@misc{60920,
  author       = {{Schmidt, Rebecca}},
  booktitle    = {{Sozialwissenschaftliche Methodenberatung}},
  title        = {{{Mit KI (Elicit) den Forschungsstand beschreiben – ein kritischer Erfahrungsbericht}}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@inbook{59865,
  author       = {{Schmidt, Rebecca}},
  booktitle    = {{Transdisziplinäre Räume in den Kulturwissenschaften}},
  editor       = {{Kornbach, Alina and Lammer, Christina and Magdeburg, Lena}},
  pages        = {{339--363}},
  publisher    = {{Verlag Herder GmbH}},
  title        = {{{Participatory Research with Teachers - A Critical Analysis of Power Dynamics}}},
  volume       = {{3}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@inproceedings{62344,
  abstract     = {{kein Abstract vorhanden}},
  author       = {{Decuypere, Mathias and Hartong, Sigrid and  Joecks, Lucas and Knox, Jeremy and  Ortegón, Carlos and Schmidt, Rebecca and Williamson, Ben}},
  location     = {{Zürich}},
  publisher    = {{LibreCat University}},
  title        = {{{Critical Edtech Studies. Defining the field; envisioning the future. 2025 Position statement after the inaugural edition of the European Conference on Critical Edtech Studies (ECCES).}}},
  doi          = {{10.5281/ZENODO.17672486}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@misc{63185,
  author       = {{Schmidt, Rebecca}},
  booktitle    = {{ Sozialwissenschaftliche Methodenberatung}},
  title        = {{{KI als Herausforderungen für die qualitative Methodenlehre – ein Diskussionsaufruf!}}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@inbook{55332,
  abstract     = {{Dieser Beitrag stellt zwei Seminarkonzeptionen vor, in welchen technisch-didaktische
Vorüberlegungen, Lehr-/Lernaktivitäten und Prüfmodalitäten unter der Bedingung
von Digitalität skizziert werden. Es wird das digitale wissenschaftliche Lesen und
Schreiben ins Zentrum der Interaktion mit digitalen Technologien gestellt. In den Se
minaren wurden von Studierenden selbstständig Daten (Text) gesammelt, ausgewertet
und geclustert. Die kollaborative cloudbasierte Speicherung der Seminardaten, der
Einbezug einer geteilten Literaturdatenbank sowie der Einsatz der Notizsoftware Obsi
dian.md beim gemeinschaftlichen wissenschaftlichen Lesen und Schreiben wurden er
probt. Zentrale Herausforderung war die Doppelrolle der Dozierenden (Verantwor
tung für Lehr-/Lernsetting vs. Techniksupport). Herausragend war die Partizipation
und Verantwortungsübernahme der Studierenden in den Seminarsitzungen und beim
Peersupport.}},
  author       = {{Schmidt, Rebecca and Peters, Laura N.}},
  booktitle    = {{Digitale Prüfungsszenarien in der Hochschule}},
  editor       = {{Bedenlier, Svenja and Gerl, Stefanie  and Küppers, Bastian and Bandtel , Matthias}},
  keywords     = {{Digitales wissenschaftliches Schreiben, Forschendes Lernen, Digitalität, Digitales Konzeptverstehen, Lehrer:innenbildung, Digital Literacy}},
  pages        = {{35--52}},
  publisher    = {{wbv}},
  title        = {{{Forschendes Lehren und Lernen unter der Bedingung von Digitalität – Vorstellung zweier Seminarkonzeptionen}}},
  volume       = {{4}},
  year         = {{2024}},
}

@article{57892,
  abstract     = {{The present paper discusses the extent to which Large Language Models (LLMs) may affect the scientific enterprise, reinforcing or mitigating existing structural inequalities expressed by the Matthew Effect and introducing a “bot delusion” in academia. In a theory-led thought experiment, we first focus on the academic publication and citation system and develop three scenarios of the anticipated consequences of using LLMs: reproducing content and status quo (Scenario 1), enabling content coherence evaluation (Scenario 2) and content evaluation (Scenario 3). Second, we discuss the interaction between the use of LLMs and academic (counter)norms for citation selection and their impact on the publication and citation system. Finally, we introduce communal counter-norms to capture academics’ loyal citation behavior and develop three future scenarios that academia may face when LLMs are widely used in the research process, namely status quo future of science, mixed-access future, and open science future.}},
  author       = {{Wieczorek, Oliver and Steinhardt, Isabel and Schmidt, Rebecca and Mauermeister, Sylvi and Schneijderberg, Christian}},
  issn         = {{0016-3287}},
  journal      = {{Futures}},
  keywords     = {{Large Language Models, Matthew Effect, Academic Publishing and Citation Systems, Scientific Norms, Thought Experiment}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier BV}},
  title        = {{{The Bot Delusion. Large language models and anticipated consequences for academics’ publication and citation behavior}}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.futures.2024.103537}},
  volume       = {{166}},
  year         = {{2024}},
}

@misc{60921,
  author       = {{Schmidt, Rebecca}},
  booktitle    = {{Sozialwissenschaftliche Methodenberatung}},
  title        = {{{Automatische Transkriptionssoftware - ein Erfahrungsbericht}}},
  year         = {{2024}},
}

@article{45604,
  author       = {{Steinhardt, Isabel and Mauermeister, Sylvi and Schmidt, Rebecca}},
  issn         = {{0023-8333}},
  journal      = {{Language Learning}},
  keywords     = {{Open Science, Open Science Practices, Cultural Change}},
  publisher    = {{Wiley}},
  title        = {{{Open Research Practices and Cultural Change: A Commentary on “(Why) Are Open Research Practices the Future for the Study of Language Learning?”}}},
  doi          = {{10.1111/lang.12583}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

@unpublished{45402,
  abstract     = {{<p>The reproduction of social inequalities through artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning via artificial neural networks (ANN) has been demonstrated empirically in various areas of society, for instance in policing and personnel hiring decisions. Yet, a broader discussion is missing to what extent ANN technological developments may affect the scientific enterprise and reinforce or mitigate existing structural inequalities in academia. Focusing on publications and citations as main currencies in science, the anticipated consequences of ChatGPT on the research communication of existing and new knowledges are discussed in three scenarios, which echo the social structures in academia.</p>}},
  author       = {{Wieczorek, Oliver and Steinhardt, Isabel and Schneijderberg, Christian and Schmidt, Rebecca and Mauermeister, Sylvi}},
  publisher    = {{Center for Open Science}},
  title        = {{{The Bot Delusion. ChatGPT and anticipated consequences for research communication}}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

@article{45252,
  author       = {{Krollmann, Rabea and Schmidt, Rebecca and Spill, Annika}},
  journal      = {{blog interdisziplinäre geschlechterforschung}},
  title        = {{{Grenzüberschreitung und Distanzierung – Geschlechterforschung in universitären Toiletten}}},
  doi          = {{10.17185/GENDER/20210126}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}