@inproceedings{17055,
  abstract     = {{Understanding a new literature corpus can be a grueling experience for junior scholars. Nevertheless, corresponding guidelines have not been updated for decades. We contend that the traditional strategy of skimming all papers and reading selected papers afterwards needs to be revised. Therefore, we design a new strategy that guides the overall exploratory process by prioritizing influential papers for initial reading, followed by skimming the remaining papers. Consistent with schemata theory, starting with in-depth reading allows readers to acquire more substantial prior content schemata, which are representa-tive for the literature corpus and useful in the following skimming process. To this end, we develop a prototype that identifies the influential papers from a set of PDFs, which is illustrated in a case study in the IT business value domain. With the new strategy, we envision a more efficient process of exploring unknown literature corpora.}},
  author       = {{Wagner, Gerit and Empl, Philipp and Schryen, Guido}},
  booktitle    = {{28th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2020)}},
  keywords     = {{Reading and skimming, Exploring literature, Review methodology, Design science research, Schemata theory}},
  location     = {{Marrakesh, Morocco}},
  title        = {{{Designing a Novel Strategy for Exploring Literature Corpora}}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@inproceedings{16285,
  abstract     = {{To  decide  in  which  part  of  town to  open  stores,  high  street  retailers consult  statistical  data  on  customers  and  cities,  but  they  cannot  analyze  their customers’  shopping  behavior  and  geospatial  features  of  a  city  due  to  missing data.  While  previous  research  has  proposed  recommendation  systems  and decision  aids  that  address  this  type  of  decision  problem –  including  factory location  and  assortment  planning –  there  currently  is no design  knowledge available  to  prescribe  the  design  of  city  center  area  recommendation  systems (CCARS).   We   set   out   to   design   a   software   prototype   considering   local customers’  shopping  interests  and  geospatial  data  on  their  shopping  trips  for retail site selection.  With real data on 500 customers and 1,100 shopping trips, we demonstrate and evaluate our IT artifact. Our results illustrate how retailers and public town center managers can use CCARS for spatial location selection, growing retailers’ profits and a city center’s attractiveness for its citizens.}},
  author       = {{zur Heiden, Philipp and Berendes, Carsten Ingo and Beverungen, Daniel}},
  booktitle    = {{Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik}},
  keywords     = {{Town Center Management, High Street Retail, Recommender Systems, Geospatial Recommendations, Design Science Research}},
  location     = {{Potsdam}},
  title        = {{{Designing City Center Area Recommendation Systems }}},
  doi          = {{doi.org/10.30844/wi_2020_e1-heiden}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{31802,
  abstract     = {{<jats:p> Much work on innovation strategy assumes or theorizes that competition in innovation elicits duplication of research and that disclosure decreases such duplication. We validate this empirically using the American Inventors Protection Act (AIPA), three complementary identification strategies, and a new measure of blocked future patent applications. We show that AIPA—intended to reduce duplication, through default disclosure of patent applications 18 months after filing—reduced duplication in the U.S. and European patent systems. The blocking measure provides a clear and micro measure of technological competition that can be aggregated to facilitate the empirical investigation of innovation, firm strategy, and the positive and negative externalities of patenting. </jats:p><jats:p> This paper was accepted by Joshua Gans, business strategy. </jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Lück, Sonja and Balsmeier, Benjamin and Seliger, Florian and Fleming, Lee}},
  issn         = {{0025-1909}},
  journal      = {{Management Science}},
  keywords     = {{Management Science and Operations Research, Strategy and Management}},
  number       = {{6}},
  pages        = {{2677--2685}},
  publisher    = {{Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)}},
  title        = {{{Early Disclosure of Invention and Reduced Duplication: An Empirical Test}}},
  doi          = {{10.1287/mnsc.2019.3521}},
  volume       = {{66}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{11946,
  abstract     = {{Literature reviews (LRs) play an important role in the development of domain knowledge in all fields. Yet, we observe a
lack of insights into the activities with which LRs actually develop knowledge. To address this important gap, we (1)
derive knowledge building activities from the extant literature on LRs, (2) suggest a knowledge-based typology of LRs
that complements existing typologies, and (3) apply the suggested typology in an empirical study that explores how LRs
with different goals and methodologies have contributed to knowledge development. The analysis of 240 LRs published
in 40 renowned IS journals between 2000 and 2014 allows us to draw a detailed picture of knowledge development
achieved by one of the most important genres in the IS field. An overarching contribution of our work is to unify extant
conceptualizations of LRs by clarifying and illustrating how LRs apply different methodologies in a range of knowledge
building activities to achieve their goals with respect to theory.}},
  author       = {{Schryen, Guido and Wagner, Gerit and Benlian, Alexander and Paré, Guy}},
  issn         = {{ 1529-3181}},
  journal      = {{Communications of the AIS}},
  keywords     = {{Literature review, knowledge development, knowledge building activities, knowledge-based typology, information systems research}},
  pages        = {{134--186}},
  title        = {{{A Knowledge Development Perspective on Literature Reviews: Validation of a New Typology in the IS Field}}},
  doi          = {{10.17705/1CAIS.04607}},
  volume       = {{46}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{35298,
  abstract     = {{Im  Artikel  werden  drei  verschiedene  Lernzugänge  (kom-petenzorientiertes,  ästhetisches  und  biographisches  Lernen)  vorgestellt  und  aus theoretischer Perspektive deren motivierender Gehalt für selbstreguliertes Lernen in Praxisphasen des Lehramtsstudiumsherausgearbeitet. Als theoretische Grund-lage dient die Selbstbestimmungstheorie als zentrale motivationale Theorie zur Erklärung selbstbestimmten Handelns.}},
  author       = {{Caruso, Carina and Adammek, Christine and Bonanati, Sabrina and Wiescholek, Sybille}},
  issn         = {{2625-0675}},
  journal      = {{Herausforderung Lehrer*innenbildung - Zeitschrift Zur Konzeption, Gestaltung Und Diskussion}},
  keywords     = {{ästhetische Forschung, Biographiearbeit, Praxissemester, Professionalisierung, selbstreguliertes Lernen, Motivation / aesthetic research, biographical work, long-term internship, profes-sionalization, self-regulated learning, motivation}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{18--33}},
  title        = {{{Motivierende Lernzugänge als Ausgangspunkt der Professionalisierung angehender Lehrer_innen}}},
  doi          = {{10.4119/hlz-2540}},
  volume       = {{3}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{33299,
  abstract     = {{The aim of this study was to find out whether teaching how to search for literature
would be more beneficial to students and teachers if done online through short videos
rather than in person during course time. To find out whether online videos are more
beneficial, two courses were asked to fill in questionnaires, one at the beginning and
one at the end of the semester. One of the courses received the input online via videos
and were given an exercise to put the newly learned skills to use, the other course
served as a control group and learned how to search for literature during the course.
The results show that while the difference between the two groups is not significant,
the videos can still be regarded as being more beneficial than teaching the necessary
skills during course time.}},
  author       = {{Hahn, Charlotte Anna}},
  issn         = {{ISSN 2199-8825}},
  journal      = {{die hochschullehre}},
  keywords     = {{E-Learning, information competence, literature, library, research}},
  number       = {{6}},
  title        = {{{Informationskompetenz durch E-Learning? Durch Lernvideos nach Literatur suchen}}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{47476,
  abstract     = {{Digital data on tangible and intangible cultural assets is an essential part of daily life, communication and experience. It has a lasting influence on the perception of cultural identity as well as on the interactions between research, the cultural economy and society. Throughout the last three decades, many cultural heritage institutions have contributed a wealth of digital representations of cultural assets (2D digital reproductions of paintings, sheet music, 3D digital models of sculptures, monuments, rooms, buildings), audio-visual data (music, film, stage performances), and procedural research data such as encoding and annotation formats. The long-term preservation and FAIR availability of research data from the cultural heritage domain is fundamentally important, not only for future academic success in the humanities but also for the cultural identity of individuals and society as a whole. Up to now, no coordinated effort for professional research data management on a national level exists in Germany. NFDI4Culture aims to fill this gap and create a user-centered, research-driven infrastructure that will cover a broad range of research domains from musicology, art history and architecture to performance, theatre, film, and media studies.</jats:p>
          <jats:p>The research landscape addressed by the consortium is characterized by strong institutional differentiation. Research units in the consortium's community of interest comprise university institutes, art colleges, academies, galleries, libraries, archives and museums. This diverse landscape is also characterized by an abundance of research objects, methodologies and a great potential for data-driven research. In a unique effort carried out by the applicant and co-applicants of this proposal and ten academic societies, this community is interconnected for the first time through a federated approach that is ideally suited to the needs of the participating researchers. To promote collaboration within the NFDI, to share knowledge and technology and to provide extensive support for its users have been the guiding principles of the consortium from the beginning and will be at the heart of all workflows and decision-making processes. Thanks to these principles, NFDI4Culture has gathered strong support ranging from individual researchers to high-level cultural heritage organizations such as the UNESCO, the International Council of Museums, the Open Knowledge Foundation and Wikimedia. On this basis, NFDI4Culture will take innovative measures that promote a cultural change towards a more reflective and sustainable handling of research data and at the same time boost qualification and professionalization in data-driven research in the domain of cultural heritage. This will create a long-lasting impact on science, cultural economy and society as a whole.}},
  author       = {{Altenhöner, Reinhard and Blümel, Ina and Boehm, Franziska and Bove, Jens and Bicher, Katrin and Bracht, Christian and Brand, Ortrun and Dieckmann, Lisa and Effinger, Maria and Hagener, Malte and Hammes, Andrea and Heller, Lambert and Kailus, Angela and Kohle, Hubertus and Ludwig, Jens and Münzmay, Andreas and Pittroff, Sarah and Razum, Matthias and Röwenstrunk, Daniel and Sack, Harald and Simon, Holger and Schmidt, Dörte and Schrade, Torsten and Walzel, Annika-Valeska and Wiermann, Barbara}},
  issn         = {{2367-7163}},
  journal      = {{Research Ideas and Outcomes}},
  keywords     = {{Research Data Management}},
  publisher    = {{Pensoft Publishers}},
  title        = {{{NFDI4Culture - Consortium for research data on material and immaterial cultural heritage}}},
  doi          = {{10.3897/rio.6.e57036}},
  volume       = {{6}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@inbook{35811,
  author       = {{Biehler, Rolf and Durand-Guerrier, Viviane}},
  booktitle    = {{Proceedings of the Third Conference of the International Network for Didactic Research in University Mathematics (INDRUM 2020, 12-19 September 2020)}},
  editor       = {{Hausberger, T. and Bosch, M. and Chelloughi, F.}},
  keywords     = {{Number Theory, Algebra, Discrete Mathematics, Logic, Research in University Mathematics Edcuation}},
  pages        = {{283--287}},
  publisher    = {{University of Carthage and INDRUM}},
  title        = {{{University Mathematics Didactic Research on Number Theory, Algebra, Discrete Mathematics, Logic}}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{48877,
  abstract     = {{OpenML is an online machine learning platform where researchers can easily share data, machine learning tasks and experiments as well as organize them online to work and collaborate more efficiently. In this paper, we present an R package to interface with the OpenML platform and illustrate its usage in combination with the machine learning R package mlr (Bischl et al. J Mach Learn Res 17(170):1—5, 2016). We show how the OpenML package allows R users to easily search, download and upload data sets and machine learning tasks. Furthermore, we also show how to upload results of experiments, share them with others and download results from other users. Beyond ensuring reproducibility of results, the OpenML platform automates much of the drudge work, speeds up research, facilitates collaboration and increases the users’ visibility online.}},
  author       = {{Casalicchio, Giuseppe and Bossek, Jakob and Lang, Michel and Kirchhoff, Dominik and Kerschke, Pascal and Hofner, Benjamin and Seibold, Heidi and Vanschoren, Joaquin and Bischl, Bernd}},
  issn         = {{0943-4062}},
  journal      = {{Computational Statistics}},
  keywords     = {{Databases, Machine learning, R, Reproducible research}},
  number       = {{3}},
  pages        = {{977–991}},
  title        = {{{OpenML: An R Package to Connect to the Machine Learning Platform OpenML}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s00180-017-0742-2}},
  volume       = {{34}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@inproceedings{48409,
  author       = {{Wessel, Lena}},
  booktitle    = {{Eleventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME11)}},
  editor       = {{Jankvist, Uffe Thomas and van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, Marja and Veldhuis, Michiel}},
  keywords     = {{Vocational education, language, percentages, scaffolding, design research}},
  number       = {{12}},
  publisher    = {{Freudenthal Group}},
  title        = {{{How theories of language-responsive mathematics can inform teaching designs for vocational mathematics}}},
  volume       = {{TWG07}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@inproceedings{24468,
  abstract     = {{Inter- and transdisciplinary research are new demands in Higher Education. Aiming to enhance the social relevance, usability and sustainability of technological products and solutions, society and public institutions such as research funding organizations increasingly expect engineers to include inter- and transdisciplinary approaches into the development of new technologies. Engineering research and education, however, are particularly challenging areas to realize inter- and transdisciplinary collaborations, for manifold reasons.
This contribution presents methods and results of an inter- and transdisciplinary research and education strategy designed to meet the particular requirements of engineers and engineering students. It starts with a brief discussion of typical challenges regarding inter- and transdisciplinary approaches in engineering (research topics, research culture, skills, time, and barriers of lay people to involve in technology development). Secondly, it presents the methods developed to overcome those challenges within the context of the NRW Fortschrittskolleg "Light - Efficient - Mobile" (FK LEM). Founded in 2014, the FK LEM is a PhD programm focuses on lightweight construction, but with a special emphasis on how lightweight technologies are connected to different areas of society, to societal actors and technology users, and to the needs of a diversity of social groups. In order to explore these connections, we organized three workshops to bring public service, civil society, industry, practitioners and engineers together to discuss the perceived needs in those areas, and the potential of lightweight solutions. Topically, the workshops were dedicated to the fields of Rescue & Security Services; Care, Mobility & Assisted Living; and Sustainable Ressources & Climate Protection. Methodologically, we applied a pragmatic but valid approach to focus groups and discourse analysis. Results of the workshops in terms of directions for future research, epistemological and ethical dimensions of lightweight engineering are presented in the third part of our contribution. Finally, we discuss how our method and experience can be transferred into other engineering and educational contexts. With other words, how empowering students, engineers and the public to involve in inter- and transdisciplinary engineering processes can be achieved, and how this empowerment supports the development of innovative technologies as well as engineers’ skills to design technology in line with societies’ needs and challenges.}},
  author       = {{Horwath, Ilona and Dohmeier-Fischer, Silvia and Weiß-Borkowski, Nathalie and Tröster, Thomas}},
  booktitle    = {{INTED2018 Proceedings}},
  keywords     = {{Lightweight Design, Interdisciplinarity, Transdisciplinarity, Higher Education, Research Methods}},
  title        = {{{FROM EMPOWERMENT TO INNOVATION: INTER- AND TRANSDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH METHODS IN LIGHTWEIGHT ENGINEERING}}},
  doi          = {{10.21125/inted.2018.1651}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@article{4516,
  abstract     = {{Although many methods have been proposed for engineering service systems and customer solutions, most of these approaches give little consideration to recombinant service innovation. Recombinant innovation refers to reusing and integrating resources that were previously unconnected. In an age of networked products and data, we can expect that many service innovations will be based on adding, dissociating, and associating existing value propositions by accessing internal and external resources instead of designing them from scratch. The purpose of this paper is to identify if current service engineering approaches account for the mechanisms of recombinant innovation and to design a method for recombinant service systems engineering. In a conceptual analysis of 24 service engineering methods, the study identified that most methods (1) focus on designing value propositions instead of service systems, (2) view service independent of physical goods, (3) are either linear or iterative instead of agile, and (4) do not sufficiently address the mechanisms of recombinant innovation. The paper discusses how these deficiencies can be remedied and designs a revised service systems engineering approach that reorganizes service engineering processes according to four design principles. The method is demonstrated with the recombinant design of a service system for predictive maintenance of agricultural machines.}},
  author       = {{Beverungen, Daniel and Lüttenberg, Hedda and Wolf, Verena}},
  issn         = {{2363-7005}},
  journal      = {{Business & Information Systems Engineering}},
  keywords     = {{Service engineering, Recombinant innovation, (Product-)service system, Design science research, New service development}},
  number       = {{5}},
  pages        = {{377--391}},
  publisher    = {{SpringerNature}},
  title        = {{{Recombinant Service Systems Engineering}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s12599-018-0526-4}},
  volume       = {{60}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@inbook{57891,
  abstract     = {{This article provides an insight into a qualitative research project concerning music educational practices with mobile music technologies. Based on social systems theory, this grounded-theory study observes how groups in two extracurricular music classes construct different technologies (e. g., iPads, mixers, ear phones) within the emergence of (reflexive) expectations as social structures. The results reveal five categories of technologies: technology as an instrument-toy-alternator that supports motivation, as a medium for knowledge and learning, as an adjusting device used for socio-aesthetic decision making, as a didactical tool for task-based situations, and as an isolator for inner differentiation by focusing aural perception. (DIPF/Orig.)}},
  author       = {{Godau, Marc}},
  booktitle    = {{Musikpädagogik und Kulturwissenschaft}},
  editor       = {{Cvetko, Alexander J. and Rolle, Christian}},
  keywords     = {{Musical education, Musikpädagogik, Musikunterricht, Deployment of media, Medien, Medieneinsatz, Mobile Computing, Music lessons, Qualitative Forschung, Qualitative research, Teaching of music, Use of media}},
  pages        = {{237–249}},
  publisher    = {{Waxmann}},
  title        = {{{Apps in der musikpädagogischen Praxis. Eine explorative Studie zur kommunikativen Konstruktion von mobilen Technologien im schulischen Nachmittagsbereich}}},
  volume       = {{38}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@inbook{57889,
  abstract     = {{During the past decade, there has been an increase of pedagogical research under conditions of posthuman theories, such as the Actor Network Theory or post-phenomenology. Yet, there has not been much research on the materiality of music pedagogical practices. This article introduces an ongoing grounded-theory study on the role of things (e.g., music instruments, black board, or digital devices) within the music classroom. Results from the analysis of group discussions and interviews with student teachers show tensions between personal preferences, school conventions, and material conventions within the process of introducing things into the classroom. (DIPF/Orig.)}},
  author       = {{Godau, Marc}},
  booktitle    = {{Soziale Aspekte des Musiklernens}},
  editor       = {{Clausen, Bernd and Dreßler, Susanne}},
  keywords     = {{Interview, Lehrer, Musical education, Musikpädagogik, Musikunterricht, Teacher, Music lessons, Qualitative Forschung, Qualitative research, Teaching of music, Object, Objekt, Ding, Handlung, Practice, Praxis, Probationary teacher training, Referendariat}},
  pages        = {{43–55}},
  publisher    = {{Waxmann}},
  title        = {{{Wie kommen die Dinge in den Musikunterricht? Zur Materialität musikpädagogischer Praxis am Beispiel divergierender Orientierungen im Kontext unterrichtsbezogenen Handelns angehender Lehrkräfte}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@inbook{57890,
  abstract     = {{Within recent years, research on music learning in groups has increased. But the distinction between collaboration and cooperation is mostly unclear. This article aims to distinguish both concepts by presenting a study on popular music learning in groups (Godau, 2017) based on elements of the learning approach in Musical Futures (Green, 2008). As a result, the two concepts are seen as complementary. They form the poles of a continuum of collective learning: Collaboration characterizes the collective action toward the common goal. By contrast, cooperation occurs when group members act separately toward achieving the common goal. (DIPF/Orig.)}},
  author       = {{Godau, Marc}},
  booktitle    = {{Soziale Aspekte des Musiklernens}},
  editor       = {{Clausen, Bernd and Dreßler, Susanne}},
  keywords     = {{Kollaboration, Musik, Learning, Lernen, Musical education, Musikpädagogik, Pop music, Popmusik, Popular Music, Studie, Musikunterricht, Music lessons, Qualitative Forschung, Qualitative research, Teaching of music, Constructivism, Cooperation, Cooperative learning, Gruppe, Klassenmusizieren, Konstruktivismus, Kooperation, Kooperatives Lernen, Learning psychology, Lernpsychologie, Psychology of learning}},
  pages        = {{131–144}},
  publisher    = {{Waxmann}},
  title        = {{{Kollaboration und Kooperation beim Klassenmusizieren mit Populärer Musik. Musikmachen in der Schule im Spannungsfeld von Lernen mit der Gruppe und für die Gruppe}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@article{5633,
  abstract     = {{Literature reviews (LRs) are recognized for their increasing impact in the information systems literature. Methodologists have drawn attention to the question of how we can leverage the value of LRs to preserve and generate knowledge. The panelists who participated in the discussion of ?Standalone Literature Reviews in IS Research: What Can Be Learnt from the Past and Other Fields?? at ICIS 2016 in Dublin acknowledged this significant issue and debated a) what the IS field can learn from other fields and where IS-specific challenges occur, b) how the IS field should move forward to foster the genre of LRs, and c) what best practices are to train doctoral IS students in publishing LRs. This article reports the key takeaways of this panel discussion. Guidance for IS scholars is provided on how to conduct LRs that contribute to the cumulative knowledge development within and across the IS field to best prepare the next generation of IS scholars.}},
  author       = {{Schryen, Guido and Benlian, Alexander and Rowe, Frantz and Shirley, Gregor and Larsen, Kai and Petter, Stacie and Par{\'e}, Guy and Wagner, Gerit and Haag, Steffi and Yasasin, Emrah}},
  issn         = {{1529-3181}},
  journal      = {{Communications of the AIS}},
  keywords     = {{Literature Review, Review Methodology, Research Methodology, Doctoral Training}},
  pages        = {{557 -- 569}},
  publisher    = {{Association for Information Systems (AIS)}},
  title        = {{{Literature Reviews in IS Research: What Can Be Learnt from the Past and Other Fields?}}},
  volume       = {{40}},
  year         = {{2017}},
}

@inbook{48411,
  author       = {{Wessel, Lena}},
  booktitle    = {{Proceedings of the Tenth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME10, February 1 – 5, 2017)}},
  editor       = {{Dooley, T. and Gueudet, G.}},
  keywords     = {{Academic language, relative frequency, scaffolding, design research, trace analysis}},
  pages        = {{1388--1395}},
  publisher    = {{DCU Institute of Education and ERME.}},
  title        = {{{How do students develop lexical means for understanding the concept of relative frequency? Empirical insights on the basis of trace analyses}}},
  year         = {{2017}},
}

@article{5700,
  abstract     = {{Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to examine the nature of context and its implications for theory and research in service. 

Design/methodology/approach
– This is a conceptual paper based on exploring existing research and theory related to context in service research. 

Findings
– The characteristics of service make context both important and challenging, there is great contextual diversity in service research as reflected, for example in ecosystems made up of multiple contextual variables. There is a need to identify the context-specific nature of middle range theory and the contextual logic of general theory. The authors explore the challenges of context for service theory and how we might learn from theory in a particular context and test or adapt it in other contexts. 

Originality/value
– The findings of this paper are of value to researchers seeking to develop and justify theory in service research (general, middle range or theory in use).}},
  author       = {{Voss, Chris and Perks, Helen and Sousa, Rui and Witell, Lars and Wünderlich, Nancy}},
  journal      = {{Journal of Service Management}},
  keywords     = {{Research, Service theory}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{30--36}},
  publisher    = {{Emerald Group Publishing Limited}},
  title        = {{{Reflections on Context in Service Research.}}},
  volume       = {{27}},
  year         = {{2016}},
}

@article{4689,
  author       = {{Müller, Oliver and Junglas, Iris and vom Brocke, Jan and Debortoli, Stefan}},
  isbn         = {{0960-085X}},
  issn         = {{14769344}},
  journal      = {{European Journal of Information Systems}},
  keywords     = {{analytics, big data, data source, information systems research, methodology}},
  number       = {{4}},
  pages        = {{289----302}},
  title        = {{{Utilizing big data analytics for information systems research: Challenges, promises and guidelines}}},
  doi          = {{10.1057/ejis.2016.2}},
  year         = {{2016}},
}

@inproceedings{5618,
  abstract     = {{Literature reviews play an important role in the development of knowledge. Yet, we observe a lack of theoretical underpinning of and epistemological insights into how literature reviews can contribute to knowledge creation and have actually contributed in the IS discipline. To address these theoretical and empirical research gaps, we suggest a novel epistemological model of literature reviews. This model allows us to align different contributions of literature reviews with their underlying knowledge conversions - thereby building a bridge between the previously largely unconnected fields of literature reviews and epistemology. We evaluate the appropriateness of the model by conducting an empirical analysis of 173 IS literature reviews which were published in 39 pertinent IS journals between 2000 and 2014. Based on this analysis, we derive an epistemological taxonomy of IS literature reviews, which complements previously suggested typologies.}},
  author       = {{Schryen, Guido and Wagner, Gerit and Benlian, Alexander}},
  booktitle    = {{International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS)}},
  keywords     = {{Literature review, Research methods/methodology, Theory of knowledge}},
  title        = {{{Theory of Knowledge for Literature Reviews: An Epistemological Model, Taxonomy and Empirical Analysis of IS Literature}}},
  year         = {{2015}},
}

