[{"keyword":["cueing","temporal-order judgements","theory of visual attention (TVA)","peripheral cue","processing speed","stimulus encoding","prior entry","Attention","Cues","Face Perception","Judgment"],"language":[{"iso":"eng"}],"_id":"6080","user_id":"42165","department":[{"_id":"424"}],"abstract":[{"text":"Peripheral visual cues lead to large shifts in psychometric distributions of temporal-order judgments. In one view, such shifts are attributed to attention speeding up processing of the cued stimulus, so-called prior entry. However, sometimes these shifts are so large that it is unlikely that they are caused by attention alone. Here we tested the prevalent alternative explanation that the cue is sometimes confused with the target on a perceptual level, bolstering the shift of the psychometric function. We applied a novel model of cued temporal-order judgments, derived from Bundesen’s Theory of Visual Attention.We found that cue–target confusions indeed contribute to shifting psychometric functions. However, cue-induced changes in the processing rates of the target stimuli play an important role, too. At smaller cueing intervals, the cue increased the processing speed of the target. At larger intervals, inhibition of return was predominant. Earlier studies of cued TOJs were insensitive","lang":"eng"}],"status":"public","type":"journal_article","publication":"Frontiers in Psychology","title":"Peripheral visual cues: Their fate in processing and effects on attention and temporal-order perception.","main_file_link":[{"url":"https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01442/full","open_access":"1"}],"doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01442","oa":"1","date_updated":"2022-06-06T16:29:50Z","date_created":"2018-12-10T07:06:09Z","author":[{"first_name":"Jan","last_name":"Tünnermann","full_name":"Tünnermann, Jan"},{"first_name":"Ingrid","orcid":"0000-0003-2364-9489","last_name":"Scharlau","id":"451","full_name":"Scharlau, Ingrid"}],"volume":7,"year":"2016","citation":{"ama":"Tünnermann J, Scharlau I. Peripheral visual cues: Their fate in processing and effects on attention and temporal-order perception. <i>Frontiers in Psychology</i>. 2016;7. doi:<a href=\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01442\">10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01442</a>","chicago":"Tünnermann, Jan, and Ingrid Scharlau. “Peripheral Visual Cues: Their Fate in Processing and Effects on Attention and Temporal-Order Perception.” <i>Frontiers in Psychology</i> 7 (2016). <a href=\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01442\">https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01442</a>.","ieee":"J. Tünnermann and I. Scharlau, “Peripheral visual cues: Their fate in processing and effects on attention and temporal-order perception.,” <i>Frontiers in Psychology</i>, vol. 7, 2016, doi: <a href=\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01442\">10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01442</a>.","apa":"Tünnermann, J., &#38; Scharlau, I. (2016). Peripheral visual cues: Their fate in processing and effects on attention and temporal-order perception. <i>Frontiers in Psychology</i>, <i>7</i>. <a href=\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01442\">https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01442</a>","bibtex":"@article{Tünnermann_Scharlau_2016, title={Peripheral visual cues: Their fate in processing and effects on attention and temporal-order perception.}, volume={7}, DOI={<a href=\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01442\">10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01442</a>}, journal={Frontiers in Psychology}, author={Tünnermann, Jan and Scharlau, Ingrid}, year={2016} }","short":"J. Tünnermann, I. Scharlau, Frontiers in Psychology 7 (2016).","mla":"Tünnermann, Jan, and Ingrid Scharlau. “Peripheral Visual Cues: Their Fate in Processing and Effects on Attention and Temporal-Order Perception.” <i>Frontiers in Psychology</i>, vol. 7, 2016, doi:<a href=\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01442\">10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01442</a>."},"intvolume":"         7","publication_status":"published","publication_identifier":{"issn":["1664-1078"]}},{"issue":"6","publication_identifier":{"issn":["1069-9384"]},"publication_status":"published","page":"1067 - 1073","intvolume":"        13","citation":{"mla":"Horstmann, Gernot, et al. “More Efficient Rejection of Happy than of Angry Face Distractors in Visual Search.” <i>Psychonomic Bulletin &#38; Review</i>, vol. 13, no. 6, 2006, pp. 1067–73.","short":"G. Horstmann, I. Scharlau, U. Ansorge, Psychonomic Bulletin &#38; Review 13 (2006) 1067–1073.","bibtex":"@article{Horstmann_Scharlau_Ansorge_2006, title={More efficient rejection of happy than of angry face distractors in visual search.}, volume={13}, number={6}, journal={Psychonomic Bulletin &#38; Review}, author={Horstmann, Gernot and Scharlau, Ingrid and Ansorge, Ulrich}, year={2006}, pages={1067–1073} }","apa":"Horstmann, G., Scharlau, I., &#38; Ansorge, U. (2006). More efficient rejection of happy than of angry face distractors in visual search. <i>Psychonomic Bulletin &#38; Review</i>, <i>13</i>(6), 1067–1073.","ieee":"G. Horstmann, I. Scharlau, and U. Ansorge, “More efficient rejection of happy than of angry face distractors in visual search.,” <i>Psychonomic Bulletin &#38; Review</i>, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 1067–1073, 2006.","chicago":"Horstmann, Gernot, Ingrid Scharlau, and Ulrich Ansorge. “More Efficient Rejection of Happy than of Angry Face Distractors in Visual Search.” <i>Psychonomic Bulletin &#38; Review</i> 13, no. 6 (2006): 1067–73.","ama":"Horstmann G, Scharlau I, Ansorge U. More efficient rejection of happy than of angry face distractors in visual search. <i>Psychonomic Bulletin &#38; Review</i>. 2006;13(6):1067-1073."},"year":"2006","volume":13,"author":[{"first_name":"Gernot","last_name":"Horstmann","full_name":"Horstmann, Gernot"},{"id":"451","full_name":"Scharlau, Ingrid","last_name":"Scharlau","orcid":"0000-0003-2364-9489","first_name":"Ingrid"},{"first_name":"Ulrich","last_name":"Ansorge","full_name":"Ansorge, Ulrich"}],"date_created":"2018-12-10T07:05:19Z","oa":"1","date_updated":"2022-06-07T00:23:43Z","main_file_link":[{"url":"https://kw.uni-paderborn.de/fileadmin/fakultaet/Institute/psychologie/Kognitive_Psychologie/Publikationen/HorstmannScharlauAnsorge.pdf","open_access":"1"}],"title":"More efficient rejection of happy than of angry face distractors in visual search.","publication":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review","type":"journal_article","status":"public","abstract":[{"text":"In the present study, we examined whether the detection advantage for negative-face targets in crowds of positive-face distractors over positive-face targets in crowds of negative faces can be explained by differentially efficient distractor rejection. Search Condition A demonstrated more efficient distractor rejection with negative-face targets in positive-face crowds than vice versa. Search Condition B showed that target identity alone is not sufficient to account for this effect, because there was no difference in processing efficiency for positive- and negative-face targets within neutral crowds. Search Condition C showed differentially efficient processing with neutral-face targets among positive- or negative-face distractors. These results were obtained with both a within-participants (Experiment 1) and a between-participants (Experiment 2) design. The pattern of results is consistent with the assumption that efficient rejection of positive (more homogenous) distractors is an im","lang":"eng"}],"department":[{"_id":"424"}],"user_id":"42165","_id":"6076","language":[{"iso":"eng"}],"extern":"1","keyword":["angry face distractors","visual search","negative face distractors","Adult","Anger","Attention","Face","Female","Happiness","Humans","Male","Rejection (Psychology)","Visual Perception","Distraction","Face Perception","Visual Perception","Visual Search"]}]