@inproceedings{60958,
  abstract     = {{Large Language Models (LLMs) excel in understanding, generating, and processing human language, with growing adoption in process mining. Process mining relies on event logs that capture explicit process knowledge; however, knowledge-intensive processes (KIPs) in domains such as healthcare and product development depend on tacit knowledge, which is often absent from event logs. To bridge this gap, this study proposes a LLM-based framework for mobilizing tacit process knowledge and enriching event logs. A proof-of-concept is demonstrated using a KIP-specific LLM-driven conversational agent built on GPT-4o. The results indicate that LLMs can capture tacit process knowledge through targeted queries and systematically integrate it into event logs. This study presents a novel approach combining LLMs, knowledge management, and process mining, advancing the understanding and management of KIPs by enhancing knowledge accessibility and documentation.}},
  author       = {{Brennig, Katharina}},
  booktitle    = {{AMCIS 2025 Proceedings. 11.}},
  keywords     = {{Process Mining, Large Language Model, Knowledge Management, Knowledge-Intensive Process, Tacit Knowledge}},
  location     = {{Montréal}},
  title        = {{{Revealing the Unspoken: Using LLMs to Mobilize and Enrich Tacit Knowledge in Event Logs of Knowledge-Intensive Processes}}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@inproceedings{57445,
  abstract     = {{Knowledge management is essential for successful disaster management. This paper conducts a Systematic Literature Review at the intersection of the knowledge management field and disaster management and examines the available body of literature. Fire departments are chosen as the focus group as they are the most prevalent emergency services. There are many publications that deal with knowledge management during the response phase of an emergency. Often, the literature focuses on the application of knowledge management in large-scale disasters to link the various organizations on-scene. What is missing in most approaches is a prior step of implementing and training the knowledge management system. Therefore, this literature review seeks to provide an overview of approaches for daily routines and small-to-medium incidents that serve as a training ground. However, literature on non-incident phases and smaller incidents is scarce. As information technologies are developing rapidly, there is no modern and recent description of the current use of knowledge management solutions in this area.}},
  author       = {{Schultz, Andreas Maximilian and Dotzki, Fabian and Mozgova, Iryna}},
  booktitle    = {{Proceedings of the 16th International Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management}},
  keywords     = {{Knowledge Management, Civil Protection, Systematic Literature Review, Fire Brigade}},
  location     = {{Porto, Portugal}},
  publisher    = {{SCITEPRESS - Science and Technology Publications}},
  title        = {{{Knowledge Management in Civil Protection at the Example of Fire Brigades}}},
  doi          = {{10.5220/0012947700003838}},
  year         = {{2024}},
}

@inproceedings{57240,
  abstract     = {{Validating assertions before adding them to a knowledge graph is an essential part of its creation and maintenance. Due to the sheer size of knowledge graphs, automatic fact-checking approaches have been developed. These approaches rely on reference knowledge to decide whether a given assertion is correct. Recent hybrid approaches achieve good results by including several knowledge sources. However, it is often impractical to provide a sheer quantity of textual knowledge or generate embedding models to leverage these hybrid approaches. We present FaVEL, an approach that uses algorithm selection and ensemble learning to amalgamate several existing fact-checking approaches that rely solely on a reference knowledge graph and, hence, use fewer resources than current hybrid approaches. For our evaluation, we create updated versions of two existing datasets and a new dataset dubbed FaVEL-DS. Our evaluation compares our approach to 15 fact-checking approaches—including the state-of-the-art approach HybridFC—on 3 datasets. Our results demonstrate that FaVEL outperforms all other approaches significantly by at least 0.04 in terms of the area under the ROC curve. Our source code, datasets, and evaluation results are open-source and can be found at https://github.com/dice-group/favel.}},
  author       = {{Qudus, Umair and Röder, Michael and Tatkeu Pekarou, Franck Lionel and Morim da Silva, Ana Alexandra and Ngonga Ngomo, Axel-Cyrille}},
  booktitle    = {{EKAW 2024}},
  editor       = {{Rospocher, Marco}},
  keywords     = {{fact checking, ensemble learning, transfer learning, knowledge management.}},
  location     = {{Amsterdam, Netherlands}},
  title        = {{{FaVEL: Fact Validation Ensemble Learning}}},
  year         = {{2024}},
}