[{"title":"Mathematics-related Competence of Early Childhood Teachers Visiting a Continuous Professional Development Course: An Intervention Study","volume":19,"author":[{"orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6604-5864","last_name":"Bruns","id":"72183","full_name":"Bruns, Julia","first_name":"Julia"},{"first_name":"Lars","last_name":"Eichen","full_name":"Eichen, Lars"},{"full_name":"Gasteiger, Hedwig","last_name":"Gasteiger","first_name":"Hedwig"}],"date_created":"2023-01-12T15:28:13Z","date_updated":"2023-06-20T19:01:36Z","intvolume":"        19","page":"76–93","citation":{"ama":"Bruns J, Eichen L, Gasteiger H. Mathematics-related Competence of Early Childhood Teachers Visiting a Continuous Professional Development Course: An Intervention Study. <i>Mathematics Teacher Education and Development (MTED)</i>. 2017;19(3):76–93.","ieee":"J. Bruns, L. Eichen, and H. Gasteiger, “Mathematics-related Competence of Early Childhood Teachers Visiting a Continuous Professional Development Course: An Intervention Study,” <i>Mathematics Teacher Education and Development (MTED)</i>, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 76–93, 2017.","chicago":"Bruns, Julia, Lars Eichen, and Hedwig Gasteiger. “Mathematics-Related Competence of Early Childhood Teachers Visiting a Continuous Professional Development Course: An Intervention Study.” <i>Mathematics Teacher Education and Development (MTED)</i> 19, no. 3 (2017): 76–93.","apa":"Bruns, J., Eichen, L., &#38; Gasteiger, H. (2017). Mathematics-related Competence of Early Childhood Teachers Visiting a Continuous Professional Development Course: An Intervention Study. <i>Mathematics Teacher Education and Development (MTED)</i>, <i>19</i>(3), 76–93.","bibtex":"@article{Bruns_Eichen_Gasteiger_2017, title={Mathematics-related Competence of Early Childhood Teachers Visiting a Continuous Professional Development Course: An Intervention Study}, volume={19}, number={3}, journal={Mathematics Teacher Education and Development (MTED)}, author={Bruns, Julia and Eichen, Lars and Gasteiger, Hedwig}, year={2017}, pages={76–93} }","mla":"Bruns, Julia, et al. “Mathematics-Related Competence of Early Childhood Teachers Visiting a Continuous Professional Development Course: An Intervention Study.” <i>Mathematics Teacher Education and Development (MTED)</i>, vol. 19, no. 3, 2017, pp. 76–93.","short":"J. Bruns, L. Eichen, H. Gasteiger, Mathematics Teacher Education and Development (MTED) 19 (2017) 76–93."},"year":"2017","issue":"3","quality_controlled":"1","publication_status":"published","language":[{"iso":"eng"}],"extern":"1","keyword":["Beliefs","Competency Based Teacher Education","Control Groups","Early Childhood Education","Faculty Development","Foreign Countries","Inservice Teacher Education","Intervention","Mathematical Aptitude","Mathematics Skills","Pedagogical Content Knowledge","Preschool Teachers","Pretests Posttests","Professional Continuing Education","Statistical Analysis","Teacher Competency Testing"],"department":[{"_id":"611"},{"_id":"97"}],"user_id":"49063","_id":"36481","status":"public","abstract":[{"lang":"eng","text":"Recent studies highlight early childhood teachers’ mathematics-related competence. Developing this competence should be a main aspect of early childhood teachers’ education. This is, however, not the case in all countries. Consequently, high-quality professional development courses are needed. Based on research results, we developed a competence-oriented continuous professional development course (\"EmMa\") and examined the effects of \"EmMa\" by asking: How does \"EmMa\" affect the development of early childhood teachers’ i) mathematical content knowledge, ii) mathematical pedagogical content knowledge and iii) beliefs towards mathematics in general? To answer these questions, we conducted a pre-test/post-test study including a control group with 99 in-service early childhood teachers. Results show that the course affected teachers’ mathematical pedagogical content knowledge and static orientation towards mathematics positively. From this we conclude that scaling-up \"EmMa\" might be a suitable approach to bridge the gap between pre-service education with nearly no mathematics and the challenges of early mathematics education."}],"publication":"Mathematics Teacher Education and Development (MTED)","type":"journal_article"},{"status":"public","abstract":[{"lang":"ger","text":"In den vergangenen Jahren wurden viele Vermutungen über die \"Wirkungen\" von Bologna auf das Studieren geäussert: Schlagworte wie Verschulung oder Entwissenschaftlichung sind zu hören und Studierende stehen im Verdacht, ihr Studium eher als Credit-Point-Jagd denn interessengeleitet zu gestalten (z.B. Stegemann, 2007, o. S.; Schultheis, et al. 2008). Meist handelt es sich jedoch um anekdotischen Beschreibungen, bis auf wenige Ausnahmen fehlen empirisch belegte Erkenntnisse.1 Denn obschon Studierende seit langem Gegenstand der Forschung sind, ist bislang wenig darüber bekannt, wie sie den langfristigen Bildungsprozess eines ganzen Studiums gestalten. Vorwiegend wurde Lernen im engeren Sinne, das so genannte \"Classroom Learning\" untersucht (Aineley, 2008).\r\nForschungsfokus. Die diesem Beitrag zugrunde liegende Studie nimmt diese Forschungslücke auf und untersucht Zielvorstellungen und Handlungsstrategien Studierender bei der Bewältigung ihres Studienalltags in unterschiedlichen Bologna-konformen Studienprogrammen. Im Einzelnen wird gefragt, (1) welche Vorstellungen und Wahrnehmungen das Handeln Studierender prägen und (2) welche programmspezifischen Kontextbedingungen die Herausbildung dieser handlungsleitenden Charakteristika beeinflussen. Als theoretischer Rahmen wurde die so genannte Kulturpsychologie herangezogen, die Handeln als Resultat einer Wechselwirkung von individuell-psychischen Merk-malen und sozio-kulturell vermittelten Vorstellungen versteht (Shweder, 1991; Bruner, 1990)."}],"type":"conference","extern":"1","alternative_title":["7. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Hochschulforschung (GfHf) zum Thema \"WISSENSCHAFT ALS BERUF – HEUTE. PERSPEKTIVEN DES AKADEMISCHEN NACHWUCHSES IN DER WISSENSGESELLSCHAFT\" in Wien, vom 9. bis 11. Mai 2012 Abstractband"],"keyword":["Hochschulentwicklung","Studienprogramme","Curriculum Development","Higher Education","Faculty Development"],"department":[{"_id":"208"},{"_id":"282"}],"user_id":"51057","_id":"4482","citation":{"apa":"Jenert, T. (2012). Studienprogramme als hochschuldidaktische Gestaltungs-und Untersuchungseinheit. Presented at the 7. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Hochschulforschung (GfHf), Wien: Gesellschaft für Hochschulforschung GfHf.","mla":"Jenert, Tobias. <i>Studienprogramme Als Hochschuldidaktische Gestaltungs-Und Untersuchungseinheit</i>. Gesellschaft für Hochschulforschung GfHf, 2012.","bibtex":"@inproceedings{Jenert_2012, title={Studienprogramme als hochschuldidaktische Gestaltungs-und Untersuchungseinheit}, publisher={Gesellschaft für Hochschulforschung GfHf}, author={Jenert, Tobias}, year={2012} }","short":"T. Jenert, in: Gesellschaft für Hochschulforschung GfHf, 2012.","ieee":"T. Jenert, “Studienprogramme als hochschuldidaktische Gestaltungs-und Untersuchungseinheit,” presented at the 7. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Hochschulforschung (GfHf), Wien, 2012.","chicago":"Jenert, Tobias. “Studienprogramme Als Hochschuldidaktische Gestaltungs-Und Untersuchungseinheit.” Gesellschaft für Hochschulforschung GfHf, 2012.","ama":"Jenert T. Studienprogramme als hochschuldidaktische Gestaltungs-und Untersuchungseinheit. In: Gesellschaft für Hochschulforschung GfHf; 2012."},"year":"2012","conference":{"location":"Wien","end_date":"2012-05-11","start_date":"2012-05-10","name":"7. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Hochschulforschung (GfHf)"},"title":"Studienprogramme als hochschuldidaktische Gestaltungs-und Untersuchungseinheit","author":[{"full_name":"Jenert, Tobias","last_name":"Jenert","first_name":"Tobias"}],"date_created":"2018-09-19T08:33:28Z","publisher":"Gesellschaft für Hochschulforschung GfHf","date_updated":"2022-01-06T07:01:06Z"}]