@inbook{35323,
  abstract     = {{Der Begriff der „Zwangsdigitalisierung“ beschreibt, dass als eine Folge der Corona-Pandemie Präsenzformate durch digital gestützte Settings ersetzt werden sowie Alter- nativen zur Kommunikation und für das gemeinsame Arbeiten und Lernen in Präsenz gefunden werden mussten. Digital gestützte Lehr-Lernsettings scheinen seit dem ersten Lockdown sowohl an Schulen als auch an Hochschulen eine Möglichkeit dafür darzustellen, die Lern- und Entwicklungsprozesse (z. B. von Schülerinnen und Schülern, angehenden Lehrkräften) trotz physischer Distanz weiterzuführen. In diesem Beitrag werden die mit der Zwangsdigitalisierung an den Hochschulen verbundenen Chancen und Grenzen für die Entwicklung digitalisierungsbezogener Kompetenzen angehender Lehrkräfte herausgearbeitet. Dabei richtet sich der Blick auf den Wert von Erfahrungen für Lernen und Entwicklung. Zudem wird, gemäß der den Angebots-Nutzungs-Modellen inhärenten Logik einer „Wirkkette“, Bezug genommen auf Perspektiven von Studierenden, deren prospektiven Schülerinnen und Schülern sowie von Dozierenden.}},
  author       = {{Caruso, Carina and Bruns, Marike and Harteis, Christian}},
  booktitle    = {{Berufsausbildung zwischen Hygienemaßnahmen und Lockdown(s) Folgen für die schulische und außerschulische Berufsausbildung in Schule, im Betrieb und bei Bildungsträgern}},
  editor       = {{Heisler, Dietmar and Meier, Jörg}},
  isbn         = {{978-3-7639-7146-6}},
  keywords     = {{Hochschullehre, Lehrer:innenausbildung, Medienkompetenz / teacher education, teaching at university, media literacy}},
  pages        = {{137–157}},
  publisher    = {{wbv}},
  title        = {{{Von der Not zur Tugend!?}}},
  doi          = {{10.3278/9783763972579}},
  volume       = {{65}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@inbook{35325,
  abstract     = {{Q is an exploratory method used to elicit discrete patterns of subjectivity (e.g., subjective theories, beliefs). To be more concrete, Q method aims to identify homogeneous latent clusters of viewpoints towards a certain topic from a larger more heterogeneous set of (a priori unknown) different viewpoints held by respondents in the population. For this purpose, study participants are asked to sort qualitative statements concerning a certain topic (e.g., their beliefs toward something) into a grid roughly following a normal distribution indicating whether they agree or disagree with the given propositions. This results in a so-called Q-sort for each participant that then can be fed into a factor analysis that compares the different Q-sorts and groups them by similarity. In the first part of the chapter, Q method is introduced. The second part of the chapter describes a small study focusing on student teachers and their perspectives concerning upcoming long-term school internships.}},
  author       = {{Leidig, Susann and Köhler, Hanna and Caruso, Carina and Goller, Michael}},
  booktitle    = {{ Methods for researching professional learning and development: Challenges, applications and empirical illustrations}},
  editor       = {{Goller, Michael and Kyndt, Eva and Paloniemi, Susanna and Damşa , Crina}},
  isbn         = {{978-3-031-08517-8}},
  issn         = {{2210-5557}},
  keywords     = {{Q method, Subjectivity, Internships, Teacher education, Q sort}},
  pages        = {{441–466}},
  publisher    = {{Springer }},
  title        = {{{Q Method: Assessing Subjectivity Through Structured Ranking of Items}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/978-3-031-08518-5_20}},
  volume       = {{33}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@article{34639,
  author       = {{Vogelsang, Christoph and Wiethoff, Christoph}},
  issn         = {{0261-9768}},
  journal      = {{European Journal of Teacher Education}},
  keywords     = {{Education}},
  pages        = {{1--19}},
  publisher    = {{Informa UK Limited}},
  title        = {{{Effects of school closures during the COVID-19 pandemic in early 2020 on prospective teachers in a one-semester school internship}}},
  doi          = {{10.1080/02619768.2022.2158808}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@article{35522,
  abstract     = {{<jats:p>Following concepts describing lesson planning as a form of anticipatory reflection, preservice physics teachers’ reflection skills are assumed to be positively connected with their planning skills. However, empirical evidence on this is scarce. To explore how relations between these specific skills change over the course of a field experience controlling for influences of professional knowledge, we conduct a pre-post field study with N = 95 preservice physics teachers in a one-semester field experience. Content knowledge (CK) and pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) (paper-and-pencil tests), and reflection and planning skills (standardized performance assessments) were assessed before and after the field experience. Path analyses revealed almost no influence of reflection skills on planning skills. Reflections skills did not contribute to preservice teachers planning skills beyond knowledge, indicating both constructs might represent rather independent abilities. The results show the need for further development of models describing the development of teachers’ professional knowledge and skills in academic teacher education and for the development of concepts for a better integration of reflection and lesson planning in field experiences.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Vogelsang, Christoph and Kulgemeyer, Christoph and Riese, Josef}},
  issn         = {{2227-7102}},
  journal      = {{Education Sciences}},
  keywords     = {{Public Administration, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, Computer Science Applications, Computer Science (miscellaneous), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation}},
  number       = {{7}},
  publisher    = {{MDPI AG}},
  title        = {{{Learning to Plan by Learning to Reflect?—Exploring Relations between Professional Knowledge, Reflection Skills, and Planning Skills of Preservice Physics Teachers in a One-Semester Field Experience}}},
  doi          = {{10.3390/educsci12070479}},
  volume       = {{12}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@article{35418,
  author       = {{Koppenborg, Markus and Klingsieck, Katrin B.}},
  issn         = {{1041-6080}},
  journal      = {{Learning and Individual Differences}},
  keywords     = {{Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, Social Psychology}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier BV}},
  title        = {{{Group work and student procrastination}}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.lindif.2022.102117}},
  volume       = {{94}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@article{48108,
  abstract     = {{<jats:p>Aspects of data science surround us in many contexts, for example regarding climate change, air pollution, and other environmental issues. To open the “data-science-black-box” for lower secondary school students we developed a data science project focussing on the analysis of self-collected environmental data. We embed this project in computer science education, which enables us to use a new knowledge-based programming approach for the data analysis within Jupyter Notebooks and the programming language Python. In this paper, we evaluate the second cycle of this project which took place in a ninth-grade computer science class. In particular, we present how the students coped with the professional tool of Jupyter Notebooks for doing statistical investigations and which insights they gained.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{PODWORNY, SUSANNE and HÜSING, SVEN and SCHULTE, CARSTEN}},
  issn         = {{1570-1824}},
  journal      = {{STATISTICS EDUCATION RESEARCH JOURNAL}},
  keywords     = {{Education, Statistics and Probability}},
  number       = {{2}},
  publisher    = {{International Association for Statistical Education}},
  title        = {{{A PLACE FOR A DATA SCIENCE PROJECT IN SCHOOL: BETWEEN STATISTICS AND EPISTEMIC PROGRAMMING}}},
  doi          = {{10.52041/serj.v21i2.46}},
  volume       = {{21}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@article{47923,
  abstract     = {{<jats:p> Integrated reporting has widely been promoted as the next evolutionary step in corporate disclosure, which would soon replace traditional reporting practices. Embedded in a zeitgeist that favors sustainability, this outlook would suggest high integrated reporting adoption rates among reporting organizations. Our analysis of integrated reporting in Germany from 2008 to 2019 shows, however, that organizations approached integrated reporting with a wait-and-see mentality. This approach cannot be described adequately by the existing conceptualizations of (partial) practice adoption. We therefore develop the notion of wait-and-see-ism, defined as the deliberate and potentially long-lasting postponement of a decision to adopt a practice while its further development is monitored silently. We see limited, though continuous, efforts to prepare for the prospect of adopting the practice of integrated reporting quickly at a later stage. Wait-and-see-ism expands on prior work on partial adoption by emphasizing its temporal dimension. This adds an important yet undertheorized option that organizations can employ to respond to ambiguous institutional demands, thus explaining the stalling of promising management practices. </jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Endenich, Christoph and Hahn, Rüdiger and Reimsbach, Daniel and Wickert, Christopher}},
  issn         = {{1476-1270}},
  journal      = {{Strategic Organization}},
  keywords     = {{Strategy and Management, Industrial relations, Education, Business and International Management}},
  number       = {{3}},
  pages        = {{566--595}},
  publisher    = {{SAGE Publications}},
  title        = {{{Wait-and-see-ism as partial adoption of management practices: The rise and stall of integrated reporting}}},
  doi          = {{10.1177/14761270221078605}},
  volume       = {{21}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@article{35111,
  abstract     = {{Forschendes Lernen in der Lehrer:innenbildung ist seit der Ausweitung schulpraktischer Anteile bzw. der Einführung des sogenannten Praxissemesters eng verwoben mit der Lehrer:innenausbildung. Gleichzeitig wird bisher weitestgehend different beantwortet, was Forschendes Lernen ist und sein kann sowie warum es wie hochschuldidaktisch gerahmt wird und werden sollte. Der Beitrag widmet sich dieser Frage. Dabei zeigt sich einerseits, dass hochschuldidaktische Zugänge zur Realisierung Forschenden Lernens in der Lehrer:innenbildung erst vor dem Hintergrund theoretischer Annahmen zur Entwicklung von Lehrpersonen und deren Professionalität sowie zur Gestalt - gemeint ist hier der Beitrag zu dieser Entwicklung sowie der Anteil an Professionalität - Forschenden Lernens entwickelt werden können, eine solche Fundierung aber oftmals ausbleibt. Andererseits wird herausgearbeitet, inwiefern eine Differenz zwischen wissenschaftlicher Forschung und Forschung im Forschenden Lernen besteht. Daran anschließend wird eine habitustheoretische Fundierung Forschenden Lernens vorgestellt und es werden exemplarisch deren Implikationen für die Gestaltung Forschenden Lernens benannt. Abschließend wird anhand empirischer Rekonstruktionen beispielhaft eine praktische Umsetzung diskutiert.}},
  author       = {{Bloh, Thiemo and Caruso, Carina}},
  issn         = {{2199-8825}},
  journal      = {{die hochschullehre}},
  keywords     = {{Forschendes Lernen, Lehrer:innenausbildung, Praxissemester, Professionalisierung / Research-based learning, teacher education, internships, professionalization}},
  number       = {{21}},
  pages        = {{299–312}},
  publisher    = {{wbv }},
  title        = {{{Ein kritisch-multiperspektivischer Blick auf Forschendes Lernen in der Lehrkräftebildung}}},
  doi          = {{10.3278/HSL2221W}},
  volume       = {{8}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@article{44689,
  abstract     = {{<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Even in the digital age, learning mathematics at an academic level still requires much reading of mathematical text. Research has shown that reading mathematical text requires readers to engage with all the structures of the book and with its pedagogical voice, making connections, and plausible reasoning. Specific practices and strategies that support the close reading of mathematical text have been suggested; however, descriptions and empirical evaluations of materials designed to support these activities are rare. We present the design and first evaluation cycle of materials developed in a design research project that aims to scaffold close reading of mathematical text. The materials were designed and evaluated in a German university course on elementary geometry for first-year teacher education students who study mathematics to become primary teachers. The reading strategies were explained and modeled for students in reading-strategy videos. Additionally, close reading of mathematical text was scaffolded by close-reading tasks and homework tasks and problems that build on the reading strategies and were specifically designed to foster understanding of the mathematical text. Survey data were collected from 296 students to evaluate their use of and attitude toward the different materials. The quantitative results indicate that students used the materials and were generally able to learn the course content by themselves. From all provided materials, they found the close-reading tasks most helpful. A qualitative analysis of answers to open questions revealed issues with different materials, particularly with the script, and requests for additional materials. The issues with the script were categorized inductively. The categories are presented as a qualitative result of the study and discussed.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Rezat, Sebastian and Malik, Sara Naseem and Leifeld, Markus}},
  issn         = {{1571-0068}},
  journal      = {{International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education}},
  keywords     = {{General Mathematics, Education}},
  number       = {{S1}},
  pages        = {{215--236}},
  publisher    = {{Springer}},
  title        = {{{Scaffolding Close Reading of Mathematical Text in Pre-service Primary Teacher Education at the Tertiary Level: Design and Evaluation}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s10763-022-10309-y}},
  volume       = {{20}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@article{34920,
  abstract     = {{<jats:p>A very warm welcome to this Special Issue of the Statistics Education Research Journal (SERJ) on data science education. Our hope is to give an overview of selected theoretical thoughts and empirical studies on data science education from a statistics education research perspective. Data science education is rapidly developing but research into data science education is still in its infancy. The current issue presents a snapshot of this developing field.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Biehler, Rolf and De Veaux, Richard and Engel, Joachim and Kazak, Sibel and Frischemeier, Daniel}},
  issn         = {{1570-1824}},
  journal      = {{Statistics Education Research Journal}},
  keywords     = {{Education, Statistics and Probability}},
  number       = {{2}},
  publisher    = {{International Association for Statistical Education}},
  title        = {{{Editorial: Research on Data Science Education}}},
  doi          = {{10.52041/serj.v21i2.606}},
  volume       = {{21}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@article{35685,
  author       = {{Liebendörfer, Michael and Göller, Robin and Gildehaus, Lara and Kortemeyer, Jörg and Biehler, Rolf and Hochmuth, Reinhard and Ostsieker, Laura and Rode, Jana and Schaper, Niclas}},
  issn         = {{0020-739X}},
  journal      = {{International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology}},
  keywords     = {{Applied Mathematics, Education, Mathematics (miscellaneous)}},
  number       = {{5}},
  pages        = {{1133--1152}},
  publisher    = {{Informa UK Limited}},
  title        = {{{The role of learning strategies for performance in mathematics courses for engineers}}},
  doi          = {{10.1080/0020739x.2021.2023772}},
  volume       = {{53}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@article{35672,
  abstract     = {{<jats:p>This study examines modelling with machine learning. In the context of a yearlong data science course, the study explores how upper secondary students apply machine learning with Jupyter Notebooks and document the modelling process as a computational essay incorporating the different steps of the CRISP-DM cycle. The students’ work is based on a teaching module about decision trees in machine learning and a worked example of such a modelling process. The study outlines the students’ performance in carrying out the machine learning technically and reasoning about bias in the data, different data preparation steps, the application context, and the resulting decision model. Furthermore, the context of the study and the theoretical backgrounds are presented.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Fleischer, Franz Yannik and Biehler, Rolf and Schulte, Carsten}},
  issn         = {{1570-1824}},
  journal      = {{Statistics Education Research Journal}},
  keywords     = {{Education, Statistics and Probability}},
  number       = {{2}},
  publisher    = {{International Association for Statistical Education}},
  title        = {{{Teaching and Learning Data-Driven Machine Learning with Educationally Designed Jupyter Notebooks}}},
  doi          = {{10.52041/serj.v21i2.61}},
  volume       = {{21}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@article{33839,
  abstract     = {{Modeling is an integral part of many computing-related disciplines and thus also represents a curricular core component in computing education in tertiary education. Competence models in which modeling is integrated at least to some extent already exist in some of these disciplines. However, for the core component of graphical modeling, a competence model that illuminates the relevant competences in detail is still lacking. Therefore, we develop a competence model for graphical modeling with the aim to make teaching and especially assessments in the field more competence-oriented. This paper reports on the first two studies conducted to develop and validate the competence model for graphical modeling. In the first study, the structure of the competence model was developed based on theories and approaches of educational science. Competences relevant for graphical modeling were deductively derived from literature and existing university course descriptions using techniques of qualitative content analysis. The result of the first study is a preliminary competence model. In the second study, the preliminary competence model was reviewed by means of an expert rating in the modeling community. The competence model was revised and refined based on these findings and subsequent expert discussions. The main result of the investigation represents the competence model for graphical modeling (CMGM), which includes a total of 74 competence facets at different cognitive process levels in the five content areas of ”model understanding and interpreting”, ”model building and modifying”, ”values, attitudes, and beliefs”, ”metacognitive knowledge and skills”, and ”social-communicative skills”.}},
  author       = {{Soyka, Chantal and Schaper, Niclas and Bender, Elena and Striewe, Michael and Ullrich, Meike}},
  journal      = {{ACM Transactions on Computing Education}},
  keywords     = {{graphical modeling, conceptual modeling, computer science, competence model, higher education}},
  number       = {{1}},
  publisher    = {{Association for Computing Machinery}},
  title        = {{{Toward a Competence Model for Graphical Modeling}}},
  doi          = {{10.1145/3567598}},
  volume       = {{23}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@article{37446,
  author       = {{Seifert, Susanne and Paleczek, Lisa}},
  issn         = {{0883-0355}},
  journal      = {{International Journal of Educational Research}},
  keywords     = {{Education}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier BV}},
  title        = {{{Comparing tablet and print mode of a german reading comprehension test in grade 3: Influence of test order, gender and language}}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.ijer.2022.101948}},
  volume       = {{113}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@article{37438,
  abstract     = {{<jats:p> This paper investigates the implementation of a reading program designed for third grade elementary school classrooms in Austria. Using a mixed-methods approach, lesson types were identified, respective class compositions analyzed, and the effects on students’ reading gains examined. The results show that the lesson types seem to reflect learner group needs as students in the different lesson types profited similarly from the reading program. This supports the hypothesis that reading is a highly individualized process and leads to the conclusion that the instructional approach of the reading program investigated supports teachers in conducting reading lessons tailored to their students’ needs. </jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Kulmhofer-Bommer, Andrea and Seifert, Susanne and Paleczek, Lisa and Gasteiger-Klicpera, Barbara}},
  issn         = {{0022-0574}},
  journal      = {{Journal of Education}},
  keywords     = {{Education}},
  publisher    = {{SAGE Publications}},
  title        = {{{Bending and Bowing: How Teachers Adapt a Vocabulary-Based Reading Program to Their Students Needs}}},
  doi          = {{10.1177/00220574221112627}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@article{37440,
  author       = {{Paleczek, Lisa and Ender, Daniela and Berger, Jessica and Prinz, Katharina and Seifert, Susanne}},
  issn         = {{0883-0355}},
  journal      = {{International Journal of Educational Research}},
  keywords     = {{Education}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier BV}},
  title        = {{{A feasibility study of digital content use in inclusive, Austrian primary school practice}}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.ijer.2022.101938}},
  volume       = {{112}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@article{37470,
  abstract     = {{<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>When the COVID-19 pandemic began, many universities switched to fully online teaching. This unexpected switching to online teaching was challenging for both teachers and students, and restrictions that were put in place because of pandemic made this challenge even greater. However, new ways of teaching might also open new opportunities for students’ learning. The research question driving our study was as follows: how do students regulate their learning and specifically their choice of resources and peer learning in university mathematics classes that are fully taught online as offered during the COVID-19 pandemic? We report on a longitudinal, qualitative study in which students recorded a brief audio diary twice a week over one whole semester (14 weeks). We focused on three students who completed 70 interviews in total and finished the semester with varying degrees of success. The results show how the students structured their studying (e.g., the roles that deadlines or synchronous teaching events played). They illustrate the strengths and limitations of digital materials provided by the lecturer and the use of complementary media. Further, the pandemic uncovered the double-edged role of simple, often anonymous exchanges (e.g., via Discord servers), with few binding forces for either side, and the significance of stable learning partnerships for students’ success. Our research highlights aspects that should be focal points when comparing traditional instruction and online instruction during the pandemic from a self-regulatory perspective. Practical implications refer to how these aspects can be combined sensibly in fully online courses, but also in blended learning contexts.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Liebendörfer, Michael and Kempen, Leander and Schukajlow, Stanislaw}},
  issn         = {{1863-9690}},
  journal      = {{ZDM – Mathematics Education}},
  keywords     = {{General Mathematics, Education}},
  publisher    = {{Springer Science and Business Media LLC}},
  title        = {{{First-year university students' self-regulated learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative longitudinal study}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s11858-022-01444-5}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@article{37472,
  abstract     = {{<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>As earlier research results suggest that many mathematics teaching students criticize a missing relevance in their studies, we explore explanations and interrelationships of their relevance assessments. We aim at finding out how one could support the students in attributing relevance to their study programs. A two-fold model for relevance assessments in mathematics teacher education is proposed, consisting of relevance content and relevance reasons. We investigate students' relevance perceptions of mathematical topics and of topics’ complexities, as well as their rating of individual and societal/ vocational relevance reasons, all in relation to their perception of the relevance of their overall program of study. Contrary to earlier research findings, our results suggest that mathematics teaching students already do attribute relevance to many content areas and that a preparation for the teaching profession is not the only reason for them to assign relevance. There also seem to be many students who would attribute relevance if they could develop as individuals and pursue their interests. We suggest that giving students opportunities to set individual priorities in their studies could hence support their relevance assessments. As low relevance assessments seem to be connected to students’ motivational problems, students might profit from motivational support, as well.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Büdenbender-Kuklinski, Christiane and Hochmuth, Reinhard and Liebendörfer, Michael}},
  issn         = {{2198-9745}},
  journal      = {{International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education}},
  keywords     = {{Education, Mathematics (miscellaneous)}},
  publisher    = {{Springer Science and Business Media LLC}},
  title        = {{{Exploring the Perceived Relevance of University Mathematics Studies by First-Semester Teaching Students}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s40753-022-00188-7}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@article{36569,
  abstract     = {{<jats:title>Zusammenfassung</jats:title><jats:p>Im vorliegenden Beitrag werden nach ausführlicher theoretischer Diskussion des Kompetenzbegriffs und der Definition von Kompetenz als Können ein Modell sachunterrichtlicher Planungskompetenz sowie ein daran anschließendes Messinstrument vorgestellt. Im Hinblick auf den Einsatz dieses Instrumentes im Rahmen einer Evaluation des nordrhein-westfälischen Praxissemesters stellen sich Fragen nach der psychometrischen Struktur der Testauswertung. Da das Instrument sowohl zur Testung von Sachunterrichtsstudierenden mit dem Lehramtsprofil ‚Grundschule‘ als auch von Sachunterrichtsstudierenden mit sonderpädagogischem Schwerpunkt eingesetzt werden soll, ist zu zeigen, dass die Testergebnisse nicht durch den gewählten Studiengang beeinflusst werden. Im Beitrag werden Rohdaten aus einer Studie an der Universität Paderborn (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 121) genutzt, um eine fünfdimensionale Modellstruktur gegen eine eindimensionale zu testen und empirisch gestützte Argumente für eine mehrdimensionale Skalierung zu generieren. Durch Differential-Item-Functioning-Analysen wird geprüft, ob die Itemschwierigkeiten mit dem Merkmal ‚Studiengang‘ interagieren, sodass sie sich trotz gleicher Kompetenzausprägung für Untersuchungsteilnehmende beider Studierendengruppen signifikant unterscheiden und zu einer diagnostischen Verzerrung führen würden. Abschließend wird der beispielhafte Einsatz des Instrumentes im Rahmen einer Wirksamkeitsanalyse in Bezug die Effektivität des nordrhein-westfälischen Praxissemesters an der Universität Paderborn (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 26) dargelegt. Aus den differenzierten Ergebnissen werden unter anderem erste Hinweise auf Defizite in der Lehrerinnen- und Lehrerausbildung abgeleitet.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Kirsch, Alexander}},
  issn         = {{1434-663X}},
  journal      = {{Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft}},
  keywords     = {{Education}},
  number       = {{4}},
  pages        = {{815--842}},
  publisher    = {{Springer Science and Business Media LLC}},
  title        = {{{Messung von Unterrichtsplanungskompetenz im Fach Sachunterricht: Empirische Befunde zur Kompetenzentwicklung angehender Grundschullehrkräfte auf Grundlage einer mehrdimensionalen Kompetenzstruktur}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s11618-022-01116-w}},
  volume       = {{25}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@inbook{37902,
  author       = {{Janicki, Nicole}},
  booktitle    = {{Technik: Verstehen wir, was wir nutzen!? - Tagungsband zur 23. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Technische Bildung in Mannheim vom 24.-25. September 2021. }},
  editor       = {{Binder, Martin and Wiesmüller, Christian and Finkbeiner, Timo}},
  keywords     = {{technology education, teacher professionalisation, Computational Thinking, digitalization, learning robots}},
  location     = {{Mannheim}},
  pages        = {{266--286}},
  title        = {{{Entwicklung und Evaluation eines Fortbildungskonzepts im Kontext der technischen Bildung an Grundschulen am Beispiel von Lernrobotern}}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}