@article{32438,
  abstract     = {{<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title>
               <jats:sec>
                  <jats:title>Objective</jats:title>
                  <jats:p>External focus (EF) of attention leads to improved balance performance. Consideration of the neuromodulatory effects of EF may inform its clinical utility in addressing neuroplastic impairments after musculoskeletal injuries. We aimed to determine whether electrocortical activity and balance performance changed with attentional foci that prioritized differing sensory feedback and whether changes in electrocortical activity and balance were associated.</jats:p>
               </jats:sec>
               <jats:sec>
                  <jats:title>Methods</jats:title>
                  <jats:p>Individuals who were healthy (n = 15) performed a single-limb balance task under 3 conditions: internal focus (IF), somatosensory focus [EF with a baton (EF-baton)], and visual focus [EF with a laser (EF-laser)]. Electrocortical activity and postural sway were recorded concurrently using electroencephalography and a triaxial force plate. Electroencephalographic signals were decomposed, localized, and clustered to generate power spectral density in θ and α-2 frequency bands. Postural sway signals were analyzed with center-of-pressure sway metrics (eg, area, distance, velocity) and knee angle. The relationship between percent change in clustered brain activity and task performance metrics was assessed.</jats:p>
               </jats:sec>
               <jats:sec>
                  <jats:title>Results</jats:title>
                  <jats:p>Both EF conditions resulted in increased cortical activity and improved balance performance compared to IF. EF-laser had the largest effect, demonstrating increased frontal θ power (d = 0.64), decreased central θ power (d = −0.30), and decreased bilateral motor, bilateral parietal, and occipital α-2 power (d = −1.38 to −4.27) as well as a shorter path distance (d = −0.94) and a deeper (d = 0.70) and less variable (d = −1.15) knee angle than IF. Weak to moderate associations exist between increases in cortical activity and improved balance performance (ρ = 0.405–0.584).</jats:p>
               </jats:sec>
               <jats:sec>
                  <jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title>
                  <jats:p>EF resulted in increased cortical activity associated with cognitive, motor, somatosensory, and visual processing. EF-laser, which prioritized visual feedback, had the largest and broadest effects. Changes in cortical activity resulting from EF were independently associated with improved balance performance.</jats:p>
               </jats:sec>
               <jats:sec>
                  <jats:title>Impact</jats:title>
                  <jats:p>This study demonstrates that goal-oriented attention results in functional increases in brain activity compared to internally directed self-focus. These results suggest EF may target neurophysiologic impairments and improve balance in clinical populations.</jats:p>
               </jats:sec>}},
  author       = {{Sherman, David A and Lehmann, Tim and Baumeister, Jochen and Gokeler, Alli and Donovan, Luke and Norte, Grant E}},
  issn         = {{0031-9023}},
  journal      = {{Physical Therapy}},
  keywords     = {{Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation}},
  publisher    = {{Oxford University Press (OUP)}},
  title        = {{{External Focus of Attention Influences Cortical Activity Associated with Single Limb Balance Performance}}},
  doi          = {{10.1093/ptj/pzab223}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@article{32453,
  abstract     = {{<jats:sec><jats:title>Context:</jats:title><jats:p> Only 55% of the athletes return to competitive sports after an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. Athletes younger than 25 years who return to sports have a second injury rate of 23%. There may be a mismatch between rehabilitation contents and the demands an athlete faces after returning to sports. Current return-to-sports (RTS) tests utilize closed and predictable motor skills; however, demands on the field are different. Neurocognitive functions are essential to manage dynamic sport situations and may fluctuate after peripheral injuries. Most RTS and rehabilitation paradigms appear to lack this aspect, which might be linked to increased risk of second injury. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Objective:</jats:title><jats:p> This systematic and scoping review aims to map existing evidence about neurocognitive and neurophysiological functions in athletes, which could be linked to ACL injury in an integrated fashion and bring an extensive perspective to assessment and rehabilitation approaches. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Data Sources:</jats:title><jats:p> PubMed and Cochrane databases were searched to identify relevant studies published between 2005 and 2020 using the keywords ACL, brain, cortical, neuroplasticity, cognitive, cognition, neurocognition, and athletes. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Study Selection:</jats:title><jats:p> Studies investigating either neurocognitive or neurophysiological functions in athletes and linking these to ACL injury regardless of their design and technique were included. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Study Design:</jats:title><jats:p> Systematic review. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Level of Evidence:</jats:title><jats:p> Level 3. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Data Extraction:</jats:title><jats:p> The demographic, temporal, neurological, and behavioral data revealing possible injury-related aspects were extracted and summarized. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results:</jats:title><jats:p> A total of 16 studies were included in this review. Deficits in different neurocognitive domains and changes in neurophysiological functions could be a predisposing risk factor for, or a consequence caused by, ACL injuries. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion:</jats:title><jats:p> Clinicians should view ACL injuries not only as a musculoskeletal but also as a neural lesion with neurocognitive and neurophysiological aspects. Rehabilitation and RTS paradigms should consider these changes for assessment and interventions after injury. </jats:p></jats:sec>}},
  author       = {{Piskin, Daghan and Benjaminse, Anne and Dimitrakis, Panagiotis and Gokeler, Alli}},
  issn         = {{1941-7381}},
  journal      = {{Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach}},
  keywords     = {{Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine}},
  number       = {{4}},
  pages        = {{549--555}},
  publisher    = {{SAGE Publications}},
  title        = {{{Neurocognitive and Neurophysiological Functions Related to ACL Injury: A Framework for Neurocognitive Approaches in Rehabilitation and Return-to-Sports Tests}}},
  doi          = {{10.1177/19417381211029265}},
  volume       = {{14}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@article{32451,
  abstract     = {{<jats:p>Athletes in team sports have to quickly visually perceive actions of opponents and teammates while executing their own movements. These continuous actions are performed under time pressure and may contribute to a non-contact ACL injury. However, ACL injury screening and prevention programmes are primarily based on standardised movements in a predictable environment. The sports environment provides much greater cognitive demand because athletes must attend their attention to numerous external stimuli and inhibit impulsive actions. Any deficit or delay in attentional processing may contribute to an inability to correct potential errors in complex coordination, resulting in knee positions that increase the ACL injury risk. In this viewpoint, we advocate that ACL injury screening should include the sports specific neurocognitive demands.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Gokeler, Alli and Benjaminse, Anne and Della Villa, Francesco and Tosarelli, Fillippo and Verhagen, Evert and Baumeister, Jochen}},
  issn         = {{2055-7647}},
  journal      = {{BMJ Open Sport &amp; Exercise Medicine}},
  keywords     = {{Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine}},
  number       = {{2}},
  publisher    = {{BMJ}},
  title        = {{{Anterior cruciate ligament injury mechanisms through a neurocognition lens: implications for injury screening}}},
  doi          = {{10.1136/bmjsem-2021-001091}},
  volume       = {{7}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@article{32454,
  author       = {{Dingenen, Bart and Billiet, Bart and De Baets, Liesbet and Bellemans, Johan and Truijen, Jan and Gokeler, Alli}},
  issn         = {{1466-853X}},
  journal      = {{Physical Therapy in Sport}},
  keywords     = {{Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, General Medicine}},
  pages        = {{68--76}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier BV}},
  title        = {{{Rehabilitation strategies of Flemish physical therapists before and after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: An online survey}}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.ptsp.2021.02.003}},
  volume       = {{49}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@article{34479,
  abstract     = {{<jats:sec><jats:title>Background:</jats:title><jats:p> The incidence of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries is commonly reported as an annual incidence rate. There is relatively little information about the seasonal aspects of these injuries. The aim of the current study was to analyze the distribution of ACL injuries during the season in nonprofessional soccer, handball, and basketball based on a retrospective analysis of a hospital-based registry. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Hypothesis:</jats:title><jats:p> ACL injuries in soccer, handball, and basketball were more common within the first 2 months of the season in comparison with the rest of the year. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Study Design:</jats:title><jats:p> Case series. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Level of Evidence:</jats:title><jats:p> Level 4. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods:</jats:title><jats:p> Injury occurrence during the calendar year was divided into 6 periods of 2 months, with segment 1 (S1) representing the first 2 months of the season. For soccer, S1 corresponded to September and October. The season started 1 month later for handball and basketball, so S1 represented October and November. Chi-square tests were used to analyze the distribution of ACL injuries among segments according to gender, age, sports, and injury mechanism (contact/noncontact). </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results:</jats:title><jats:p> A total of 371 ACL injuries were included (soccer, 258, handball, 56, basketball, 57). Overall, the distribution of ACL injuries was not uniform across the segments ( P &lt; 0.01). Almost one-third of the ACL injuries occurred in S1 (n = 104; 28%). Significant differences could be observed according to sports ( P &lt; 0.01). There were fewer ACL injuries in S2 for soccer compared with basketball ( P &lt; 0.05). In S5, there were significantly more ACL injuries in soccer compared with handball and basketball ( P &lt; 0.05). </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion:</jats:title><jats:p> A high occurrence of ACL injuries was reported immediately within the first 2 months of the season in nonprofessional soccer, handball, and basketball sports. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Clinical Relevance:</jats:title><jats:p> These findings indicate that ACL injury prevention programs should be started in the preseason period to allow for gradual increases of load. </jats:p></jats:sec>}},
  author       = {{Mouton, Caroline and Gokeler, Alli and Urhausen, Anouk and Nührenbörger, Christian and Seil, Romain}},
  issn         = {{1941-7381}},
  journal      = {{Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach}},
  keywords     = {{Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{183--187}},
  publisher    = {{SAGE Publications}},
  title        = {{{High Incidence of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries Within the First 2 Months of the Season in Amateur Team Ball Sports}}},
  doi          = {{10.1177/19417381211014140}},
  volume       = {{14}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@article{34476,
  author       = {{Rambaud, Alexandre JM and Neri, Thomas and Dingenen, Bart and Parker, David and Servien, Elvire and Gokeler, Alli and Edouard, Pascal}},
  issn         = {{1877-0657}},
  journal      = {{Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine}},
  keywords     = {{Rehabilitation, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine}},
  number       = {{4}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier BV}},
  title        = {{{The modifying factors that help improve anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction rehabilitation: A narrative review}}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.rehab.2021.101601}},
  volume       = {{65}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@article{46545,
  abstract     = {{<jats:sec><jats:title>Context:</jats:title><jats:p> Only 55% of the athletes return to competitive sports after an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. Athletes younger than 25 years who return to sports have a second injury rate of 23%. There may be a mismatch between rehabilitation contents and the demands an athlete faces after returning to sports. Current return-to-sports (RTS) tests utilize closed and predictable motor skills; however, demands on the field are different. Neurocognitive functions are essential to manage dynamic sport situations and may fluctuate after peripheral injuries. Most RTS and rehabilitation paradigms appear to lack this aspect, which might be linked to increased risk of second injury. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Objective:</jats:title><jats:p> This systematic and scoping review aims to map existing evidence about neurocognitive and neurophysiological functions in athletes, which could be linked to ACL injury in an integrated fashion and bring an extensive perspective to assessment and rehabilitation approaches. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Data Sources:</jats:title><jats:p> PubMed and Cochrane databases were searched to identify relevant studies published between 2005 and 2020 using the keywords ACL, brain, cortical, neuroplasticity, cognitive, cognition, neurocognition, and athletes. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Study Selection:</jats:title><jats:p> Studies investigating either neurocognitive or neurophysiological functions in athletes and linking these to ACL injury regardless of their design and technique were included. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Study Design:</jats:title><jats:p> Systematic review. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Level of Evidence:</jats:title><jats:p> Level 3. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Data Extraction:</jats:title><jats:p> The demographic, temporal, neurological, and behavioral data revealing possible injury-related aspects were extracted and summarized. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results:</jats:title><jats:p> A total of 16 studies were included in this review. Deficits in different neurocognitive domains and changes in neurophysiological functions could be a predisposing risk factor for, or a consequence caused by, ACL injuries. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion:</jats:title><jats:p> Clinicians should view ACL injuries not only as a musculoskeletal but also as a neural lesion with neurocognitive and neurophysiological aspects. Rehabilitation and RTS paradigms should consider these changes for assessment and interventions after injury. </jats:p></jats:sec>}},
  author       = {{Piskin, Daghan Yuksel and Benjaminse, Anne and Dimitrakis, Panagiotis and Gokeler, Alli}},
  issn         = {{1941-7381}},
  journal      = {{Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach}},
  keywords     = {{Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine}},
  number       = {{4}},
  pages        = {{549--555}},
  publisher    = {{SAGE Publications}},
  title        = {{{Neurocognitive and Neurophysiological Functions Related to ACL Injury: A Framework for Neurocognitive Approaches in Rehabilitation and Return-to-Sports Tests}}},
  doi          = {{10.1177/19417381211029265}},
  volume       = {{14}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@article{40598,
  author       = {{Rudisch, Julian and Jöllenbeck, Thomas and Vogt, Lutz and Cordes, Thomas and Klotzbier, Thomas Jürgen and Vogel, Oliver and Wollesen, Bettina}},
  issn         = {{0966-6362}},
  journal      = {{Gait &amp; Posture}},
  keywords     = {{Rehabilitation, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Biophysics}},
  pages        = {{55--64}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier BV}},
  title        = {{{Agreement and consistency of five different clinical gait analysis systems in the assessment of spatiotemporal gait parameters}}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.01.013}},
  volume       = {{85}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@article{34024,
  abstract     = {{<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title>
               <jats:sec>
                  <jats:title>Objective</jats:title>
                  <jats:p>External focus (EF) of attention leads to improved balance performance. Consideration of the neuromodulatory effects of EF may inform its clinical utility in addressing neuroplastic impairments after musculoskeletal injuries. We aimed to determine whether electrocortical activity and balance performance changed with attentional foci that prioritized differing sensory feedback and whether changes in electrocortical activity and balance were associated.</jats:p>
               </jats:sec>
               <jats:sec>
                  <jats:title>Methods</jats:title>
                  <jats:p>Individuals who were healthy (n = 15) performed a single-limb balance task under 3 conditions: internal focus (IF), somatosensory focus [EF with a baton (EF-baton)], and visual focus [EF with a laser (EF-laser)]. Electrocortical activity and postural sway were recorded concurrently using electroencephalography and a triaxial force plate. Electroencephalographic signals were decomposed, localized, and clustered to generate power spectral density in θ and α-2 frequency bands. Postural sway signals were analyzed with center-of-pressure sway metrics (eg, area, distance, velocity) and knee angle. The relationship between percent change in clustered brain activity and task performance metrics was assessed.</jats:p>
               </jats:sec>
               <jats:sec>
                  <jats:title>Results</jats:title>
                  <jats:p>Both EF conditions resulted in increased cortical activity and improved balance performance compared to IF. EF-laser had the largest effect, demonstrating increased frontal θ power (d = 0.64), decreased central θ power (d = −0.30), and decreased bilateral motor, bilateral parietal, and occipital α-2 power (d = −1.38 to −4.27) as well as a shorter path distance (d = −0.94) and a deeper (d = 0.70) and less variable (d = −1.15) knee angle than IF. Weak to moderate associations exist between increases in cortical activity and improved balance performance (ρ = 0.405–0.584).</jats:p>
               </jats:sec>
               <jats:sec>
                  <jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title>
                  <jats:p>EF resulted in increased cortical activity associated with cognitive, motor, somatosensory, and visual processing. EF-laser, which prioritized visual feedback, had the largest and broadest effects. Changes in cortical activity resulting from EF were independently associated with improved balance performance.</jats:p>
               </jats:sec>
               <jats:sec>
                  <jats:title>Impact</jats:title>
                  <jats:p>This study demonstrates that goal-oriented attention results in functional increases in brain activity compared to internally directed self-focus. These results suggest EF may target neurophysiologic impairments and improve balance in clinical populations.</jats:p>
               </jats:sec>}},
  author       = {{Sherman, David A and Lehmann, Tim and Baumeister, Jochen and Gokeler, Alli and Donovan, Luke and Norte, Grant E}},
  issn         = {{0031-9023}},
  journal      = {{Physical Therapy}},
  keywords     = {{Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation}},
  publisher    = {{Oxford University Press (OUP)}},
  title        = {{{External Focus of Attention Influences Cortical Activity Associated with Single Limb Balance Performance}}},
  doi          = {{10.1093/ptj/pzab223}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@article{45115,
  abstract     = {{<jats:sec>
                  <jats:title>Context</jats:title>
                  <jats:p>Return to running (RTR) after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a crucial milestone. However, how and when to start a running program are uncertain.</jats:p>
               </jats:sec>
               <jats:sec>
                  <jats:title>Objective</jats:title>
                  <jats:p>To explore the feasibility of a structured program to reintroduce running after ACLR and evaluate the predictive value of potential predictors of short-term success.</jats:p>
               </jats:sec>
               <jats:sec>
                  <jats:title>Design</jats:title>
                  <jats:p>Longitudinal cohort study.</jats:p>
               </jats:sec>
               <jats:sec>
                  <jats:title>Setting</jats:title>
                  <jats:p>Local research center and participants' homes.</jats:p>
               </jats:sec>
               <jats:sec>
                  <jats:title>Patients or Other Participants</jats:title>
                  <jats:p>Thirty-five participants were recruited after ACLR.</jats:p>
               </jats:sec>
               <jats:sec>
                  <jats:title>Intervention(s)</jats:title>
                  <jats:p>Program with a progression algorithm to reintroduce running (10 running sessions in 14 days).</jats:p>
               </jats:sec>
               <jats:sec>
                  <jats:title>Main Outcome Measure(s)</jats:title>
                  <jats:p>The criterion for short-term success was no exacerbation of symptoms. Potential predictors were (1) the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee form score, (2) ACL Return to Sport after Injury questionnaire score, (3) quadriceps and hamstrings strength, (4) step-down endurance test, and (5) modified Star Excursion Balance test. Descriptive statistics were performed to study the feasibility of the RTR program, and Poisson regression analysis was used to evaluate predictors of success.</jats:p>
               </jats:sec>
               <jats:sec>
                  <jats:title>Results</jats:title>
                  <jats:p>Of the 34 participants, 33 completed the RTR program. Sixteen participants experienced some temporary exacerbation of symptoms, but only 1 had to stop the program. The initial IKDC score was the only significant predictor of a successful RTR, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 80.4%. An IKDC cut-off of 63.7/100 differentiated responders and nonresponders with the highest sensitivity and specificity (77.8% and 75.0%, respectively). A participant with an IKDC score above this threshold had a 3-fold greater chance of success.</jats:p>
               </jats:sec>
               <jats:sec>
                  <jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title>
                  <jats:p>Our results confirm the feasibility of our RTR program and progression algorithm after ACLR. Clinicians should use an IKDC score of &amp;gt;64 as a criterion to reintroduce running after ACLR to increase the likelihood of short-term success.</jats:p>
               </jats:sec>}},
  author       = {{Pairot de Fontenay, Benoit and Van Cant, Joachim and Gokeler, Alli and Roy, Jean-Sébastien}},
  issn         = {{1938-162X}},
  journal      = {{Journal of Athletic Training}},
  keywords     = {{Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, General Medicine}},
  number       = {{6}},
  pages        = {{540--546}},
  publisher    = {{Journal of Athletic Training/NATA}},
  title        = {{{Reintroduction of Running After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With a Hamstrings Graft: Can We Predict Short-Term Success?}}},
  doi          = {{10.4085/1062-6050-0407.21}},
  volume       = {{57}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@article{45135,
  abstract     = {{<jats:sec><jats:title>Context:</jats:title><jats:p> Only 55% of the athletes return to competitive sports after an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. Athletes younger than 25 years who return to sports have a second injury rate of 23%. There may be a mismatch between rehabilitation contents and the demands an athlete faces after returning to sports. Current return-to-sports (RTS) tests utilize closed and predictable motor skills; however, demands on the field are different. Neurocognitive functions are essential to manage dynamic sport situations and may fluctuate after peripheral injuries. Most RTS and rehabilitation paradigms appear to lack this aspect, which might be linked to increased risk of second injury. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Objective:</jats:title><jats:p> This systematic and scoping review aims to map existing evidence about neurocognitive and neurophysiological functions in athletes, which could be linked to ACL injury in an integrated fashion and bring an extensive perspective to assessment and rehabilitation approaches. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Data Sources:</jats:title><jats:p> PubMed and Cochrane databases were searched to identify relevant studies published between 2005 and 2020 using the keywords ACL, brain, cortical, neuroplasticity, cognitive, cognition, neurocognition, and athletes. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Study Selection:</jats:title><jats:p> Studies investigating either neurocognitive or neurophysiological functions in athletes and linking these to ACL injury regardless of their design and technique were included. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Study Design:</jats:title><jats:p> Systematic review. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Level of Evidence:</jats:title><jats:p> Level 3. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Data Extraction:</jats:title><jats:p> The demographic, temporal, neurological, and behavioral data revealing possible injury-related aspects were extracted and summarized. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results:</jats:title><jats:p> A total of 16 studies were included in this review. Deficits in different neurocognitive domains and changes in neurophysiological functions could be a predisposing risk factor for, or a consequence caused by, ACL injuries. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion:</jats:title><jats:p> Clinicians should view ACL injuries not only as a musculoskeletal but also as a neural lesion with neurocognitive and neurophysiological aspects. Rehabilitation and RTS paradigms should consider these changes for assessment and interventions after injury. </jats:p></jats:sec>}},
  author       = {{Piskin, Daghan and Benjaminse, Anne and Dimitrakis, Panagiotis and Gokeler, Alli}},
  issn         = {{1941-7381}},
  journal      = {{Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach}},
  keywords     = {{Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine}},
  number       = {{4}},
  pages        = {{549--555}},
  publisher    = {{SAGE Publications}},
  title        = {{{Neurocognitive and Neurophysiological Functions Related to ACL Injury: A Framework for Neurocognitive Approaches in Rehabilitation and Return-to-Sports Tests}}},
  doi          = {{10.1177/19417381211029265}},
  volume       = {{14}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@article{45138,
  abstract     = {{<jats:p>Individuals after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) have a high rate of reinjury upon return to competitive sports. Deficits in motor control may influence reinjury risk and can be addressed during rehabilitation with motor learning strategies. When instructing patients in performing motor tasks after ACLR, an external focus of attention directed to the intended movement effect has been shown to be more effective in reducing reinjury risk than an internal focus of attention on body movements. While this concept is mostly agreed upon, recent literature has made it clear that the interpretation and implementation of an external focus of attention within ACLR rehabilitation needs to be better described. The purpose of this commentary is to provide a clinical framework for the application of attentional focus strategies and guide clinicians towards effectively utilizing an external focus of attention in rehabilitation after ACLR.</jats:p> <jats:sec id="level-of-evidence"> <jats:title>Level of Evidence</jats:title> <jats:p>5</jats:p> </jats:sec>}},
  author       = {{Singh, Harjiv and Gokeler, Alli and Benjaminse, Anne}},
  issn         = {{2159-2896}},
  journal      = {{International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy}},
  keywords     = {{Rehabilitation, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation}},
  number       = {{6}},
  publisher    = {{International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy}},
  title        = {{{Effective Attentional Focus Strategies after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Commentary}}},
  doi          = {{10.26603/001c.29848}},
  volume       = {{16}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@article{45151,
  author       = {{Dingenen, Bart and Billiet, Bart and De Baets, Liesbet and Bellemans, Johan and Truijen, Jan and Gokeler, Alli}},
  issn         = {{1466-853X}},
  journal      = {{Physical Therapy in Sport}},
  keywords     = {{Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, General Medicine}},
  pages        = {{68--76}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier BV}},
  title        = {{{Rehabilitation strategies of Flemish physical therapists before and after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: An online survey}}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.ptsp.2021.02.003}},
  volume       = {{49}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@article{37830,
  abstract     = {{<jats:title>Zusammenfassung</jats:title><jats:p>Jegliche Art von Emotionen im Sport spielen vor allem in Wettkampfsituationen eine bedeutende Rolle, wenn es darum geht, zu einem bestimmten Zeitpunkt die optimale Leistung abzurufen. Emotionen können Auswirkungen auf der physiologischen, perzeptuell-kognitiven oder behavioralen Ebenen haben. Daher bildet den Schwerpunkt des vorliegenden Scoping-Reviews, die Untersuchung der Bedeutung wettkampfbezogener (state) Emotionen von Sporttreibenden. Die Literaturrecherche ergab 1126 Arbeiten, aus denen 15 Studien die Einschlusskriterien erfüllten. Diese wurden hinsichtlich ihrer Themenschwerpunkte betrachtet: 1) Emotionen, Kognitionen und Angst; 2) Emotionen, Leistungsbeurteilung und Stress; 3) Emotionen und Leistungsziele; 4) Unterschiede emotionaler Ausprägung im Geschlecht und Leistungsniveau; 5) Einfluss von Kausalzuschreibungen auf die Emotionen. Anschließend wurden die in den vorgestellten Studien verwendeten emotionserfassenden Messinstrumente betrachtet und vorgestellt. Zusammengefasst erscheint die Erfassung wettkampfbezogener (state) Emotionen rund um das sportliche Geschehen (vor, während, danach) ein wesentlicher Bestandteil der angewandten Sportpsychologie, davon abgeleiteter Emotionsregulationsstrategien und somit der optimalen Leistungserbringung zu sein, auch wenn der (deutschsprachigen) sportpsychologischen Praxis bisher nur begrenzte validierte Messinstrumente vorliegen.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Wetzel, Änne and Güldenpenning, Iris and Weigelt, Matthias}},
  issn         = {{2509-3142}},
  journal      = {{German Journal of Exercise and Sport Research}},
  keywords     = {{Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine}},
  number       = {{3}},
  pages        = {{419--432}},
  publisher    = {{Springer Science and Business Media LLC}},
  title        = {{{Wettkampfbezogene Emotionen im Sport – ein Scoping-Review}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s12662-021-00772-0}},
  volume       = {{52}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@article{34480,
  author       = {{Bolt, Ruben and Heuvelmans, Pieter and Benjaminse, Anne and Robinson, Mark A. and Gokeler, Alli}},
  issn         = {{1476-3141}},
  journal      = {{Sports Biomechanics}},
  keywords     = {{Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine}},
  pages        = {{1--14}},
  publisher    = {{Informa UK Limited}},
  title        = {{{An ecological dynamics approach to ACL injury risk research: a current opinion}}},
  doi          = {{10.1080/14763141.2021.1960419}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@article{51319,
  abstract     = {{<jats:p>Frank Beier, Franziska Wyßuwa und Elisa Wagner diskutieren in ihrem aktuellen Beitrag Fallinterpretationen zwischen Theorieund Anwendungsbezug den praktischen Nutzen wissenschaftlicher Erkenntnisse, insbesondere von Theorie, für die Schule und Erwachsenenbildung. Wir greifen ihre Position in einer dialogischen Replik kritisch auf. Die Form des Dialogs bietet uns die Möglichkeit, unsere Perspektiven als Erziehungswissenschaftler, Lehrer und Soziologe in die Debatte einzubringen. Wir möchten so die eingespielten Grenzziehungen in ‚Theorie- Praxis-Debatten‘ irritieren und Beiers, Wyßuwas und Wagners Plädoyer für die Stärke wissenschaftlicher Theorie ergänzen. Diese Stärke kommt weniger zur Geltung, wenn Theorie Kontingenz schließende und mehr, wenn sie Kontingenz öffnende Effekte hat. Zudem sollte Theorie nicht auf Modelle oder auf Theorien begrenzter Reichweite beschränkt und die konkrete Verwendung von Theorie zum Gegenstand der (Selbst)Reflexion und (Selbst)Kritik werden.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Haker, Christoph and Otterspeer, Lukas}},
  issn         = {{2567-5974}},
  journal      = {{Debatte. Beiträge zur Erwachsenenbildung}},
  keywords     = {{Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, General Medicine}},
  number       = {{1-2020}},
  pages        = {{49--63}},
  publisher    = {{Verlag Barbara Budrich GmbH}},
  title        = {{{Zum praktischen Nutzen von Theorie. Ein Dialog über die Grenzen von Bildungspraxis, Erziehungswissenschaft und Soziologie}}},
  doi          = {{10.3224/debatte.v3i1.05}},
  volume       = {{3}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{37787,
  abstract     = {{<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Purpose</jats:title><jats:p>In sports games, tactical instructions are mostly presented on tactic boards under temporal constraints determined by the length of time outs (e.g., 20–60 s time outs in basketball) and coaches’ instructional behavior. Thus, instructions should be presented in a way that enables fast and errorless information processing. High affordances in visual–spatial transformation (e.g., mental rotation processes) might both impede information processing and decrease execution performance. The aim of this study was to scrutinize the effect of different orientations of visual tactical displays on observation time under self-paced conditions as well as to compare the effects on execution performance to those of externally paced conditions. According to the self-determination theory, self-control over observation time is assumed to increase performance.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>In a mixed-factors design with two factors, 48 participants were instructed to execute a basketball playing pattern, which was presented on a virtual tactic board in one of five different spatial disparities to the players’ on-court perspective. The Self-Paced Group determined the observation time in a self-controlled manner, whereas in the Yoked Group observation times were externally controlled, i.e., the observation time was constrained to match that of the Self-Paced Group..</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>The self-controlled time for watching the pattern before execution was significantly shorter and spatial accuracy in pattern execution was significantly higher for low disparity between instruction perspective and on-court perspective. Self-control over observation time did not affect execution accuracy.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title><jats:p>The orientation effects might be explained by interfering mental rotation processes that are necessary to transform the instructional perspective into the players’ egocentric perspective. According to these results, coaches should align their tactic boards to their players’ on-court viewing perspective.</jats:p></jats:sec>}},
  author       = {{Krause, Daniel and Weigelt, Matthias}},
  issn         = {{2509-3142}},
  journal      = {{German Journal of Exercise and Sport Research}},
  keywords     = {{Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine}},
  number       = {{3}},
  pages        = {{354--365}},
  publisher    = {{Springer Science and Business Media LLC}},
  title        = {{{Mental rotation and performance in basketball: effects of self-controlled and externally controlled time constraints on the processing and execution of tactic board instructions with varied orientations}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s12662-020-00659-6}},
  volume       = {{50}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{37775,
  author       = {{Weigelt, Matthias and Memmert, Daniel}},
  issn         = {{0270-1367}},
  journal      = {{Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport}},
  keywords     = {{Nephrology, Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, General Medicine}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{137--145}},
  publisher    = {{Informa UK Limited}},
  title        = {{{The Mental Rotation Ability of Expert Basketball Players: Identifying On-Court Plays}}},
  doi          = {{10.1080/02701367.2020.1713289}},
  volume       = {{92}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@inproceedings{47045,
  author       = {{Güldenpenning, Iris}},
  booktitle    = {{Zeitschrift für Sportpsychologie}},
  keywords     = {{Applied Psychology, Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Social Psychology}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{80--81}},
  publisher    = {{Hogrefe Publishing Group}},
  title        = {{{Bericht zur 52. Tagung der Arbeitsgemeinschaft für  Sportpsychologie: Neues Format, unbekannte Talente und Belohnungsaufschub}}},
  doi          = {{10.1026/1612-5010/a000300}},
  volume       = {{27}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{51323,
  abstract     = {{<jats:p>Sebastian Zicks erziehungswissenschaftliche Kritik des Mobilitätsimperativs ist Ausgangspunkt unseres Beitrags. Wir greifen diese Kritik auf, indem wir sie in zweifacher Hinsicht ergänzen: Erstens um einen Fokus auf soziale Mobilität, welche sich in Mobilitätsnarrativen mit räumlicher Mobilität als verwoben zeigt. Zweitens um die Perspektive auf Mobilität als Rückkehr, die wir von einer Perspektive auf Mobilität als Fortbewegung abgrenzen. Die Rückwärtsbewegung ist für uns eng an (Selbst-)Reflexionen und transformatorische Bildungsprozesse gebunden, wie sie in Didier Eribons autosozioanalytischem Vorhaben einer Rückkehr zu erkennen sind. Unsere Ausführungen münden erstens in einer Kritik am Imperativ des Bildungsaufstiegs, in dem mehr Bildung scheinbar immer mit individuellen und kollektiven Fortschritten einhergeht. Zweitens wenden wir die von uns herausgearbeitete Kritik reflexiv auf die Erziehungswissenschaft. Sie ist dann eine Verunsicherungswissenschaft, für die die Rückkehr, und damit das Hinterfragen eigener Selbstverständlichkeiten, konstitutiv ist.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Haker, Christoph and Otterspeer, Lukas}},
  issn         = {{2567-5974}},
  journal      = {{Debatte. Beiträge zur Erwachsenenbildung}},
  keywords     = {{Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, General Medicine}},
  number       = {{2-2019}},
  pages        = {{161--176}},
  publisher    = {{Verlag Barbara Budrich GmbH}},
  title        = {{{Erziehungswissenschaft als Verunsicherungswissenschaft. Nicht nur eine Kritik des Mobilitätsimperativs}}},
  doi          = {{10.3224/debatte.v2i2.04}},
  volume       = {{2}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

