---
_id: '67174'
abstract:
- lang: eng
  text: Approval of products in safety-sensitive areas, such as medical technology,
    requires considerable effort. Companies must comply with numerous regulations
    for such product approvals. This results in requirements for processes, methods,
    tools and organizations throughout the product life cycle. A proven approach to
    handling regulatory requirements is the application of product lifecycle management
    (PLM) platforms. Applying PLM platforms (e.g. Teamcenter, 3DExperience) poses
    challenges in designing compliant processes as well as adapting methods and tools.
    For example, in medical technology, ISO 13485 specifies an industry-specific product
    engineering process. The exemplary adaptations of requirements engineering methods
    and related support – e.g. MBSE including Requirements Diagrams – are not intuitively
    apparent. Existing literature primarily regards these regulation-related challenges
    as boundary conditions, offering only vague operational solutions. Companies struggle
    to align PLM processes with regulatory requirements, yet few methods exist to
    support this integration. In this paper, a method is proposed that supports the
    application of regulation-centered PLM platforms and reduces effort in product
    approvals. The method is developed by applying a five-step approach. Existing
    literature on process models for applying PLM platforms is identified (1). The
    identified approaches are then analyzed to determine whether and to what extent
    they consider regulations in applying PLM platforms (2). Based on identified partial
    solutions from literature and findings from industry workshops, a new method is
    developed (3). The method comprises strategic level, process level, data level,
    pilot level, and operation level. Validation is conducted within a German medical
    technology company, containing proof of applicability determined through a pilot
    project (4) and proof of concept achieved through interviews (5). The method is
    applied to regulation-centered PLM for the use case ‘requirements engineering’.
    The concept is confirmed by experts in terms of applicability and transferability.
    The method supports engineers in applying regulation-centered PLM platforms, leading
    to reduced effort.
author:
- first_name: Iris
  full_name: Gräßler, Iris
  id: '47565'
  last_name: Gräßler
  orcid: 0000-0001-5765-971X
- first_name: Jan Niklas
  full_name: Pfeifer, Jan Niklas
  id: '62841'
  last_name: Pfeifer
- first_name: Denis
  full_name: Trost, Denis
  last_name: Trost
citation:
  ama: 'Gräßler I, Pfeifer JN, Trost D. RegPLM – A method for the application of regulation-centered
    PLM platforms. In: <i>INCOSE International Symposium</i>. Vol 36. Wiley; 2026:1641-1655.
    doi:<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/iis2.70264">https://doi.org/10.1002/iis2.70264</a>'
  apa: Gräßler, I., Pfeifer, J. N., &#38; Trost, D. (2026). RegPLM – A method for
    the application of regulation-centered PLM platforms. <i>INCOSE International
    Symposium</i>, <i>36</i>(1), 1641–1655. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/iis2.70264">https://doi.org/10.1002/iis2.70264</a>
  bibtex: '@inproceedings{Gräßler_Pfeifer_Trost_2026, place={Yokohama}, title={RegPLM
    – A method for the application of regulation-centered PLM platforms}, volume={36},
    DOI={<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/iis2.70264">https://doi.org/10.1002/iis2.70264</a>},
    number={1}, booktitle={INCOSE International Symposium}, publisher={Wiley}, author={Gräßler,
    Iris and Pfeifer, Jan Niklas and Trost, Denis}, year={2026}, pages={1641–1655}
    }'
  chicago: 'Gräßler, Iris, Jan Niklas Pfeifer, and Denis Trost. “RegPLM – A Method
    for the Application of Regulation-Centered PLM Platforms.” In <i>INCOSE International
    Symposium</i>, 36:1641–55. Yokohama: Wiley, 2026. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/iis2.70264">https://doi.org/10.1002/iis2.70264</a>.'
  ieee: 'I. Gräßler, J. N. Pfeifer, and D. Trost, “RegPLM – A method for the application
    of regulation-centered PLM platforms,” in <i>INCOSE International Symposium</i>,
    Yokohma, Japan, 2026, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 1641–1655, doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/iis2.70264">https://doi.org/10.1002/iis2.70264</a>.'
  mla: Gräßler, Iris, et al. “RegPLM – A Method for the Application of Regulation-Centered
    PLM Platforms.” <i>INCOSE International Symposium</i>, vol. 36, no. 1, Wiley,
    2026, pp. 1641–55, doi:<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/iis2.70264">https://doi.org/10.1002/iis2.70264</a>.
  short: 'I. Gräßler, J.N. Pfeifer, D. Trost, in: INCOSE International Symposium,
    Wiley, Yokohama, 2026, pp. 1641–1655.'
conference:
  end_date: 2026-06-18
  location: Yokohma, Japan
  name: 36th Annual INCOSE International Symposium
  start_date: 2026-06-13
date_created: 2026-09-18T08:54:01Z
date_updated: 2026-09-18T08:56:11Z
doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/iis2.70264
intvolume: '        36'
issue: '1'
keyword:
- Regulations
- Product Lifecycle Management
- Requirements Engineering
- Model-Based Systems Engineering
- medical technology
language:
- iso: eng
page: 1641 - 1655
place: Yokohama
publication: INCOSE International Symposium
publication_identifier:
  issn:
  - 2334-5837
publication_status: published
publisher: Wiley
quality_controlled: '1'
status: public
title: RegPLM – A method for the application of regulation-centered PLM platforms
type: conference
user_id: '62841'
volume: 36
year: '2026'
...
---
_id: '32174'
abstract:
- lang: eng
  text: <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Increasing system complexity can
    be controlled by using systems engineering processes. INCOSE defines processes
    with inputs and outputs (artifacts) for this purpose. Specific SE roles are used
    to organize the tasks of the processes within the company. In this work, the responsibilities
    for artifacts are evaluated by means of the RACI scheme and examined by a cluster
    analysis and discussed for a SE transformation project with a German automotive
    OEM. As a result of the study, the optimal composition for systems engineering
    teams is identified and the systems engineering roles are prioritized.</jats:p>
article_type: original
author:
- first_name: Iris
  full_name: Gräßler, Iris
  id: '47565'
  last_name: Gräßler
  orcid: 0000-0001-5765-971X
- first_name: Henrik
  full_name: Thiele, Henrik
  id: '33419'
  last_name: Thiele
- first_name: Benedikt
  full_name: Grewe, Benedikt
  id: '52359'
  last_name: Grewe
- first_name: Michael
  full_name: Hieb, Michael
  id: '72252'
  last_name: Hieb
citation:
  ama: Gräßler I, Thiele H, Grewe B, Hieb M. Responsibility Assignment in Systems
    Engineering. <i>Proceedings of the Design Society</i>. 2022;2:1875-1884. doi:<a
    href="https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2022.190">10.1017/pds.2022.190</a>
  apa: Gräßler, I., Thiele, H., Grewe, B., &#38; Hieb, M. (2022). Responsibility Assignment
    in Systems Engineering. <i>Proceedings of the Design Society</i>, <i>2</i>, 1875–1884.
    <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2022.190">https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2022.190</a>
  bibtex: '@article{Gräßler_Thiele_Grewe_Hieb_2022, title={Responsibility Assignment
    in Systems Engineering}, volume={2}, DOI={<a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2022.190">10.1017/pds.2022.190</a>},
    journal={Proceedings of the Design Society}, publisher={Cambridge University Press
    (CUP)}, author={Gräßler, Iris and Thiele, Henrik and Grewe, Benedikt and Hieb,
    Michael}, year={2022}, pages={1875–1884} }'
  chicago: 'Gräßler, Iris, Henrik Thiele, Benedikt Grewe, and Michael Hieb. “Responsibility
    Assignment in Systems Engineering.” <i>Proceedings of the Design Society</i> 2
    (2022): 1875–84. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2022.190">https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2022.190</a>.'
  ieee: 'I. Gräßler, H. Thiele, B. Grewe, and M. Hieb, “Responsibility Assignment
    in Systems Engineering,” <i>Proceedings of the Design Society</i>, vol. 2, pp.
    1875–1884, 2022, doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2022.190">10.1017/pds.2022.190</a>.'
  mla: Gräßler, Iris, et al. “Responsibility Assignment in Systems Engineering.” <i>Proceedings
    of the Design Society</i>, vol. 2, Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2022, pp.
    1875–84, doi:<a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2022.190">10.1017/pds.2022.190</a>.
  short: I. Gräßler, H. Thiele, B. Grewe, M. Hieb, Proceedings of the Design Society
    2 (2022) 1875–1884.
conference:
  end_date: 2022-05-26
  location: Dubrovnik
  name: 17th International DESIGN Conference
  start_date: 2022-05-23
date_created: 2022-06-27T07:51:41Z
date_updated: 2023-01-24T08:41:31Z
ddc:
- '620'
department:
- _id: '152'
doi: 10.1017/pds.2022.190
file:
- access_level: closed
  content_type: application/pdf
  creator: hthiele
  date_created: 2022-06-27T07:56:35Z
  date_updated: 2022-06-27T07:56:35Z
  file_id: '32175'
  file_name: responsibility-assignment-in-systems-engineering.pdf
  file_size: 787640
  relation: main_file
  success: 1
file_date_updated: 2022-06-27T07:56:35Z
has_accepted_license: '1'
intvolume: '         2'
keyword:
- systems engineering (SE)
- project management
- model-based systems engineering (MBSE)
language:
- iso: eng
main_file_link:
- open_access: '1'
  url: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/proceedings-of-the-design-society/article/responsibility-assignment-in-systems-engineering/07269DA1B1160C17AF0E0BE6035FD1A2
oa: '1'
page: 1875-1884
publication: Proceedings of the Design Society
publication_identifier:
  issn:
  - 2732-527X
publication_status: published
publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
quality_controlled: '1'
status: public
title: Responsibility Assignment in Systems Engineering
type: journal_article
user_id: '72252'
volume: 2
year: '2022'
...
---
_id: '24280'
abstract:
- lang: eng
  text: 'Challenges in decisions on technical changes are the lack of knowledge about
    the expected impact and change propagation. Currently, no literature study contains
    a systematic differentiation and evaluation of existing approaches, which is a
    prerequisite for practitioners to select a suitable approach. This research aims
    at defining differentiation criteria as well as generally applicable requirements
    for evaluation. A four-step approach is used: systematic literature review on
    approaches for impact analysis of engineering changes (1), categorization and
    prioritization of approaches based on reoccuring elements (2), derivation of context
    specific requirements for evaluation (3), and evaluation of approaches (4). The
    result indicates existing potential of object-oriented modeling approaches.'
author:
- first_name: Iris
  full_name: Gräßler, Iris
  id: '47565'
  last_name: Gräßler
  orcid: 0000-0001-5765-971X
- first_name: Dominik
  full_name: Wiechel, Dominik
  id: '67161'
  last_name: Wiechel
citation:
  ama: 'Gräßler I, Wiechel D. Systematische Bewertung von Auswirkungsanalysen des
    Engineering Change Managements. In: Krause D, Paetzold K, Wartzack S, eds. <i>DS
    111: Proceedings of the 32nd Symposium Design for X</i>. ; 2021. doi:<a href="https://doi.org/10.35199/dfx2021.12">10.35199/dfx2021.12</a>'
  apa: 'Gräßler, I., &#38; Wiechel, D. (2021). Systematische Bewertung von Auswirkungsanalysen
    des Engineering Change Managements. In D. Krause, K. Paetzold, &#38; S. Wartzack
    (Eds.), <i>DS 111: Proceedings of the 32nd Symposium Design for X</i>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.35199/dfx2021.12">https://doi.org/10.35199/dfx2021.12</a>'
  bibtex: '@inproceedings{Gräßler_Wiechel_2021, title={Systematische Bewertung von
    Auswirkungsanalysen des Engineering Change Managements}, DOI={<a href="https://doi.org/10.35199/dfx2021.12">10.35199/dfx2021.12</a>},
    booktitle={DS 111: Proceedings of the 32nd Symposium Design for X}, author={Gräßler,
    Iris and Wiechel, Dominik}, editor={Krause, Dieter and Paetzold, Kristin and Wartzack,
    Sandro}, year={2021} }'
  chicago: 'Gräßler, Iris, and Dominik Wiechel. “Systematische Bewertung von Auswirkungsanalysen
    Des Engineering Change Managements.” In <i>DS 111: Proceedings of the 32nd Symposium
    Design for X</i>, edited by Dieter Krause, Kristin Paetzold, and Sandro Wartzack,
    2021. <a href="https://doi.org/10.35199/dfx2021.12">https://doi.org/10.35199/dfx2021.12</a>.'
  ieee: 'I. Gräßler and D. Wiechel, “Systematische Bewertung von Auswirkungsanalysen
    des Engineering Change Managements,” in <i>DS 111: Proceedings of the 32nd Symposium
    Design for X</i>, Tutzing, 2021, doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.35199/dfx2021.12">10.35199/dfx2021.12</a>.'
  mla: 'Gräßler, Iris, and Dominik Wiechel. “Systematische Bewertung von Auswirkungsanalysen
    Des Engineering Change Managements.” <i>DS 111: Proceedings of the 32nd Symposium
    Design for X</i>, edited by Dieter Krause et al., 2021, doi:<a href="https://doi.org/10.35199/dfx2021.12">10.35199/dfx2021.12</a>.'
  short: 'I. Gräßler, D. Wiechel, in: D. Krause, K. Paetzold, S. Wartzack (Eds.),
    DS 111: Proceedings of the 32nd Symposium Design for X, 2021.'
conference:
  end_date: 28-09-2021
  location: Tutzing
  name: Symposium Design for X (DFX2021)
  start_date: 27-09-2021
date_created: 2021-09-13T14:45:10Z
date_updated: 2023-05-09T18:22:30Z
department:
- _id: '152'
doi: 10.35199/dfx2021.12
editor:
- first_name: Dieter
  full_name: Krause, Dieter
  last_name: Krause
- first_name: Kristin
  full_name: Paetzold, Kristin
  last_name: Paetzold
- first_name: Sandro
  full_name: Wartzack, Sandro
  last_name: Wartzack
keyword:
- Engineering Change Management
- Impact Analysis
- Engineering  Changes
- Model-based Systems Engineering
- Product Developmen
language:
- iso: eng
publication: 'DS 111: Proceedings of the 32nd Symposium Design for X'
publication_status: published
quality_controlled: '1'
status: public
title: Systematische Bewertung von Auswirkungsanalysen des Engineering Change Managements
type: conference
user_id: '67161'
year: '2021'
...
