@article{44639,
  author       = {{Hoppe, Julia Amelie and Tuisku, Outi and Johansson-Pajala, Rose-Marie and Pekkarinen, Satu and Hennala, Lea and Gustafsson, Christine and Melkas, Helinä and Thommes, Kirsten}},
  issn         = {{2451-9588}},
  journal      = {{Computers in Human Behavior Reports}},
  keywords     = {{Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Neuroscience, Computer Science Applications, Human-Computer Interaction, Applied Psychology, Neuroscience (miscellaneous)}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier BV}},
  title        = {{{When do individuals choose care robots over a human caregiver? Insights from a laboratory experiment on choices under uncertainty}}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.chbr.2022.100258}},
  volume       = {{9}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

@inproceedings{50118,
  abstract     = {{Despite the widespread use of machine learning algorithms, their effectiveness is limited by a phenomenon known as algorithm aversion. Recent research concluded that unobserved variables can cause algorithm aversion. However, the impact of an unobserved variable on algorithm aversion remains unclear. Previous studies focused on situations where humans had more variables available than algorithms. We extend this research by conducting an online experiment with 94 participants, systematically varying the number of observable variables to the advisor and the advisor type. Surprisingly, our results did not confirm that an unobserved variable had a negative effect on advice-taking. Instead, we found a positive impact in an algorithm appreciation scenario. This study provides new insights into the paradoxical behavior in which people weigh advice more despite having fewer variables, as they correct for the advisor's errors. Practitioners should consider this behavior when designing algorithms and account for user correction behavior.}},
  author       = {{Leffrang, Dirk}},
  booktitle    = {{Wirtschaftsinformatik Conference}},
  keywords     = {{Algorithm aversion, Data, Decision-making, Advice-taking, Human-Computer Interaction}},
  location     = {{Paderborn}},
  number       = {{19}},
  title        = {{{The Broken Leg of Algorithm Appreciation: An Experimental Study on the Effect of Unobserved Variables on Advice Utilization}}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

@inproceedings{37058,
  abstract     = {{Digital technologies have made the line of visibility more transparent, enabling customers to get deeper insights into an organization’s core operations than ever before. This creates new challenges for organizations trying to consistently deliver high-quality customer experiences. In this paper we conduct an empirical analysis of customers’ preferences and their willingness-to-pay for different degrees of process transparency, using the example of digitally-enabled business-to-customer delivery services. Applying conjoint analysis, we quantify customers’ preferences and willingness-to-pay for different service attributes and levels. Our contributions are two-fold: For research, we provide empirical measurements of customers’ preferences and their willingness-to-pay for process transparency, suggesting that more is not always better. Additionally, we provide a blueprint of how conjoint analysis can be applied to study design decisions regarding changing an organization’s digital line of visibility. For practice, our findings enable service managers to make decisions about process transparency and establishing different levels of service quality.
}},
  author       = {{Brennig, Katharina and Müller, Oliver}},
  booktitle    = {{Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences}},
  keywords     = {{Digital Services, Line of Visibility, Process Transparency, Customer Preferences, Conjoint Analysis}},
  location     = {{Lāhainā}},
  title        = {{{More Isn’t Always Better – Measuring Customers’ Preferences for Digital Process Transparency}}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

@article{51371,
  abstract     = {{<jats:p>In this paper, we investigate the effect of distractions and hesitations as a scaffolding strategy. Recent research points to the potential beneficial effects of a speaker’s hesitations on the listeners’ comprehension of utterances, although results from studies on this issue indicate that humans do not make strategic use of them. The role of hesitations and their communicative function in human-human interaction is a much-discussed topic in current research. To better understand the underlying cognitive processes, we developed a human–robot interaction (HRI) setup that allows the measurement of the electroencephalogram (EEG) signals of a human participant while interacting with a robot. We thereby address the research question of whether we find effects on single-trial EEG based on the distraction and the corresponding robot’s hesitation scaffolding strategy. To carry out the experiments, we leverage our LabLinking method, which enables interdisciplinary joint research between remote labs. This study could not have been conducted without LabLinking, as the two involved labs needed to combine their individual expertise and equipment to achieve the goal together. The results of our study indicate that the EEG correlates in the distracted condition are different from the baseline condition without distractions. Furthermore, we could differentiate the EEG correlates of distraction with and without a hesitation scaffolding strategy. This proof-of-concept study shows that LabLinking makes it possible to conduct collaborative HRI studies in remote laboratories and lays the first foundation for more in-depth research into robotic scaffolding strategies.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Richter, Birte and Putze, Felix and Ivucic, Gabriel and Brandt, Mara and Schütze, Christian and Reisenhofer, Rafael and Wrede, Britta and Schultz, Tanja}},
  issn         = {{2414-4088}},
  journal      = {{Multimodal Technologies and Interaction}},
  keywords     = {{Computer Networks and Communications, Computer Science Applications, Human-Computer Interaction, Neuroscience (miscellaneous)}},
  number       = {{4}},
  publisher    = {{MDPI AG}},
  title        = {{{EEG Correlates of Distractions and Hesitations in Human–Robot Interaction: A LabLinking Pilot Study}}},
  doi          = {{10.3390/mti7040037}},
  volume       = {{7}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

@article{43437,
  abstract     = {{<jats:p>In virtual reality (VR), participants may not always have hands, bodies, eyes, or even voices—using VR helmets and two controllers, participants control an avatar through virtual worlds that do not necessarily obey familiar laws of physics; moreover, the avatar’s bodily characteristics may not neatly match our bodies in the physical world. Despite these limitations and specificities, humans get things done through collaboration and the creative use of the environment. While multiuser interactive VR is attracting greater numbers of participants, there are currently few attempts to analyze the in situ interaction systematically. This paper proposes a video-analytic detail-oriented methodological framework for studying virtual reality interaction. Using multimodal conversation analysis, the paper investigates a nonverbal, embodied, two-person interaction: two players in a survival game strive to gesturally resolve a misunderstanding regarding an in-game mechanic—however, both of their microphones are turned off for the duration of play. The players’ inability to resort to complex language to resolve this issue results in a dense sequence of back-and-forth activity involving gestures, object manipulation, gaze, and body work. Most crucially, timing and modified repetitions of previously produced actions turn out to be the key to overcome both technical and communicative challenges. The paper analyzes these action sequences, demonstrates how they generate intended outcomes, and proposes a vocabulary to speak about these types of interaction more generally. The findings demonstrate the viability of multimodal analysis of VR interaction, shed light on unique challenges of analyzing interaction in virtual reality, and generate broader methodological insights about the study of nonverbal action.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Klowait, Nils}},
  issn         = {{2578-1863}},
  journal      = {{Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies}},
  keywords     = {{Human-Computer Interaction, General Social Sciences, Social Psychology, Virtual Reality : Multimodality, Nonverbal Interaction, Search Sequence, Gesture, Co-Operative Action, Goodwin, Ethnomethodology}},
  pages        = {{1--15}},
  publisher    = {{Hindawi Limited}},
  title        = {{{On the Multimodal Resolution of a Search Sequence in Virtual Reality}}},
  doi          = {{10.1155/2023/8417012}},
  volume       = {{2023}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

@article{48543,
  abstract     = {{Explanation has been identified as an important capability for AI-based systems, but research on systematic strategies for achieving understanding in interaction with such systems is still sparse. Negation is a linguistic strategy that is often used in explanations. It creates a contrast space between the affirmed and the negated item that enriches explaining processes with additional contextual information. While negation in human speech has been shown to lead to higher processing costs and worse task performance in terms of recall or action execution when used in isolation, it can decrease processing costs when used in context. So far, it has not been considered as a guiding strategy for explanations in human-robot interaction. We conducted an empirical study to investigate the use of negation as a guiding strategy in explanatory human-robot dialogue, in which a virtual robot explains tasks and possible actions to a human explainee to solve them in terms of gestures on a touchscreen. Our results show that negation vs. affirmation 1) increases processing costs measured as reaction time and 2) increases several aspects of task performance. While there was no significant effect of negation on the number of initially correctly executed gestures, we found a significantly lower number of attempts—measured as breaks in the finger movement data before the correct gesture was carried out—when being instructed through a negation. We further found that the gestures significantly resembled the presented prototype gesture more following an instruction with a negation as opposed to an affirmation. Also, the participants rated the benefit of contrastive vs. affirmative explanations significantly higher. Repeating the instructions decreased the effects of negation, yielding similar processing costs and task performance measures for negation and affirmation after several iterations. We discuss our results with respect to possible effects of negation on linguistic processing of explanations and limitations of our study.}},
  author       = {{Groß, A. and Singh, Amit and Banh, Ngoc Chi and Richter, B. and Scharlau, Ingrid and Rohlfing, Katharina J. and Wrede, B.}},
  journal      = {{Frontiers in Robotics and AI}},
  keywords     = {{HRI, XAI, negation, understanding, explaining, touch interaction, gesture}},
  title        = {{{Scaffolding the human partner by contrastive guidance in an explanatory human-robot dialogue}}},
  doi          = {{10.3389/frobt.2023.1236184}},
  volume       = {{10}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

@article{42953,
  author       = {{Cara, Eleonora and Hönicke, Philipp and Kayser, Yves and Lindner, Jörg K. N. and Castellino, Micaela and Murataj, Irdi and Porro, Samuele and Angelini, Angelo and De Leo, Natascia and Pirri, Candido Fabrizio and Beckhoff, Burkhard and Boarino, Luca and Ferrarese Lupi, Federico}},
  issn         = {{2637-6105}},
  journal      = {{ACS Applied Polymer Materials}},
  keywords     = {{Organic Chemistry, Polymers and Plastics, Process Chemistry and Technology}},
  number       = {{3}},
  pages        = {{2079--2087}},
  publisher    = {{American Chemical Society (ACS)}},
  title        = {{{Developing Quantitative Nondestructive Characterization of Nanomaterials: A Case Study on Sequential Infiltration Synthesis of Block Copolymers}}},
  doi          = {{10.1021/acsapm.2c02094}},
  volume       = {{5}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

@inproceedings{44154,
  abstract     = {{<jats:p>Abstract. Due to an increasing volume of shipments, there is a significant need for more delivery vehicles. One approach to reduce the associated increase in carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions is a new light weight design approach involving the substitution of conventional materials with glass fiber mat-reinforced thermoplastics (GMT) based on polypropylene (PP). The application of GMT by compression molding is a widely used process in the automotive industry. However, application in the commercial vehicle sector requires much larger dimensions, making it necessary to clarify whether the manufacturing process and material are suitable for semi-structural applications on this scale. To find this out, two replacement geometries are abstracted in this study and manufactured by varying the main manufacturing parameters. The feasibility can be demonstrated by recording and analyzing the resulting process variables and measuring the formed fiber distribution. At the end of the paper, recommendations are given for the production of GMT structures on the scale of commercial vehicles. </jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Lückenkötter, Julian and Leimbach, J.P. and Stallmeister, Tim and Marten, Thorsten and Tröster, Thomas}},
  booktitle    = {{Materials Research Proceedings}},
  issn         = {{978-1-64490-247-9}},
  keywords     = {{Compression Molding, Fiber Content, Process Development, Lightweight Design}},
  location     = {{Krakow, Poland}},
  pages        = {{249--258}},
  publisher    = {{Materials Research Forum LLC}},
  title        = {{{Feasibility Study of Compression Molding for Large Reinforcement Structures in the Commercial Vehicle Sector}}},
  doi          = {{10.21741/9781644902479-27}},
  volume       = {{28}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

@article{43457,
  abstract     = {{The production of hydrogen and the utilization of biomass for sustainable concepts of energy conversion and storage require gas sensors that discriminate between hydrogen (H2) and carbon monoxide (CO). Mesoporous copper–ceria (Cu–CeO2) materials with large specific surface areas and uniform porosity are prepared by nanocasting, and their textural properties are characterized by N2 physisorption, powder XRD, scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. The oxidation states of copper (Cu+, Cu2+) and cerium (Ce3+, Ce4+) are investigated by XPS. The materials are used as resistive gas sensors for H2 and CO. The sensors show a stronger response to CO than to H2 and low cross-sensitivity to humidity. Copper turns out to be a necessary component; copper-free ceria materials prepared by the same method show only poor sensing performance. By measuring both gases (CO and H2) simultaneously, it is shown that this behavior can be utilized for selective sensing of CO in the presence of H2.}},
  author       = {{Baier, Dominik and Priamushko, Tatiana and Weinberger, Christian and Kleitz, Freddy and Tiemann, Michael}},
  issn         = {{2379-3694}},
  journal      = {{ACS Sensors}},
  keywords     = {{Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, Process Chemistry and Technology, Instrumentation, Bioengineering}},
  number       = {{4}},
  pages        = {{1616 -- 1623}},
  publisher    = {{American Chemical Society (ACS)}},
  title        = {{{Selective Discrimination between CO and H2 with Copper–Ceria-Resistive Gas Sensors}}},
  doi          = {{10.1021/acssensors.2c02739}},
  volume       = {{8}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

@article{46637,
  author       = {{Gonchikzhapov, Munko and Kasper, Tina}},
  issn         = {{2666-352X}},
  journal      = {{Applications in Energy and Combustion Science}},
  keywords     = {{Nanoparticle synthesis, Flame spray pyrolysis, SpraySyn burner, Flame structure, Species distribution, Temperature distribution}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier BV}},
  title        = {{{Thermal and chemical structure of ethanol and 2-ethylhexanoic acid/ethanol SpraySyn flames}}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.jaecs.2023.100174}},
  volume       = {{15}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

@article{32266,
  author       = {{Hoppe, Julia Amelie and Melkas, Helinä and Pekkarinen, Satu and Tuisku, Outi and Hennala, Lea and Johansson-Pajala, Rose-Marie and Gustafsson, Christine and Thommes, Kirsten}},
  issn         = {{1044-7318}},
  journal      = {{International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction}},
  keywords     = {{Computer Science Applications, Human-Computer Interaction, Human Factors and Ergonomics}},
  pages        = {{1--17}},
  publisher    = {{Informa UK Limited}},
  title        = {{{Perception of Society’s Trust in Care Robots by Public Opinion Leaders}}},
  doi          = {{10.1080/10447318.2022.2081283}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@article{32267,
  author       = {{Hoppe, Julia Amelie and Melkas, Helinä and Pekkarinen, Satu and Tuisku, Outi and Hennala, Lea and Johansson-Pajala, Rose-Marie and Gustafsson, Christine and Thommes, Kirsten}},
  issn         = {{1044-7318}},
  journal      = {{International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction}},
  keywords     = {{Computer Science Applications, Human-Computer Interaction, Human Factors and Ergonomics}},
  pages        = {{1--17}},
  publisher    = {{Informa UK Limited}},
  title        = {{{Perception of Society’s Trust in Care Robots by Public Opinion Leaders}}},
  doi          = {{10.1080/10447318.2022.2081283}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@article{34223,
  abstract     = {{In this study, quasi-unidirectional continuous fiber reinforced thermoplastics (CFRTs) are joined with metal sheets via cold formed cylindrical, elliptical and polygonal pin structures which are directly pressed into the CFRT component after local infrared heating. In comparison to already available studies, the unique novelty is the use of non-rotational symmetric pin structures for the CFRT/metal hybrid joining. Thus, a variation in the fiber orientation in the CFRT component as well as a variation in the non-rotational symmetric pins’ orientation in relation to the sample orientation is conducted. The created samples are consequently mechanically tested via single lap shear experiments in a quasi-static state. Finally, the failure behavior of the single lap shear samples is investigated with the help of microscopic images and detailed photographs. In the single lap shear tests, it could be shown that non-rotational symmetric pin structures lead to an increase in maximum testing forces of up to 74% when compared to cylindrical pins. However, when normalized to the pin foot print related joint strength, only one polygonal pin variation showed increased joint strength in comparison to cylindrical pin structures. The investigation of the failure behavior showed two distinct failure modes. The first failure mode was failure of the CFRT component due to an exceedance of the maximum bearing strength of the pin-hole leading to significant damage in the CFRT component. The second failure mode was pin-deflection due to the applied testing load and a subsequent pin extraction from the CFRT component resulting in significantly less visible damage in the CFRT component. Generally, CFRT failure is more likely with a fiber orientation of 0° in relation to the load direction while pin extraction typically occurs with a fiber orientation of 90°. It is assumed that for future investigations, pin structures with an undercutting shape that creates an interlocking joint could counteract the tendency for pin-extraction and consequently lead to increased maximum joint strengths.}},
  author       = {{Popp, Julian and Römisch, David and Merklein, Marion and Drummer, Dietmar}},
  issn         = {{2076-3417}},
  journal      = {{Applied Sciences}},
  keywords     = {{Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, Computer Science Applications, Process Chemistry and Technology, General Engineering, Instrumentation, General Materials Science}},
  number       = {{10}},
  publisher    = {{MDPI AG}},
  title        = {{{Joining of CFRT/Steel Hybrid Parts via Direct Pressing of Cold Formed Non-Rotational Symmetric Pin Structures}}},
  doi          = {{10.3390/app12104962}},
  volume       = {{12}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@article{34046,
  author       = {{Hoffmann, Christin and Thommes, Kirsten}},
  issn         = {{2168-2291}},
  journal      = {{IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems}},
  keywords     = {{Artificial Intelligence, Computer Networks and Communications, Computer Science Applications, Human-Computer Interaction, Signal Processing, Control and Systems Engineering, Human Factors and Ergonomics}},
  pages        = {{1--11}},
  publisher    = {{Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)}},
  title        = {{{Seizing the Opportunity for Automation—How Traffic Density Determines Truck Drivers' Use of Cruise Control}}},
  doi          = {{10.1109/thms.2022.3212335}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@article{30218,
  author       = {{Tuisku, Outi and Johansson-Pajala, Rose-Marie and Hoppe, Julia Amelie and Pekkarinen, Satu and Hennala, Lea and Thommes, Kirsten and Gustafsson, Christine and Melkas, Helinä}},
  issn         = {{0144-929X}},
  journal      = {{Behaviour & Information Technology}},
  keywords     = {{Human-Computer Interaction, General Social Sciences, Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous), Developmental and Educational Psychology}},
  pages        = {{1--17}},
  publisher    = {{Informa UK Limited}},
  title        = {{{Assistant nurses and orientation to care robot use in three European countries}}},
  doi          = {{10.1080/0144929x.2022.2042736}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@article{44637,
  author       = {{Hoppe, Julia Amelie and Tuisku, Outi and Johansson-Pajala, Rose-Marie and Pekkarinen, Satu and Hennala, Lea and Gustafsson, Christine and Melkas, Helinä and Thommes, Kirsten}},
  issn         = {{2451-9588}},
  journal      = {{Computers in Human Behavior Reports}},
  keywords     = {{Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Neuroscience, Computer Science Applications, Human-Computer Interaction, Applied Psychology, Neuroscience (miscellaneous)}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier BV}},
  title        = {{{When do individuals choose care robots over a human caregiver? Insights from a laboratory experiment on choices under uncertainty}}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.chbr.2022.100258}},
  volume       = {{9}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@article{34295,
  author       = {{Hoppe, Julia Amelie and Tuisku, Outi and Johansson-Pajala, Rose-Marie and Pekkarinen, Satu and Hennala, Lea and Gustafsson, Christine and Melkas, Helinä and Thommes, Kirsten}},
  issn         = {{2451-9588}},
  journal      = {{Computers in Human Behavior Reports}},
  keywords     = {{Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Neuroscience, Computer Science Applications, Human-Computer Interaction, Applied Psychology, Neuroscience (miscellaneous)}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier BV}},
  title        = {{{When do individuals choose care robots over a human caregiver? Insights from a laboratory experiment on choices under uncertainty}}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.chbr.2022.100258}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@article{44636,
  author       = {{Hoppe, Julia A. and Tuisku, Outi and Johansson-Pajala, Rose-Marie and Pekkarinen, Satu and Hennala, Lea and Gustafsson, Christine and Melkas, Helinä and Thommes, Kirsten}},
  issn         = {{2451-9588}},
  journal      = {{Computers in Human Behavior Reports}},
  keywords     = {{Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Neuroscience, Computer Science Applications, Human-Computer Interaction, Applied Psychology, Neuroscience (miscellaneous)}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier BV}},
  title        = {{{When do individuals choose care robots over a human caregiver? Insights from a laboratory experiment on choices under uncertainty}}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.chbr.2022.100258}},
  volume       = {{9}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@article{32273,
  author       = {{Hoppe, Julia Amelie and Melkas, Helinä and Pekkarinen, Satu and Tuisku, Outi and Hennala, Lea and Johansson-Pajala, Rose-Marie and Gustafsson, Christine and Thommes, Kirsten}},
  issn         = {{1044-7318}},
  journal      = {{International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction}},
  keywords     = {{Computer Science Applications, Human-Computer Interaction, Human Factors and Ergonomics}},
  pages        = {{1--17}},
  publisher    = {{Informa UK Limited}},
  title        = {{{Perception of Society’s Trust in Care Robots by Public Opinion Leaders}}},
  doi          = {{10.1080/10447318.2022.2081283}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@inproceedings{34317,
  author       = {{Arslan, Kader and Trier, Matthias}},
  booktitle    = {{Proceedings of the 33rd Australasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS 2022)}},
  keywords     = {{Social media, Social media marketing process, Social media strategy, Social media management, Guidelines}},
  location     = {{Melbourne, Australia}},
  title        = {{{Towards a Process Model for Social Media Marketing}}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

