@article{6075,
  abstract     = {{For almost three decades, the theory of visual attention (TVA) has been successful in mathematically describing and explaining a wide variety of phenomena in visual selection and recognition with high quantitative precision. Interestingly, the influence of feature contrast on attention has been included in TVA only recently, although it has been extensively studied outside the TVA framework. The present approach further develops this extension of TVA’s scope by measuring and modeling salience. An empirical measure of salience is achieved by linking different (orientation and luminance) contrasts to a TVA parameter. In the modeling part, the function relating feature contrasts to salience is described mathematically and tested against alternatives by Bayesian model comparison. This model comparison reveals that the power function is an appropriate model of salience growth in the dimensions of orientation and luminance contrast. Furthermore, if contrasts from the two dimensions are comb}},
  author       = {{Krüger, Alexander and Tünnermann, Jan and Scharlau, Ingrid}},
  issn         = {{1943-3921}},
  journal      = {{Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics}},
  keywords     = {{Salience, Visual attention, Bayesian inference, Theory of visual attention, Computational modeling, Inference, Object Recognition, Theories, Visual Perception, Visual Attention, Luminance, Perceptual Orientation, Statistical Probability, Stimulus Salience, Computational Modeling}},
  number       = {{6}},
  pages        = {{1593 -- 1614}},
  title        = {{{Measuring and modeling salience with the theory of visual attention.}}},
  doi          = {{10.3758/s13414-017-1325-6}},
  volume       = {{79}},
  year         = {{2017}},
}

@article{6085,
  abstract     = {{In three experiments, we tested whether sequentially coding two visual stimuli can create a spatial misperception of a visual moving stimulus. In Experiment 1, we showed that a spatial misperception, the flash-lag effect, is accompanied by a similar temporal misperception of first perceiving the flash and only then a change of the moving stimulus, when in fact the two events were exactly simultaneous. In Experiment 2, we demonstrated that when the spatial misperception of a flash-lag effect is absent, the temporal misperception is also absent. In Experiment 3, we extended these findings and showed that if the stimulus conditions require coding first a flash and subsequently a nearby moving stimulus, a spatial flash-lag effect is found, with the position of the moving stimulus being misperceived as shifted in the direction of its motion, whereas this spatial misperception is reversed so that the moving stimulus is misperceived as shifted in a direction opposite to its motion when the c}},
  author       = {{Priess, Heinz-Werner and Scharlau, Ingrid and Becker, Stefanie I. and Ansorge, Ulrich}},
  issn         = {{1943-3921}},
  journal      = {{Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics}},
  keywords     = {{spatial mislocalization, sequential coding, stimulus parameters, Attention, Discrimination (Psychology), Humans, Judgment, Motion Perception, Optical Illusions, Orientation, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Psychophysics, Space Perception, Cognitive Processes, Motion Perception, Perceptual Localization, Spatial Perception, Stimulus Parameters, Consequence}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{365 -- 378}},
  title        = {{{Spatial mislocalization as a consequence of sequential coding of stimuli.}}},
  volume       = {{74}},
  year         = {{2012}},
}

@article{6091,
  abstract     = {{In the present article, the role of endogenous feature-specific orienting for conscious and unconscious vision is reviewed. We start with an overview of orienting. We proceed with a review of masking research, and the definition of the criteria of experimental protocols that demonstrate endogenous and exogenous orienting, respectively. Against this background of criteria, we assess studies of unconscious orienting and come to the conclusion that so far studies of unconscious orienting demonstrated endogenous feature-specific orienting. The review closes with a discussion of the role of unconscious orienting in action control. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)}},
  author       = {{Ansorge, Ulrich and Horstmann, Gernot and Scharlau, Ingrid}},
  issn         = {{1895-1171}},
  journal      = {{Advances in Cognitive Psychology}},
  keywords     = {{visual input, awareness, conscious, orientation, visual perception, Awareness, Consciousness States, Perceptual Orientation, Visual Perception, Blindsight}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{108 -- 119}},
  title        = {{{Top-down contingent feature-specific orienting with and without awareness of the visual input.}}},
  volume       = {{7}},
  year         = {{2011}},
}

@article{6077,
  abstract     = {{The phenomena of illusory line motion and perceptual latency priming are both assumed to reflect a facilitation of perceptual latency. The explanation of illusory line motion presupposes that attention is distributed in a gradient fashion whereas this is not a necessary part of the explanation of perceptual latency priming. Two experiments test whether an attentional gradient is present in perceptual latency priming. Evidence for a gradient was found within 2.5° of visual angle around the attended location, but not at a distance of 5° and more. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)}},
  author       = {{Scharlau, Ingrid and Horstmann, Gernot}},
  issn         = {{1895-1171}},
  journal      = {{Advances in Cognitive Psychology}},
  keywords     = {{perceptual latency priming, illusory line motion, attention, visual angle, Illusions (Perception), Priming, Visual Field, Visual Perception, Visual Attention, Spatial Orientation (Perception)}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{87 -- 97}},
  title        = {{{Perceptual latency priming and illusory line motion: Facilitation by gradients of attention?}}},
  volume       = {{2}},
  year         = {{2006}},
}

@article{6068,
  abstract     = {{Attending to a location shortens the perceptual latency of stimuli appearing at this location (perceptual latency priming). According to attentional explanations, perceptual latency priming relies on the speeded transfer of attended visual information into an internal model. However, doubts about the attentional origin have repeatedly been raised because efforts to minimize response bias have been insufficient in most studies. Five experiments investigated the contribution of a response bias to perceptual latency priming (judgment bias due to the two-alternative forced-choice method and due to the existence of the prime, criterion effects or second-order bias, sensorimotor priming). If any, only small response biases were found. The results thus support the attentional explanation. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)}},
  author       = {{Scharlau, Ingrid}},
  issn         = {{0340-0727}},
  journal      = {{Psychological Research}},
  keywords     = {{response bias, temporal order tasks, attention manipulation, masked primes, perceptual latency priming, Adult, Attention, Discrimination Learning, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Orientation, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Perceptual Masking, Psychomotor Performance, Psychophysics, Reaction Time, Serial Learning, Attention, Latent Learning, Priming, Response Bias, Visual Perception, Response Latency, Temporal Order (Judgment)}},
  number       = {{4}},
  pages        = {{224 -- 236}},
  title        = {{{Evidence against response bias in temporal order tasks with attention manipulation by masked primes.}}},
  volume       = {{68}},
  year         = {{2004}},
}