---
_id: '57971'
abstract:
- lang: eng
  text: 'Repetitive TMS (rTMS) with a frequency of 5-10~Hz is widely used for language
    mapping. However, it may be accompanied by discomfort and is limited in the number
    and reliability of evoked language errors. We, here, systematically tested the
    influence of different stimulation frequencies (i.e., 10, 30, and 50 Hz) on tolerability,
    number, reliability, and cortical distribution of language errors aiming at improved
    language mapping. 15 right-handed, healthy subjects (m~=~8, median age: 29 yrs)
    were investigated in two sessions, separated by 2-5 days. In each session, 10,
    30, and 50 Hz rTMS were applied over the left hemisphere in a randomized order
    during a picture naming task. Overall, 30 Hz rTMS evoked significantly more errors
    (20 $\pm$ 12{%}) compared to 50 Hz (12 $\pm$ 8{%}; p {\textless}.01), whereas
    error rates were comparable between 30/50 and 10~Hz (18 $\pm$ 11{%}). Across all
    conditions, a significantly higher error rate was found in Session 1 (19 $\pm$
    13{%}) compared to Session 2 (13 $\pm$ 7{%}, p {\textless}.05). The error rate
    was poorly reliable between sessions for 10 (intraclass correlation coefficient,
    ICC~=~.315) and 30 Hz (ICC~=~.427), whereas 50 Hz showed a moderate reliability
    (ICC~=~.597). Spatial reliability of language errors was low to moderate with
    a tendency toward increased reliability for higher frequencies, for example, within
    frontal regions. Compared to 10~Hz, both, 30 and 50 Hz were rated as less painful.
    Taken together, our data favor the use of rTMS-protocols employing higher frequencies
    for evoking language errors reliably and with reduced discomfort, depending on
    the region of interest.'
author:
- first_name: Charlotte
  full_name: Nettekoven, Charlotte
  last_name: Nettekoven
- first_name: Julia
  full_name: Pieczewski, Julia
  last_name: Pieczewski
- first_name: Volker
  full_name: Neuschmelting, Volker
  last_name: Neuschmelting
- first_name: Kristina
  full_name: Jonas, Kristina
  id: '94540'
  last_name: Jonas
  orcid: 0000-0002-1067-9139
- first_name: Roland
  full_name: Goldbrunner, Roland
  last_name: Goldbrunner
- first_name: Christian
  full_name: Grefkes, Christian
  last_name: Grefkes
- first_name: Carolin
  full_name: Weiss Lucas, Carolin
  last_name: Weiss Lucas
citation:
  ama: Nettekoven C, Pieczewski J, Neuschmelting V, et al. Improving the efficacy
    and reliability of rTMS language mapping by increasing the stimulation frequency.
    <i>Human brain mapping</i>. 2021;42(16):5309–5321. doi:<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25619">10.1002/hbm.25619</a>
  apa: Nettekoven, C., Pieczewski, J., Neuschmelting, V., Jonas, K., Goldbrunner,
    R., Grefkes, C., &#38; Weiss Lucas, C. (2021). Improving the efficacy and reliability
    of rTMS language mapping by increasing the stimulation frequency. <i>Human Brain
    Mapping</i>, <i>42</i>(16), 5309–5321. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25619">https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25619</a>
  bibtex: '@article{Nettekoven_Pieczewski_Neuschmelting_Jonas_Goldbrunner_Grefkes_Weiss
    Lucas_2021, title={Improving the efficacy and reliability of rTMS language mapping
    by increasing the stimulation frequency}, volume={42}, DOI={<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25619">10.1002/hbm.25619</a>},
    number={16}, journal={Human brain mapping}, author={Nettekoven, Charlotte and
    Pieczewski, Julia and Neuschmelting, Volker and Jonas, Kristina and Goldbrunner,
    Roland and Grefkes, Christian and Weiss Lucas, Carolin}, year={2021}, pages={5309–5321}
    }'
  chicago: 'Nettekoven, Charlotte, Julia Pieczewski, Volker Neuschmelting, Kristina
    Jonas, Roland Goldbrunner, Christian Grefkes, and Carolin Weiss Lucas. “Improving
    the Efficacy and Reliability of RTMS Language Mapping by Increasing the Stimulation
    Frequency.” <i>Human Brain Mapping</i> 42, no. 16 (2021): 5309–5321. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25619">https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25619</a>.'
  ieee: 'C. Nettekoven <i>et al.</i>, “Improving the efficacy and reliability of rTMS
    language mapping by increasing the stimulation frequency,” <i>Human brain mapping</i>,
    vol. 42, no. 16, pp. 5309–5321, 2021, doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25619">10.1002/hbm.25619</a>.'
  mla: Nettekoven, Charlotte, et al. “Improving the Efficacy and Reliability of RTMS
    Language Mapping by Increasing the Stimulation Frequency.” <i>Human Brain Mapping</i>,
    vol. 42, no. 16, 2021, pp. 5309–5321, doi:<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25619">10.1002/hbm.25619</a>.
  short: C. Nettekoven, J. Pieczewski, V. Neuschmelting, K. Jonas, R. Goldbrunner,
    C. Grefkes, C. Weiss Lucas, Human Brain Mapping 42 (2021) 5309–5321.
date_created: 2025-01-06T12:11:43Z
date_updated: 2026-04-13T11:37:55Z
doi: 10.1002/hbm.25619
extern: '1'
intvolume: '        42'
issue: '16'
keyword:
- Adult
- Brain Mapping
- Cerebral Cortex/diagnostic imaging/physiology
- Female
- Humans
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Male
- Pattern Recognition
- Psycholinguistics
- Reproducibility of Results
- Speech/physiology
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
- Visual/physiology
- Young Adult
language:
- iso: eng
page: 5309–5321
publication: Human brain mapping
status: public
title: Improving the efficacy and reliability of rTMS language mapping by increasing
  the stimulation frequency
type: journal_article
user_id: '61071'
volume: 42
year: '2021'
...
---
_id: '6081'
abstract:
- lang: eng
  text: The law of prior entry states that attended objects come to consciousness
    more quickly than unattended ones. This has been well established in spatial cueing
    paradigms, where two task-relevant stimuli are presented near-simultaneously at
    two different locations. Here, we suggest that prior entry also plays a pivotal
    role in temporal attention paradigms, where stimuli appear at the same location
    but at distinct moments in time, in rapid serial presentation (RSVP). Specifically,
    we hypothesize that prior entry can explain temporal order reversals in reporting
    two targets from RSVP. In support of this, three experiments show that cueing
    attention toward either of the targets has a strong influence on order errors.
    We conclude that prior entry provides a viable explanation of the way in which
    relevant information is prioritized in RSVP. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016
    APA, all rights reserved)
author:
- first_name: Frederic
  full_name: Hilkenmeier, Frederic
  last_name: Hilkenmeier
- first_name: Christian N. L.
  full_name: Olivers, Christian N. L.
  last_name: Olivers
- first_name: Ingrid
  full_name: Scharlau, Ingrid
  id: '451'
  last_name: Scharlau
  orcid: 0000-0003-2364-9489
citation:
  ama: 'Hilkenmeier F, Olivers CNL, Scharlau I. Prior entry and temporal attention:
    Cueing affects order errors in RSVP. <i>Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human
    Perception and Performance</i>. 2012;38(1):180-190.'
  apa: 'Hilkenmeier, F., Olivers, C. N. L., &#38; Scharlau, I. (2012). Prior entry
    and temporal attention: Cueing affects order errors in RSVP. <i>Journal of Experimental
    Psychology: Human Perception and Performance</i>, <i>38</i>(1), 180–190.'
  bibtex: '@article{Hilkenmeier_Olivers_Scharlau_2012, title={Prior entry and temporal
    attention: Cueing affects order errors in RSVP.}, volume={38}, number={1}, journal={Journal
    of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance}, author={Hilkenmeier,
    Frederic and Olivers, Christian N. L. and Scharlau, Ingrid}, year={2012}, pages={180–190}
    }'
  chicago: 'Hilkenmeier, Frederic, Christian N. L. Olivers, and Ingrid Scharlau. “Prior
    Entry and Temporal Attention: Cueing Affects Order Errors in RSVP.” <i>Journal
    of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance</i> 38, no. 1 (2012):
    180–90.'
  ieee: 'F. Hilkenmeier, C. N. L. Olivers, and I. Scharlau, “Prior entry and temporal
    attention: Cueing affects order errors in RSVP.,” <i>Journal of Experimental Psychology:
    Human Perception and Performance</i>, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 180–190, 2012.'
  mla: 'Hilkenmeier, Frederic, et al. “Prior Entry and Temporal Attention: Cueing
    Affects Order Errors in RSVP.” <i>Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception
    and Performance</i>, vol. 38, no. 1, 2012, pp. 180–90.'
  short: 'F. Hilkenmeier, C.N.L. Olivers, I. Scharlau, Journal of Experimental Psychology:
    Human Perception and Performance 38 (2012) 180–190.'
date_created: 2018-12-10T07:06:20Z
date_updated: 2022-06-06T16:35:40Z
department:
- _id: '424'
funded_apc: '1'
intvolume: '        38'
issue: '1'
keyword:
- attentional blink
- attentional enhancement
- lag-1 sparing
- prior entry
- temporal cueing
- visual attention
- rapid serial presentation
- Adolescent
- Adult
- Attention
- Attentional Blink
- Color Perception
- Cues
- Female
- Humans
- Male
- Neuropsychological Tests
- Pattern Recognition
- Visual
- Time Factors
- Visual Perception
- Young Adult
- Cues
- Serial Recall
- Visual Attention
- Eyeblink Reflex
language:
- iso: eng
page: 180 - 190
publication: 'Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance'
publication_identifier:
  issn:
  - 0096-1523
publication_status: published
status: public
title: 'Prior entry and temporal attention: Cueing affects order errors in RSVP.'
type: journal_article
user_id: '42165'
volume: 38
year: '2012'
...
---
_id: '6082'
abstract:
- lang: eng
  text: 'When two targets are presented in rapid succession, the first target (T1)
    is usually identified, but the second target (T2) is often missed. A remarkable
    exception to this ''attentional blink'' occurs when T2 immediately follows the
    first T1, at lag 1. It is then often spared but reported in the wrong order—that
    is, before T1. These order reversals have led to the hypothesis that ''lag 1 sparing''
    occurs because the two targets merge into a single episodic representation. Here,
    we report evidence consistent with an alternative theory: T2 receives more attention
    than T1, leading to prior entry into working memory. Two experiments showed that
    the more T2 performance exceeded that for T1, the more order reversals were made.
    Furthermore, precuing T1 led to a shift in performance benefits from T2 to T1
    and to an equivalent reduction in order reversals. We conclude that it is not
    necessary to assume episodic integration to explain lag 1 sparing or the accompanying
    order reversals. (PsycINFO Dat'
author:
- first_name: Christian N. L.
  full_name: Olivers, Christian N. L.
  last_name: Olivers
- first_name: Frederic
  full_name: Hilkenmeier, Frederic
  last_name: Hilkenmeier
- first_name: Ingrid
  full_name: Scharlau, Ingrid
  id: '451'
  last_name: Scharlau
  orcid: 0000-0003-2364-9489
citation:
  ama: Olivers CNL, Hilkenmeier F, Scharlau I. Prior entry explains order reversals
    in the attentional blink. <i>Attention, Perception, &#38; Psychophysics</i>. 2011;73(1):53-67.
  apa: Olivers, C. N. L., Hilkenmeier, F., &#38; Scharlau, I. (2011). Prior entry
    explains order reversals in the attentional blink. <i>Attention, Perception, &#38;
    Psychophysics</i>, <i>73</i>(1), 53–67.
  bibtex: '@article{Olivers_Hilkenmeier_Scharlau_2011, title={Prior entry explains
    order reversals in the attentional blink.}, volume={73}, number={1}, journal={Attention,
    Perception, &#38; Psychophysics}, author={Olivers, Christian N. L. and Hilkenmeier,
    Frederic and Scharlau, Ingrid}, year={2011}, pages={53–67} }'
  chicago: 'Olivers, Christian N. L., Frederic Hilkenmeier, and Ingrid Scharlau. “Prior
    Entry Explains Order Reversals in the Attentional Blink.” <i>Attention, Perception,
    &#38; Psychophysics</i> 73, no. 1 (2011): 53–67.'
  ieee: C. N. L. Olivers, F. Hilkenmeier, and I. Scharlau, “Prior entry explains order
    reversals in the attentional blink.,” <i>Attention, Perception, &#38; Psychophysics</i>,
    vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 53–67, 2011.
  mla: Olivers, Christian N. L., et al. “Prior Entry Explains Order Reversals in the
    Attentional Blink.” <i>Attention, Perception, &#38; Psychophysics</i>, vol. 73,
    no. 1, 2011, pp. 53–67.
  short: C.N.L. Olivers, F. Hilkenmeier, I. Scharlau, Attention, Perception, &#38;
    Psychophysics 73 (2011) 53–67.
date_created: 2018-12-10T07:06:31Z
date_updated: 2022-06-07T00:16:50Z
department:
- _id: '424'
funded_apc: '1'
intvolume: '        73'
issue: '1'
keyword:
- attentional blink
- order reversals
- prior entry
- working memory
- visual attention
- attentional performance
- Adolescent
- Adult
- Attention
- Attentional Blink
- Color Perception
- Cues
- Discrimination (Psychology)
- Female
- Humans
- Male
- Memory
- Short-Term
- Pattern Recognition
- Visual
- Psychophysics
- Reaction Time
- Reversal Learning
- Sensory Gating
- Serial Learning
- Young Adult
- Eyeblink Reflex
- Stimulus Change
- Stimulus Parameters
- Visual Attention
- Attentional Blink
- Short Term Memory
language:
- iso: eng
main_file_link:
- open_access: '1'
  url: https://kw.uni-paderborn.de/fileadmin/fakultaet/Institute/psychologie/Kognitive_Psychologie/Publikationen/Olivers_etal__2011__AP_PProofs.pdf
oa: '1'
page: 53 - 67
publication: Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
publication_identifier:
  issn:
  - 1943-3921
publication_status: published
status: public
title: Prior entry explains order reversals in the attentional blink.
type: journal_article
user_id: '42165'
volume: 73
year: '2011'
...
---
_id: '6084'
abstract:
- lang: eng
  text: Attended stimuli are perceived as occurring earlier than unattended stimuli.
    This phenomenon of prior entry is usually identified by a shift in the point of
    subjective simultaneity (PSS) in temporal order judgements (TOJs). According to
    its traditional psychophysical interpretation, the PSS coincides with the perception
    of simultaneity. This assumption is, however, questionable. Technically, the PSS
    represents the temporal interval between two stimuli at which the two alternative
    TOJs are equally likely. Thus it also seems possible that observers perceive not
    simultaneity, but uncertainty of temporal order. This possibility is supported
    by prior-entry studies, which find that perception of simultaneity is not very
    likely at the PSS. The present study tested the percept at the PSS in prior entry,
    using peripheral cues to orient attention. We found that manipulating attention
    caused varying temporal perceptions around the PSS. On some occasions observers
    perceived the two stimuli as sim
author:
- first_name: Katharina
  full_name: Weiß, Katharina
  last_name: Weiß
- first_name: Ingrid
  full_name: Scharlau, Ingrid
  id: '451'
  last_name: Scharlau
  orcid: 0000-0003-2364-9489
citation:
  ama: 'Weiß K, Scharlau I. Simultaneity and temporal order perception: Different
    sides of the same coin? Evidence from a visual prior-entry study. <i>The Quarterly
    Journal of Experimental Psychology</i>. 2011;64(2):394-416.'
  apa: 'Weiß, K., &#38; Scharlau, I. (2011). Simultaneity and temporal order perception:
    Different sides of the same coin? Evidence from a visual prior-entry study. <i>The
    Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology</i>, <i>64</i>(2), 394–416.'
  bibtex: '@article{Weiß_Scharlau_2011, title={Simultaneity and temporal order perception:
    Different sides of the same coin? Evidence from a visual prior-entry study.},
    volume={64}, number={2}, journal={The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology},
    author={Weiß, Katharina and Scharlau, Ingrid}, year={2011}, pages={394–416} }'
  chicago: 'Weiß, Katharina, and Ingrid Scharlau. “Simultaneity and Temporal Order
    Perception: Different Sides of the Same Coin? Evidence from a Visual Prior-Entry
    Study.” <i>The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology</i> 64, no. 2 (2011):
    394–416.'
  ieee: 'K. Weiß and I. Scharlau, “Simultaneity and temporal order perception: Different
    sides of the same coin? Evidence from a visual prior-entry study.,” <i>The Quarterly
    Journal of Experimental Psychology</i>, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 394–416, 2011.'
  mla: 'Weiß, Katharina, and Ingrid Scharlau. “Simultaneity and Temporal Order Perception:
    Different Sides of the Same Coin? Evidence from a Visual Prior-Entry Study.” <i>The
    Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology</i>, vol. 64, no. 2, 2011, pp. 394–416.'
  short: K. Weiß, I. Scharlau, The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 64
    (2011) 394–416.
date_created: 2018-12-10T07:06:56Z
date_updated: 2022-06-07T00:17:26Z
department:
- _id: '424'
funded_apc: '1'
intvolume: '        64'
issue: '2'
keyword:
- temporal order perception
- simultaneity
- temporal order judgment
- attention
- visual perception
- Adolescent
- Adult
- Attention
- Cues
- Discrimination (Psychology)
- Female
- Humans
- Judgment
- Male
- Models
- Psychological
- Photic Stimulation
- Reaction Time
- Time Factors
- Uncertainty
- Visual Perception
- Young Adult
- Attention
- Judgment
- Stimulus Similarity
- Time Perception
- Visual Discrimination
- Temporal Order (Judgment)
language:
- iso: eng
main_file_link:
- open_access: '1'
  url: https://kw.uni-paderborn.de/fileadmin/fakultaet/Institute/psychologie/Kognitive_Psychologie/Publikationen/WeissScharlau2010.pdf
oa: '1'
page: 394 - 416
publication: The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
publication_identifier:
  issn:
  - 1747-0218
publication_status: published
status: public
title: 'Simultaneity and temporal order perception: Different sides of the same coin?
  Evidence from a visual prior-entry study.'
type: journal_article
user_id: '42165'
volume: 64
year: '2011'
...