[{"year":"2012","citation":{"apa":"Weiß, K., &#38; Scharlau, I. (2012). At the mercy of prior entry: Prior entry induced by invisible primes is not susceptible to current intentions. <i>Acta Psychologica</i>, <i>139</i>(1), 54–64.","mla":"Weiß, Katharina, and Ingrid Scharlau. “At the Mercy of Prior Entry: Prior Entry Induced by Invisible Primes Is Not Susceptible to Current Intentions.” <i>Acta Psychologica</i>, vol. 139, no. 1, 2012, pp. 54–64.","bibtex":"@article{Weiß_Scharlau_2012, title={At the mercy of prior entry: Prior entry induced by invisible primes is not susceptible to current intentions.}, volume={139}, number={1}, journal={Acta Psychologica}, author={Weiß, Katharina and Scharlau, Ingrid}, year={2012}, pages={54–64} }","short":"K. Weiß, I. Scharlau, Acta Psychologica 139 (2012) 54–64.","chicago":"Weiß, Katharina, and Ingrid Scharlau. “At the Mercy of Prior Entry: Prior Entry Induced by Invisible Primes Is Not Susceptible to Current Intentions.” <i>Acta Psychologica</i> 139, no. 1 (2012): 54–64.","ieee":"K. Weiß and I. Scharlau, “At the mercy of prior entry: Prior entry induced by invisible primes is not susceptible to current intentions.,” <i>Acta Psychologica</i>, vol. 139, no. 1, pp. 54–64, 2012.","ama":"Weiß K, Scharlau I. At the mercy of prior entry: Prior entry induced by invisible primes is not susceptible to current intentions. <i>Acta Psychologica</i>. 2012;139(1):54-64."},"page":"54 - 64","intvolume":"       139","publication_status":"published","publication_identifier":{"issn":["0001-6918"]},"issue":"1","title":"At the mercy of prior entry: Prior entry induced by invisible primes is not susceptible to current intentions.","date_updated":"2022-06-06T16:41:22Z","date_created":"2018-12-10T07:01:19Z","author":[{"first_name":"Katharina","last_name":"Weiß","full_name":"Weiß, Katharina"},{"first_name":"Ingrid","full_name":"Scharlau, Ingrid","id":"451","orcid":"0000-0003-2364-9489","last_name":"Scharlau"}],"volume":139,"abstract":[{"lang":"eng","text":"If one of two events is attended to, it will be perceived earlier than a simultaneously occurring unattended event. Since 150 years, this effect has been ascribed to the facilitating influence of attention, also known as prior entry. Yet, the attentional origin of prior-entry effects¹ has been repeatedly doubted. One criticism is that prior-entry effects might be due to biased decision processes that would mimic a temporal advantage for attended stimuli. Although most obvious biases have already been excluded experimentally (e.g. judgment criteria, response compatibility) and prior-entry effects have shown to persist (Shore, Spence, & Klein, 2001), many other biases are conceivable, which makes it difficult to put the debate to an end. Thus, we approach this problem the other way around by asking whether prior-entry effects can be biased voluntarily. Observers were informed about prior entry and instructed to reduce it as far as possible. For this aim they received continuous feedback"}],"status":"public","type":"journal_article","publication":"Acta Psychologica","keyword":["intentions","events","attention","decision processes","Adult","Attention","Choice Behavior","Cues","Female","Humans","Intention","Judgment","Male","Middle Aged","Reaction Time","Time Perception","Visual Perception","Attention","Decision Making","Experiences (Events)","Intention"],"funded_apc":"1","language":[{"iso":"eng"}],"_id":"6064","user_id":"42165","department":[{"_id":"424"}]}]