@article{29246,
  abstract     = {{<jats:p>Openness in science and education is increasing in importance within the digital knowledge society. So far, less attention has been paid to teaching Open Science in bachelor’s degrees or in qualitative methods. Therefore, the aim of this article is to use a seminar example to explore what Open Science practices can be taught in qualitative research and how digital tools can be involved. The seminar focused on the following practices: Open data practices, the practice of using the free and open source tool “Collaborative online Interpretation, the practice of participating, cooperating, collaborating and contributing through participatory technologies and in social (based) networks. To learn Open Science practices, the students were involved in a qualitative research project about “Use of digital technologies for the study and habitus of students”. The study shows the practices of Open Data are easy to teach, whereas the use of free and open source tools and participatory technologies for collaboration, participation, cooperation and contribution is more difficult. In addition, a cultural shift would have to take place within German universities to promote Open Science practices in general.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Steinhardt, Isabel}},
  issn         = {{0167-8329}},
  journal      = {{Education for Information}},
  keywords     = {{Open Science, Open Education Practices, Library and Information Sciences, Education, Information Systems}},
  number       = {{3}},
  pages        = {{263--279}},
  publisher    = {{IOS Press}},
  title        = {{{Learning Open Science by doing Open Science. A reflection of a qualitative research project-based seminar}}},
  doi          = {{10.3233/efi-190308}},
  volume       = {{36}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{35301,
  abstract     = {{Ausgehend von Ergebnissen zur Mediennutzung und Ausführungen zur Medienkompetenz fokussiert der Beitrag digitale Praktiken im Religionsunterricht. Zur Analyse der mit der Digitalisierung verbundenen Transformation digitaler Praktiken wird die Akteur-Netzwerk-Theorie dargestellt sowie die Begriffe Digitalisierung und Digitalität definiert. Anhand einer Vignette (dichte Beschreibung) wird der Frage nachgegangen, wie sich Lehrkräfte auf Herausforderungen von Digitalität einlassen (können), inwiefern sie digitale Praktiken eröffnen und inwiefern diese mit traditionellen Praktiken verbunden sind.}},
  author       = {{Caruso, Carina and Reis, Oliver}},
  journal      = {{ Österreichische Religionspädagogische Forum}},
  keywords     = {{Digitale Praktiken, Digitalisierung, Medienkompetenz, Professionalisierung, Religionsunterricht / digital practices, digitization, digital literacy, teachers' professional development, religious education}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{212–234}},
  publisher    = {{Universitätsbibliothek Graz}},
  title        = {{{„Sie sind doch eine Medienklasse!“}}},
  doi          = {{10.25364/10.28:2020.1.12}},
  volume       = {{28}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@inbook{35836,
  abstract     = {{Digitalisierung ist derzeit ein viel diskutiertes Thema. Mit ihr werden derart tief grei- fende Veränderungen der Gesellschaft und Arbeitswelt erwartet, dass sie häufig als digitale Revolution bezeichnet wird. Gleichzeitig wirft die Auseinandersetzung mit diesen antizipierten Veränderungen viele noch unbeantwortete Fragen auf. Diese umfassen unter anderem Überlegungen hinsichtlich des Substitutionspotenzials menschlicher Arbeit durch die Digitalisierung, die Frage nach der Ausgestaltung der Rolle des Menschen in der Industrie 4.0 und schließlich Erwägungen in Bezug auf die Vorbereitung und Begleitung von Beschäftigten in der digitalen Transformation. Der vorliegende Beitrag gibt Aufschluss über die Dimensionen der Digitalisierung und die derzeit diskutierten Entwicklungslinien; er befasst sich weiterhin mit den sich daraus ergebenden Herausforderungen und Bedeutungen für die industrielle Arbeit und die Beschäftigten. Abschließend werden daraus abzuleitende Implikationen für die berufliche und allgemeine Bildung diskutiert.}},
  author       = {{Berisha-Gawlowski, Angelina  and Caruso, Carina and Goller, Michael and Harteis, Christian}},
  booktitle    = {{Digitalisierung am Übergang Schule Beruf Ansätze und Perspektiven in Arbeitsdomänen und beruflicher Förderung}},
  editor       = {{Heisler, Dietmar and Meier, Jörg}},
  isbn         = {{978-3-7639-6158-0}},
  keywords     = {{Digitalisierung, Industrie 4.0, Arbeit 4.0, berufliche Aus- und Weiterbildung, allgemeine Bildung / digitalization, industry 4.0, work 4.0, vocational education and training, general education}},
  pages        = {{33–51}},
  publisher    = {{wbv}},
  title        = {{{Auswirkungen der Digitalisierung industrieller Arbeit auf die berufliche und allgemeine Bildung}}},
  doi          = {{10.3278/6004725w}},
  volume       = {{56}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@misc{36373,
  author       = {{Pöllmann, Andreas}},
  booktitle    = {{Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education}},
  issn         = {{0305-7925}},
  keywords     = {{Education}},
  number       = {{4}},
  pages        = {{629--630}},
  publisher    = {{Informa UK Limited}},
  title        = {{{Transforming study abroad: a handbook}}},
  doi          = {{10.1080/03057925.2020.1769882}},
  volume       = {{51}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{38525,
  author       = {{Prikoszovits, Matthias}},
  issn         = {{2198-2430}},
  journal      = {{Deutsch als Fremdsprache}},
  keywords     = {{Computer Science Applications, History, Education}},
  number       = {{2}},
  publisher    = {{Erich Schmidt Verlag GmbH & Co. KG}},
  title        = {{{Christian Efing / Karl-Hubert Kiefer (Hg.): Sprachbezogene Curricula und Aufgaben in der beruflichen Bildung. Aktuelle Konzepte und Forschungsergebnisse}}},
  doi          = {{10.37307/j.2198-2430.2018.02.14}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{35701,
  author       = {{Lünne, Steffen and Schnell, Susanne and Biehler, Rolf}},
  issn         = {{0261-9768}},
  journal      = {{European Journal of Teacher Education}},
  keywords     = {{Education}},
  number       = {{5}},
  pages        = {{688--705}},
  publisher    = {{Informa UK Limited}},
  title        = {{{Motivation of out-of-field teachers for participating in professional development courses in mathematics}}},
  doi          = {{10.1080/02619768.2020.1793950}},
  volume       = {{44}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{35822,
  abstract     = {{<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>The derivative concept plays a major role in economics. However, its use in economics is very heterogeneous, sometimes inconsistent, and contradicts students’ prior knowledge from school. This applies in particular to the common economic interpretation of the derivative as the amount of change while increasing the production by one unit. Hence, in calculus courses for economics students, learners should acquire an understanding of the derivative that is mathematically acceptable and connected to their prior knowledge, but which also takes into account its practical use in economics. In this paper we first develop a theoretical model describing such an understanding of the derivative for economics students. We then present an exploratory study investigating the extent to which economics students have such an understanding after their calculus course. The results indicate that many of them might not have acquired this kind of understanding, in particular concerning the common economic interpretation of the derivative. The study furthermore yields possible gaps in students’ understanding and possible misconceptions.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Feudel, Frank and Biehler, Rolf}},
  issn         = {{0173-5322}},
  journal      = {{Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik}},
  keywords     = {{Education, General Mathematics}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{273--305}},
  publisher    = {{Springer Science and Business Media LLC}},
  title        = {{{Students’ Understanding of the Derivative Concept in the Context of Mathematics for Economics}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s13138-020-00174-z}},
  volume       = {{42}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{35712,
  abstract     = {{<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title>
               <jats:p>Mathematics learning support centres (MLSC) are widely established and evaluated in English-speaking countries (such as the UK, Ireland and Australia). In most of these countries, several national surveys on MLSCs exist. They give an overview of the number of MLSCs as well as their characteristics in these countries. In Germany, there is a lack of studies on MLSCs and the landscape of MLSCs has not been described yet. This article presents basic information concerning counts of MLSCs and their characteristics at universities. Based on a three-step approach of analysing university homepages and additional personal contact via email or phone calls, we gathered typical MLSC features (e.g. staff quantities and qualification, opening and support hours, supported study programmes). We analysed 190 universities from a web-based register on study programmes. In total, we found 61 MLSCs located at 51 German universities. Another 16 support centres were specialized on mathematics didactics, which means they focussed on didactical and methodological support for preservice teacher students and often provided different teaching materials. Thirty-eight centres were located at universities (62.3%) and 23 MLSCs at universities of applied sciences and comparable universities (37.7%). The MLSCs were different in their sizes of staff and opening hours, and both the numbers of staff and the service hours differed greatly. The student groups MLSCs at German universities focus on differ concerning characteristics like study programme or semester. We will provide the main categories describing these groups. We seek to answer research questions concerning the characteristics of MLSCs in Germany and discuss the results compared to international findings. This information is useful for further international collaborative research, for example a standardized international survey. From a national perspective, these findings support networking and collaborations between the MLSCs as well. As some German MLSCs are facing financial cuts, these results might help in gaining additional funding.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Schürmann, Mirko and Gildehaus, Lara and Liebendörfer, Michael and Schaper, Niclas and Biehler, Rolf and Hochmuth, Reinhard and Kuklinski, Christiane and Lankeit, Elisa}},
  issn         = {{0268-3679}},
  journal      = {{Teaching Mathematics and its Applications: An International Journal of the IMA}},
  keywords     = {{Education, General Mathematics}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{99--113}},
  publisher    = {{Oxford University Press (OUP)}},
  title        = {{{Mathematics learning support centres in Germany—an overview}}},
  doi          = {{10.1093/teamat/hraa007}},
  volume       = {{40}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@inbook{37610,
  abstract     = {{Der Gedanke einer inklusiven Schule als einer Schule für alle Kinder ist, wenn auch aus der Perspektive von 100 Jahren Grundschule erst kürzlich durch die UN-Konvention über die Rechte von Menschen mit Behinderung (United Nations 2006) verstärkt, als an das Bildungssystem gerichtete Anforderung unbestritten. Die Didaktik des Sachunterrichts als wissenschaftliche Disziplin und als Instanz technikbezogenen Lernens in der Grundschule hat sich dem Thema Inklusion mit den Untersuchungen von Seitz (2005) und Schomaker (2000), für eine fachdidaktische Disziplin vergleichsweise früh zugewendet (Pech & Schomaker 2013, S. 341). Pech, Schomaker & Simon (2018, S. 12ff.) arbeiten jedoch an begrifflichen Unschärfen in einschlägigen Veröffentlichungen heraus, dass es in der Sachunterrichtsdidaktik bis heute keinen systematischen Diskurs darüber gibt, wie Inklusion zu verstehen, zu entwickeln und zu implementieren ist. Die allgemeinpädagogisch unter anderem von Feuser (2011, S. 89) für das Bildungssystem formulierte Entwicklungsaufgabe von der Segregation über die Integration zur Inklusion findet sich in Abhängigkeit von der Perspektive unterschiedlich definiert in der Sachunterrichts- bzw. Fachdidaktik wieder. Da bei der Definition von inklusivem Sachunterricht unterschiedliche wissenschaftliche Kontexte (z.B. sonderpädagogische, inklusionspädagogische oder allgemeindidaktische) zur Argumentation herangezogen werden, ist im Folgenden häufiger von der Rekontextualisierung von Inklusion in der Fachdidaktik die Rede. Die Berücksichtigung von Lernbedürfnissen und die Nutzung von individuellen Potenzialen stellt eine sich in der Sachunterrichtsdidaktik (u.a. Lichtblau 2014, S. 204; Simon 2014, S. 241; Pech, Schomaker & Simon 2018, 15f.) wie in der allgemeinen Pädagogik (Feuser 1989, S. 9; Schumann 2009, S. 51; Preuß 2018, S. 81) wiederholende Rekontextualisierung zur Beschreibung inklusiven Unterrichts dar. Potenzialorientierte (fach-)didaktische Überlegungen, also solche, die eine Orientierung an in Personen liegenden Defiziten auf der einen und standardisierten Normen auf der anderen Seite ablehnen und den Blick vermehrt auf die im Individuum, dem Fach oder einem Lerngegenstand liegenden Potenziale für eine gleichberechtigte und gleichwertige Partizipation aller Lernenden richten (Simon 2019, S. 114), erfahren derzeit vermehrt Aufmerksamkeit. Die Berücksichtigung individueller Lernbedürfnisse auf der anderen Seite bleibt in einschlägigen Veröffentlichungen dagegen oftmals theoretisch unreflektiert.
Ausgehend davon leistet das vorgestellte Dissertationsvorhaben mit Blick auf technikbezogenes Lernen im Sachunterricht der Grundschule einen theoriebildend angelegten Beitrag zur Verbindung von erziehungswissenschaftlicher und sachunterrichtsdidaktischer Inklusionsforschung am Lerngegenstand
 Technik. Die Studie ist, ob der Offenheit des Forschungsfeldes bezogen auf technikbezogenen Sachunterricht im Kontext von Inklusion, überwiegend qualitativ-rekonstruktiv angelegt. Unter der Rekontextualisierung von Inklusion als Berücksichtigung zunehmend vielfältiger Lernbedürfnisse im Sachunterricht, fragt die Studie nach der Beschaffenheit und Dimensionen der Verschiedenheit von Lernbedürfnissen sowie Möglichkeiten bzw. Hindernissen auf dem Weg zu ihrer Berücksichtigung. }},
  author       = {{Schröer, Franz}},
  booktitle    = {{Technikunterricht: handfest und geistreich - Der Beitrag technischer Bildung zur kulturellen Bildung - Tagungsband zur 21. Tagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Technische Bildung in Flensburg vom 20.-21. September 2019. Offenbach am Main}},
  editor       = {{Binder, Martin and Wiesmüller, Christian and Finkbeiner, Timo}},
  isbn         = {{978-3-947868-02-5}},
  keywords     = {{Inclusion, Sachunterricht, basic needs, technology education}},
  location     = {{Flensburg}},
  pages        = {{119--141}},
  publisher    = {{BE.ER Konzept}},
  title        = {{{Technisches Lernen inklusiv gestalten – Zur Beschaffenheit von Lernbedürfnissen im Kontext technikbezogenen Sachunterrichts}}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{24458,
  abstract     = {{In child–robot interaction (cHRI) research, many studies pursue the goal to develop interactive systems that can be applied in everyday settings. For early education, increasingly, the setting of a kindergarten is targeted. However, when cHRI and research are brought into a kindergarten, a range of ethical and related procedural aspects have to be considered and dealt with.While ethical models elaborated within other human–robot interaction settings, e.g., assisted living contexts, can provide some important indicators for relevant issues, we argue that it is important to start developing a systematic approach to identify and tackle those ethical issues which rise with cHRI in kindergarten settings on a more global level and address the impact of the technology from a macroperspective beyond the effects on the individual. Based on our experience in conducting studies with children in general and pedagogical considerations on the role of the institution of kindergarten in specific, in this paper,we enfold some relevant aspects that have barely been addressed in an explicit way in current cHRI research. Four areas are analyzed and key ethical issues are identified in each area: (1) the institutional setting of a kindergarten, (2) children as a vulnerable group, (3) the caregivers’ role, and (4) pedagogical concepts. With our considerations, we aim at (i) broadening
the methodology of the current studies within the area of cHRI, (ii) revalidate it based on our comprehensive empirical
experience with research in kindergarten settings, both laboratory and real-world contexts, and (iii) provide a framework for the development of a more systematic approach to address the ethical issues in cHRI research within kindergarten settings.}},
  author       = {{Tolksdorf, Nils F. and Siebert, Scarlet and Zorn, Isabel and Horwath, Ilona and Rohlfing, Katharina J.}},
  issn         = {{1875-4791}},
  journal      = {{International Journal of Social Robotics}},
  keywords     = {{Robot ethics · Kindergarten settings · Child–robot interaction · Early childhood education}},
  pages        = {{129--140}},
  title        = {{{Ethical Considerations of Applying Robots in Kindergarten Settings: Towards an Approach from a Macroperspective}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s12369-020-00622-3}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{34816,
  abstract     = {{<jats:title>Zusammenfassung</jats:title><jats:p>Frühe mathematische Bildung findet in der Kindertagesstätte insbesondere in spontanen Alltagssituationen statt. Damit diese Alltagssituationen zu natürlichen Lernsituationen für die Kinder werden, müssen (angehende) frühpädagogische Fachkräfte zunächst das mathematische Potenzial in diesen Situationen erkennen. Diese Fähigkeit zur <jats:italic>situativen Beobachtung und Wahrnehmung </jats:italic>ist bisher unzureichend erforscht, was unter anderem auf begrenzte Methoden zur standardisierten Erfassung dieses Konstrukts zurückzuführen ist. Um diesem Bedarf zu begegnen, wurde das videobasierte Testinstrument <jats:italic>Vimas_num</jats:italic> zur Erfassung der Fähigkeit zur situativen Beobachtung und Wahrnehmung angehender frühpädagogischer Fachpersonen im Bereich Mengen und Zahlen entwickelt. Auf der Grundlage von drei aufeinander aufbauenden Studien wird die Validität verschiedener Aspekte der Testwertinterpretation untersucht. Die Ergebnisse geben Hinweise auf die Validität der Testwertinterpretation in Bezug auf den Testinhalt, die interne Struktur des Tests und die Zusammenhänge mit theoretisch verbundenen Konstrukten.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Bruns, Julia and Strahl, Carolin and Gasteiger, Hedwig}},
  issn         = {{0340-4099}},
  journal      = {{Unterrichtswissenschaft}},
  keywords     = {{Education}},
  number       = {{3}},
  pages        = {{345--371}},
  publisher    = {{Springer Science and Business Media LLC}},
  title        = {{{Situative Beobachtung und Wahrnehmung angehender frühpädagogischer Fachpersonen im Bereich Mathematik – Entwicklung und Validierung eines Testinstruments}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s42010-020-00091-7}},
  volume       = {{49}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{45180,
  author       = {{Kulgemeyer, Christoph and Borowski, Andreas and Buschhüter, David and Enkrott, Patrick and Kempin, Maren and Reinhold, Peter and Riese, Josef and Schecker, Horst and Schröder, Jan and Vogelsang, Christoph}},
  issn         = {{0022-4308}},
  journal      = {{Journal of Research in Science Teaching}},
  keywords     = {{Education}},
  pages        = {{1--29}},
  publisher    = {{Wiley}},
  title        = {{{Professional knowledge affects action-related skills: The development of preservice physics teachers’ explaining skills during a field experience}}},
  doi          = {{10.1002/tea.21632}},
  volume       = {{57}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{23747,
  author       = {{Witte, Thomas and Hanemann, Stefan and Sommerfeld, Herbert and Temmen, Katrin and Fechner, Sabine}},
  issn         = {{0944-5846}},
  journal      = {{CHEMKON}},
  keywords     = {{digital, technology, teacher education}},
  number       = {{4}},
  pages        = {{193--198}},
  title        = {{{Selbstbau eines digitalen Low-Cost-Fotometers für den Chemieunterricht}}},
  doi          = {{10.1002/ckon.201900026}},
  volume       = {{27}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{24462,
  abstract     = {{This article offers new insight into students’ responses to Womens’
and Gender Studies (WGS) classes by overcoming the self-selection
bias hitherto inherent in the field. Exploring the experiences of 1406
students (770 women, 636 men) of a university with a WGS
requirement across all study programmes, we examine the
prevailing discourses on WGS, participants’ (dis)agreement as well
as personal and professional benefits gained through WGS.
Additionally, we evaluate the perceived value of WGS for
themselves, in society, and of WGS opportunities in higher
education. Findings reveal a gender bias regarding discourses,
experience, benefit, and value, with 70.1% women and 32.4% men
supporting the idea of WGS as a mandatory subject. Women’s
support indicates a need for tools to negotiate gender issues,
while men’s resistance serves to defend male privileges. We
conclude that a requirement of WGS classes amplifies the
potential for both – resistance and change.}},
  author       = {{Horwath, Ilona and Diabl, Christian}},
  issn         = {{0954-0253}},
  journal      = {{Gender and Education}},
  keywords     = {{Education policy, equality, higher education, critical pedagogies, gender mainstreaming, curriculum}},
  pages        = {{1109--1126}},
  title        = {{{Liberating or indoctrinating? Surveying students’ perceptions of a Womens’ and Gender Studies requirement}}},
  doi          = {{10.1080/09540253.2019.1608355}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@article{33438,
  author       = {{Knickenberg, Margarita and Zurbriggen, Carmen and Venetz, Martin and Schwab, Susanne and Gebhardt, Markus}},
  issn         = {{0885-6257}},
  journal      = {{European Journal of Special Needs Education}},
  keywords     = {{Developmental and Educational Psychology, Health Professions (miscellaneous), Education}},
  number       = {{3}},
  pages        = {{287--302}},
  publisher    = {{Informa UK Limited}},
  title        = {{{Assessing dimensions of inclusion from students’ perspective – measurement invariance across students with learning disabilities in different educational settings}}},
  doi          = {{10.1080/08856257.2019.1646958}},
  volume       = {{35}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@misc{36375,
  author       = {{Pöllmann, Andreas}},
  booktitle    = {{Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education}},
  issn         = {{0305-7925}},
  keywords     = {{Education}},
  number       = {{8}},
  pages        = {{1222--1223}},
  publisher    = {{Informa UK Limited}},
  title        = {{{European educational research (re)constructed: institutional change in Germany, the United Kingdom, Norway, and the European Union}}},
  doi          = {{10.1080/03057925.2019.1665260}},
  volume       = {{50}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@article{46156,
  abstract     = {{<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Although the teaching of vocabulary in mathematics lessons is requested in content- and language-integrated lesson designs, the clarification of the specific lexical language demands is still an open question for many mathematical topics. In a content- and language-integrated lesson design towards understanding the concept of equivalent fractions, the vocabulary (words and phrases) used by 17 students has been analyzed with qualitative means of data analysis. The qualitative in-depth analyses underline the importance of meaning-related vocabulary for making structural relations between the fractions in view explicit. Quantitative analyses of inventoried vocabulary for the four categories “self-initiated by students,” “triggered by teaching material,” “triggered by teacher,” or “triggered by peers” show the relations of collective and autonomous vocabularies from which the students retrieve their lexical means in oral and written language production.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Wessel, Lena}},
  issn         = {{1033-2170}},
  journal      = {{Mathematics Education Research Journal}},
  keywords     = {{Education, General Mathematics}},
  number       = {{4}},
  pages        = {{653--681}},
  publisher    = {{Springer Science and Business Media LLC}},
  title        = {{{Vocabulary in learning processes towards conceptual understanding of equivalent fractions—specifying students’ language demands on the basis of lexical trace analyses}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s13394-019-00284-z}},
  volume       = {{32}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@inproceedings{48409,
  author       = {{Wessel, Lena}},
  booktitle    = {{Eleventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME11)}},
  editor       = {{Jankvist, Uffe Thomas and van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, Marja and Veldhuis, Michiel}},
  keywords     = {{Vocational education, language, percentages, scaffolding, design research}},
  number       = {{12}},
  publisher    = {{Freudenthal Group}},
  title        = {{{How theories of language-responsive mathematics can inform teaching designs for vocational mathematics}}},
  volume       = {{TWG07}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@article{48324,
  author       = {{Barwell, Richard and Wessel, Lena and Parra, Aldo}},
  issn         = {{1479-4802}},
  journal      = {{Research in Mathematics Education}},
  keywords     = {{General Mathematics, Education}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{113--118}},
  publisher    = {{Informa UK Limited}},
  title        = {{{Language diversity and mathematics education: new developments}}},
  doi          = {{10.1080/14794802.2019.1638824}},
  volume       = {{21}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@inproceedings{34121,
  abstract     = {{The first impression is important in many aspects of human decision-making. In mobile apps, this impression can be influenced by an onboarding process. In addition, not only the user experience (UX) can be improved via onboarding, but also the user can get a very good didactical introduction to a new topic or different functionalities of an app.
Therefore, this study examines different onboarding types and develops an onboarding process into an Augmented Reality (AR) based mobile application (app) that teaches students how to use and operate electro-technical laboratory equipment. This onboarding process is then assessed by students through a subsequent questionnaire in terms of attractiveness, functionality, and novelty. The results of this field study serve to examine this first prototype for possible optimizations and to further develop the app accordingly.}},
  author       = {{Alptekin, Mesut and Temmen, Katrin}},
  booktitle    = {{2019 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON)}},
  keywords     = {{Augmented Reality, Laboratory Training, Engineering Education, Progressive Onboarding}},
  location     = {{Dubai, UAE}},
  pages        = {{1047--1054}},
  title        = {{{Teaching an Oscilloscope through Progressive Onboarding in an Augmented Reality Based Virtual Laboratory}}},
  doi          = {{10.1109/EDUCON.2019.8725038}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}