---
_id: '6080'
abstract:
- lang: eng
  text: Peripheral visual cues lead to large shifts in psychometric distributions
    of temporal-order judgments. In one view, such shifts are attributed to attention
    speeding up processing of the cued stimulus, so-called prior entry. However, sometimes
    these shifts are so large that it is unlikely that they are caused by attention
    alone. Here we tested the prevalent alternative explanation that the cue is sometimes
    confused with the target on a perceptual level, bolstering the shift of the psychometric
    function. We applied a novel model of cued temporal-order judgments, derived from
    Bundesen’s Theory of Visual Attention.We found that cue–target confusions indeed
    contribute to shifting psychometric functions. However, cue-induced changes in
    the processing rates of the target stimuli play an important role, too. At smaller
    cueing intervals, the cue increased the processing speed of the target. At larger
    intervals, inhibition of return was predominant. Earlier studies of cued TOJs
    were insensitive
author:
- first_name: Jan
  full_name: Tünnermann, Jan
  last_name: Tünnermann
- first_name: Ingrid
  full_name: Scharlau, Ingrid
  id: '451'
  last_name: Scharlau
  orcid: 0000-0003-2364-9489
citation:
  ama: 'Tünnermann J, Scharlau I. Peripheral visual cues: Their fate in processing
    and effects on attention and temporal-order perception. <i>Frontiers in Psychology</i>.
    2016;7. doi:<a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01442">10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01442</a>'
  apa: 'Tünnermann, J., &#38; Scharlau, I. (2016). Peripheral visual cues: Their fate
    in processing and effects on attention and temporal-order perception. <i>Frontiers
    in Psychology</i>, <i>7</i>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01442">https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01442</a>'
  bibtex: '@article{Tünnermann_Scharlau_2016, title={Peripheral visual cues: Their
    fate in processing and effects on attention and temporal-order perception.}, volume={7},
    DOI={<a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01442">10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01442</a>},
    journal={Frontiers in Psychology}, author={Tünnermann, Jan and Scharlau, Ingrid},
    year={2016} }'
  chicago: 'Tünnermann, Jan, and Ingrid Scharlau. “Peripheral Visual Cues: Their Fate
    in Processing and Effects on Attention and Temporal-Order Perception.” <i>Frontiers
    in Psychology</i> 7 (2016). <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01442">https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01442</a>.'
  ieee: 'J. Tünnermann and I. Scharlau, “Peripheral visual cues: Their fate in processing
    and effects on attention and temporal-order perception.,” <i>Frontiers in Psychology</i>,
    vol. 7, 2016, doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01442">10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01442</a>.'
  mla: 'Tünnermann, Jan, and Ingrid Scharlau. “Peripheral Visual Cues: Their Fate
    in Processing and Effects on Attention and Temporal-Order Perception.” <i>Frontiers
    in Psychology</i>, vol. 7, 2016, doi:<a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01442">10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01442</a>.'
  short: J. Tünnermann, I. Scharlau, Frontiers in Psychology 7 (2016).
date_created: 2018-12-10T07:06:09Z
date_updated: 2022-06-06T16:29:50Z
department:
- _id: '424'
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01442
intvolume: '         7'
keyword:
- cueing
- temporal-order judgements
- theory of visual attention (TVA)
- peripheral cue
- processing speed
- stimulus encoding
- prior entry
- Attention
- Cues
- Face Perception
- Judgment
language:
- iso: eng
main_file_link:
- open_access: '1'
  url: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01442/full
oa: '1'
publication: Frontiers in Psychology
publication_identifier:
  issn:
  - 1664-1078
publication_status: published
status: public
title: 'Peripheral visual cues: Their fate in processing and effects on attention
  and temporal-order perception.'
type: journal_article
user_id: '42165'
volume: 7
year: '2016'
...
---
_id: '6076'
abstract:
- lang: eng
  text: In the present study, we examined whether the detection advantage for negative-face
    targets in crowds of positive-face distractors over positive-face targets in crowds
    of negative faces can be explained by differentially efficient distractor rejection.
    Search Condition A demonstrated more efficient distractor rejection with negative-face
    targets in positive-face crowds than vice versa. Search Condition B showed that
    target identity alone is not sufficient to account for this effect, because there
    was no difference in processing efficiency for positive- and negative-face targets
    within neutral crowds. Search Condition C showed differentially efficient processing
    with neutral-face targets among positive- or negative-face distractors. These
    results were obtained with both a within-participants (Experiment 1) and a between-participants
    (Experiment 2) design. The pattern of results is consistent with the assumption
    that efficient rejection of positive (more homogenous) distractors is an im
author:
- first_name: Gernot
  full_name: Horstmann, Gernot
  last_name: Horstmann
- first_name: Ingrid
  full_name: Scharlau, Ingrid
  id: '451'
  last_name: Scharlau
  orcid: 0000-0003-2364-9489
- first_name: Ulrich
  full_name: Ansorge, Ulrich
  last_name: Ansorge
citation:
  ama: Horstmann G, Scharlau I, Ansorge U. More efficient rejection of happy than
    of angry face distractors in visual search. <i>Psychonomic Bulletin &#38; Review</i>.
    2006;13(6):1067-1073.
  apa: Horstmann, G., Scharlau, I., &#38; Ansorge, U. (2006). More efficient rejection
    of happy than of angry face distractors in visual search. <i>Psychonomic Bulletin
    &#38; Review</i>, <i>13</i>(6), 1067–1073.
  bibtex: '@article{Horstmann_Scharlau_Ansorge_2006, title={More efficient rejection
    of happy than of angry face distractors in visual search.}, volume={13}, number={6},
    journal={Psychonomic Bulletin &#38; Review}, author={Horstmann, Gernot and Scharlau,
    Ingrid and Ansorge, Ulrich}, year={2006}, pages={1067–1073} }'
  chicago: 'Horstmann, Gernot, Ingrid Scharlau, and Ulrich Ansorge. “More Efficient
    Rejection of Happy than of Angry Face Distractors in Visual Search.” <i>Psychonomic
    Bulletin &#38; Review</i> 13, no. 6 (2006): 1067–73.'
  ieee: G. Horstmann, I. Scharlau, and U. Ansorge, “More efficient rejection of happy
    than of angry face distractors in visual search.,” <i>Psychonomic Bulletin &#38;
    Review</i>, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 1067–1073, 2006.
  mla: Horstmann, Gernot, et al. “More Efficient Rejection of Happy than of Angry
    Face Distractors in Visual Search.” <i>Psychonomic Bulletin &#38; Review</i>,
    vol. 13, no. 6, 2006, pp. 1067–73.
  short: G. Horstmann, I. Scharlau, U. Ansorge, Psychonomic Bulletin &#38; Review
    13 (2006) 1067–1073.
date_created: 2018-12-10T07:05:19Z
date_updated: 2022-06-07T00:23:43Z
department:
- _id: '424'
extern: '1'
intvolume: '        13'
issue: '6'
keyword:
- angry face distractors
- visual search
- negative face distractors
- Adult
- Anger
- Attention
- Face
- Female
- Happiness
- Humans
- Male
- Rejection (Psychology)
- Visual Perception
- Distraction
- Face Perception
- Visual Perception
- Visual Search
language:
- iso: eng
main_file_link:
- open_access: '1'
  url: https://kw.uni-paderborn.de/fileadmin/fakultaet/Institute/psychologie/Kognitive_Psychologie/Publikationen/HorstmannScharlauAnsorge.pdf
oa: '1'
page: 1067 - 1073
publication: Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
publication_identifier:
  issn:
  - 1069-9384
publication_status: published
status: public
title: More efficient rejection of happy than of angry face distractors in visual
  search.
type: journal_article
user_id: '42165'
volume: 13
year: '2006'
...