@article{39817,
  abstract     = {{In the mentoring programme project “Schule für alle” (“School for all”) at the University of Bielefeld in North Rhine-Westphalia, university students of primary or special education support a child who is in a situation of crisis for more than one year. In addition, the university students receive ongoing, systematic university support (cf. Kottmann, 2007, p. 32; Kottmann, 2014, p. 380).</jats:p><jats:p>The accompanying research by “Schule für alle” focuses on the professionalization processes of student teachers during practical phases at universities; accordingly, control groups were included on a pro rata basis. In the pre-post design, all students completed a questionnaire (cf. Pieper, Kottmann &amp; Miller, 2018, p. 294), the evaluation of which shows few changes in the professional perception of competence. Students of the mentoring programme also regularly reflected on their practical experience. Based on the objective hermeneutics it was discovered that the conception of the project supports the process of perceiving, acknowledging and becoming more sensitive in regard to heterogeneous realities in life (cf. Pieper &amp; Kottmann 2019b, p. 312) and that students can consciously perceive and reflect their own normative expectations (cf. Pieper &amp; Kottmann 2019a, p. 79).</jats:p><jats:p>The article primarily presents the results of the pre-post survey in detail and adds insights into the qualitative evaluation processes. In the conclusion, the potential of the project and mentoring programmes in general, specifically for teacher training students, is described.}},
  author       = {{Kottmann, Brigitte and Pieper, Catania}},
  issn         = {{2064-2199}},
  journal      = {{Hungarian Educational Research Journal}},
  keywords     = {{professionalization of teacher training students, practical university phases, teacher training at universities, men-toring programmes}},
  number       = {{3}},
  pages        = {{232--251}},
  title        = {{{Project “Schule für alle” as a mentoring programme in university teacher education: Professionalization processes of student teachers in different practical university phases}}},
  doi          = {{10.1556/063.2020.00022}},
  volume       = {{10}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{23747,
  author       = {{Witte, Thomas and Hanemann, Stefan and Sommerfeld, Herbert and Temmen, Katrin and Fechner, Sabine}},
  issn         = {{0944-5846}},
  journal      = {{CHEMKON}},
  keywords     = {{digital, technology, teacher education}},
  number       = {{4}},
  pages        = {{193--198}},
  title        = {{{Selbstbau eines digitalen Low-Cost-Fotometers für den Chemieunterricht}}},
  doi          = {{10.1002/ckon.201900026}},
  volume       = {{27}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@inproceedings{8575,
  abstract     = {{The transition from high school to university mathematics has proven to be difficult for many students but especially for pre-service secondary teachers. To support these students at mastering this transition, various universities have introduced support measures of various kinds. The WiGeMath project developed a taxonomy that makes it possible to describe and compare these measures concerning their goals as well as their frame characteristics. We will exemplify the use of the taxonomy in the description of one specific innovative measure that was part of the WiGeMath evaluations. Moreover, we will present first results concerning the goal-fulfilment of this measure concerning affective characteristics of the student cohort and their predominant beliefs.}},
  author       = {{Kuklinski, Christiane and Leis, Elena and Liebendörfer, Michael and Hochmuth, Reinhard and Biehler, Rolf and Lankeit, Elisa and Neuhaus, Silke and Schaper, Niclas and Schürmann, Mirko}},
  booktitle    = {{Proceedings of the Second Conference of the International Network for Didactic Research in University Mathematics (INDRUM 2018, 5-7 April 2018)}},
  editor       = {{Durand-Guerrier, V. and Hochmuth, R. and Goodchild, S. and Hogstad, N.M.}},
  keywords     = {{Beliefs., Motivational developments, Novel approaches to teaching, Teacher education, Transition to and across university mathematics}},
  pages        = {{527--536}},
  publisher    = {{INDRUM Network, University of Agder}},
  title        = {{{Evaluating Innovative Measures in University Mathematics – The Case of Affective Outcomes in a Lecture focused on Problem-Solving}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@inbook{57889,
  abstract     = {{During the past decade, there has been an increase of pedagogical research under conditions of posthuman theories, such as the Actor Network Theory or post-phenomenology. Yet, there has not been much research on the materiality of music pedagogical practices. This article introduces an ongoing grounded-theory study on the role of things (e.g., music instruments, black board, or digital devices) within the music classroom. Results from the analysis of group discussions and interviews with student teachers show tensions between personal preferences, school conventions, and material conventions within the process of introducing things into the classroom. (DIPF/Orig.)}},
  author       = {{Godau, Marc}},
  booktitle    = {{Soziale Aspekte des Musiklernens}},
  editor       = {{Clausen, Bernd and Dreßler, Susanne}},
  keywords     = {{Interview, Lehrer, Musical education, Musikpädagogik, Musikunterricht, Teacher, Music lessons, Qualitative Forschung, Qualitative research, Teaching of music, Object, Objekt, Ding, Handlung, Practice, Praxis, Probationary teacher training, Referendariat}},
  pages        = {{43–55}},
  publisher    = {{Waxmann}},
  title        = {{{Wie kommen die Dinge in den Musikunterricht? Zur Materialität musikpädagogischer Praxis am Beispiel divergierender Orientierungen im Kontext unterrichtsbezogenen Handelns angehender Lehrkräfte}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@article{35315,
  abstract     = {{In vielen Bundesländern ist ein Praxissemester obligatorischer Bestandteil der Lehramtsausbildung. Zunehmend wird untersucht, ob und in welcher Form Studierende die für diesen Ausbildungsabschnitt vorgesehenen Standards erreichen. Dabei fokussieren Untersuchungen primär bildungswissenschaftliche Kompetenzbereiche. Die Frage, inwiefern das Praxissemester zum Erwerb domänenspezifischer bzw. insbesondere fachdidaktischer Kompetenzen beiträgt, lässt sich als Forschungsdesiderat konstatieren. Es ist zudem unklar, wie bestimmte Lerngelegenheiten diesen Prozess beeinflussen. Um diesem Forschungsbedarf zu begegnen, wurde an der Universität Paderborn die interdisziplinäre Forschungsgruppe Fachdidaktische Forschung im Praxissemester gegründet. Ziel der gemeinsamen Arbeit ist es, auf Basis wissenschaftlicher Ergebnisse einen Beitrag zur Weiterentwicklung des Praxissemesters zu leisten. Am Praxissemester sind drei Ausbildungsorte beteiligt: Hochschulen, Zentren für schulpraktische Lehrerausbildung (ZfsL) und Schulen. Ein Schwerpunkt liegt daher auf der Untersuchung des kritisch-produktiven Verhältnisses von Hochschullehre und Praxis. Vor dem Hintergrund fachübergreifender Heuristiken zur Professionalisierung in der Lehrer/innenbildung, werden in diesem Artikel aktuelle Projekte der Forschungsgruppe und deren Kontexte vorgestellt und diskutiert.}},
  author       = {{Wosnitza, Christopher and Caruso, Carina and Vogelsang, Christoph}},
  issn         = {{ 2199-8825}},
  journal      = {{die hochschullehre}},
  keywords     = {{Praxissemester, Lehrer/innenbildung, Evaluation, Kompetenzentwicklung, Fachdidaktik / school internships, teacher education, evaluation, professional competence, subject matter education}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{1--19}},
  publisher    = {{wbv}},
  title        = {{{Das Praxissemester fachdidaktisch in den Blick nehmen}}},
  doi          = {{10.3278/HSL1705W}},
  volume       = {{3}},
  year         = {{2017}},
}

@article{36481,
  abstract     = {{Recent studies highlight early childhood teachers’ mathematics-related competence. Developing this competence should be a main aspect of early childhood teachers’ education. This is, however, not the case in all countries. Consequently, high-quality professional development courses are needed. Based on research results, we developed a competence-oriented continuous professional development course ("EmMa") and examined the effects of "EmMa" by asking: How does "EmMa" affect the development of early childhood teachers’ i) mathematical content knowledge, ii) mathematical pedagogical content knowledge and iii) beliefs towards mathematics in general? To answer these questions, we conducted a pre-test/post-test study including a control group with 99 in-service early childhood teachers. Results show that the course affected teachers’ mathematical pedagogical content knowledge and static orientation towards mathematics positively. From this we conclude that scaling-up "EmMa" might be a suitable approach to bridge the gap between pre-service education with nearly no mathematics and the challenges of early mathematics education.}},
  author       = {{Bruns, Julia and Eichen, Lars and Gasteiger, Hedwig}},
  journal      = {{Mathematics Teacher Education and Development (MTED)}},
  keywords     = {{Beliefs, Competency Based Teacher Education, Control Groups, Early Childhood Education, Faculty Development, Foreign Countries, Inservice Teacher Education, Intervention, Mathematical Aptitude, Mathematics Skills, Pedagogical Content Knowledge, Preschool Teachers, Pretests Posttests, Professional Continuing Education, Statistical Analysis, Teacher Competency Testing}},
  number       = {{3}},
  pages        = {{76–93}},
  title        = {{{Mathematics-related Competence of Early Childhood Teachers Visiting a Continuous Professional Development Course: An Intervention Study}}},
  volume       = {{19}},
  year         = {{2017}},
}

@inproceedings{35684,
  abstract     = {{In research, pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) is considered as an important aspect of teachers’ professional competence. However, there is no standardized definition concerning the internal structure of this concept, especially in science subjects such as physics. Therefore, results of different empirical studies measuring PCK are difficult to compare. Moreover, there is no study that can report on correlations between various aspects of PCK. Against this background, different conceptualizations and theoretical considerations of PCK have been consulted and compared. Based on these analyses, a comprehensive model of prospective physics teachers’ PCK and a related test instrument (in the form of a pen-and-paper test) have been developed. Its purpose is to enlighten the correlations between certain aspects of PCK as well as between PCK and other areas of knowledge (e.g. content knowledge). To validate the test instrument and the underlying PCK model, a think aloud study with 15 probands was conducted. We focused on the knowledge areas that the probands referred to while answering the items. With these data, indications of the validity of the underlying model could be identified. Furthermore, the test instrument was piloted with a sample of 216 prospective physics teachers. 

}},
  author       = {{Gramzow, Yvonne and Riese, Josef and Reinhold, Peter}},
  booktitle    = {{E-Book Proceedings of the ESERA 2013 Conference: Science Education Research For Evidence-based Teaching and Coherence in Learning. Part 13}},
  editor       = {{Constantinou, Costas P. and Papadouris, Nikos and Hadjigeorgiou, Angela}},
  keywords     = {{PCK, teacher education, physics, think aloud study}},
  pages        = {{20--27}},
  title        = {{{ Prospective physics teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. Validating a test instrument by using a think aloud study}}},
  year         = {{2014}},
}