@article{50866, author = {{Blank, Andreas}}, journal = {{European Journal of Philosophy}}, number = {{4}}, pages = {{337--349}}, title = {{{“Helvétius’s Challenge: Moral Luck, Political Constitutions and the Economy of Esteem.” }}}, volume = {{28}}, year = {{2020}}, } @article{51316, abstract = {{AbstractRight-wing populism has strongly polarizing effects in politics, education and science—a problem which this article aims to adress. Instead of claiming a demarcation between science and education on the one hand and right-wing populist ideology on the other, we initially focus on continuities. At the same time, we are concerned with finding a critical distance towards right-wing populism. Using the theoretical framework of boundary-work we therefore analyse a case of right-wing populist educational and scientific efforts. Boundary-work can occur in an institutional, content-related and epistemic dimension. While we identify strong continuities in the institutional and content-related dimensions, we see the main difference in the epistemic dimension. In conclusion, we use the results of our analysis to develop a critical position as scientists and educationists towards right-wing populism, drawing consequences for the epistemic, content-related and institutional dimensions.}}, author = {{Haker, Christoph and Otterspeer, Lukas}}, issn = {{2364-0014}}, journal = {{Zeitschrift für Weiterbildungsforschung}}, keywords = {{General Earth and Planetary Sciences, General Environmental Science}}, number = {{3}}, pages = {{357--376}}, title = {{{Neither demarcation nor confrontation. Finding a critical position towards right-wing populism}}}, doi = {{10.1007/s40955-020-00174-z}}, volume = {{43}}, year = {{2020}}, } @article{51317, author = {{Haker, Christoph and Otterspeer, Lukas}}, issn = {{2195-867X}}, journal = {{Zeitschrift für Diskursforschung}}, number = {{2}}, pages = {{250--271}}, publisher = {{Beltz Juventa}}, title = {{{Right-Wing Populism and Educational Research. Exploring theoretical and methodological perspectives}}}, doi = {{10.3262/ZFD2002250}}, year = {{2020}}, } @article{51319, abstract = {{Frank Beier, Franziska Wyßuwa und Elisa Wagner diskutieren in ihrem aktuellen Beitrag Fallinterpretationen zwischen Theorieund Anwendungsbezug den praktischen Nutzen wissenschaftlicher Erkenntnisse, insbesondere von Theorie, für die Schule und Erwachsenenbildung. Wir greifen ihre Position in einer dialogischen Replik kritisch auf. Die Form des Dialogs bietet uns die Möglichkeit, unsere Perspektiven als Erziehungswissenschaftler, Lehrer und Soziologe in die Debatte einzubringen. Wir möchten so die eingespielten Grenzziehungen in ‚Theorie- Praxis-Debatten‘ irritieren und Beiers, Wyßuwas und Wagners Plädoyer für die Stärke wissenschaftlicher Theorie ergänzen. Diese Stärke kommt weniger zur Geltung, wenn Theorie Kontingenz schließende und mehr, wenn sie Kontingenz öffnende Effekte hat. Zudem sollte Theorie nicht auf Modelle oder auf Theorien begrenzter Reichweite beschränkt und die konkrete Verwendung von Theorie zum Gegenstand der (Selbst)Reflexion und (Selbst)Kritik werden.}}, author = {{Haker, Christoph and Otterspeer, Lukas}}, issn = {{2567-5974}}, journal = {{Debatte. Beiträge zur Erwachsenenbildung}}, keywords = {{Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, General Medicine}}, number = {{1-2020}}, pages = {{49--63}}, publisher = {{Verlag Barbara Budrich GmbH}}, title = {{{Zum praktischen Nutzen von Theorie. Ein Dialog über die Grenzen von Bildungspraxis, Erziehungswissenschaft und Soziologie}}}, doi = {{10.3224/debatte.v3i1.05}}, volume = {{3}}, year = {{2020}}, } @article{51318, author = {{Alvear, Rafael and Haker, Christoph}}, journal = {{MAD}}, number = {{42}}, pages = {{1–9}}, title = {{{Teoría de sistemas crítica y teoría crítica de sistemas sociales: Alegato por una distinción necesaria}}}, year = {{2020}}, } @book{48045, editor = {{Münzmay, Andreas and Aquavella-RauchJ, Stefanie and Veit, Joachim}}, publisher = {{Musikwissenschaftliches Seminar der Universität Paderborn und der Hochschule für Musik Detmold}}, title = {{{Brückenschläge zwischen Musikwissenschaft und Informatik. Theoretische und praktische Aspekte der Kooperation}}}, doi = {{10.25366/2020.87}}, volume = {{3}}, year = {{2020}}, } @inbook{47474, author = {{Münzmay, Andreas and Aquavella-Rauch, Stefanie and Veit, Joachim}}, booktitle = {{Brückenschläge zwischen Musikwissenschaft und Informatik. Theoretische und praktische Aspekte der Kooperation}}, editor = {{Münzmay, Andreas and Acquavella-Rauch, Stefanie and Veit, Joachim}}, pages = {{XI--XV}}, publisher = {{Musikwissenschaftliches Seminar der Universität Paderborn und der Hochschule für Musik Detmold}}, title = {{{Brückenschläge zwischen Musikwissenschaft und Informatik – Vorbemerkung}}}, doi = {{10.25366/2020.88}}, volume = {{3}}, year = {{2020}}, } @article{47476, abstract = {{Digital data on tangible and intangible cultural assets is an essential part of daily life, communication and experience. It has a lasting influence on the perception of cultural identity as well as on the interactions between research, the cultural economy and society. Throughout the last three decades, many cultural heritage institutions have contributed a wealth of digital representations of cultural assets (2D digital reproductions of paintings, sheet music, 3D digital models of sculptures, monuments, rooms, buildings), audio-visual data (music, film, stage performances), and procedural research data such as encoding and annotation formats. The long-term preservation and FAIR availability of research data from the cultural heritage domain is fundamentally important, not only for future academic success in the humanities but also for the cultural identity of individuals and society as a whole. Up to now, no coordinated effort for professional research data management on a national level exists in Germany. NFDI4Culture aims to fill this gap and create a user-centered, research-driven infrastructure that will cover a broad range of research domains from musicology, art history and architecture to performance, theatre, film, and media studies. The research landscape addressed by the consortium is characterized by strong institutional differentiation. Research units in the consortium's community of interest comprise university institutes, art colleges, academies, galleries, libraries, archives and museums. This diverse landscape is also characterized by an abundance of research objects, methodologies and a great potential for data-driven research. In a unique effort carried out by the applicant and co-applicants of this proposal and ten academic societies, this community is interconnected for the first time through a federated approach that is ideally suited to the needs of the participating researchers. To promote collaboration within the NFDI, to share knowledge and technology and to provide extensive support for its users have been the guiding principles of the consortium from the beginning and will be at the heart of all workflows and decision-making processes. Thanks to these principles, NFDI4Culture has gathered strong support ranging from individual researchers to high-level cultural heritage organizations such as the UNESCO, the International Council of Museums, the Open Knowledge Foundation and Wikimedia. On this basis, NFDI4Culture will take innovative measures that promote a cultural change towards a more reflective and sustainable handling of research data and at the same time boost qualification and professionalization in data-driven research in the domain of cultural heritage. This will create a long-lasting impact on science, cultural economy and society as a whole.}}, author = {{Altenhöner, Reinhard and Blümel, Ina and Boehm, Franziska and Bove, Jens and Bicher, Katrin and Bracht, Christian and Brand, Ortrun and Dieckmann, Lisa and Effinger, Maria and Hagener, Malte and Hammes, Andrea and Heller, Lambert and Kailus, Angela and Kohle, Hubertus and Ludwig, Jens and Münzmay, Andreas and Pittroff, Sarah and Razum, Matthias and Röwenstrunk, Daniel and Sack, Harald and Simon, Holger and Schmidt, Dörte and Schrade, Torsten and Walzel, Annika-Valeska and Wiermann, Barbara}}, issn = {{2367-7163}}, journal = {{Research Ideas and Outcomes}}, keywords = {{Research Data Management}}, publisher = {{Pensoft Publishers}}, title = {{{NFDI4Culture - Consortium for research data on material and immaterial cultural heritage}}}, doi = {{10.3897/rio.6.e57036}}, volume = {{6}}, year = {{2020}}, } @techreport{51690, author = {{Maaz, Kai and Jungkamp, Burkhard and Antony, Johanna and Becker-Mrotzek, Michael and Chapman, Azalea and Diedrich, Martina and Eger, Joanna and Eickelmann, Birgit and Hanschmann, Felix and Hebborn, Klaus and Heinrich, Martin and Iscan-Pilic, Gülay and Leiss, Dominik and Mülhens-Hackbarth, Ines and Pech, Miriam and Scheinkönig, Christine and Siebert, Matthias and Teichert, Ute and Wagner, Lucia and Wassmuth, Stephan and Werner, Birgit and Wojciechowicz, Anna Aleksandra and Wrase, Michael}}, title = {{{Schule in Zeiten der Pandemie. Empfehlungen für die Gestaltung des Schuljahres 2020/21. Stellungnahme der Expert*innenkommission der Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung}}}, year = {{2020}}, } @misc{51813, author = {{Schmitt, Martin}}, title = {{{Die Geschichte des Potsdamer Rechenzentrums: Sozialistische Computernutzung und die Digitalisierung in Ostdeutschland}}}, year = {{2020}}, } @article{23827, author = {{Dawood, Abbas O. and Al-Lami, Abbas Jarullah Sangoor and Al-Rkaby, Alaa H.J.}}, issn = {{2214-5095}}, journal = {{Case Studies in Construction Materials}}, title = {{{Behavior of tall masonry chimneys under wind loadings using CFD technique}}}, doi = {{10.1016/j.cscm.2020.e00451}}, year = {{2020}}, } @article{52711, author = {{Jenert, Tobias}}, journal = {{Zeitschrift für Hochschulentwicklung}}, number = {{4}}, pages = {{203--222}}, title = {{{Überlegungen auf dem Weg zu einer Theorie lehrbezogenen Wandels an Hochschulen}}}, volume = {{15}}, year = {{2020}}, } @phdthesis{48925, author = {{Peitz, Nina-Madeleine}}, publisher = {{Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg}}, title = {{{Professional Development of Vocational Teachers in Language-Sensitive Content Teaching–A Study Visit Abroad as Design-Based Research Intervention for Vocational Teachers Working in School-to-Work Transition Phases}}}, year = {{2020}}, } @article{52817, author = {{Büttner, Denise and Roll, Heike}}, journal = {{ProDaz-Journal}}, number = {{4}}, title = {{{Migration und Mehrsprachigkeit zum Unterrichtsthema machen – Migrationsliteratur als Zugang im Deutschunterricht? }}}, year = {{2020}}, } @misc{28698, author = {{Peckhaus, Volker}}, booktitle = {{zbMATH Open, Zbl 1445.01036}}, title = {{{Wittgenstein, Ludwig, Wiener Ausgabe, Bd. 8.2: Synopse der Manuskriptbände V bis X, hg. v. Michael Nedo, Vittorio Klostermann: Frankfurt a.M. 2019}}}, year = {{2020}}, } @techreport{14901, abstract = {{This study investigates whether country risk factors, including political and fiscal budget risk, attenuate the effectiveness of tax policy tools that aim to encourage corporate risk-taking. Exploiting a cross-country panel, we predict and find that the effectiveness of loss offset rules and tax rate changes is fully attenuated for firms located in high-risk countries. We document the attenuating effect of country risk is more pronounced in high-tax countries or when countries increase their corporate tax rate. Additional tests around the U.S. federal budget crises from 2011 to 2013 indicate that temporarily heightened fiscal budget risk attenuates the effectiveness of loss offset rules even in countries with low political risk. We identify conditions (low political and low fiscal budget risk) under which targeted tax policy tools effectively stimulate risk-taking. This suggests that ensuring taxpayers receive tax refunds is important in times of economic crises with budgetary or political challenges. }}, author = {{Osswald, Benjamin and Sureth-Sloane, Caren}}, publisher = {{TRR 266 Accounting for Transparency Working Paper Series No. 28}}, title = {{{Do Country Risk Factors Attenuate the Effect of Tax Loss Incentives on Corporate Risk-Taking?}}}, doi = {{10.2139/ssrn.3297418}}, year = {{2020}}, } @misc{17817, author = {{Peckhaus, Volker}}, booktitle = {{Isis 111 (2018), 682-683.}}, title = {{{Brendan Dooley (ed.), The Continued Exercise of Reason. Public Addresses by George Boole, The MIT Press: Cambridge, Mass./London 2018}}}, year = {{2020}}, } @misc{28704, author = {{Peckhaus, Volker}}, booktitle = {{zbMATH Open, Zbl. 1455.01038}}, title = {{{Bolzano, Bernard, Mathematische Schriften 1804–1810, hg. v. Steve Russ und Edgar Morscher, Frommann-Holzboog, Eckhart Holzboog: Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt 2020 (Bernard Bolzano-Gesamtausgabe. Reihe I: Schriften. Bd. 1)}}}, year = {{2020}}, } @misc{17818, author = {{Peckhaus, Volker}}, booktitle = {{British Journal for the History of Mathematics}}, pages = {{175--177}}, title = {{{The Mathematical World of Charles L. Dodgson (Lewis Carroll). Edited by Robin Wilson and Amirouche Moktefi. Oxford University Press: Oxford 2019}}}, volume = {{35}}, year = {{2020}}, } @misc{18738, author = {{Peckhaus, Volker}}, booktitle = {{zbMATH Open, Zbl 1436.03014}}, title = {{{van Atten, Mark, Essays on Gödel’s Reception of Leibniz, Husserl, Brouwer, Springer: Cham u.a. 2015 (Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science, 35)}}}, year = {{2020}}, }