@article{50368, abstract = {{AbstractAfter 50 years, there is still an ongoing debate about the Limits to Growth (LtG) study. This paper recalibrates the 2005 World3‐03 model. The input parameters are changed to better match empirical data on world development. An iterative method is used to compute and optimize different parameter sets. This improved parameter set results in a World3 simulation that shows the same overshoot and collapse mode in the coming decade as the original business as usual scenario of the LtG standard run. The main effect of the recalibration update is to raise the peaks of most variables and move them a few years into the future. The parameters with the largest relative changes are those related to industrial capital lifetime, pollution transmission delay, and urban‐industrial land development time.}}, author = {{Nebel, Arjuna and Kling, Alexander and Willamowski, Ruben and Schell, Tim}}, issn = {{1088-1980}}, journal = {{Journal of Industrial Ecology}}, keywords = {{General Social Sciences, General Environmental Science}}, publisher = {{Wiley}}, title = {{{Recalibration of limits to growth: An update of the World3 model}}}, doi = {{10.1111/jiec.13442}}, year = {{2023}}, } @article{51015, author = {{Wells, Aaron}}, issn = {{0815-0796}}, journal = {{Metascience}}, keywords = {{History and Philosophy of Science, General Social Sciences, History}}, publisher = {{Springer Science and Business Media LLC}}, title = {{{Will do? Causes and volitions}}}, doi = {{10.1007/s11016-023-00936-8}}, year = {{2023}}, } @article{43437, abstract = {{In virtual reality (VR), participants may not always have hands, bodies, eyes, or even voices—using VR helmets and two controllers, participants control an avatar through virtual worlds that do not necessarily obey familiar laws of physics; moreover, the avatar’s bodily characteristics may not neatly match our bodies in the physical world. Despite these limitations and specificities, humans get things done through collaboration and the creative use of the environment. While multiuser interactive VR is attracting greater numbers of participants, there are currently few attempts to analyze the in situ interaction systematically. This paper proposes a video-analytic detail-oriented methodological framework for studying virtual reality interaction. Using multimodal conversation analysis, the paper investigates a nonverbal, embodied, two-person interaction: two players in a survival game strive to gesturally resolve a misunderstanding regarding an in-game mechanic—however, both of their microphones are turned off for the duration of play. The players’ inability to resort to complex language to resolve this issue results in a dense sequence of back-and-forth activity involving gestures, object manipulation, gaze, and body work. Most crucially, timing and modified repetitions of previously produced actions turn out to be the key to overcome both technical and communicative challenges. The paper analyzes these action sequences, demonstrates how they generate intended outcomes, and proposes a vocabulary to speak about these types of interaction more generally. The findings demonstrate the viability of multimodal analysis of VR interaction, shed light on unique challenges of analyzing interaction in virtual reality, and generate broader methodological insights about the study of nonverbal action.}}, author = {{Klowait, Nils}}, issn = {{2578-1863}}, journal = {{Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies}}, keywords = {{Human-Computer Interaction, General Social Sciences, Social Psychology, Virtual Reality : Multimodality, Nonverbal Interaction, Search Sequence, Gesture, Co-Operative Action, Goodwin, Ethnomethodology}}, pages = {{1--15}}, publisher = {{Hindawi Limited}}, title = {{{On the Multimodal Resolution of a Search Sequence in Virtual Reality}}}, doi = {{10.1155/2023/8417012}}, volume = {{2023}}, year = {{2023}}, } @article{30341, author = {{Hoyer, Britta and van Straaten, Dirk}}, issn = {{2214-8043}}, journal = {{Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics}}, keywords = {{General Social Sciences, Economics and Econometrics, Applied Psychology}}, pages = {{101869}}, publisher = {{Elsevier BV}}, title = {{{Anonymity and Self-Expression in Online Rating Systems - An Experimental Analysis}}}, doi = {{10.1016/j.socec.2022.101869}}, volume = {{98}}, year = {{2022}}, } @article{30218, author = {{Tuisku, Outi and Johansson-Pajala, Rose-Marie and Hoppe, Julia Amelie and Pekkarinen, Satu and Hennala, Lea and Thommes, Kirsten and Gustafsson, Christine and Melkas, Helinä}}, issn = {{0144-929X}}, journal = {{Behaviour & Information Technology}}, keywords = {{Human-Computer Interaction, General Social Sciences, Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous), Developmental and Educational Psychology}}, pages = {{1--17}}, publisher = {{Informa UK Limited}}, title = {{{Assistant nurses and orientation to care robot use in three European countries}}}, doi = {{10.1080/0144929x.2022.2042736}}, year = {{2022}}, } @article{36133, abstract = {{Considering students’ voices and perspectives is indispensable in educational contexts. Therefore, instruments of measurement that are reliable and valid and can be used easily without complications are needed in schools. The Perceptions of Inclusion Questionnaire (PIQ) is a short instrument used to assess three central dimensions of inclusion, namely emotional and social inclusion and academic self-concept. Previous evaluations indicate in general high psychometric properties. This study aimed to evaluate the construct validity of the three scales of the PIQ’s student version using different approaches in two samples from primary (grade 4, N = 721) and secondary (grade 7, N = 393) schools. The results of confirmatory factorial analyses confirmed the PIQ’s three factors in both samples which are also measurement equivalent across grades. Plausible correlations with additional divergent and convergent scales reveal that the PIQ measures the theoretically assumed constructs—emotional and social inclusion as well as academic self-concept—validly. }}, author = {{Knickenberg, Margarita and Zurbriggen, Carmen L. A. and Schwab, Susanne}}, issn = {{2158-2440}}, journal = {{SAGE Open}}, keywords = {{General Social Sciences, General Arts and Humanities}}, number = {{1}}, publisher = {{SAGE Publications}}, title = {{{Validation of the student version of the Perceptions of Inclusion Questionnaire in primary and secondary education settings}}}, doi = {{10.1177/21582440221079896}}, volume = {{12}}, year = {{2022}}, } @article{39362, abstract = {{AbstractThis article presents an overview of characteristics of Citizen Social Science (CSS) in Germany. CSS is defined as scientific research in the humanities and social sciences, carried out in cooperation between professional and non-professional researchers. The study draws on an online survey and semi-structured interviews with project coordinators and co-researchers. It finds that participatory research activities in the humanities and social sciences are very diverse in their disciplinary traditions and organisational settings. Key features of CSS activities initiated inside as well as outside academic institutions are analysed to understand patterns of participation and cooperation. The results show that CSS activities are frequently realised in heterogeneous consortia of academic and non-academic partners. These consortia influence interactions between professional and non-professional researchers. To investigate these observations further, the article extends the analytical gaze from participation of individual volunteers to various forms of cooperation in consortia. This shift in attention brings to sight additional actors and activities that are usually not, or only marginally, considered in discussions about C(S)S. Staff of civil society organisations, municipalities, schools or cross-sectoral initiatives as well as university students are involved in making CSS work. In addition to research tasks, CSS rests on science communication, project management and intermediation activities. This extended perspective captures more diverse constellations of knowledge production in participatory research in the social sciences and humanities than the common focus on participation. In this way, the article aims to lay the groundwork for understanding the functioning of CSS beyond aspects described by the concept of invited and uninvited participation. It shows that CSS activities are not limited to capacitating lay people for participation in science. A more adequate description is that such projects are concerned with facilitating cooperation with co-researchers and other partners in consortia inside and outside of academia. On this basis, the article introduces the notion of cooperation capacity as a heuristic device to propose new prompts for research on CSS as well as for supporting CSS practice.}}, author = {{Göbel, Claudia and Mauermeister, Sylvi and Henke, Justus}}, issn = {{2662-9992}}, journal = {{Humanities and Social Sciences Communications}}, keywords = {{General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, General Psychology, General Social Sciences, General Arts and Humanities, General Business, Management and Accounting}}, number = {{1}}, publisher = {{Springer Science and Business Media LLC}}, title = {{{Citizen Social Science in Germany—cooperation beyond invited and uninvited participation}}}, doi = {{10.1057/s41599-022-01198-1}}, volume = {{9}}, year = {{2022}}, } @article{37019, abstract = {{Der hier vorliegende Beitrag erarbeitet Verbindungslinien zwischen Wirtschaftssoziologie (insb. Finanzsoziologie), Soziologie der Bewertung und Körpersoziologie anhand des Falls finanzmarktregulatorischer Risikobewertung. Dabei spielt der analytische Begriff der Prothese (Michel Callon) eine wichtige Rolle. Nach der Finanzkrise kommt es zu einer Neuverteilung von sensorischen Bewertungskompetenzen in einer hierarchisch aufgebauten, vernetzten Wissensarchitektur. Es ist nun die Maschine, der Lebendigkeit attestiert wird, während der Mensch parzellierte Funktionen in einer Apparatur übernimmt. Gleichzeitig soll der Mensch so zu einem adäquaten und beweglichen (spielerischen) Umgang mit Risiken angeregt werden, die man ihm/ihr in einem eher groben und einfachen Aufsichtssystem nicht mehr zutraute (hier wurden „regulatory arbitrage“ und „kreative Buchführung“ zum Problem). Der Aufsatz rekonstruiert die praktischen Orientierungen und kollektiven Erfahrungen dieses finanzaufsichtlichen Umbaus anhand zweier problemzentrierter Interviews. Unter Rekurs auf die Körperbezüge in diesen Interviews wird die Paradoxie eines Systems herausgearbeitet, das nach wie vor auf individuelle Entscheidungsrationalität und -agilität setzt, diese nun aber maschinell zu erschaffen sucht.}}, author = {{Knoll, Lisa}}, issn = {{1011-0070}}, journal = {{Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie}}, keywords = {{General Social Sciences}}, number = {{3}}, pages = {{305--317}}, publisher = {{Springer Science and Business Media LLC}}, title = {{{Von lebenden Systemen und gefühlten Zahlen. Eine körpersoziologische Analyse des finanzaufsichtlichen Risikobewertungsregimes}}}, doi = {{10.1007/s11614-022-00501-3}}, volume = {{47}}, year = {{2022}}, } @article{51210, author = {{Tuisku, Outi and Johansson-Pajala, Rose-Marie and Hoppe, Julia Amelie and Pekkarinen, Satu and Hennala, Lea and Thommes, Kirsten and Gustafsson, Christine and Melkas, Helinä}}, issn = {{0144-929X}}, journal = {{Behaviour & Information Technology}}, keywords = {{Human-Computer Interaction, General Social Sciences, Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous), Developmental and Educational Psychology}}, number = {{6}}, pages = {{758--774}}, publisher = {{Informa UK Limited}}, title = {{{Assistant nurses and orientation to care robot use in three European countries}}}, doi = {{10.1080/0144929x.2022.2042736}}, volume = {{42}}, year = {{2022}}, } @article{36318, abstract = {{ Building and expanding on Bourdieu’s notions of cultural capital, habitus, and field, this conceptual article aims to contribute to a better understanding of intercultural transformations. Distancing itself from essentialist reductionism in the analysis of cultures, it associates intercultural transformations with habitus crises through “culture shock,” with the realization of intercultural capital, and with changes in the scope and configuration of cultural pluriformity. In going beyond Bourdieu without abandoning him along the way, the approach outlined in the course of this article combines a range of conceptual tools which may prove to be useful in sustaining struggles for social justice in educational institutions and in society at large. }}, author = {{Pöllmann, Andreas}}, issn = {{2158-2440}}, journal = {{SAGE Open}}, keywords = {{General Social Sciences, General Arts and Humanities}}, number = {{4}}, publisher = {{SAGE Publications}}, title = {{{Bourdieu and the Quest for Intercultural Transformations}}}, doi = {{10.1177/21582440211061391}}, volume = {{11}}, year = {{2021}}, } @article{36007, abstract = {{Abstract This article studies the anti-racist writings by contemporary scholars Cornel West, Eddie S. Glaude, Jr., George Yancy, and Claudia Rankine. It uncovers how they include personal narratives in their works in order to theorise the workings of white hegemony in the twenty-first century. In doing so, I argue, they productively blur the lines between the personal and the theoretical as well as between the past and the present. Consequently, they problematise the notion of abstract theorising, the myth of continuous racial progress as well as conceptions of postracialism.}}, author = {{Hartmann, Alexandra}}, issn = {{2451-3474}}, journal = {{Open Cultural Studies}}, keywords = {{General Social Sciences, General Arts and Humanities}}, number = {{1}}, pages = {{224--235}}, publisher = {{Walter de Gruyter GmbH}}, title = {{{The Personal Is Theoretical and the Past Is Present: Blurring the Lines in Contemporary Anti-Racist Writing}}}, doi = {{10.1515/culture-2018-0021}}, volume = {{2}}, year = {{2018}}, } @article{42675, author = {{Klowait, Nils}}, issn = {{1562-2495}}, journal = {{Sociological Journal}}, keywords = {{General Social Sciences}}, number = {{1}}, pages = {{8--33}}, publisher = {{Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (FCTAS RAS)}}, title = {{{Reflexive anthropomorphism: Ontological ignorance, or ignorant ontology?}}}, doi = {{10.19181/socjour.2018.24.1.5711}}, volume = {{24}}, year = {{2018}}, } @article{36011, abstract = {{Abstract This article studies the anti-racist writings by contemporary scholars Cornel West, Eddie S. Glaude, Jr., George Yancy, and Claudia Rankine. It uncovers how they include personal narratives in their works in order to theorise the workings of white hegemony in the twenty-first century. In doing so, I argue, they productively blur the lines between the personal and the theoretical as well as between the past and the present. Consequently, they problematise the notion of abstract theorising, the myth of continuous racial progress as well as conceptions of postracialism.}}, author = {{Hartmann, Alexandra}}, issn = {{2451-3474}}, journal = {{Open Cultural Studies}}, keywords = {{General Social Sciences, General Arts and Humanities}}, number = {{1}}, pages = {{224--235}}, publisher = {{Walter de Gruyter GmbH}}, title = {{{The Personal Is Theoretical and the Past Is Present: Blurring the Lines in Contemporary Anti-Racist Writing}}}, doi = {{10.1515/culture-2018-0021}}, volume = {{2}}, year = {{2018}}, }