---
_id: '33368'
abstract:
- lang: eng
text: 'AbstractThe Open Science movement is gaining
tremendous popularity and tries to initiate changes in science, for example the
sharing and reuse of data. The new requirements that come with Open Science poses
researchers with several challenges. While most of these challenges have already
been addressed in several studies, little attention has been paid so far to the
underlying Open Science practices (OSP). An exploratory study was conducted focusing
on the OSP relating to sharing and using data. 13 researchers from the Weizenbaum
Institute were interviewed. The Weizenbaum Institute is an interdisciplinary research
institute in Germany that was founded in 2017. To reconstruct OSP a grounded theory
methodology (Strauss in Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists, Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge, 1987) was used and classified OSP into open production,
open distribution and open consumption (Smith in Openness as social praxis. First
Monday, 2017). The research shows that apart from the disciplinary background
and research environment, the methodological approach and the type of research
data play a major role in the context of OSP. The interviewees’ self-attributions
related to the types of data they work with: qualitative, quantitative, social
media and source code. With regard to the methodological approach and type of
data, it was uncovered that uncertainties and missing knowledge, data protection,
competitive disadvantages, vulnerability and costs are the main reasons for the
lack of openness. The analyses further revealed that knowledge and established
data infrastructures as well as competitive advantages act as drivers for openness.
Because of the link between research data and OSP, the authors of this paper argue
that in order to promote OSP, the methodological approach and the type of research
data must also be considered.'
article_type: original
author:
- first_name: Isabel
full_name: Steinhardt, Isabel
id: '90339'
last_name: Steinhardt
orcid: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2590-6189
- first_name: Mareike
full_name: Bauer, Mareike
last_name: Bauer
- first_name: Hannes
full_name: Wünsche, Hannes
last_name: Wünsche
- first_name: Sonja
full_name: Schimmler, Sonja
last_name: Schimmler
citation:
ama: Steinhardt I, Bauer M, Wünsche H, Schimmler S. The connection of open science
practices and the methodological approach of researchers. Quality & Quantity.
2023;57(4):3621-3636. doi:10.1007/s11135-022-01524-4
apa: Steinhardt, I., Bauer, M., Wünsche, H., & Schimmler, S. (2023). The connection
of open science practices and the methodological approach of researchers. Quality
& Quantity, 57(4), 3621–3636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-022-01524-4
bibtex: '@article{Steinhardt_Bauer_Wünsche_Schimmler_2023, title={The connection
of open science practices and the methodological approach of researchers}, volume={57},
DOI={10.1007/s11135-022-01524-4},
number={4}, journal={Quality & Quantity}, publisher={Springer Science and
Business Media LLC}, author={Steinhardt, Isabel and Bauer, Mareike and Wünsche,
Hannes and Schimmler, Sonja}, year={2023}, pages={3621–3636} }'
chicago: 'Steinhardt, Isabel, Mareike Bauer, Hannes Wünsche, and Sonja Schimmler.
“The Connection of Open Science Practices and the Methodological Approach of Researchers.”
Quality & Quantity 57, no. 4 (2023): 3621–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-022-01524-4.'
ieee: 'I. Steinhardt, M. Bauer, H. Wünsche, and S. Schimmler, “The connection of
open science practices and the methodological approach of researchers,” Quality
& Quantity, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 3621–3636, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s11135-022-01524-4.'
mla: Steinhardt, Isabel, et al. “The Connection of Open Science Practices and the
Methodological Approach of Researchers.” Quality & Quantity, vol. 57,
no. 4, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2023, pp. 3621–36, doi:10.1007/s11135-022-01524-4.
short: I. Steinhardt, M. Bauer, H. Wünsche, S. Schimmler, Quality & Quantity
57 (2023) 3621–3636.
date_created: 2022-09-15T07:57:51Z
date_updated: 2023-12-04T12:53:39Z
ddc:
- '300'
doi: 10.1007/s11135-022-01524-4
file:
- access_level: closed
content_type: application/pdf
creator: isste
date_created: 2022-09-15T07:58:30Z
date_updated: 2022-09-15T07:58:30Z
file_id: '33369'
file_name: 2022 Steinhardt et al. Open Science Methodology.pdf
file_size: 697252
relation: main_file
success: 1
file_date_updated: 2022-09-15T07:58:30Z
has_accepted_license: '1'
intvolume: ' 57'
issue: '4'
keyword:
- Open Science
language:
- iso: eng
main_file_link:
- open_access: '1'
oa: '1'
page: 3621-3636
publication: Quality & Quantity
publication_identifier:
issn:
- 0033-5177
- 1573-7845
publication_status: published
publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
quality_controlled: '1'
status: public
title: The connection of open science practices and the methodological approach of
researchers
type: journal_article
user_id: '90339'
volume: 57
year: '2023'
...
---
_id: '45604'
article_type: letter_note
author:
- first_name: Isabel
full_name: Steinhardt, Isabel
id: '90339'
last_name: Steinhardt
orcid: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2590-6189
- first_name: Sylvi
full_name: Mauermeister, Sylvi
id: '98032'
last_name: Mauermeister
- first_name: Rebecca
full_name: Schmidt, Rebecca
id: '94416'
last_name: Schmidt
orcid: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2516-359X
citation:
ama: 'Steinhardt I, Mauermeister S, Schmidt R. Open Research Practices and Cultural
Change: A Commentary on “(Why) Are Open Research Practices the Future for the
Study of Language Learning?” Language Learning. Published online 2023.
doi:10.1111/lang.12583'
apa: 'Steinhardt, I., Mauermeister, S., & Schmidt, R. (2023). Open Research
Practices and Cultural Change: A Commentary on “(Why) Are Open Research Practices
the Future for the Study of Language Learning?” Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12583'
bibtex: '@article{Steinhardt_Mauermeister_Schmidt_2023, title={Open Research Practices
and Cultural Change: A Commentary on “(Why) Are Open Research Practices the Future
for the Study of Language Learning?”}, DOI={10.1111/lang.12583},
journal={Language Learning}, publisher={Wiley}, author={Steinhardt, Isabel and
Mauermeister, Sylvi and Schmidt, Rebecca}, year={2023} }'
chicago: 'Steinhardt, Isabel, Sylvi Mauermeister, and Rebecca Schmidt. “Open Research
Practices and Cultural Change: A Commentary on ‘(Why) Are Open Research Practices
the Future for the Study of Language Learning?’” Language Learning, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12583.'
ieee: 'I. Steinhardt, S. Mauermeister, and R. Schmidt, “Open Research Practices
and Cultural Change: A Commentary on ‘(Why) Are Open Research Practices the Future
for the Study of Language Learning?,’” Language Learning, 2023, doi: 10.1111/lang.12583.'
mla: 'Steinhardt, Isabel, et al. “Open Research Practices and Cultural Change: A
Commentary on ‘(Why) Are Open Research Practices the Future for the Study of Language
Learning?’” Language Learning, Wiley, 2023, doi:10.1111/lang.12583.'
short: I. Steinhardt, S. Mauermeister, R. Schmidt, Language Learning (2023).
date_created: 2023-06-14T10:52:12Z
date_updated: 2024-07-30T10:41:22Z
department:
- _id: '477'
- _id: '121'
doi: 10.1111/lang.12583
keyword:
- Open Science
- Open Science Practices
- Cultural Change
language:
- iso: eng
main_file_link:
- open_access: '1'
oa: '1'
publication: Language Learning
publication_identifier:
issn:
- 0023-8333
- 1467-9922
publication_status: published
publisher: Wiley
quality_controlled: '1'
status: public
title: 'Open Research Practices and Cultural Change: A Commentary on “(Why) Are Open
Research Practices the Future for the Study of Language Learning?”'
type: journal_article
user_id: '94416'
year: '2023'
...
---
_id: '43094'
abstract:
- lang: eng
text:
article_type: letter_note
author:
- first_name: Tamara
full_name: Heck, Tamara
last_name: Heck
- first_name: Isabel
full_name: Steinhardt, Isabel
id: '90339'
last_name: Steinhardt
orcid: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2590-6189
- first_name: Rima-Maria
full_name: Rahal, Rima-Maria
last_name: Rahal
- first_name: Moritz
full_name: Schubotz, Moritz
last_name: Schubotz
- first_name: Dominik
full_name: Scholl, Dominik
last_name: Scholl
- first_name: Sarah
full_name: Behrens, Sarah
last_name: Behrens
citation:
ama: 'Heck T, Steinhardt I, Rahal R-M, Schubotz M, Scholl D, Behrens S. Bootstrapping
the Open Science culture: The fellowship approach. Research Ideas and Outcomes.
2023;9. doi:10.3897/rio.9.e103675'
apa: 'Heck, T., Steinhardt, I., Rahal, R.-M., Schubotz, M., Scholl, D., & Behrens,
S. (2023). Bootstrapping the Open Science culture: The fellowship approach. Research
Ideas and Outcomes, 9. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.9.e103675'
bibtex: '@article{Heck_Steinhardt_Rahal_Schubotz_Scholl_Behrens_2023, title={Bootstrapping
the Open Science culture: The fellowship approach}, volume={9}, DOI={10.3897/rio.9.e103675},
journal={Research Ideas and Outcomes}, publisher={Pensoft Publishers}, author={Heck,
Tamara and Steinhardt, Isabel and Rahal, Rima-Maria and Schubotz, Moritz and Scholl,
Dominik and Behrens, Sarah}, year={2023} }'
chicago: 'Heck, Tamara, Isabel Steinhardt, Rima-Maria Rahal, Moritz Schubotz, Dominik
Scholl, and Sarah Behrens. “Bootstrapping the Open Science Culture: The Fellowship
Approach.” Research Ideas and Outcomes 9 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.9.e103675.'
ieee: 'T. Heck, I. Steinhardt, R.-M. Rahal, M. Schubotz, D. Scholl, and S. Behrens,
“Bootstrapping the Open Science culture: The fellowship approach,” Research
Ideas and Outcomes, vol. 9, 2023, doi: 10.3897/rio.9.e103675.'
mla: 'Heck, Tamara, et al. “Bootstrapping the Open Science Culture: The Fellowship
Approach.” Research Ideas and Outcomes, vol. 9, Pensoft Publishers, 2023,
doi:10.3897/rio.9.e103675.'
short: T. Heck, I. Steinhardt, R.-M. Rahal, M. Schubotz, D. Scholl, S. Behrens,
Research Ideas and Outcomes 9 (2023).
date_created: 2023-03-24T06:40:51Z
date_updated: 2023-03-24T06:43:01Z
department:
- _id: '121'
doi: 10.3897/rio.9.e103675
intvolume: ' 9'
keyword:
- Open Science
language:
- iso: eng
main_file_link:
- open_access: '1'
url: https://riojournal.com/article/103675/
oa: '1'
publication: Research Ideas and Outcomes
publication_identifier:
issn:
- 2367-7163
publication_status: published
publisher: Pensoft Publishers
status: public
title: 'Bootstrapping the Open Science culture: The fellowship approach'
type: journal_article
user_id: '90339'
volume: 9
year: '2023'
...
---
_id: '34132'
abstract:
- lang: eng
text: 'How can Knowledge In/Equity be addressed in qualitative research
by taking the idea of Open Science into account? Two projects from the Open Science
Fellows Programme by Wikimedia Deutschland will be used to illustrate how Open
Science practices can succeed in qualitative research, thereby reducing In/Equity.
In this context, In/Equity is considered as a fair and equal representation of
people, their knowledge and insights and comprehends questions about how epistemic,
structural, institutional and personal biases generate and shape knowledge as
guidance. Three questions guide this approach: firstly, what do we understand
by In/Equity in the context of knowledge production in these projects? Secondly,
who will be involved in knowledge generation and to what extent will they be valued
or unvalued? Thirdly, how can data be made accessible for re-use to enable true
participation and sharing?'
article_type: original
author:
- first_name: Isabel
full_name: Steinhardt, Isabel
last_name: Steinhardt
- first_name: Felicitas
full_name: Kruschick, Felicitas
last_name: Kruschick
citation:
ama: Steinhardt I, Kruschick F. Knowledge Equity and Open Science in qualitative
research – Practical research considerations. Research Ideas and Outcomes.
2022;8. doi:10.3897/rio.8.e86387
apa: Steinhardt, I., & Kruschick, F. (2022). Knowledge Equity and Open Science
in qualitative research – Practical research considerations. Research Ideas
and Outcomes, 8. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.8.e86387
bibtex: '@article{Steinhardt_Kruschick_2022, title={Knowledge Equity and Open Science
in qualitative research – Practical research considerations}, volume={8}, DOI={10.3897/rio.8.e86387}, journal={Research
Ideas and Outcomes}, publisher={Pensoft Publishers}, author={Steinhardt, Isabel
and Kruschick, Felicitas}, year={2022} }'
chicago: Steinhardt, Isabel, and Felicitas Kruschick. “Knowledge Equity and Open
Science in Qualitative Research – Practical Research Considerations.” Research
Ideas and Outcomes 8 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.8.e86387.
ieee: 'I. Steinhardt and F. Kruschick, “Knowledge Equity and Open Science in qualitative
research – Practical research considerations,” Research Ideas and Outcomes,
vol. 8, 2022, doi: 10.3897/rio.8.e86387.'
mla: Steinhardt, Isabel, and Felicitas Kruschick. “Knowledge Equity and Open Science
in Qualitative Research – Practical Research Considerations.” Research Ideas
and Outcomes, vol. 8, Pensoft Publishers, 2022, doi:10.3897/rio.8.e86387.
short: I. Steinhardt, F. Kruschick, Research Ideas and Outcomes 8 (2022).
date_created: 2022-11-22T15:55:11Z
date_updated: 2022-11-22T16:05:00Z
department:
- _id: '477'
doi: 10.3897/rio.8.e86387
intvolume: ' 8'
keyword:
- Open Science
- Knowledge Equity
- Qualitative Methods
language:
- iso: eng
main_file_link:
- open_access: '1'
oa: '1'
publication: Research Ideas and Outcomes
publication_identifier:
issn:
- 2367-7163
publication_status: published
publisher: Pensoft Publishers
quality_controlled: '1'
status: public
title: Knowledge Equity and Open Science in qualitative research – Practical research
considerations
type: journal_article
user_id: '90339'
volume: 8
year: '2022'
...
---
_id: '33371'
article_type: original
author:
- first_name: Isabel
full_name: Steinhardt, Isabel
id: '90339'
last_name: Steinhardt
orcid: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2590-6189
citation:
ama: Steinhardt I. Kollaborative Autoethnographien digitaler Praktiken. Eine konzeptionelle,
methodische und theoretische Einführung zu einem Lehr-Forschungsprojekt im ersten
Corona-Semester. DNGPS Working Paper. 2022;8(si):1-11. doi:10.3224/dngps.v8si.01
apa: Steinhardt, I. (2022). Kollaborative Autoethnographien digitaler Praktiken.
Eine konzeptionelle, methodische und theoretische Einführung zu einem Lehr-Forschungsprojekt
im ersten Corona-Semester. DNGPS Working Paper, 8(si), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3224/dngps.v8si.01
bibtex: '@article{Steinhardt_2022, title={Kollaborative Autoethnographien digitaler
Praktiken. Eine konzeptionelle, methodische und theoretische Einführung zu einem
Lehr-Forschungsprojekt im ersten Corona-Semester}, volume={8}, DOI={10.3224/dngps.v8si.01},
number={si}, journal={DNGPS Working Paper}, publisher={Verlag Barbara Budrich
GmbH}, author={Steinhardt, Isabel}, year={2022}, pages={1–11} }'
chicago: 'Steinhardt, Isabel. “Kollaborative Autoethnographien digitaler Praktiken.
Eine konzeptionelle, methodische und theoretische Einführung zu einem Lehr-Forschungsprojekt
im ersten Corona-Semester.” DNGPS Working Paper 8, no. si (2022): 1–11.
https://doi.org/10.3224/dngps.v8si.01.'
ieee: 'I. Steinhardt, “Kollaborative Autoethnographien digitaler Praktiken. Eine
konzeptionelle, methodische und theoretische Einführung zu einem Lehr-Forschungsprojekt
im ersten Corona-Semester,” DNGPS Working Paper, vol. 8, no. si, pp. 1–11,
2022, doi: 10.3224/dngps.v8si.01.'
mla: Steinhardt, Isabel. “Kollaborative Autoethnographien digitaler Praktiken. Eine
konzeptionelle, methodische und theoretische Einführung zu einem Lehr-Forschungsprojekt
im ersten Corona-Semester.” DNGPS Working Paper, vol. 8, no. si, Verlag
Barbara Budrich GmbH, 2022, pp. 1–11, doi:10.3224/dngps.v8si.01.
short: I. Steinhardt, DNGPS Working Paper 8 (2022) 1–11.
date_created: 2022-09-15T08:03:19Z
date_updated: 2022-09-15T08:34:45Z
ddc:
- '300'
department:
- _id: '121'
doi: 10.3224/dngps.v8si.01
file:
- access_level: closed
content_type: application/pdf
creator: isste
date_created: 2022-09-15T08:33:30Z
date_updated: 2022-09-15T08:33:30Z
file_id: '33374'
file_name: 2022 Steinhardt Kollaborative Autoethnographie DNGPS.pdf
file_size: 177005
relation: main_file
success: 1
file_date_updated: 2022-09-15T08:33:30Z
has_accepted_license: '1'
intvolume: ' 8'
issue: si
keyword:
- Open Science
- kollaborative Autoethnographie
language:
- iso: ger
main_file_link:
- open_access: '1'
url: https://www.budrich-journals.de/index.php/dngps/article/view/39212/33438
oa: '1'
page: 1-11
publication: DNGPS Working Paper
publication_identifier:
issn:
- 2365-3329
publication_status: published
publisher: Verlag Barbara Budrich GmbH
status: public
title: Kollaborative Autoethnographien digitaler Praktiken. Eine konzeptionelle, methodische
und theoretische Einführung zu einem Lehr-Forschungsprojekt im ersten Corona-Semester
type: journal_article
user_id: '90339'
volume: 8
year: '2022'
...
---
_id: '33370'
abstract:
- lang: eng
text: Research that investigates respective researchers’ engagement in Open
Science varies widely in the topics addressed, methods employed, and disciplines
investigated, which makes it difficult to integrate and compare its results. To
investigate current outcomes of Open Science research, and to get a better understanding
on well-researched topics and research gaps, we aimed at providing an openly accessible
overview of empirical studies that focus on different aspects of Open Science
in different scientific disciplines, academic groups and geographical regions.
In this paper, we describe a data set of studies about Open Science practices
retrieved following a PRISMA approach to compile a literature review. We included
studies from the Scopus and Web of Science databases with keywords relating to
Open Science between the years 2000 and 2020, as well as a snowball search for
relevant articles. Studies that did not investigate any aspect of Open Science,
or weren’t peer-reviewed were excluded, resulting in a total of 695 remaining
studies. The data set was collaboratively annotated to
ensure intercoder reliability of the coded data.
article_number: '535'
article_type: original
author:
- first_name: Jana
full_name: Lasser, Jana
last_name: Lasser
- first_name: Jürgen
full_name: Schneider, Jürgen
last_name: Schneider
- first_name: Thomas
full_name: Lösch, Thomas
last_name: Lösch
- first_name: Ronny
full_name: Röwert, Ronny
last_name: Röwert
- first_name: Tamara
full_name: Heck, Tamara
last_name: Heck
- first_name: Clemens
full_name: Bluemel, Clemens
last_name: Bluemel
- first_name: Maike
full_name: Neufend, Maike
last_name: Neufend
- first_name: Isabel
full_name: Steinhardt, Isabel
id: '90339'
last_name: Steinhardt
orcid: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2590-6189
- first_name: Stefan
full_name: Skupien, Stefan
last_name: Skupien
citation:
ama: Lasser J, Schneider J, Lösch T, et al. MapOSR - A mapping review dataset of
empirical studies on Open Science. F1000Research. 2022;11. doi:10.12688/f1000research.121665.1
apa: Lasser, J., Schneider, J., Lösch, T., Röwert, R., Heck, T., Bluemel, C., Neufend,
M., Steinhardt, I., & Skupien, S. (2022). MapOSR - A mapping review dataset
of empirical studies on Open Science. F1000Research, 11, Article
535. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.121665.1
bibtex: '@article{Lasser_Schneider_Lösch_Röwert_Heck_Bluemel_Neufend_Steinhardt_Skupien_2022,
title={MapOSR - A mapping review dataset of empirical studies on Open Science},
volume={11}, DOI={10.12688/f1000research.121665.1},
number={535}, journal={F1000Research}, publisher={F1000 Research Ltd}, author={Lasser,
Jana and Schneider, Jürgen and Lösch, Thomas and Röwert, Ronny and Heck, Tamara
and Bluemel, Clemens and Neufend, Maike and Steinhardt, Isabel and Skupien, Stefan},
year={2022} }'
chicago: Lasser, Jana, Jürgen Schneider, Thomas Lösch, Ronny Röwert, Tamara Heck,
Clemens Bluemel, Maike Neufend, Isabel Steinhardt, and Stefan Skupien. “MapOSR
- A Mapping Review Dataset of Empirical Studies on Open Science.” F1000Research
11 (2022). https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.121665.1.
ieee: 'J. Lasser et al., “MapOSR - A mapping review dataset of empirical
studies on Open Science,” F1000Research, vol. 11, Art. no. 535, 2022, doi:
10.12688/f1000research.121665.1.'
mla: Lasser, Jana, et al. “MapOSR - A Mapping Review Dataset of Empirical Studies
on Open Science.” F1000Research, vol. 11, 535, F1000 Research Ltd, 2022,
doi:10.12688/f1000research.121665.1.
short: J. Lasser, J. Schneider, T. Lösch, R. Röwert, T. Heck, C. Bluemel, M. Neufend,
I. Steinhardt, S. Skupien, F1000Research 11 (2022).
date_created: 2022-09-15T08:00:49Z
date_updated: 2022-09-15T08:31:55Z
doi: 10.12688/f1000research.121665.1
intvolume: ' 11'
keyword:
- Open Science
language:
- iso: eng
main_file_link:
- open_access: '1'
url: https://f1000research.com/articles/11-535
oa: '1'
publication: F1000Research
publication_identifier:
issn:
- 2046-1402
publication_status: published
publisher: F1000 Research Ltd
quality_controlled: '1'
status: public
title: MapOSR - A mapping review dataset of empirical studies on Open Science
type: journal_article
user_id: '90339'
volume: 11
year: '2022'
...
---
_id: '36524'
abstract:
- lang: eng
text: 'How can Knowledge In/Equity be addressed in qualitative research
by taking the idea of Open Science into account? Two projects from the Open Science
Fellows Programme by Wikimedia Deutschland will be used to illustrate how Open
Science practices can succeed in qualitative research, thereby reducing In/Equity.
In this context, In/Equity is considered as a fair and equal representation of
people, their knowledge and insights and comprehends questions about how epistemic,
structural, institutional and personal biases generate and shape knowledge as
guidance. Three questions guide this approach: firstly, what do we understand
by In/Equity in the context of knowledge production in these projects? Secondly,
who will be involved in knowledge generation and to what extent will they be valued
or unvalued? Thirdly, how can data be made accessible for re-use to enable true
participation and sharing?'
article_type: original
author:
- first_name: Isabel
full_name: Steinhardt, Isabel
id: '90339'
last_name: Steinhardt
orcid: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2590-6189
- first_name: Felicitas
full_name: Kruschick, Felicitas
last_name: Kruschick
citation:
ama: Steinhardt I, Kruschick F. Knowledge Equity and Open Science in qualitative
research – Practical research considerations. Research Ideas and Outcomes.
2022;8:e86387. doi:10.3897/rio.8.e86387
apa: Steinhardt, I., & Kruschick, F. (2022). Knowledge Equity and Open Science
in qualitative research – Practical research considerations. Research Ideas
and Outcomes, 8, e86387. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.8.e86387
bibtex: '@article{Steinhardt_Kruschick_2022, title={Knowledge Equity and Open Science
in qualitative research – Practical research considerations}, volume={8}, DOI={10.3897/rio.8.e86387}, journal={Research
Ideas and Outcomes}, publisher={Pensoft Publishers}, author={Steinhardt, Isabel
and Kruschick, Felicitas}, year={2022}, pages={e86387} }'
chicago: 'Steinhardt, Isabel, and Felicitas Kruschick. “Knowledge Equity and Open
Science in Qualitative Research – Practical Research Considerations.” Research
Ideas and Outcomes 8 (2022): e86387. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.8.e86387.'
ieee: 'I. Steinhardt and F. Kruschick, “Knowledge Equity and Open Science in qualitative
research – Practical research considerations,” Research Ideas and Outcomes,
vol. 8, p. e86387, 2022, doi: 10.3897/rio.8.e86387.'
mla: Steinhardt, Isabel, and Felicitas Kruschick. “Knowledge Equity and Open Science
in Qualitative Research – Practical Research Considerations.” Research Ideas
and Outcomes, vol. 8, Pensoft Publishers, 2022, p. e86387, doi:10.3897/rio.8.e86387.
short: I. Steinhardt, F. Kruschick, Research Ideas and Outcomes 8 (2022) e86387.
date_created: 2023-01-13T08:33:03Z
date_updated: 2023-01-13T08:41:34Z
ddc:
- '300'
department:
- _id: '121'
doi: 10.3897/rio.8.e86387
file:
- access_level: closed
content_type: application/pdf
creator: isste
date_created: 2023-01-13T08:39:48Z
date_updated: 2023-01-13T08:39:48Z
file_id: '36525'
file_name: 2022 Steinhardt, Kruschick Knowledge Equity.pdf
file_size: 208525
relation: main_file
success: 1
file_date_updated: 2023-01-13T08:39:48Z
has_accepted_license: '1'
intvolume: ' 8'
keyword:
- Open Science
- Knowledge Equity
- Qualitative Methods
language:
- iso: eng
main_file_link:
- open_access: '1'
url: https://riojournal.com/article/86387/
oa: '1'
page: e86387
publication: Research Ideas and Outcomes
publication_identifier:
issn:
- 2367-7163
publication_status: published
publisher: Pensoft Publishers
quality_controlled: '1'
status: public
title: Knowledge Equity and Open Science in qualitative research – Practical research
considerations
type: journal_article
user_id: '90339'
volume: 8
year: '2022'
...
---
_id: '29246'
abstract:
- lang: eng
text: 'Openness in science and education is increasing in importance within
the digital knowledge society. So far, less attention has been paid to teaching
Open Science in bachelor’s degrees or in qualitative methods. Therefore, the aim
of this article is to use a seminar example to explore what Open Science practices
can be taught in qualitative research and how digital tools can be involved. The
seminar focused on the following practices: Open data practices, the practice
of using the free and open source tool “Collaborative online Interpretation, the
practice of participating, cooperating, collaborating and contributing through
participatory technologies and in social (based) networks. To learn Open Science
practices, the students were involved in a qualitative research project about
“Use of digital technologies for the study and habitus of students”. The study
shows the practices of Open Data are easy to teach, whereas the use of free and
open source tools and participatory technologies for collaboration, participation,
cooperation and contribution is more difficult. In addition, a cultural shift
would have to take place within German universities to promote Open Science practices
in general.'
article_type: original
author:
- first_name: Isabel
full_name: Steinhardt, Isabel
id: '90339'
last_name: Steinhardt
orcid: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2590-6189
citation:
ama: Steinhardt I. Learning Open Science by doing Open Science. A reflection of
a qualitative research project-based seminar. Education for Information.
2020;36(3):263-279. doi:10.3233/efi-190308
apa: Steinhardt, I. (2020). Learning Open Science by doing Open Science. A reflection
of a qualitative research project-based seminar. Education for Information,
36(3), 263–279. https://doi.org/10.3233/efi-190308
bibtex: '@article{Steinhardt_2020, title={Learning Open Science by doing Open Science.
A reflection of a qualitative research project-based seminar}, volume={36}, DOI={10.3233/efi-190308}, number={3},
journal={Education for Information}, publisher={IOS Press}, author={Steinhardt,
Isabel}, year={2020}, pages={263–279} }'
chicago: 'Steinhardt, Isabel. “Learning Open Science by Doing Open Science. A Reflection
of a Qualitative Research Project-Based Seminar.” Education for Information
36, no. 3 (2020): 263–79. https://doi.org/10.3233/efi-190308.'
ieee: 'I. Steinhardt, “Learning Open Science by doing Open Science. A reflection
of a qualitative research project-based seminar,” Education for Information,
vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 263–279, 2020, doi: 10.3233/efi-190308.'
mla: Steinhardt, Isabel. “Learning Open Science by Doing Open Science. A Reflection
of a Qualitative Research Project-Based Seminar.” Education for Information,
vol. 36, no. 3, IOS Press, 2020, pp. 263–79, doi:10.3233/efi-190308.
short: I. Steinhardt, Education for Information 36 (2020) 263–279.
date_created: 2022-01-11T15:56:37Z
date_updated: 2022-09-15T08:39:32Z
ddc:
- '300'
department:
- _id: '477'
doi: 10.3233/efi-190308
extern: '1'
file:
- access_level: closed
content_type: application/pdf
creator: isste
date_created: 2022-09-15T08:38:44Z
date_updated: 2022-09-15T08:38:44Z
file_id: '33376'
file_name: 2020 Steinhardt Learning Open Science.pdf
file_size: 3745348
relation: main_file
success: 1
file_date_updated: 2022-09-15T08:38:44Z
has_accepted_license: '1'
intvolume: ' 36'
issue: '3'
keyword:
- Open Science
- Open Education Practices
- Library and Information Sciences
- Education
- Information Systems
language:
- iso: eng
main_file_link:
- open_access: '1'
oa: '1'
page: 263-279
publication: Education for Information
publication_identifier:
issn:
- 0167-8329
- 1875-8649
publication_status: published
publisher: IOS Press
quality_controlled: '1'
status: public
title: Learning Open Science by doing Open Science. A reflection of a qualitative
research project-based seminar
type: journal_article
user_id: '90339'
volume: 36
year: '2020'
...
---
_id: '29247'
abstract:
- lang: ger
text: 'Ausgehend von den fünf Schulen von Open Science von Fecher und Friesicke
(2014) findet in diesem Beitrag eine Reflexion eines qualitativen Open Science-Forschungsprojektes
statt. Mit der Reflexion wird der Offenlegung und Transparenz, die Open Science-Projekten
immanent ist, entsprochen. Es soll aber auch zukünftigen Forscherinnen und Forschern,
die überlegen ein Open Science Projekt zu starten, dabei helfen mögliche Hürden
aber auch Lösungswege zu antizipieren. Als Reflexionsbeispiel dient das Projekt
«Nutzung digitaler Medien und Habitus von Studierenden», das auf folgenden fünf
Ebenen betrachtet wird: Ebene der Wissensproduktion; Ebene der freien Zugänglichkeit
von Wissen; Ebene der Infrastruktur; Ebene der kollaborativen Forschung und Ebene
der Impakt-Messung.'
author:
- first_name: Isabel
full_name: Steinhardt, Isabel
id: '90339'
last_name: Steinhardt
orcid: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2590-6189
citation:
ama: 'Steinhardt I. Open Science-Forschung und qualitative Methoden – fünf Ebenen
der Reflexion. MedienPädagogik: Zeitschrift für Theorie und Praxis der Medienbildung.
2018;32:122-138. doi:10.21240/mpaed/32/2018.10.28.X'
apa: 'Steinhardt, I. (2018). Open Science-Forschung und qualitative Methoden – fünf
Ebenen der Reflexion. MedienPädagogik: Zeitschrift für Theorie und Praxis der
Medienbildung, 32, 122–138. https://doi.org/10.21240/mpaed/32/2018.10.28.X'
bibtex: '@article{Steinhardt_2018, title={Open Science-Forschung und qualitative
Methoden – fünf Ebenen der Reflexion}, volume={32}, DOI={10.21240/mpaed/32/2018.10.28.X},
journal={MedienPädagogik: Zeitschrift für Theorie und Praxis der Medienbildung},
publisher={Sektion Medienpadagogik der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Erziehungswissenschaft
- DGfE}, author={Steinhardt, Isabel}, year={2018}, pages={122–138} }'
chicago: 'Steinhardt, Isabel. “Open Science-Forschung und qualitative Methoden –
fünf Ebenen der Reflexion.” MedienPädagogik: Zeitschrift für Theorie und Praxis
der Medienbildung 32 (2018): 122–38. https://doi.org/10.21240/mpaed/32/2018.10.28.X.'
ieee: 'I. Steinhardt, “Open Science-Forschung und qualitative Methoden – fünf Ebenen
der Reflexion,” MedienPädagogik: Zeitschrift für Theorie und Praxis der Medienbildung,
vol. 32, pp. 122–138, 2018, doi: 10.21240/mpaed/32/2018.10.28.X.'
mla: 'Steinhardt, Isabel. “Open Science-Forschung und qualitative Methoden – fünf
Ebenen der Reflexion.” MedienPädagogik: Zeitschrift für Theorie und Praxis
der Medienbildung, vol. 32, Sektion Medienpadagogik der Deutschen Gesellschaft
fur Erziehungswissenschaft - DGfE, 2018, pp. 122–38, doi:10.21240/mpaed/32/2018.10.28.X.'
short: 'I. Steinhardt, MedienPädagogik: Zeitschrift für Theorie und Praxis der Medienbildung
32 (2018) 122–138.'
date_created: 2022-01-11T15:59:12Z
date_updated: 2022-01-11T16:04:27Z
doi: 10.21240/mpaed/32/2018.10.28.X
extern: '1'
intvolume: ' 32'
keyword:
- Mediendidaktik
- Hochschule
- Open Science
language:
- iso: ger
main_file_link:
- open_access: '1'
oa: '1'
page: 122-138
publication: 'MedienPädagogik: Zeitschrift für Theorie und Praxis der Medienbildung'
publication_identifier:
issn:
- 1424-3636
publication_status: published
publisher: Sektion Medienpadagogik der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Erziehungswissenschaft
- DGfE
quality_controlled: '1'
status: public
title: Open Science-Forschung und qualitative Methoden – fünf Ebenen der Reflexion
type: journal_article
user_id: '90339'
volume: 32
year: '2018'
...