},
  keywords     = {{Trust, Risk, Reputation System, Blockchain Technology, Business Reputation System.}},
  location     = {{Kristiansand}},
  title        = {{{Business Reputation Systems based on Blockchain Technology—A Risky Advance}}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

@article{53232,
  abstract     = {{<jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Purpose</jats:title><jats:p>New business practices and the globalization of markets force firms to take innovation as the fundamental pillar of their competitive strategy. Research and Development (R&amp;D) plays a vital role in innovation. As technology advances and product life cycles become shorter, firms rely on R&amp;D as a strategy to invigorate innovation. R&amp;D project portfolio selection is a complex and challenging task. Despite the management's efforts to implement the best project portfolio selection practices, many projects continue to fail or miss their target. The problem is that selecting R&amp;D projects requires a deep understanding of strategic vision and technical capabilities. However, many decision-makers lack technological insight or strategic vision. This article aims to provide a method to capitalize on the expertise of R&amp;D professionals to assist managers in making informed and effective decisions. It also provides a framework for aligning the portfolio of R&amp;D projects with the organizational vision and mission.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Design/methodology/approach</jats:title><jats:p>This article proposes a new strategic approach for R&amp;D project portfolio selection using efficiency-uncertainty maps.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Findings</jats:title><jats:p>The proposed strategy plane helps decision-makers align R&amp;D project portfolios with their strategies to combine a strategic view and numerical analysis in this research. The proposed strategy plane consists of four areas: Exploitation Zone, Challenge Zone, Desperation Zone and Discretion Zone. Mapping the project into this strategic plane would help decision-makers align their project portfolio according to the corporate perspectives.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Originality/value</jats:title><jats:p>The new approach combines the efficiency and uncertainty dimensions in portfolio selection into an integrated framework that: (i) provides a complete representation of the stochastic decision-making processes, (ii) models the endogenous uncertainty inherent in the project selection process and (iii) proposes a computationally practical and visually unique solution procedure for classifying desirable and undesirable R&amp;D projects.</jats:p></jats:sec>}},
  author       = {{Namazi, Mehdi and Tavana, Madjid and Mohammadi, Emran and Bonyadi Naeini, Ali}},
  issn         = {{1463-5771}},
  journal      = {{Benchmarking: An International Journal}},
  keywords     = {{Business and International Management, Strategy and Management}},
  number       = {{10}},
  pages        = {{4193--4220}},
  publisher    = {{Emerald}},
  title        = {{{A new strategic approach for R&D project portfolio selection using efficiency-uncertainty maps}}},
  doi          = {{10.1108/bij-02-2022-0129}},
  volume       = {{30}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

@article{41192,
  abstract     = {{<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>We examine distortions caused by tax base allocation systems–separate accounting (SA) or formula apportionment (FA)–with respect to the allocation of assets and workforce within multinational entities (MNEs). The effects of both systems are intensively debated by EU Member States as they are striving to implement a European tax system. Its introduction would lead to a switch from SA to FA. Moreover, Pillar One of the recent global tax reform includes a mix of both tax base allocation systems. We find that, against the claims of the EU, FA does not necessarily create lower distortions of the factor allocation. Decisive for that assessment is the level of profit shifting under SA. Our results indicate that, in tendency, the factor allocation is more severely distorted by FA when the profit shifting possibilities were rather low under SA. In contrast to former studies, we highlight the importance of analyzing the status quo under the recently applied system (SA) in order to be able to assess the consequences of a switch from SA to FA. Our results are interesting for policy-makers as they help anticipating reactions of MNEs to a change in the applied tax base allocation system and for companies as a basis for future tax planning.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Ortmann, Regina and Pummerer, Erich}},
  issn         = {{0044-2372}},
  journal      = {{Journal of Business Economics}},
  keywords     = {{Economics and Econometrics, Business and International Management}},
  publisher    = {{Springer Science and Business Media LLC}},
  title        = {{{Distortional effects of separate accounting and formula apportionment on factor allocation}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s11573-022-01133-5}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

@article{41929,
  abstract     = {{<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>The advent of social media and its commodification have created a never-ending feedback loop between businesses and their customers. In this context, constant negative Word-of-Mouth (NWOM) may jeopardize a corporate image and cause defensiveness in corporate communication. This paper presents a case study of several customer service accounts of the railway company Deutsche Bahn on Twitter to investigate the management and control of constant NWOM and the impact of accountability strategies on customers’ perception of the firm. To this end, a sample of 36,757 Twitter postings was drawn and analyzed by means of sentiment and content analysis techniques. The findings suggest that the perceived accountability towards the firm declined in case of an attitude shift towards the user. In contrast, the firm was being held accountable more insistently after expressed defensiveness, regardless of the firm’s actual accountableness. With this paper, we introduce the notion of accountability management and an accompanying theoretical framework to the literature. This provides a novel perspective on constant NWOM countermeasures for organizations that are part of ‘toxic’ industries or face unrightfully claimed accusations, i.e., when being held accountable for outer circumstances beyond their control.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Mirbabaie, Milad and Stieglitz, Stefan and Marx, Julian}},
  issn         = {{2366-6153}},
  journal      = {{Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research}},
  keywords     = {{Management of Technology and Innovation, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, General Business, Management and Accounting}},
  publisher    = {{Springer Science and Business Media LLC}},
  title        = {{{Negative Word of Mouth On Social Media: A Case Study of Deutsche Bahn’s Accountability Management}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s41471-022-00152-w}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

@article{45655,
  author       = {{FitzGerald, Clare and Fraser, Alec and Kimmitt, Jonathan and Knoll, Lisa and Williams, James}},
  issn         = {{1096-7494}},
  journal      = {{International Public Management Journal}},
  keywords     = {{Public Administration, Business and International Management}},
  number       = {{3}},
  pages        = {{329--338}},
  publisher    = {{Informa UK Limited}},
  title        = {{{Outcomes-based contracting and public management reform: Lessons from a decade of experimentation}}},
  doi          = {{10.1080/10967494.2023.2170504}},
  volume       = {{26}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

@inproceedings{45812,
  author       = {{Özcan, Leon and Fichtler, Timm and Kasten, Benjamin and Koldewey, Christian and Dumitrescu, Roman}},
  keywords     = {{Digital Platform, Platform Strategy, Strategic Management, Platform Life Cycle, Interview Study, Business Model, Business-to-Business, Two-sided Market, Multi-sided Market}},
  location     = {{Ljubljana}},
  title        = {{{Interview Study on Strategy Options for Platform Operation in B2B Markets}}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

@inproceedings{29839,
  abstract     = {{The development of business models is a challenging task that can be supported with software tools. Here, existing approaches and tools do not focus on the company’s situation in which the development takes place (e.g., ﬁnancial resources, product type). To tackle this challenge, we used design science research to develop a situation-speciﬁc business model development approach that contains three stages: First, existing knowledge in terms of tasks to do (e.g., analyze competitive advantage), and decisions to be made (e.g., social media marketing) are stored in repositories. Second, the knowledge is used to compose a development method based on the company’s situation. Third, the development method is enacted to develop a business model. This demonstration paper presents a tool-support called Situational Business Model Developer that supports all stages of our approach. We release the tool under open-source and evaluate it with a case study on developing business models for mobile apps.}},
  author       = {{Gottschalk, Sebastian and Yigitbas, Enes and Nowosad, Alexander and Engels, Gregor}},
  booktitle    = {{Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik}},
  keywords     = {{Business Model Development, Situational Method Engineering, Tool Support}},
  location     = {{Nuremberg}},
  publisher    = {{AIS}},
  title        = {{{Situational Business Model Developer: A Tool-support for Situation-speciﬁc Business Model Development}}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@article{33665,
  author       = {{Fritz, Marlon}},
  issn         = {{2110-7017}},
  journal      = {{International Economics}},
  keywords     = {{General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, General Business, Management and Accounting}},
  pages        = {{157--167}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier BV}},
  title        = {{{Improved output gap estimates and forecasts using a local linear regression}}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.inteco.2022.09.007}},
  volume       = {{172}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@article{35740,
  abstract     = {{<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>While the Information Systems (IS) discipline has researched digital platforms extensively, the body of knowledge appertaining to platforms still appears fragmented and lacking conceptual consistency. Based on automated text mining and unsupervised machine learning, we collect, analyze, and interpret the IS discipline’s comprehensive research on platforms—comprising 11,049 papers spanning 44 years of research activity. From a cluster analysis concerning platform concepts’ semantically most similar words, we identify six research streams on platforms, each with their own platform terms. Based on interpreting the identified concepts vis-à-vis the extant research and considering a temporal perspective on the concepts’ application, we present a lexicon of platform concepts, to guide further research on platforms in the IS discipline. Researchers and managers can build on our results to position their work appropriately, applying a specific theoretical perspective on platforms in isolation or combining multiple perspectives to study platform phenomena at a more abstract level.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Bartelheimer, Christian and zur Heiden, Philipp and Lüttenberg, Hedda and Beverungen, Daniel}},
  issn         = {{1019-6781}},
  journal      = {{Electronic Markets}},
  keywords     = {{Management of Technology and Innovation, Marketing, Computer Science Applications, Economics and Econometrics, Business and International Management}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{375--396}},
  publisher    = {{Springer Science and Business Media LLC}},
  title        = {{{Systematizing the lexicon of platforms in information systems: a data-driven study}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s12525-022-00530-6}},
  volume       = {{32}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@article{47670,
  abstract     = {{<jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Purpose</jats:title><jats:p>The purpose of this paper is to revisit the disastrous DaimlerChrysler AG takeover episode from 1998 to 2007 in order to arrive at a more comprehensive explanation of this and other merger and takeover failures based on institutional theory.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Design/methodology/approach</jats:title><jats:p>The case study is based on various secondary sources of information and on the insights that one of the authors gained from working for 14 years in various positions for Daimler-Benz and DaimlerChrysler.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Findings</jats:title><jats:p>DaimlerChrysler failed because top management made mistakes in trying to globalize the company. They were unable to realize possible synergies between the two companies, which brought complementary resources into the merger. Furthermore, they did not account for the institutional embeddedness of strategies when they adopted lean production globally, diffused the production system developed in Germany to other parts of the world and tried to implement a global stock enlisted in New York and Frankfurt. The underlying theoretical framework is relevant for other merger and acquisition cases. It features institutional embeddedness, path dependency and institutional arbitrage.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Originality/value</jats:title><jats:p>The paper develops an institutional perspective on DaimlerChrysler and on cross-border merger and acquisition failure more generally. The perspective is organized around the varieties-of-capitalism approach. This contribution is important because there is increasing dissatisfaction with the dominant explanation of cross-border merger and acquisition failure, which is based on the allegedly failed management of culture “clashes.”</jats:p></jats:sec>}},
  author       = {{Riach, John Rankin Wood and Schneider, Martin}},
  issn         = {{2059-5794}},
  journal      = {{Cross Cultural and Strategic Management}},
  keywords     = {{Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management, Sociology and Political Science, Cultural Studies, Business and International Management}},
  number       = {{3}},
  pages        = {{552--568}},
  publisher    = {{Emerald}},
  title        = {{{The DaimlerChrysler takeover failure revisited from a varieties-of-capitalism perspective}}},
  doi          = {{10.1108/ccsm-12-2020-0250}},
  volume       = {{29}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@article{47920,
  abstract     = {{<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Integrated thinking (IT) is a managerial mindset increasingly discussed in the context of value creation. Through the lens of systems theory, this study examines how the degree to which IT is embedded in a firm's strategy and day‐to‐day business processes is associated with the firm's social and environmental value creation. Using a broad international dataset, we find strong evidence that our measure of IT is positively related to a firm's sustainability performance (SP), which we use to operationalize social and environmental value creation (or erosion). Our results also reveal that the increase in a firm's SP might come at the cost of a short‐term decrease in financial performance (FP). We find no indication, however, that IT induces a trade‐off between SP and long‐term FP. Integrated thinking appears to stipulate long‐term financial value creation instead. We further explore moderating factors within the organizational and institutional context of our sample firms and highlight implications for society, corporate practice, and policymaking.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Reimsbach, Daniel and Braam, Geert}},
  issn         = {{0964-4733}},
  journal      = {{Business Strategy and the Environment}},
  keywords     = {{Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Strategy and Management, Geography, Planning and Development, Business and International Management}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{304--320}},
  publisher    = {{Wiley}},
  title        = {{{Creating social and environmental value through integrated thinking: International evidence}}},
  doi          = {{10.1002/bse.3131}},
  volume       = {{32}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@article{47923,
  abstract     = {{<jats:p> Integrated reporting has widely been promoted as the next evolutionary step in corporate disclosure, which would soon replace traditional reporting practices. Embedded in a zeitgeist that favors sustainability, this outlook would suggest high integrated reporting adoption rates among reporting organizations. Our analysis of integrated reporting in Germany from 2008 to 2019 shows, however, that organizations approached integrated reporting with a wait-and-see mentality. This approach cannot be described adequately by the existing conceptualizations of (partial) practice adoption. We therefore develop the notion of wait-and-see-ism, defined as the deliberate and potentially long-lasting postponement of a decision to adopt a practice while its further development is monitored silently. We see limited, though continuous, efforts to prepare for the prospect of adopting the practice of integrated reporting quickly at a later stage. Wait-and-see-ism expands on prior work on partial adoption by emphasizing its temporal dimension. This adds an important yet undertheorized option that organizations can employ to respond to ambiguous institutional demands, thus explaining the stalling of promising management practices. </jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Endenich, Christoph and Hahn, Rüdiger and Reimsbach, Daniel and Wickert, Christopher}},
  issn         = {{1476-1270}},
  journal      = {{Strategic Organization}},
  keywords     = {{Strategy and Management, Industrial relations, Education, Business and International Management}},
  number       = {{3}},
  pages        = {{566--595}},
  publisher    = {{SAGE Publications}},
  title        = {{{Wait-and-see-ism as partial adoption of management practices: The rise and stall of integrated reporting}}},
  doi          = {{10.1177/14761270221078605}},
  volume       = {{21}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

