@article{6086,
  abstract     = {{Visual stimuli (primes) reduce the perceptual latency of a target appearing at the same location (perceptual latency priming, PLP). Three experiments assessed the time course of PLP by masked and, in Experiment 3, unmasked primes. Experiments 1 (N=11; mean age 26.9) and 2 (N=12; mean age 25.6) investigated the temporal parameters that determine the size of priming. Stimulus onset asynchrony was found to exert the main influence accompanied by a small effect of prime duration. Experiment 3 (N=19; mean age 27.7) used a large range of priming onset asynchronies. We suggest to explain PLP by the Asynchronous Updating Model which relates it to the asynchrony of 2 central coding processes, preattentive coding of basic visual features and attentional orienting as a prerequisite for perceptual judgments and conscious perception. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved)}},
  author       = {{Scharlau, Ingrid and Neumann, Odmar}},
  issn         = {{0001-6918}},
  journal      = {{Acta Psychologica}},
  keywords     = {{perceptual latency priming, temporal parameters, Asynchronous Updating Model, time course, stimulus onset asynchrony, visual masking, attention, Adult, Attention, Female, Humans, Male, Perceptual Masking, Reaction Time, Time Perception, Visual Perception, Attention, Priming, Stimulus Onset, Visual Masking, Visual Perception, Models, Time}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{185 -- 203}},
  title        = {{{Temporal parameters and time course of perceptual latency priming.}}},
  volume       = {{113}},
  year         = {{2003}},
}

@inbook{34447,
  abstract     = {{The Object Constraint Language (OCL) was introduced to support the specification of constraints for UML diagrams and is mainly used to formulate invariants and operation pre- and postconditions. Though OCL is also applied in behavioral diagrams, e.g., as guards for state transitions, it is currently not possible to specify constraints concerning the dynamic behavior and timing properties of such diagrams.

This article discusses OCL’s application for the dynamic behavior of UML Statechart diagrams and presents an OCL extension for specification of state-oriented time-bounded constraints.We introduce operations to extract state configurations from diagrams and define additional predicates over states and state configurations. The semantics of our OCL extension is given by employing time-bounded Computational Tree Logic (CTL) formulae. An example of a flexible manufacturing system with automated guided vehicles demonstrates the application of our extension.}},
  author       = {{Flake, Stephan and Müller, Wolfgang}},
  booktitle    = {{Advances in Object Modelling with the OCL}},
  editor       = {{Clark, T. and Warmer, J.}},
  isbn         = {{978-3-540-45669-8}},
  keywords     = {{Model Check     Temporal Logic     Object Constraint Language     Execution Path     Kripke Structure}},
  pages        = {{150 -- 171}},
  publisher    = {{Springer-Verlag}},
  title        = {{{An OCL Extension for Real-Time Constraints}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/3-540-45669-4_8}},
  year         = {{2002}},
}

@article{32503,
  abstract     = {{Two parameters of language production, the partner model and the mentally represented knowledge
about a spatial constellation, are investigated with respect to their influence on spatial reference. At
issue is whether the verbally expressed point of view in route directions is primarily influenced by the
needs of the partner or by the underlying mental representation of the speaker stemming from his or
her own experience with an object. Two experiments in which participants (N 5 90) were asked to
produce a set of route directions are reported. The experimental situation was such that the point of
view of the speaker did not correspond to the point of view of the partner. The results show that more
participants localize from their own point of view than from the point of view of the partner.
Discussion centers on the fact that speakers do not always behave in a truly partner-oriented manner.}},
  author       = {{Buhl, Heike M.}},
  journal      = {{Journal of Psycholinguistic Research}},
  keywords     = {{language production, partner model, mental representation, spatial point of view, route direction}},
  number       = {{6}},
  pages        = {{549 -- 567}},
  title        = {{{Partner orientation and speaker’s knowledge as conflicting parameters in language production}}},
  volume       = {{30}},
  year         = {{2001}},
}