@article{29224,
  abstract     = {{Altruistically motivated investment has become the subject of economic, psychological and sociological research in recent years. The long tradition of ethical considerations concerning investment behavior has often been mentioned by historians but rarely investigated. This paper presents a case study of the 19th century philhellene banker Jean-Gabriel Eynard,
who was philanthropically active in Greece, but also invested part of his capital on the emerging Greek market. Drawing on the methodological approach of the “sociology of morality”, this article examines how Eynard invested in Greece, which norms and values concerning investment behavior he articulated and how far they were comparable with the norms and values of today’s Socially Responsible Investment. What emerges is that the practices and the norms of Socially
Responsible and Ethical Investment then and now are remarkably similar, while the “moral background” (G. Abend) has changed considerably in some, but not all points.}},
  author       = {{Schönhärl, Korinna}},
  issn         = {{0340-8728}},
  journal      = {{Vierteljahrschrift für Sozial- und Wirtschaftsgeschichte}},
  keywords     = {{Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous), Sociology and Political Science, History, Cultural Studies}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{167--190}},
  publisher    = {{Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft mbH}},
  title        = {{{Socially Responsible Investment in 19th Century Greece: A Case Study of a Swiss Banker}}},
  doi          = {{10.25162/vswg-2019-0007}},
  volume       = {{106}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@article{48515,
  abstract     = {{This article analyzes the contagion process of entrepreneurial passion and its effects on employee outcomes. We develop a mediation model showing entrepreneurs’ entrepreneurial passion affects an employee passion response, which in turn affects employee outcomes. We draw on a dual-process perspective to analyze how entrepreneurs’ emotional and identity displays interact to create employees’ perceptions of entrepreneurs’ passion, and question whether the contagion effect uniformly works for all employees. Our empirical studies, one field study and one experiment, provide empirical support for a contagion effect of entrepreneurial passion, and show the particularities of the effects of entrepreneurs’ passion on employee outcomes.}},
  author       = {{Hubner-Benz, Sylvia and Baum, Matthias and Frese, Michael}},
  issn         = {{1042-2587}},
  journal      = {{Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice}},
  keywords     = {{Economics and Econometrics, Business and International Management}},
  number       = {{6}},
  pages        = {{1112--1140}},
  publisher    = {{SAGE Publications}},
  title        = {{{Contagion of Entrepreneurial Passion: Effects on Employee Outcomes}}},
  doi          = {{10.1177/1042258719883995}},
  volume       = {{44}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@article{41294,
  author       = {{Steinhoff, Lena and Arli, Denni and Weaven, Scott and Kozlenkova, Irina V.}},
  issn         = {{0092-0703}},
  journal      = {{Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science}},
  keywords     = {{Marketing, Economics and Econometrics, Business and International Management}},
  number       = {{3}},
  pages        = {{369--393}},
  publisher    = {{Springer Science and Business Media LLC}},
  title        = {{{Online relationship marketing}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s11747-018-0621-6}},
  volume       = {{47}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@article{35756,
  abstract     = {{<jats:sec>
<jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Purpose</jats:title>
<jats:p>Leveraging social action theory, social network theory and the notion of network externality, the purpose of this paper is to model two different return on investment (ROI) measures: the networked ROI which captures the network effect originating from a social media investment, and the discrete ROI which focuses social media discrete returns from individual users.</jats:p>
</jats:sec>
<jats:sec>
<jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Design/methodology/approach</jats:title>
<jats:p>A field experiment was set up over a period of three months to test the effects of two variants of an advertisement campaign (a social vs a discrete ad) on the modeled networked and discrete ROIs.</jats:p>
</jats:sec>
<jats:sec>
<jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Findings</jats:title>
<jats:p>The authors find that emphasizing discrete user actions leads to lower network gains, but higher monetary returns while the social action emphasis produces higher network gains, but lower monetary returns. The study further suggests that social action focus is preferable for brand promotion and engagement, whereas the discrete action focus is suitable for boosting sales and website traffic.</jats:p>
</jats:sec>
<jats:sec>
<jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Practical implications</jats:title>
<jats:p>Several potential implications for social media researchers and marketers are also discussed.</jats:p>
</jats:sec>
<jats:sec>
<jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Originality/value</jats:title>
<jats:p>The authors for the first time showed that that the social media returns are derived not only from individual actions taken by the user (e.g. likes and shares) but also from users’ social interdependencies and the additional exposure that results from network effects.</jats:p>
</jats:sec>}},
  author       = {{Khan, Gohar and Mohaisen, Manar and Trier, Matthias}},
  issn         = {{1066-2243}},
  journal      = {{Internet Research}},
  keywords     = {{Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, Communication}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{631--652}},
  publisher    = {{Emerald}},
  title        = {{{The network ROI}}},
  doi          = {{10.1108/intr-07-2018-0346}},
  volume       = {{30}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@article{41339,
  author       = {{Garnefeld, Ina and Eggert, Andreas and Husemann-Kopetzky, Markus and Böhm, Eva}},
  issn         = {{0092-0703}},
  journal      = {{Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science}},
  keywords     = {{Marketing, Economics and Econometrics, Business and International Management}},
  number       = {{4}},
  pages        = {{595--616}},
  publisher    = {{Springer Science and Business Media LLC}},
  title        = {{{Exploring the link between payment schemes and customer fraud: a mental accounting perspective}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s11747-019-00653-x}},
  volume       = {{47}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@article{46803,
  abstract     = {{<jats:title>ABSTRACT</jats:title><jats:p>Drawing on the political theory of judicial decision making, our paper proposes a new and parsimonious ex ante litigation risk measure: federal judge ideology. We find that judge ideology complements existing measures of litigation risk based on industry membership and firm characteristics. Firms in liberal circuits (the third quartile in ideology) are 33.5% more likely to be sued in securities class action lawsuits than those in conservative circuits (the first quartile in ideology). This result is stronger after the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in the <jats:italic>Tellabs</jats:italic> case. We next show that the effect of judge ideology on litigation risk is greater for firms with more sophisticated shareholders and with higher expected litigation costs. Furthermore, judicial appointments affect litigation risk and the value of firms in the circuit, highlighting the economic consequences of political appointments of judges. Finally, using our new measure, we document that litigation risk deters managers from providing long‐term earnings guidance, a result that existing measures of litigation risk cannot show.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{HUANG, ALLEN and HUI, KAI WAI and Li, Reeyarn}},
  issn         = {{0021-8456}},
  journal      = {{Journal of Accounting Research}},
  keywords     = {{Economics and Econometrics, Finance, Accounting}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{431--489}},
  publisher    = {{Wiley}},
  title        = {{{Federal Judge Ideology: A New Measure of Ex Ante Litigation Risk}}},
  doi          = {{10.1111/1475-679x.12260}},
  volume       = {{57}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@article{45585,
  author       = {{Gallier, Carlo and Goeschl, Timo and Kesternich, Martin and Lohse, Johannes and Reif, Christiane and Römer, Daniel}},
  issn         = {{0167-2681}},
  journal      = {{Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization}},
  keywords     = {{Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Economics and Econometrics}},
  pages        = {{500--517}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier BV}},
  title        = {{{Leveling up? An inter-neighborhood experiment on parochialism and the efficiency of multi-level public goods provision}}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.jebo.2019.05.028}},
  volume       = {{164}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@article{45588,
  author       = {{Kesternich, Martin and Römer, Daniel and Flues, Florens}},
  issn         = {{0014-2921}},
  journal      = {{European Economic Review}},
  keywords     = {{Economics and Econometrics, Finance}},
  pages        = {{76--91}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier BV}},
  title        = {{{The power of active choice: Field experimental evidence on repeated contribution decisions to a carbon offsetting program}}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.euroecorev.2019.02.001}},
  volume       = {{114}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@article{40492,
  author       = {{Sackel, Johanna}},
  issn         = {{0340-8728}},
  journal      = {{Vierteljahrschrift für Sozial- und Wirtschaftsgeschichte}},
  keywords     = {{Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous), Sociology and Political Science, History, Cultural Studies}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{183--200}},
  publisher    = {{Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft mbH}},
  title        = {{{„Rationale Fischerei“? Das Konzept des Maximum Sustainable Yield im Spannungsfeld von Ökonomie und Ökologie}}},
  doi          = {{10.25162/vswg-2018-0005}},
  volume       = {{105}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@article{31807,
  abstract     = {{Drawing upon recent advances in machine learning and natural language processing, we introduce new tools that automatically ingest, parse, disambiguate, and build an updated database using U.S. patent data. The tools identify unique inventor, assignee, and location entities mentioned on each granted U.S. patent from 1976 to 2016. We describe data flow, algorithms, user interfaces, descriptive statistics, and a novelty measure based on the first appearance of a word in the patent corpus. We illustrate an automated coinventor network mapping tool and visualize trends in patenting over the last 40 years.}},
  author       = {{Balsmeier, Benjamin and Assaf, Mohamad and Chesebro, Tyler and Fierro, Gabe and Johnson, Kevin and Johnson, Scott and Li, Guan‐Cheng and Lück, Sonja and O'Reagan, Doug and Yeh, Bill and Zang, Guangzheng and Fleming, Lee}},
  issn         = {{1058-6407}},
  journal      = {{Journal of Economics & Management Strategy}},
  keywords     = {{Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management, Economics and Econometrics, General Business, Management and Accounting, General Medicine}},
  number       = {{3}},
  pages        = {{535--553}},
  publisher    = {{Wiley}},
  title        = {{{Machine learning and natural language processing on the patent corpus: Data, tools, and new measures}}},
  doi          = {{10.1111/jems.12259}},
  volume       = {{27}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@article{41340,
  author       = {{Garnefeld, Ina and Böhm, Eva and Klimke, Lena and Oestreich, Andrea}},
  issn         = {{0092-0703}},
  journal      = {{Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science}},
  keywords     = {{Marketing, Economics and Econometrics, Business and International Management}},
  number       = {{6}},
  pages        = {{1133--1147}},
  publisher    = {{Springer Science and Business Media LLC}},
  title        = {{{I thought it was over, but now it is back: customer reactions to ex post time extensions of sales promotions}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s11747-018-0600-y}},
  volume       = {{46}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@article{47913,
  author       = {{Reimsbach, Daniel and Hahn, Rüdiger and Gürtürk, Anil}},
  issn         = {{0963-8180}},
  journal      = {{European Accounting Review}},
  keywords     = {{Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous), Accounting, Business and International Management, Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous), Economics and Econometrics, Finance}},
  number       = {{3}},
  pages        = {{559--581}},
  publisher    = {{Informa UK Limited}},
  title        = {{{Integrated Reporting and Assurance of Sustainability Information: An Experimental Study on Professional Investors’ Information Processing}}},
  doi          = {{10.1080/09638180.2016.1273787}},
  volume       = {{27}},
  year         = {{2017}},
}

@article{45589,
  author       = {{Kesternich, Martin and Lange, Andreas and Sturm, Bodo}},
  issn         = {{1386-4157}},
  journal      = {{Experimental Economics}},
  keywords     = {{Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{180--204}},
  publisher    = {{Springer Science and Business Media LLC}},
  title        = {{{On the performance of rule-based contribution schemes under endowment heterogeneity}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s10683-017-9535-2}},
  volume       = {{21}},
  year         = {{2017}},
}

@article{45590,
  author       = {{Kesternich, Martin and Reif, Christiane and Rübbelke, Dirk}},
  issn         = {{0924-6460}},
  journal      = {{Environmental and Resource Economics}},
  keywords     = {{Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Economics and Econometrics}},
  number       = {{3}},
  pages        = {{403--411}},
  publisher    = {{Springer Science and Business Media LLC}},
  title        = {{{Recent Trends in Behavioral Environmental Economics}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s10640-017-0162-3}},
  volume       = {{67}},
  year         = {{2017}},
}

@article{34661,
  author       = {{Black, Tobias}},
  issn         = {{1468-1218}},
  journal      = {{Nonlinear Analysis: Real World Applications}},
  keywords     = {{Applied Mathematics, Computational Mathematics, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, General Engineering, General Medicine, Analysis}},
  pages        = {{593--609}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier BV}},
  title        = {{{Sublinear signal production in a two-dimensional Keller–Segel–Stokes system}}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.nonrwa.2016.03.008}},
  volume       = {{31}},
  year         = {{2016}},
}

@article{45592,
  author       = {{Kesternich, Martin and Löschel, Andreas and Römer, Daniel}},
  issn         = {{0047-2727}},
  journal      = {{Journal of Public Economics}},
  keywords     = {{Economics and Econometrics, Finance}},
  pages        = {{70--78}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier BV}},
  title        = {{{The long-term impact of matching and rebate subsidies when public goods are impure: Field experimental evidence from the carbon offsetting market}}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.jpubeco.2016.01.004}},
  volume       = {{137}},
  year         = {{2016}},
}

@article{45591,
  author       = {{Gallier, Carlo and Kesternich, Martin and Sturm, Bodo}},
  issn         = {{0924-6460}},
  journal      = {{Environmental and Resource Economics}},
  keywords     = {{Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Economics and Econometrics}},
  number       = {{3}},
  pages        = {{535--557}},
  publisher    = {{Springer Science and Business Media LLC}},
  title        = {{{Voting for Burden Sharing Rules in Public Goods Games}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s10640-016-0022-6}},
  volume       = {{67}},
  year         = {{2016}},
}

@article{45593,
  author       = {{Kesternich, Martin}},
  issn         = {{0003-6846}},
  journal      = {{Applied Economics}},
  keywords     = {{Economics and Econometrics}},
  number       = {{12}},
  pages        = {{1047--1065}},
  publisher    = {{Informa UK Limited}},
  title        = {{{Minimum participation rules in international environmental agreements: empirical evidence from a survey among delegates in international climate negotiations}}},
  doi          = {{10.1080/00036846.2015.1093082}},
  volume       = {{48}},
  year         = {{2015}},
}

@article{45594,
  author       = {{Dai, Jing and Kesternich, Martin and Löschel, Andreas and Ziegler, Andreas}},
  issn         = {{0921-8009}},
  journal      = {{Ecological Economics}},
  keywords     = {{Economics and Econometrics, General Environmental Science}},
  pages        = {{310--321}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier BV}},
  title        = {{{Extreme weather experiences and climate change beliefs in China: An econometric analysis}}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.05.001}},
  volume       = {{116}},
  year         = {{2015}},
}

@article{33087,
  author       = {{Gries, Thomas and Meierrieks, Daniel and Redlin, Margarete}},
  issn         = {{0030-7653}},
  journal      = {{Oxford Economic Papers}},
  keywords     = {{Economics and Econometrics}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{83--103}},
  publisher    = {{Oxford University Press (OUP)}},
  title        = {{{Oppressive governments, dependence on the USA, and anti-American terrorism}}},
  doi          = {{10.1093/oep/gpu038}},
  volume       = {{67}},
  year         = {{2014}},
}

