@inproceedings{4470, abstract = {{Abstract Summary: Study programs are currently receiving more attention in Europe. In consequence, it can be observed that the roles of program development and management are professionalized. In the proposed round table, we would like to discuss the role of educational developers to support this professionalization via measures of training and process support in the light of recent developments in Switzerland. Abstract Text: Professionalization of program development as an institutional responsibility In Switzerland, different developments in higher education have led to increased attention to the development and management of the study programs such as the Bologna process, an increasingly competitive environment, the tertiarisation of a number of professions formerly acquired through vocational education. Furthermore, the national qualification framework and in particular accreditation processes require HEI to demonstrate the effectiveness of their activities (e.g., Sursock & Smit, 2010). Many different actors have been involved in development processes on the program level but also within educational development units. However, so far a systematic discourse on key issues regarding the management and development of study programs is missing, not only in German-speaking Europe. The following main question will guide the round table session: How can educational development give vital impulses for program development? Our starting points are two approaches or frameworks from Swiss HEI: a) the definition of competencies for new program professionals at the Zurich University for Teacher Education and b) a process for the strategic development of didactically-aligned study programs at the University of St. Gallen. Framework 1: Competencies for program managers The experiences with a training program for study program managers at the Zurich University for Teacher Education are reported. Over a period of four years, a competency profile has been developed and refined. Insights into the challenges and struggles of this role were gained. Despite diverse job characteristics of program managers (often resulting from an institution-specific history), there is a common set of competencies necessary to successfully cope with organizational complexity such as role competency (Schein, 1992) and lateral leadership (Kühl et al., 2005). Framework 2: Towards a systematic development of study programs The second initiative concerns the strategic approach to program development implemented at the University of St. Gallen (Brahm & Jenert, 2013; Jenert, 2011). In this structured process, the program goes through four process steps: process initiation, program analysis, program development, evaluation of the process and results. A major challenge in this process is the role of program professionals. The goal is to establish them as change agents for a didactically-aligned study program. Outcome: Role of educational development After briefly introducing the two examples, the roles of program professionals and educational development in HEI will be discussed. The questions guiding the discussion will be: • How can program development be established as a continuing task, closely tied to quality development? • How can the competencies of program professionals be developed and the local capacity and ownership be strengthened? • How can educational development support program development and provide vital impulses? Audience Engagement. Depending on the number of participants, first the questions will be discussed in groups. To put the results of the discussion on record, it will be summarized and uploaded in our weblog for further discussion after the session.}}, author = {{Brahm, Taiga and Zellweger, Franziska and Jenert, Tobias and Thomann, Geri}}, keywords = {{curriculum development, study programs, Bologna, educational development, higher education}}, location = {{Stockholm}}, title = {{{Developing study programs as a continuous task-the role of educational developers}}}, year = {{2014}}, } @inproceedings{4474, abstract = {{The transition from school to university can be overwhelming for some students. While students' motivation is considered a strong predictor of performance, the development of motivation during students' transition from high school to university has rarely been investigated. Additionally, little is known about the relation of motivational aspects with other influences on study performance. The present mixed methods study addresses this research gap and examines the development of economics students' study motivation. The longitudinal mixed-method study included three waves of data collected using quantitative surveys and a series of five interviews conducted with 14 first-year students over eight months. Regarding students' development over time, the quantitative analysis showed a gradual decline in students' motivation. However, in the interviews, certain events during the first year were identified as critical incidents demotivating students. These insights into the development of students' motivation at a business school show that concrete incidents influence students' motivational development; thus, they could be transformed by structural changes.}}, author = {{Brahm, Taiga and Jenert, Tobias}}, keywords = {{motivation, business school, higher education, latent growth curve model, longitudinal study, mixed methods, interview, students}}, location = {{Leuven}}, title = {{{The crucial first year: The development of students' motivation at a Business School-a Mixed Methods Study}}}, year = {{2014}}, } @inproceedings{4475, abstract = {{Tertiary education comprises at least two phases, undergraduate and graduate studies. Often, the first year is regarded another, crucial phase where students familiarize with the study environment. It can be hypothesized that students' individual perceptions of learning and studying as well as the pedagogies they experience differ depending on their current study phase. Yet, differences between the phases in HE have rarely been investigated. To capture differences in student experiences in HE comprehensively, Jenert and Gebhardt (2010) have developed a framework describing Learning Culture in HEI. LC comprises a number of constructs on the three levels of the individual student, pedagogical interactions and the organization. The study first aims to quantitatively describe differences in LC between the phases of HE within a university. Based on this analysis, a second goal is to develop a deeper understanding of how students manage the transitions between different phases by applying qualitative research methods.}}, author = {{Gebhardt, Anja and Jenert, Tobias}}, keywords = {{Higher Education, Transitions, Bachelor, Master}}, location = {{Leuven}}, title = {{{Transition within higher education institutions (HEI): Differences in learning culture (LC) between first-year, bachelor, and master students at a business school}}}, year = {{2014}}, } @article{37458, author = {{Schwab, Susanne and Seifert, Susanne and Gasteiger-Klicpera, Barbara}}, issn = {{0966-9760}}, journal = {{International Journal of Early Years Education}}, keywords = {{Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education}}, number = {{2}}, pages = {{210--222}}, publisher = {{Informa UK Limited}}, title = {{{Improving reading in children with German as a first or second language}}}, doi = {{10.1080/09669760.2014.909308}}, volume = {{22}}, year = {{2014}}, } @article{35906, abstract = {{Against the background of a European-wide strategy of governance aimed at improving support for parents and families, the following report details the conceptualization and evaluation of a federal state program4 in Baden- Württemberg (Germany) which was launched in 2008 to encourage fam- ily and parent education. Two program components, a voucher system for parents with a new-born child and an element that emphasizes educa- tional offers for families with special needs in particular living situations, were started to increase requests for educational courses. The aim was to establish and deepen cooperation between different public and private professional services that are in contact with parents and their children. The results show that main goals of the program were reached.}}, author = {{Landhäußer, Sandra and Faas, Stefan and Treptow, Rainer}}, journal = {{Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal (CEPS)}}, keywords = {{family and parent education, cooperation, voucher system, support for families with special needs in particular living situations, program evaluation}}, number = {{No 4}}, title = {{{Encouraging Family and Parent Education: Program Development and Evaluation in the Federal State of Baden-Württemberg, Germany}}}, doi = {{https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1129548.pdf}}, volume = {{Vol 4}}, year = {{2014}}, } @inproceedings{35684, abstract = {{In research, pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) is considered as an important aspect of teachers’ professional competence. However, there is no standardized definition concerning the internal structure of this concept, especially in science subjects such as physics. Therefore, results of different empirical studies measuring PCK are difficult to compare. Moreover, there is no study that can report on correlations between various aspects of PCK. Against this background, different conceptualizations and theoretical considerations of PCK have been consulted and compared. Based on these analyses, a comprehensive model of prospective physics teachers’ PCK and a related test instrument (in the form of a pen-and-paper test) have been developed. Its purpose is to enlighten the correlations between certain aspects of PCK as well as between PCK and other areas of knowledge (e.g. content knowledge). To validate the test instrument and the underlying PCK model, a think aloud study with 15 probands was conducted. We focused on the knowledge areas that the probands referred to while answering the items. With these data, indications of the validity of the underlying model could be identified. Furthermore, the test instrument was piloted with a sample of 216 prospective physics teachers. }}, author = {{Gramzow, Yvonne and Riese, Josef and Reinhold, Peter}}, booktitle = {{E-Book Proceedings of the ESERA 2013 Conference: Science Education Research For Evidence-based Teaching and Coherence in Learning. Part 13}}, editor = {{Constantinou, Costas P. and Papadouris, Nikos and Hadjigeorgiou, Angela}}, keywords = {{PCK, teacher education, physics, think aloud study}}, pages = {{20--27}}, title = {{{ Prospective physics teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. Validating a test instrument by using a think aloud study}}}, year = {{2014}}, } @inproceedings{4478, abstract = {{The purpose of the research was to develop and validate an instrument for the assessment of attitudes towards the study environment in higher education contexts. The questionnaire is designed to measure students' attitudes towards two particular objects: the university (or Higher Education Institution) and the process of studying. Five studies at two different universities were conducted to develop and validate the Attitudes towards the Study Environment Questionnaire (ASEQ). In total, 1640 students filled in the questionnaire. Reliability tests and exploratory factor analysis as well as confirmatory factor analysis showed satisfactory psychometric characteristics of the ASEQ. Each part of the questionnaire is internally consistent and construct validity of the scales is supported by correlations with other constructs as assumed by current theories: Positive attitudinal constructs (normative behavior, autonomy, joy, self-efficacy, and task value) are positively related to intrinsic motivation and the expected study performance while anxiety is negatively related to these constructs. Since attitudes towards the study situation are connected to student engagement and motivation, the study contributes to the theory of student learning by providing a validated instrument to assess attitudes. Thus, the ASEQ can support further research on student performance and development by providing an instrument for the hitherto neglected but nonetheless extremely relevant domain of attitudes. Also, the questionnaire can be used as a diagnostic instrument for higher education faculty and administration to trace students' attitudinal development over time - a factor of prime importance for student socialization during the introductory phase of studying.}}, author = {{Brahm, Taiga and Jenert, Tobias and Euler, Dieter}}, keywords = {{attitudes, teaching and learning, studying, higher education institution, theory of planned behavior, instrument development}}, location = {{München }}, publisher = {{EARLI European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction}}, title = {{{On the assessment of attitudes towards the study process and the university: Attitudes towards the Study Environment Questionnaire (ASEQ)}}}, year = {{2013}}, } @inproceedings{4480, abstract = {{The proposed paper aims to investigate the longitudinal development of students' motivation over the first year of their studies at a business school by using latent growth curve modeling. The study tackles the following core research questions: How do first-year university students' intrinsic and extrinsic vary over time? Which (motivational) factors are related to students' motivational development? Although motivational dispositions have been analyzed extensively in previous studies, their longitudinal development has hitherto not been examined in the higher education context. This longitudinal study is conducted at the University of St. Gallen in Switzerland. The current sample includes 280 first-year students who have been surveyed three times and who are representative of the first-year student population. Descriptive results show that prior to their studies, students were motivated most by intrinsic factors, however, extrinsic motivation was also quite high. Employing latent growth curve modeling, it could be shown that both intrinsic and extrinsic motivation decline significantly over the course of the first year (8 months). The study contributes to motivation theory by providing further insights into the development of academic motivation over time. Latent growth curve modeling as a method can be well used for longitudinal data analysis, thus, excluding measurement error from longitudinal data. Furthermore, the study supports educational developers by determining factors influencing students' motivational development.}}, author = {{Brahm, Taiga and Jenert, Tobias}}, keywords = {{motivation, intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, latent growth curve modeling, longitudinal data analysis, ASEQ, higher education, studying}}, location = {{München}}, publisher = {{EARLI European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction}}, title = {{{A latent growth curve analysis of Business students' intrinsic and extrinsic motivation}}}, year = {{2013}}, } @article{48332, author = {{Prediger, Susanne and Wessel, Lena}}, issn = {{1033-2170}}, journal = {{Mathematics Education Research Journal}}, keywords = {{Education, General Mathematics}}, number = {{3}}, pages = {{435--456}}, publisher = {{Springer Science and Business Media LLC}}, title = {{{Fostering German-language learners’ constructions of meanings for fractions—design and effects of a language- and mathematics-integrated intervention}}}, doi = {{10.1007/s13394-013-0079-2}}, volume = {{25}}, year = {{2013}}, } @article{35717, abstract = {{Engineering faculties generally involve their students in the creation of numerous scientific works and publications. However, students are rarely trained in this area and could well benefit from targeted support: to this end, we propose a specific lecture that addresses the subtleties of scientific research and writing and allows the students to apply and mentally anchor their acquired knowledge while composing a basic scientific term paper.}}, author = {{Temmen, Katrin and Walther, Thomas}}, issn = {{2192-4880}}, journal = {{International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP)}}, keywords = {{General Engineering, Education}}, number = {{3}}, publisher = {{International Association of Online Engineering (IAOE)}}, title = {{{Learning by Doing – Improving Academic Skills}}}, doi = {{10.3991/ijep.v3i3.2827}}, volume = {{3}}, year = {{2013}}, } @article{46940, author = {{Klingsieck, Katrin B. and Grund, Axel and Schmid, Sebastian and Fries, Stefan}}, issn = {{1543-3382}}, journal = {{Journal of College Student Development}}, keywords = {{Education}}, number = {{4}}, pages = {{397--412}}, publisher = {{Project MUSE}}, title = {{{Why Students Procrastinate: A Qualitative Approach}}}, doi = {{10.1353/csd.2013.0060}}, volume = {{54}}, year = {{2013}}, } @phdthesis{4443, abstract = {{ Mit welchen Erwartungen und Anforderungen sehen sich Studierende im Hochschulalltag konfrontiert? Wie muss nach Ansicht der Studierenden gehandelt werden, um das Studium "erfolgreich" zu bewältigen? Wie laufen die Auswahl unterschiedlicher Lernaktivitäten im Studium sowie die Allokation von Ressourcen im Detail ab? Diese und weitere Fragen sind vor allem im Zusammenhang mit der Debatte um die Bologna-Reform stärker in den Mittelpunkt gerückt. Denn während modularisierte Curricula und Credit-Point-Systeme oft nach administrativ-organisatorischen Gesichtspunkten eingeführt wurden, hat die Gestaltung der Studienstrukturen auf Programmebene zwangsweise Auswirkungen auf das Studienhandeln - und damit auch auf das Lernen der Studierenden. Es gibt viele Vermutungen über die "Wirkungen" von Bologna auf das Studieren: Die Rede ist von Verschulung, Entwissenschaftlichung und Arbeitsüberlastung und Studierende stehen im Verdacht, ihren Studienpfad eher im Sinne einer Credit-Point-Jagd denn interessengeleitet zu gestalten. In der Regel bleibt es dabei jedoch bei anekdotischen Beobachtungen - es fehlt bislang an gesicherten Erkenntnissen über Zusammenhänge zwischen Bologna-konformen Studienkontexten und dem Handeln Studierender. Denn obschon Studierende seit langem Gegenstand der Forschung sind, ist bislang wenig darüber bekannt, wie sie den langfristigen Bildungsprozess eines ganzen Studiums gestalten. Stattdessen wurde vorwiegend das Lernen im engeren Sinne, das so genannte "Classroom Learning" untersucht. Diejenigen, die Studienprogramme nach didaktischen Gesichtspunkten gestalten wollen müssen wissen, wie Studierende mit unterschiedlichen Studienstrukturen umgehen. Denn nur so ist eine planvolle Programmgestaltung im Sinne pädagogischer Zielsetzungen und didaktischer Prinzipien möglich. Die vorliegende Arbeit nimmt diese Problemstellung auf und untersucht, welche Zielvorstellungen und Handlungsstrategien Studierende bei der Bewältigung ihres Studienalltags in unterschiedlichen Bologna-konformen Studienprogrammen entwickeln. Im Einzelnen wird gefragt, (1) welche Vorstellungen, Wahrnehmungen und Handlungslogiken das Handeln Studierender in unterschiedlichen Studienprogrammen prägen und (2) welche programmspezifischen Kontextbedingungen die Herausbildung dieser handlungsleitenden Charakteristika beeinflussen. Ausgehend von diesen beiden Fragestellungen wird zunächst ein theoretisch fundierter Analyserahmen für Studienprogramme entwickelt. Darauf aufbauend werden verschiedene Studienprogramme empirisch untersucht, um schliesslich Design-Prinzipien für die Gestaltung von Studienprogrammen zu formulieren. Es wird nicht davon ausgegangen, dass Studienstrukturen das Handeln Studierender im Sinne eines kausalen Wirkungszusammenhangs bestimmen. Vielmehr wird gefragt, was die Studierenden mit den Strukturen, auf die sie treffen, machen. Studienprogramme werden als kulturelle Einheiten verstanden, innerhalb derer sich spezifische handlungsleitende Vorstellungen und Normen entwickeln. Diese impliziten Regeln des Studienhandelns - das so genannte "Hidden Curriculum" - und vor allem auch die dahinterliegenden Konstruktionsprozesse aufzudecken, ist Ziel dieser Arbeit.}}, author = {{Jenert, Tobias}}, keywords = {{Studierverhalten, Hochschuldidaktik, Lernpsychologie, Kulturpsychologie, Bologna-Prozess, Curriculumentwicklung, Hochschulbildung, Study programme, Bologna-process, educational development, cultural psychology, higher education, curriculum development}}, publisher = {{Universität St. Gallen}}, title = {{{Studienprogramme als didaktische Gestaltungs-und Untersuchungseinheit: Theoretische Grundlegung und empirische Analyse}}}, year = {{2012}}, } @inproceedings{4482, abstract = {{In den vergangenen Jahren wurden viele Vermutungen über die "Wirkungen" von Bologna auf das Studieren geäussert: Schlagworte wie Verschulung oder Entwissenschaftlichung sind zu hören und Studierende stehen im Verdacht, ihr Studium eher als Credit-Point-Jagd denn interessengeleitet zu gestalten (z.B. Stegemann, 2007, o. S.; Schultheis, et al. 2008). Meist handelt es sich jedoch um anekdotischen Beschreibungen, bis auf wenige Ausnahmen fehlen empirisch belegte Erkenntnisse.1 Denn obschon Studierende seit langem Gegenstand der Forschung sind, ist bislang wenig darüber bekannt, wie sie den langfristigen Bildungsprozess eines ganzen Studiums gestalten. Vorwiegend wurde Lernen im engeren Sinne, das so genannte "Classroom Learning" untersucht (Aineley, 2008). Forschungsfokus. Die diesem Beitrag zugrunde liegende Studie nimmt diese Forschungslücke auf und untersucht Zielvorstellungen und Handlungsstrategien Studierender bei der Bewältigung ihres Studienalltags in unterschiedlichen Bologna-konformen Studienprogrammen. Im Einzelnen wird gefragt, (1) welche Vorstellungen und Wahrnehmungen das Handeln Studierender prägen und (2) welche programmspezifischen Kontextbedingungen die Herausbildung dieser handlungsleitenden Charakteristika beeinflussen. Als theoretischer Rahmen wurde die so genannte Kulturpsychologie herangezogen, die Handeln als Resultat einer Wechselwirkung von individuell-psychischen Merk-malen und sozio-kulturell vermittelten Vorstellungen versteht (Shweder, 1991; Bruner, 1990).}}, author = {{Jenert, Tobias}}, keywords = {{Hochschulentwicklung, Studienprogramme, Curriculum Development, Higher Education, Faculty Development}}, location = {{Wien}}, publisher = {{Gesellschaft für Hochschulforschung GfHf}}, title = {{{Studienprogramme als hochschuldidaktische Gestaltungs-und Untersuchungseinheit}}}, year = {{2012}}, } @inproceedings{4483, abstract = {{Die Lehrpraxis an Hochschulen breitenwirksam und nachhaltig zu verbessern, gehört zu den schwierigsten Herausforderungen für die Hochschuldidaktik. Ein möglicher Weg besteht darin, als hochschuldidaktische Einrichtung stets mit Blick auf die Gesamtstrategie der Hochschule und Anspruchsgruppen in der Hochschulleitung und -administration zu agieren (Jenert & Brahm, 2010). Es stellt sich die Frage, welche Vorstellungen bezüglich der eigenen Aufgaben und der Wirksamkeit des eigenen Handels hochschuldidaktische Stellen in Deutschland haben. Mit einer Online-Befragung von Leitungspersonen im Bereich Hochschuldidaktik und -entwicklung in Deutschland konnten 35 Personen (72 angeschrieben) erreicht werden, wobei sich ein breiter Querschnitt verschiedener Einrichtungen ergab. Abgefragt wurden (1) Struktur und institutionelle Anbindung der Einrichtung, (2) Wahrnehmung der eigenen Wirksamkeit sowie (3) Aufgabenschwerpunkte und notwendige Kompetenzen. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass einerseits ein Bewusstsein für Herausforderungen jenseits didaktischer Aus- und Weiterbildung besteht und die strategische Dimension erkannt ist. Gleichzeitig zeigt die Betonung "traditioneller" Aufgaben und Kompetenzen, dass die strategische Dimension im Tagesgeschäft oft noch keine zentrale Rolle spielt.}}, author = {{Jenert, Tobias and Brahm, Taiga}}, keywords = {{Hochschulentwicklung, higher education development, Hochschuldidaktik}}, location = {{Mainz}}, publisher = {{Deutsche Gesellschaft für Hochschuldidaktik dghd}}, title = {{{" Nur" didaktisch oder auch strategisch?: Strukturelle Verankerung, Aufgaben-und Wirksamkeitswahrnehmungen hochschuldidaktischer Einrichtungen in Deutschland}}}, year = {{2012}}, } @article{45287, author = {{Riese, Josef and Reinhold, Peter}}, issn = {{1434-663X}}, journal = {{Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft}}, keywords = {{Education}}, number = {{1}}, pages = {{111--143}}, publisher = {{Springer Science and Business Media LLC}}, title = {{{Die professionelle Kompetenz angehender Physiklehrkräfte in verschiedenen Ausbildungsformen}}}, doi = {{10.1007/s11618-012-0259-y}}, volume = {{15}}, year = {{2012}}, } @article{4430, abstract = {{Eine zentrale Herausforderung in der Ausbildung angehender Wirtschaftslehrpersonen stellt die sinnvolle Verknüpfung von Theorie- und Praxiserfahrungen dar. Im Rahmen der Ausbildung angehender Wirtschaftslehrpersonen an der Universität St. Gallen wird eine Lernumgebung gestaltet, die eine Verschränkung von Theorie- und Praxiserfahrungen ermöglichen soll. Die Lernprozesse der Studierenden werden dabei durch didaktisch angeleitete Weblogarbeit unterstützt. Trotz der Lernchancen, die sich aus einer Verknüpfung von theoretischen und praktischen Lernphasen ergeben, schätzen die Studierenden den Nutzen der Weblogarbeit als äusserst gering ein. Die Studierenden bei der reflexiven Integration praxisnaher und theoretischer Lernerfahrungen zu unterstützen, ist eine Herausforderung, die dezidierter Anleitung und Förderung durch die Lehrpersonen bedarf}}, author = {{Jenert, Tobias and Gebhardt, Anja and Käser, Reto}}, issn = {{1992-9579}}, journal = {{Zeitschrift für E-Learning}}, keywords = {{Weblog, Blog, e-learning, TEL, higher education, business education}}, number = {{2}}, pages = {{17--29}}, publisher = {{Studien-Verlag}}, title = {{{Weblogs zur Unterstützung der Theorie-Praxis-Integration in der Wirtschaftslehrenden-Ausbildung}}}, volume = {{6}}, year = {{2011}}, } @inproceedings{4489, abstract = {{Over the last two decades, the discussion about innovating teaching and learning at higher education institutions (HEI) has concentrated on various core concepts: such as an increased focus on learning outcomes as competencies and more student-centered teaching. These concepts form part of what Barr and Tagg (1995) have termed the "shift from teaching to learning". However, very few approaches have been proposed so far in the scholarly literature on how to actually transfer such normative concepts into the practice of teaching and learning at HEI. In order to sustainably develop the practices of teaching and learning at HEI, it is necessary to comprehend the prerequisites for educational development. The construct of "learning culture" can be seen as a possible concept to explicate these prerequisites. The aims of this study are to (a) propose an institution-wide approach to educational development at HEI and to (b) present a comprehensive instrument to diagnose learning culture as a starting point for educational development. The findings of the study include a first version of the Learning Culture Inventory for HEI. The students' version of the instrument encompasses 12 scales for the individual, 12 for the pedagogical interactions and 5 for the organizational dimension. The assumed basic factor structure of the instruments could be confirmed. With the institution-wide approach to educational development and the Learning Culture Inventory, this study can provide the basis for sustainable developmental initiatives to innovate teaching and learning at HEI.}}, author = {{Brahm, Taiga and Gebhardt, Anja and Jenert, Tobias}}, keywords = {{higher education, instrument development, strategy, educational development}}, location = {{Exeter}}, publisher = {{European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction}}, title = {{{Learning culture as a prerequisite for an institution-wide approach to educational development}}}, year = {{2011}}, } @article{4433, abstract = {{Die aktuelle hochschuldidaktische Diskussion ist durch Schlüsselbegriffe wie Outcome- und Kompetenzorientierung geprägt. Allerdings sind die Strategien zur nachhaltigen Gestaltung der Lehr- und Lernpraxis bisher nur wenig differenziert. Der Beitrag stellt das Konzept einer "institutionsweiten Hochschulentwicklung" vor. Dieses spricht individuelles Handeln von Lehrenden und Lernenden sowie curriculare und organisationale Aspekte an. Mittels Experteninterviews wird gezeigt, dass Hochschulentwicklung eine "Third-Space-Funktion" zwischen Akademie und Administration einnimmt. Das personelle Profil solcher Einrichtungen verlangt nach "Blended Professionals", die sowohl als Servicepersonal als auch als Mitglieder der akademischen Welt wirkungsvoll agieren können.}}, author = {{Jenert, Tobias and Brahm, Taiga}}, issn = {{2219-6994}}, journal = {{Zeitschrift für Hochschulentwicklung}}, keywords = {{Hochschulentwicklung, educational development, higher education, Hochschuldidaktik}}, number = {{4}}, pages = {{124--145}}, publisher = {{Forum Neue Medien Austria}}, title = {{{,,Blended Professionals´´ als Akteure einer institutionsweiten Hochschulentwicklung}}}, volume = {{5}}, year = {{2010}}, } @inproceedings{4493, author = {{Jenert, Tobias and Gebhardt, Anja}}, keywords = {{earning culture, Lernkultur, whole-institution approach, higher education, Hochschule}}, location = {{Kirkkonummi, Helsinki, Finnland}}, title = {{{Learning Cultures at Higher Education Institutions: Outlining a wohle-institution approach to teaching and learning}}}, year = {{2010}}, } @techreport{4450, author = {{Jenert, Tobias and Zellweger, Franziska and Dommen, Jenny and Gebhardt, Anja}}, keywords = {{Lernkultur, Hochschule, HEI, learning culture, higher education, teaching and learning, Hochschullehre}}, title = {{{Lernkulturen an Hochschulen: Theoretische Überlegungen zur Betrachtung studentischen Lernens unter individueller, pädagogischer und organisationaler Perspektive}}}, year = {{2009}}, }