--- _id: '60099' abstract: - lang: ger text: Nachhaltigkeit ist ein Konzept mit einem weiten Bedeutungsspektrum. Dessen Begriffsinhalt wird u. a. von den Autor:innen in den Diskussionen der weltweit vielgenutzten Wikipedia intensiv und mitunter kontrovers ausgehandelt. Für begriffliche Abgrenzungen fechten die Autor:innen die ihres Erachtens inadäquaten Sachverhaltsdarstellungen etc. an, indem sie entsprechende konzeptuelle Aspekte unterschiedlich explizit und sprachbewusst durch die Handlung des Negierens als nicht gültig zurückweisen. Um den Begriff der Nachhaltigkeit zu konturieren, vollziehen die Autor:innen in Wikipedia-Diskussionen folglich die sprachreflexive, kommunikative Praktik des WIDERSPRECHENS. Auf der Basis eines Korpus aus den Diskussionen zu den Artikeln ‚Nachhaltigkeit‘, ‚Nachhaltige Entwicklung‘, ‚Umweltschutz‘ etc. der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia ermittelt dieser Beitrag Tendenzen, welchen Nachhaltigkeitsaspekten zumeist widersprochen wird, die insofern als besonders umkämpft erachtet werden können. article_type: original author: - first_name: Alexander full_name: Dübbert, Alexander id: '44613' last_name: Dübbert orcid: 0009-0002-4063-801X citation: ama: 'Dübbert A. WIDERSPRECHEN in der Wikipedia zur Aushandlung des Begriffs der Nachhaltigkeit: Eine sprachreflexive, kommunikative Praktik. Research on Language. 2025;2(1):56-72. doi:https://doi.org/10.26204/KLUEDO/9044' apa: 'Dübbert, A. (2025). WIDERSPRECHEN in der Wikipedia zur Aushandlung des Begriffs der Nachhaltigkeit: Eine sprachreflexive, kommunikative Praktik. Research on Language, 2(1), 56–72. https://doi.org/10.26204/KLUEDO/9044' bibtex: '@article{Dübbert_2025, title={WIDERSPRECHEN in der Wikipedia zur Aushandlung des Begriffs der Nachhaltigkeit: Eine sprachreflexive, kommunikative Praktik}, volume={2}, DOI={https://doi.org/10.26204/KLUEDO/9044}, number={1}, journal={Research on Language}, author={Dübbert, Alexander}, year={2025}, pages={56–72} }' chicago: 'Dübbert, Alexander. “WIDERSPRECHEN in der Wikipedia zur Aushandlung des Begriffs der Nachhaltigkeit: Eine sprachreflexive, kommunikative Praktik.” Research on Language 2, no. 1 (2025): 56–72. https://doi.org/10.26204/KLUEDO/9044.' ieee: 'A. Dübbert, “WIDERSPRECHEN in der Wikipedia zur Aushandlung des Begriffs der Nachhaltigkeit: Eine sprachreflexive, kommunikative Praktik,” Research on Language, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 56–72, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.26204/KLUEDO/9044.' mla: 'Dübbert, Alexander. “WIDERSPRECHEN in der Wikipedia zur Aushandlung des Begriffs der Nachhaltigkeit: Eine sprachreflexive, kommunikative Praktik.” Research on Language, vol. 2, no. 1, 2025, pp. 56–72, doi:https://doi.org/10.26204/KLUEDO/9044.' short: A. Dübbert, Research on Language 2 (2025) 56–72. date_created: 2025-06-02T12:41:27Z date_updated: 2025-06-02T12:41:39Z department: - _id: '115' doi: https://doi.org/10.26204/KLUEDO/9044 intvolume: ' 2' issue: '1' keyword: - Widersprechen - Praktik - Negation - Nachhaltigkeit language: - iso: ger main_file_link: - open_access: '1' url: https://researchonlanguage.de/artikel/widersprechen oa: '1' page: 56-72 publication: Research on Language publication_identifier: unknown: - 2944-4969 publication_status: published quality_controlled: '1' status: public title: 'WIDERSPRECHEN in der Wikipedia zur Aushandlung des Begriffs der Nachhaltigkeit: Eine sprachreflexive, kommunikative Praktik' type: journal_article user_id: '44613' volume: 2 year: '2025' ... --- _id: '48543' abstract: - lang: eng text: Explanation has been identified as an important capability for AI-based systems, but research on systematic strategies for achieving understanding in interaction with such systems is still sparse. Negation is a linguistic strategy that is often used in explanations. It creates a contrast space between the affirmed and the negated item that enriches explaining processes with additional contextual information. While negation in human speech has been shown to lead to higher processing costs and worse task performance in terms of recall or action execution when used in isolation, it can decrease processing costs when used in context. So far, it has not been considered as a guiding strategy for explanations in human-robot interaction. We conducted an empirical study to investigate the use of negation as a guiding strategy in explanatory human-robot dialogue, in which a virtual robot explains tasks and possible actions to a human explainee to solve them in terms of gestures on a touchscreen. Our results show that negation vs. affirmation 1) increases processing costs measured as reaction time and 2) increases several aspects of task performance. While there was no significant effect of negation on the number of initially correctly executed gestures, we found a significantly lower number of attempts—measured as breaks in the finger movement data before the correct gesture was carried out—when being instructed through a negation. We further found that the gestures significantly resembled the presented prototype gesture more following an instruction with a negation as opposed to an affirmation. Also, the participants rated the benefit of contrastive vs. affirmative explanations significantly higher. Repeating the instructions decreased the effects of negation, yielding similar processing costs and task performance measures for negation and affirmation after several iterations. We discuss our results with respect to possible effects of negation on linguistic processing of explanations and limitations of our study. article_type: original author: - first_name: A. full_name: Groß, A. last_name: Groß - first_name: Amit full_name: Singh, Amit id: '91018' last_name: Singh orcid: 0000-0002-7789-1521 - first_name: Ngoc Chi full_name: Banh, Ngoc Chi id: '38219' last_name: Banh orcid: 0000-0002-5946-4542 - first_name: B. full_name: Richter, B. last_name: Richter - first_name: Ingrid full_name: Scharlau, Ingrid id: '451' last_name: Scharlau orcid: 0000-0003-2364-9489 - first_name: Katharina J. full_name: Rohlfing, Katharina J. id: '50352' last_name: Rohlfing - first_name: B. full_name: Wrede, B. last_name: Wrede citation: ama: Groß A, Singh A, Banh NC, et al. Scaffolding the human partner by contrastive guidance in an explanatory human-robot dialogue. Frontiers in Robotics and AI. 2023;10. doi:10.3389/frobt.2023.1236184 apa: Groß, A., Singh, A., Banh, N. C., Richter, B., Scharlau, I., Rohlfing, K. J., & Wrede, B. (2023). Scaffolding the human partner by contrastive guidance in an explanatory human-robot dialogue. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2023.1236184 bibtex: '@article{Groß_Singh_Banh_Richter_Scharlau_Rohlfing_Wrede_2023, title={Scaffolding the human partner by contrastive guidance in an explanatory human-robot dialogue}, volume={10}, DOI={10.3389/frobt.2023.1236184}, journal={Frontiers in Robotics and AI}, author={Groß, A. and Singh, Amit and Banh, Ngoc Chi and Richter, B. and Scharlau, Ingrid and Rohlfing, Katharina J. and Wrede, B.}, year={2023} }' chicago: Groß, A., Amit Singh, Ngoc Chi Banh, B. Richter, Ingrid Scharlau, Katharina J. Rohlfing, and B. Wrede. “Scaffolding the Human Partner by Contrastive Guidance in an Explanatory Human-Robot Dialogue.” Frontiers in Robotics and AI 10 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2023.1236184. ieee: 'A. Groß et al., “Scaffolding the human partner by contrastive guidance in an explanatory human-robot dialogue,” Frontiers in Robotics and AI, vol. 10, 2023, doi: 10.3389/frobt.2023.1236184.' mla: Groß, A., et al. “Scaffolding the Human Partner by Contrastive Guidance in an Explanatory Human-Robot Dialogue.” Frontiers in Robotics and AI, vol. 10, 2023, doi:10.3389/frobt.2023.1236184. short: A. Groß, A. Singh, N.C. Banh, B. Richter, I. Scharlau, K.J. Rohlfing, B. Wrede, Frontiers in Robotics and AI 10 (2023). date_created: 2023-10-30T09:29:16Z date_updated: 2024-06-26T08:01:50Z department: - _id: '749' doi: 10.3389/frobt.2023.1236184 funded_apc: '1' intvolume: ' 10' keyword: - HRI - XAI - negation - understanding - explaining - touch interaction - gesture language: - iso: eng main_file_link: - open_access: '1' url: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frobt.2023.1236184/full oa: '1' project: - _id: '115' grant_number: '438445824' name: 'TRR 318 - A05: TRR 318 - Echtzeitmessung der Aufmerksamkeit im Mensch-Roboter-Erklärdialog (Teilprojekt A05)' publication: Frontiers in Robotics and AI publication_status: published quality_controlled: '1' status: public title: Scaffolding the human partner by contrastive guidance in an explanatory human-robot dialogue type: journal_article user_id: '38219' volume: 10 year: '2023' ... --- _id: '46067' abstract: - lang: eng text: '

The study investigates two different ways of guiding the addressee of an explanation - an explainee, through action demonstration: contrastive and non-contrastive. Their effect was tested on attention to specific action elements (goal) as well as on event memory. In an eye-tracking experiment, participants were shown different motion videos that were either contrastive or non-contrastive with respect to the segments of movement presentation. Given that everyday action demonstration is often multimodal, the stimuli were created with re- spect to their visual and verbal presentation. For visual presentation, a video combined two movements in a contrastive (e.g., Up-motion following a Down-motion) or non-contrastive way (e.g., two Up-motions following each other). For verbal presentation, each video was combined with a sequence of instruction descriptions in the form of negative (i.e., contrastive) or assertive (i.e., non-contrastive) guidance. It was found that a) attention to the event goal increased for this condition in the later time window, and b) participants’ recall of the event was facilitated when a visually contrastive motion was combined with a verbal contrast.

' author: - first_name: Amit full_name: Singh, Amit id: '91018' last_name: Singh orcid: 0000-0002-7789-1521 - first_name: Katharina J. full_name: Rohlfing, Katharina J. id: '50352' last_name: Rohlfing citation: ama: 'Singh A, Rohlfing KJ. Contrastiveness in the context of action demonstration: an eye-tracking study on its effects on action perception and action recall. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society 45 (45). Cognitive Science Society; 2023.' apa: 'Singh, A., & Rohlfing, K. J. (2023). Contrastiveness in the context of action demonstration: an eye-tracking study on its effects on action perception and action recall. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society 45 (45). 45th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Sydney.' bibtex: '@inproceedings{Singh_Rohlfing_2023, place={Sydney, Australia}, title={Contrastiveness in the context of action demonstration: an eye-tracking study on its effects on action perception and action recall}, booktitle={Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society 45 (45)}, publisher={Cognitive Science Society}, author={Singh, Amit and Rohlfing, Katharina J.}, year={2023} }' chicago: 'Singh, Amit, and Katharina J. Rohlfing. “Contrastiveness in the Context of Action Demonstration: An Eye-Tracking Study on Its Effects on Action Perception and Action Recall.” In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society 45 (45). Sydney, Australia: Cognitive Science Society, 2023.' ieee: 'A. Singh and K. J. Rohlfing, “Contrastiveness in the context of action demonstration: an eye-tracking study on its effects on action perception and action recall,” presented at the 45th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Sydney, 2023.' mla: 'Singh, Amit, and Katharina J. Rohlfing. “Contrastiveness in the Context of Action Demonstration: An Eye-Tracking Study on Its Effects on Action Perception and Action Recall.” Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society 45 (45), Cognitive Science Society, 2023.' short: 'A. Singh, K.J. Rohlfing, in: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society 45 (45), Cognitive Science Society, Sydney, Australia, 2023.' conference: location: Sydney name: 45th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society date_created: 2023-07-15T12:16:42Z date_updated: 2023-09-27T13:51:42Z department: - _id: '749' - _id: '660' keyword: - Attention - negation - contrastive guidance - eye-movements - action understanding - event representation language: - iso: eng main_file_link: - open_access: '1' url: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2w94t4cv oa: '1' place: Sydney, Australia popular_science: '1' project: - _id: '115' grant_number: '438445824' name: 'TRR 318 - A05: TRR 318 - Echtzeitmessung der Aufmerksamkeit im Mensch-Roboter-Erklärdialog (Teilprojekt A05)' publication: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society 45 (45) publication_status: published publisher: Cognitive Science Society quality_controlled: '1' related_material: record: - id: '46067' relation: contains status: public status: public title: 'Contrastiveness in the context of action demonstration: an eye-tracking study on its effects on action perception and action recall' type: conference user_id: '91018' year: '2023' ...