@article{62135,
  author       = {{Markewitz, Friedrich}},
  journal      = {{Journal für Medienlinguistik}},
  number       = {{1}},
  title        = {{{Rezension Brommer, Sarah/Roth, Kersten Sven/Spitzmüller, Jürgen (Hg.) (2022): Brückenschläge. Linguistik an den Schnittstellen}}},
  doi          = {{https://doi.org/10.21248/jfml.2025.70}},
  volume       = {{7}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@article{62136,
  author       = {{Markewitz, Friedrich}},
  journal      = {{Zeitschrift für Angewandte Linguistik}},
  number       = {{83}},
  publisher    = {{Walter de Gruyter}},
  title        = {{{Rezension Takada, Hiroyuki. 2024. Hitlers Reden 1919–1945. Eine sprachwissenschaftliche Analyse}}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@misc{62129,
  author       = {{Markewitz, Friedrich}},
  booktitle    = {{Diskursmonitor. Glossar zur strategischen Kommunikation in öffentlichen Diskursen}},
  title        = {{{Zensur}}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@inproceedings{61079,
  abstract     = {{We propose a spatio-spectral, combined model-based and data-driven
diarization pipeline consisting of TDOA-based segmentation followed by
embedding-based clustering. The proposed system requires neither access to
multi-channel training data nor prior knowledge about the number or placement
of microphones. It works for both a compact microphone array and distributed
microphones, with minor adjustments. Due to its superior handling of
overlapping speech during segmentation, the proposed pipeline significantly
outperforms the single-channel pyannote approach, both in a scenario with a
compact microphone array and in a setup with distributed microphones.
Additionally, we show that, unlike fully spatial diarization pipelines, the
proposed system can correctly track speakers when they change positions.}},
  author       = {{Cord-Landwehr, Tobias and Gburrek, Tobias and Deegen, Marc and Haeb-Umbach, Reinhold}},
  booktitle    = {{Proceedings of INTERSPEECH}},
  location     = {{Rotterdam}},
  title        = {{{Spatio-spectral diarization of meetings by combining TDOA-based  segmentation and speaker embedding-based clustering}}},
  doi          = {{10.21437/Interspeech.2025-1663}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@article{60940,
  author       = {{Gräßler, Iris and Rarbach, Sven and Grewe, Benedikt}},
  issn         = {{2942-6170}},
  journal      = {{Industry 4.0 Science}},
  number       = {{3}},
  publisher    = {{GITO mbH Verlag}},
  title        = {{{Strategic Product Planning Model – Digital twins for circular products and production processes}}},
  doi          = {{10.30844/i4se.25.3.24}},
  volume       = {{2025}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@inproceedings{61099,
  author       = {{Gräßler, Iris and Rarbach, Sven}},
  booktitle    = {{Procedia CIRP}},
  issn         = {{2212-8271}},
  pages        = {{207--212}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier BV}},
  title        = {{{Model-based Impact Analysis for Engineering Sustainable Products in Value Creation Networks}}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.procir.2025.08.037}},
  volume       = {{136}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@article{62165,
  abstract     = {{Academic publishing is both an indication of scientific contribution and a currency for career advancement. This dual role gives rise to a normative scientific conflict: Does the structural incentive to publish constitute a conflict of interest (COI) that ought to be disclosed? In this paper, we address this conflict through an action research approach, engaging collaboratively and reflexively to answer four related questions: (1) What evidence suggests that researchers face a (financial) COI when publishing? (2) What are the benefits and drawbacks of explicitly acknowledging that publications function as academic currency? (3) How should such conflicts be disclosed? (4) Do mechanisms such as pre-registration and registered reports resolve these concerns? This paper contends that while researchers are clearly incentivised to publish, this interest need not necessarily constitute a conflict or be explicitly disclosed. Treating this issue as a normative scientific conflict does reveal the need for a shift in how researchers understand and navigate the subjective, self-interested dimensions of their work. We propose four key responses: (1) integrating discussions of COIs and biases more extensively into undergraduate science education, (2) promoting greater reflexivity in everyday research practice (e.g., through reflexivity journals, peer-led audit groups, and the reintegration of discussions on the historicity and cultural nature of research into scientific publications), (3) critically investigating institutional incentives and journal policies, and (4) proactively adopting methodological safeguards such as pre-registration. By addressing this conflict through action research, we demonstrate how normative tensions in science can be made productive — supporting both critical reflection and structural improvement.}},
  author       = {{Acem, Ensar and Aczel, Balazs and Albayrak, Nihan and Brown, Nicholas J. L. and Dudda, Leonie A. and Elsherif, Mahmoud Medhat and Gjoneska, Biljana and Kowal, Marta and Krishna, Anand and Miłkoś, Szymon and Paruzel-Czachura, Mariola and Patel, Jay and Pypno-Blajda, Katarzyna and Scharlau, Ingrid and Verheyen, Steven and Zubaly, Benjamin}},
  issn         = {{0304-2421}},
  journal      = {{Theory and Society}},
  publisher    = {{Springer Science and Business Media LLC}},
  title        = {{{Why I declare a conflict of interest and you should not}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s11186-025-09641-3}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@inproceedings{60013,
  author       = {{Gräßler, Iris and Pottebaum, Jens and Nyhuis, Peter and Schmidt, Matthias and Grewe, Benedikt and Vollenkemper, Felix and Hesse, Thomas and Meinecke, Tim}},
  booktitle    = {{Stuttgarter Symposium für Produktentwicklung (SSP) 2025}},
  editor       = {{Hölzle, Katharina and Kreimeyer, Matthias and Roth, Daniel and Maier, Thomas and Riedel, Oliver}},
  location     = {{Stuttgart}},
  pages        = {{509--518}},
  publisher    = {{Fraunhofer IAO}},
  title        = {{{Evolving Design for Assembly, Disassembly and Reassembly into a new paradigm: Design-for-Capabilities with Hybrid Decision Support as an enabler for circular products}}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@phdthesis{62167,
  abstract     = {{Diese Dissertation befasst sich mit der Entwicklung eines induktiv-basierten Lokalisierungsverfahrens mittels planarer Spulen, das auf magnetischer Kopplung beruht. Grundlage ist die elektromagnetische Induktion, bei der sich die entstehende Spannung proportional zur Gegeninduktivität verhält. Das Verfahren arbeitet im physikalischen Nahfeld und im Frequenzbereich von einigen kHz bis MHz, um eine effiziente Kopplung ohne Ausbreitung elektromagnetischer Wellen zu gewährleisten. Im Vergleich zu etablierten Verfahren wie GPS oder Ultraschall zeigt die induktive Ortung Vorteile bei kurzer Reichweite, insbesondere durch hohe Genauigkeit im Zentimeterbereich und geringe Materialabhängigkeit. Zudem lässt sie sich in bestehende Technologien wie bei der drahtlosen Energieübertragung integrieren und durch Sensorfusion mit anderen Verfahren kombinieren. Zur Modellierung und Optimierung werden physikalische Eigenschaften von planaren Spulen und EM-Feldern analysiert und elektrische Ersatzschaltbilder eingesetzt. Die geometriebasierte Berechnung der Gegeninduktivität ermöglicht die Entwicklung und Bewertung geeigneter Ortungsalgorithmen. Stochastische Filterverfahren verbessern zusätzlich die Robustheit gegenüber Umgebungseinflüssen. Abschließend wird eine modulare Simulationsplattform vorgestellt, die als Grundlage für die Generierung von Trainingsdaten sowie zur Weiterentwicklung von Mess-, Ortungs- und Filtermethoden dient.}},
  author       = {{Lange, Sven}},
  pages        = {{247}},
  publisher    = {{Universitätsbibliothek Paderborn}},
  title        = {{{Analyse und Modellierung eines induktiven Ortungsprozesses unter Berücksichtigung der elektromagnetischen Wechselwirkungen planarer Spulensysteme}}},
  doi          = {{10.17619/UNIPB/1-2436}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@inbook{62168,
  author       = {{Schlömer, Tobias and Kiepe, Karina}},
  booktitle    = {{Innovation für Nachhaltigkeit durch berufs- und wirtschaftspädagogische Forschung}},
  editor       = {{Schlicht, Juliana and Schwehm, Franziska and Kaiser, Sophie}},
  isbn         = {{978-3-7639-7739-0}},
  pages        = {{299--314}},
  title        = {{{Innovation Hubs und ihre Lernpotenziale für Auszubildende im Rahmen von BBNE}}},
  doi          = {{10.3278/9783763977390}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@article{61944,
  abstract     = {{his article describes a new student-based approach to Decoding and Disrupting. This approach consists of an educational programme that works with a multidisciplinary group of undergraduate students, so-called Culture Fellows. In the programme, the students learn about theories on disciplinary cultures and their practices, Decoding the Disciplines, and communication. The programme focuses on the implicitness of disciplinary practices and how to explore them, i.e., it seeks to address the importance of making disciplinary practices, norms, and values more accessible to students. Within the programme, the Culture Fellows use a student-based variant of the Decoding the Disciplines Paradigm that we call ‘Culture Quest’. The Culture Quest supplies students with the tools to question, explore, and decode their respective disciplines and practices. Disciplinary practices often remain implicit because lecturers, with their wealth of experience and expertise in their discipline, may be operationally blind and thus no longer aware of the fact that certain practices might need to be explained. This lack of explanation or explicitness can lead to students feeling bewildered, confused or puzzled. The Culture Fellows and in particular the Culture Quest can encourage dialogue about and exploration of disciplinary cultures and their practices and can thus allow students to grasp the implicit cultural norms and expectations within their respective disciplines more clearly. The Culture Fellows and the Culture Quest provide students – and maybe even lecturers – with opportunities to engage with and reflect on teaching and learning strategies and practices.}},
  author       = {{Schmöckel, Sabrina and Scharlau, Ingrid}},
  issn         = {{1918-0853}},
  journal      = {{Transformative Dialogues: Teaching and Learning Journal}},
  number       = {{3}},
  pages        = {{98--115}},
  publisher    = {{Penn State University Libraries}},
  title        = {{{No Student Should Be an Island: A Peer-Approach to Decoding and Disrupting}}},
  doi          = {{10.59236/td2025vol18iss31913}},
  volume       = {{18}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@article{60847,
  abstract     = {{With the rise of multimodal AI tools, such as DALL-E, Midjourney, or Stable
Diffusion, it has never been easier and faster to produce compelling fashion
images. While the proliferation of AI-generated fashion images can be
seen as the ultimate triumph of the fashion image over both fashion text
and fashionable garments, this paper critically examines how these images
are produced, what exactly they show, and ultimately, how this impacts our
understanding of fashion. Building on current research on multimodal AI,
specifically text-to-image models, I argue that AI-generated fashion images
are produced through textual means, that is, through “operative ekphrasis”
(Bajohr 2024: 83). This means that the generation of fashion images created
via multimodal AI is based on textual prompts that extract statistically
probable images from a latent space, which, in turn, is the result of previously
indexed and labeled image-text pairs. Because the indexing of images
requires a reduction of complexity, images generated through multimodal
AI are often generic. In the case of fashion images, this is reflected in the lack
of texture and the reproduction of fashion photography’s conventions. As
fashion photography is not necessarily a representation of ‘the world’ or even
fashionable garments, it resembles AI-generated images more than other photographic
genres. AI-generated fashion images are then not images of fashionable
garments, but images about fashion images—a statistically probable permutation
of fashion photographs from the past (cf. Meyer 2023: 108). As such,
AI-generated fashion images are not only the product of a mediated collective
imaginary but also feed back into it. The view on fashion shaped by AI-generated
fashion images is then based on reduction and stylized normativity.}},
  author       = {{Brachtendorf, Charlotte}},
  issn         = {{1614-0885}},
  journal      = {{Image: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Image Sciences}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{155--168}},
  title        = {{{Possible Fashion Images: Operative Ekphrasis and the Reduction of Fashion Through Multimodal AI}}},
  doi          = {{10.1453/1614-0885-2-2025-16663}},
  volume       = {{42}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@unpublished{59917,
  abstract     = {{nder the slogan of trustworthy AI, much of contemporary AI research is focused on designing AI systems and usage practices that inspire human trust and, thus, enhance adoption of AI systems. However, a person affected by an AI system may not be convinced by AI system design alone---neither should they, if the AI system is embedded in a social context that gives good reason to believe that it is used in tension with a person’s interest. In such cases,  distrust in the system may be justified and necessary to build meaningful trust in the first place. We propose the term \emph{healthy distrust} to describe such a justified, careful stance towards certain AI usage practices. We investigate prior notions of trust and distrust in computer science, sociology, history, psychology, and philosophy, outline a remaining gap that healthy distrust might fill and conceptualize healthy distrust as a crucial part for AI usage that respects human autonomy.}},
  author       = {{Paaßen, Benjamin and Alpsancar, Suzana and Matzner, Tobias and Scharlau, Ingrid}},
  booktitle    = {{arXiv}},
  title        = {{{Healthy Distrust in AI systems}}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@inbook{62244,
  author       = {{Albus, Vanessa}},
  booktitle    = {{Handbuch Lehrerinnen- und Lehrerbildung}},
  editor       = {{Cramer, Colin and König, Johannes and Rothland, Martin}},
  isbn         = {{9783825265441}},
  pages        = {{586--591}},
  publisher    = {{UTB}},
  title        = {{{Philosophie und Ethik in der Lehrerinnen- und Lehrerbildung. Grundlagen und Perspektiven}}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@article{62286,
  abstract     = {{Optical tweezer arrays of laser-cooled and individually controlled particles have revolutionized atomic, molecular, and optical physics. They afford exquisite capabilities for applications in quantum simulation of many-body physics, quantum computation, and sensing. Underlying this development is the technical maturity of generating scalable optical beams, enabled by active components and a high numerical aperture objective. However, such a complex combination of bulk optics outside the vacuum chamber is very sensitive to any vibration and drift. Here, we demonstrate the generation of a 3 × 3 static tweezer array with a single chip-scale multifunctional metasurface element in vacuum, replacing the meter-long free space optics. Fluorescence counts on the camera validate the successful trapping of the atomic ensemble array and showcase a promising strategy for integrated photonics with cold atom systems. The introduction of a polarization independent dual-wavelength metasurface significantly enhances fluorescence collection efficiency while reducing experimental complexity. This approach paves the way for scalable neutral atom platforms and offers a compelling route towards the realization of next generation quantum metasurfaces.}},
  author       = {{Li, Donghao and Liao, Qiming and Xu, Beining and Zentgraf, Thomas and Narvaez Castaneda, Emmanuel and Zhou, Yaoting and Qin, Keyu and Xu, Zhongxiao and Shen, Heng and Huang, Lingling}},
  issn         = {{1094-4087}},
  journal      = {{Optics Express}},
  number       = {{24}},
  publisher    = {{Optica Publishing Group}},
  title        = {{{In vacuum metasurface for optical microtrap array}}},
  doi          = {{10.1364/oe.580201}},
  volume       = {{33}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@article{58114,
  author       = {{Fuchs, Christian}},
  journal      = {{Philosophy and Social Criticism}},
  number       = {{10}},
  pages        = {{1703--1729}},
  title        = {{{Antonio Negri, Spinoza, Marx, and Digital Capitalism. }}},
  doi          = {{10.1177/01914537241308108 }},
  volume       = {{51}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@article{57531,
  author       = {{Alpsancar, Suzana and Buhl, Heike M. and Matzner, Tobias and Scharlau, Ingrid}},
  journal      = {{AI and Ethics}},
  pages        = {{3015–3033}},
  publisher    = {{Springer}},
  title        = {{{Explanation needs and ethical demands: unpacking the instrumental value of XAI}}},
  doi          = {{https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-024-00622-3}},
  volume       = {{5}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@inproceedings{62344,
  abstract     = {{kein Abstract vorhanden}},
  author       = {{Decuypere, Mathias and Hartong, Sigrid and  Joecks, Lucas and Knox, Jeremy and  Ortegón, Carlos and Schmidt, Rebecca and Williamson, Ben}},
  location     = {{Zürich}},
  publisher    = {{LibreCat University}},
  title        = {{{Critical Edtech Studies. Defining the field; envisioning the future. 2025 Position statement after the inaugural edition of the European Conference on Critical Edtech Studies (ECCES).}}},
  doi          = {{10.5281/ZENODO.17672486}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@inproceedings{62688,
  author       = {{Gräßler, Iris and Pottebaum, Jens and Rarbach, Sven}},
  booktitle    = {{The 11th World Sustainability Forum (WSF11)}},
  location     = {{Barcelona}},
  publisher    = {{MDPI}},
  title        = {{{Potentials of Product Lifecycle Management to Enhance Circular Economy}}},
  doi          = {{10.3390/proceedings2025131047}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@inproceedings{62714,
  abstract     = {{Die fortschreitende Digitalisierung bringt große Herausforderungen für die Aus- und Weiterbildung
von Lehrkräften mit sich. Während angehende Lehrkräfte bereits von neuen Entwicklungen in der
Ausbildung profitieren, sind viele aktive Lehrkräfte bislang nicht ausreichend auf die digitalen Möglichkeiten
im Unterricht vorbereitet. Der Kompetenzverbund lernen:digital setzt genau hier an und
unterstützt gezielt Lehrkräfte beim Erwerb digitalisierungsbezogener Kompetenzen. Im Rahmen des
Verbundprojekts ComeMINT wurde unter anderem ein Online-Selbstlernkurs entwickelt, der sich
mit dem Einsatz digitaler Medien im Physikunterricht befasst. Grundlage des Kurses bilden zum
einen eine Bedürfnisanalyse unter praktizierenden Physiklehrkräften und zum anderen bereits bestehende
Materialien aus der Lehrkräfteausbildung. Der Kurs vermittelt grundlegende Kompetenzen
im Umgang mit physikspezifischen digitalen Medien, wie zum Beispiel digitaler Messwerterfassung,
Augmented Reality oder Simulationen. In diesem Beitrag werden die Entwicklung und die
Inhalte des Selbstlernkurses skizziert, sowie die nachhaltige Aufbereitung der Materialien zur Nachnutzung
dargestellt.}},
  author       = {{Weiler, David Christoph and Burde, Jan-Philipp and Costan, Kasim and Gieshoff, Rike Isabel and Kulgemeyer, Christoph and Lässer, Armin and Plicht, Katja and Riese, Josef and Schubatzky, Thomas}},
  booktitle    = {{PhyDid B - Didaktik Der Physik - Beiträge Zur DPG-Frühjahrstagung}},
  location     = {{Göttingen}},
  pages        = {{71--78}},
  title        = {{{Online-Selbstlernkurs zu digitalen Medien im Physikunterricht}}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

