@article{62111,
  abstract     = {{<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title>
          <jats:p>The execution of incompatible actions imposes costs on action planning, commonly known as response-response incompatibility-costs. This phenomenon is also evident in sports: A basketball player who performs a pass in one direction whilst orienting the head into the contrary direction (pass with head fake) needs more time to initiate the action as if pass direction and head orientation are the same (pass without head fake).</jats:p>
          <jats:p>The aim of this study was twofold: First, we present a re-analysis of the data from Böer et al. (Psychological Research 88:523–524, 2024) using mixture effect modelling (Miller, Behavior Research Methods 38:92–106, 2006) explore if fake-production costs manifest continuously (uniform effect) in all participants or if some participants show fake-production costs occasionally but substantially (mixed effect). Second, we collected data of a control group which was analysed with the previous data of the practice group and fitted initiation times (ITs) to an ex-Gaussian distribution.</jats:p>
          <jats:p>The analysis of mixture effects revealed that most participants exhibited a uniform effect when they didn’t have time to mentally prepare the movement. This pattern was not changed by practice, suggesting fake-production costs can’t be overcome by practice alone without mental preparation time.</jats:p>
          <jats:p>The analysis of mean ITs revealed improvements in the practice group but not in the control group, independent of the type of pass performed. The distribution analyses complemented these findings as it showed that the improvement in participants’ performance with increasing practice can mainly be attributed to a reduction of the exponential part of the distribution (parameter tau).</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Böer, Nils Tobias and Schütz, Christoph and Weigelt, Matthias and Güldenpenning, Iris}},
  issn         = {{0340-0727}},
  journal      = {{Psychological Research}},
  keywords     = {{Sport Psychology, Sport Science, Deception, Distribution Analysis}},
  number       = {{2}},
  publisher    = {{Springer Science and Business Media LLC}},
  title        = {{{How does practice modulate fake-production costs in a basketball task? Analyses of frequency distributions and mixture effects}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s00426-025-02084-6}},
  volume       = {{89}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@book{62123,
  abstract     = {{Martin Heideggers Einfluss reicht bis heute weit über enge disziplinäre Grenzen hinaus in die verschiedenen Geistes- und Kulturwissenschaften sowie die gesamtgesellschaftliche Öffentlichkeit hinein. Gleichzeitig werden er und seine Philosophie, insbesondere seit der Veröffentlichung seiner Denktagebücher, der ‚Schwarzen Hefte‘, aufgrund nationalsozialistischer Verstrickungen und antisemitischer Konnotationen kontrovers diskutiert. Trotz seiner diskursiven Herausgehobenheit und Relevanz stehen linguistische Aufarbeitungen zu Heideggers Kommunikationsverhalten bis heute weitestgehend aus. Die vorliegende kommunikationsanalytische Studie versteht sich als erster umfassender Versuch, Heideggers Kommunikationsverhalten in den Blick zu nehmen, um Charakteristika wie Problematiken des Heideggerischen Sprachgebrauchs aufzuarbeiten sowie zu reflektieren.}},
  author       = {{Markewitz, Friedrich}},
  keywords     = {{Linguistische Hermeneutik, Kommunikationsanalyse, Invektivitätsforschung, Begriffsarbeit}},
  pages        = {{532}},
  publisher    = {{Peter Lang Verlag}},
  title        = {{{Zu Heidegger - Kommunikationsanalytische Studien}}},
  doi          = {{10.3726/b23009}},
  volume       = {{11}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@article{62142,
  author       = {{Mildorf, Jarmila}},
  issn         = {{ 1387-6740 }},
  journal      = {{Narrative Inquiry}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{207 -- 215 }},
  publisher    = {{John Benjamins}},
  title        = {{{Life Storytelling across Media and Contexts }}},
  doi          = {{https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.25041.mil}},
  volume       = {{35}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@article{62143,
  author       = {{Mildorf, Jarmila}},
  issn         = {{1387-6740}},
  journal      = {{Narrative Inquiry}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{337 -- 358 }},
  title        = {{{ Soundscapes and Storytelling in Literary Interviews: Audionarratological Perspectives}}},
  doi          = {{ https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.24083.mil }},
  volume       = {{35}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@misc{62141,
  booktitle    = {{Narrative Inquiry}},
  editor       = {{Mildorf, Jarmila and Foniokova, Zuzana}},
  issn         = {{1387-6740}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{207--358}},
  publisher    = {{John Benjamins}},
  title        = {{{Life Storytelling across Media and Contexts }}},
  volume       = {{35}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@article{59335,
  abstract     = {{Technological advancements and evolving value orientations reshape future value creation and pose new requirements for service innovation. While a variety of disciplines are developing new approaches to drive service innovation, this is primarily done in isolation and generates only fragmented solutions. Sociological theory has proposed “boundary objects” as an effective umbrella for communication and cooperation among communities. Therefore, we introduce continuous value shaping (CVS) as a boundary object describing service innovation approaches along five principles. We reflect on this concept through the different disciplinary lenses of researchers in service marketing, information systems, service engineering, sociology of work, and innovation management. These perspectives highlight how the CVS principles already connect to discourses within the individual disciplines. However, the CVS concept will not only provide an umbrella to embrace existing activities in different academic disciplines. It also assists to identify research themes that will benefit from uniting the power of these disciplines, and it can serve as an integrating framework to conceptualize complex service innovation approaches. Thus, the CVS concept should guide both researchers and practitioners to develop and implement novel innovation and transformation efforts—in and across organizations.}},
  author       = {{Böhmann, Tilo and Roth, Angela and Satzger, Gerhard and Benz, Carina and Beverungen, Daniel and Boes, Andreas and Breidbach, Christoph and Gersch, Martin and Gudergan, Gerhard and Hogreve, Jens and Kurtz, Christian and Langes, Barbara and Leimeister, Jan Marco and Lewandowski, Tom and Meiren, Thomas and Nägele, Rainer and Paluch, Stefanie and Peters, Christoph and Poeppelbuss, Jens and Robra-Bissantz, Susanne and Schultz, Carsten and Schumann, Jan H. and Wirtz, Jochen and Wünderlich, Nancy V.}},
  issn         = {{1019-6781}},
  journal      = {{Electronic Markets}},
  keywords     = {{Continuous value shaping (CVS), Service research, Service innovation, Digitalization, Sustainability, Interdisciplinary research}},
  number       = {{1}},
  publisher    = {{Springer Science and Business Media LLC}},
  title        = {{{Continuous value shaping: A boundary concept for innovating service innovation approaches}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s12525-025-00771-1}},
  volume       = {{35}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@article{61410,
  abstract     = {{Purpose: The purpose of this study is to identify, analyze, and explain the implications that could
arise for service settings if AI systems develop, or are perceived to develop, consciousness – the
ability to acknowledge their own existence and the capacity for positive or negative experiences.

Design/methodology/approach: This study proposes and explores four hypothetical scenarios in
which conscious AI in service could manifest. We contextualize our resulting typology in the
health service context and integrate extant literature on technology-enabled service, AI
consciousness, and AI ethics into the narrative.

Findings: This study provides a unique theoretical contribution to service research in the form of
a Type IV theory. It enables future service researchers to apprehend, explain, and predict how
functionally conscious AI in service might unfold.

Originality: An increasingly prolific public discourse acknowledges that conscious AI systems
may emerge. Against this backdrop, this study aims to systematically explore a question that is
perhaps the most critical and timely, but also inherently speculative, in relation to AI in service
research by introducing much-needed theory and terminology.

Practical implications: The ethical use of conscious AI in service could emerge as a distinct
competitive advantage in the future. Achieving this outcome involves speculative yet actionable
recommendations that include training, guiding, and controlling how humans engage with such
systems, developing appropriate wellbeing protocols for functionally conscious AI systems, and
establishing AI rights and governance frameworks.}},
  author       = {{Breidbach, Christoph and Lars-Erik, Casper Ferm and Maglio, Paul and Beverungen, Daniel and Wirtz, Jochen and Twigg, Alex}},
  journal      = {{Journal of Service Management}},
  keywords     = {{AI, AI consciousness, AI ethics, service systems}},
  publisher    = {{Emerald}},
  title        = {{{Conscious Artificial Intelligence in Service}}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@article{54576,
  author       = {{Nastjuk, Ilja and Rampold, Florian and Trang, Simon Thanh-Nam and Benitez, Jose}},
  issn         = {{0960-085X}},
  journal      = {{European Journal of Information Systems (VHB Jourqual 3 A)}},
  number       = {{4}},
  pages        = {{1--24}},
  publisher    = {{Informa UK Limited}},
  title        = {{{A field experiment on ISP training designs for enhancing employee information security compliance}}},
  doi          = {{10.1080/0960085x.2024.2359460}},
  volume       = {{34}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@inproceedings{61043,
  abstract     = {{<jats:p>Dynamic market conditions, technological disruption and social change require organizations to continuously adapt and evolve. However, studies on organizational change show that the majority of transformations undertaken fail because they are characterized by a lack of clarity, overload and ineffective measures. This paper shows how a clear structure as a critical success factor can make the chaos and challenges of a transformation manageable.  The focus here is on a practice-oriented framework that divides a transformation into nine essential building blocks with activities that are critical to success. The structure of the framework is understood as a flexible organizing principle for a transformation without hindering creativity and dynamics. Case studies show the adaptability and applicability of the framework to different characteristics and dimensions of transformation. The transformation framework provides an operative structure and enables transformation managers for transparent orchestration and implementation of transformation.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Gräßler, Iris and Grewe, Benedikt and Fritzen, Marc}},
  booktitle    = {{AHFE International}},
  issn         = {{2771-0718}},
  location     = {{Pula, Croatia}},
  publisher    = {{AHFE International}},
  title        = {{{The importance of structure in transformation chaos: A Transformation Framework}}},
  doi          = {{10.54941/ahfe1006790}},
  volume       = {{198}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@inproceedings{61055,
  abstract     = {{<jats:title>ABSTRACT:</jats:title><jats:p>Challenges of increasing system complexity and the need for interdisciplinary collaboration are prompting companies to reorganize towards Systems Engineering (SE). As part of the implementation of large-scale transformation programs, transformation progress is of great interest to management and employees involved. Existing maturity models lack measurable variables and reliable forecast. For this reason, a maturity model for evaluating SE Transformation is developed, that builds on quantitative metrics and enables an overarching view on transformation considering cultural aspects. Literature-based criteria for evaluating SE Transformation lay the foundation for measures and referenced metrics and indicators. Due to its data-centricity, the model presented enables a more comprehensive, fact-based decision-making basis for the design and steering of SE Transformation programs.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Graessler, Iris and Grewe, Benedikt and Felgen, Luc}},
  booktitle    = {{Proceedings of the Design Society}},
  issn         = {{2732-527X}},
  location     = {{Dallas, USA}},
  pages        = {{1081--1090}},
  publisher    = {{Cambridge University Press (CUP)}},
  title        = {{{Data-driven decision support in the design and controlling of systems engineering transformation: a maturity model}}},
  doi          = {{10.1017/pds.2025.10122}},
  volume       = {{5}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@article{60140,
  abstract     = {{<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title>
	  <jats:p>The increasing prevalence of embedded software in today’s vehicles is leading to growing complexity, which can only be managed effectively through the use of reliable interdisciplinary engineering processes. With this in mind, systems engineering (SE) is currently being introduced on a large scale into the automotive industry. Pilot projects have demonstrated the potential for implementing changes, but these have not yet been accompanied by viable implementation concepts for SE. In the context of the proposed application-based research, the SETup automotive method (<jats:bold>S</jats:bold>ystems <jats:bold>E</jats:bold>ngineering <jats:bold>T</jats:bold>ransformation <jats:bold>u</jats:bold>nder <jats:bold>p</jats:bold>iloting in the <jats:bold>automotive</jats:bold> industry) is presented, which comprises a step-by-step procedure of introducing SE into large automotive companies. By introducing SE by pilot projects first, both an in-process tailoring of all processes, methods, tools and structures (PMTS) required for the introduction and an in-process validation of the pilot scheme elaborated by the pilot projects are achieved. The presented method builds upon fundamental approaches to change management, which have been developed over many years in both research and practice. It has been validated by the industrial practice of SE transformation at German car manufacturers and suppliers. As a result, decision-makers, transformation managers and systems engineers are provided with a scientifically based and field-tested set of steps for the introduction of SE in their own company.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Graessler, Iris and Grewe, Benedikt}},
  issn         = {{2053-4701}},
  journal      = {{Design Science}},
  publisher    = {{Cambridge University Press (CUP)}},
  title        = {{{SETup automotive: a Method for Systems Engineering Transformation in automotive industry}}},
  doi          = {{10.1017/dsj.2025.10}},
  volume       = {{11}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@article{60940,
  author       = {{Gräßler, Iris and Rarbach, Sven and Grewe, Benedikt}},
  issn         = {{2942-6170}},
  journal      = {{Industry 4.0 Science}},
  number       = {{3}},
  publisher    = {{GITO mbH Verlag}},
  title        = {{{Strategic Product Planning Model – Digital twins for circular products and production processes}}},
  doi          = {{10.30844/i4se.25.3.24}},
  volume       = {{2025}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@inproceedings{61099,
  author       = {{Gräßler, Iris and Rarbach, Sven}},
  booktitle    = {{Procedia CIRP}},
  issn         = {{2212-8271}},
  pages        = {{207--212}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier BV}},
  title        = {{{Model-based Impact Analysis for Engineering Sustainable Products in Value Creation Networks}}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.procir.2025.08.037}},
  volume       = {{136}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@inproceedings{62153,
  author       = {{Gräßler, Iris and Grewe, Benedikt}},
  booktitle    = {{Procedia CIRP}},
  issn         = {{2212-8271}},
  pages        = {{936--942}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier BV}},
  title        = {{{Structuring Systems Engineering Transformation: A three-step cycle of Transformation}}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.procir.2025.08.159}},
  volume       = {{136}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@inproceedings{60013,
  author       = {{Gräßler, Iris and Pottebaum, Jens and Nyhuis, Peter and Schmidt, Matthias and Grewe, Benedikt and Vollenkemper, Felix and Hesse, Thomas and Meinecke, Tim}},
  booktitle    = {{Stuttgarter Symposium für Produktentwicklung (SSP) 2025}},
  editor       = {{Hölzle, Katharina and Kreimeyer, Matthias and Roth, Daniel and Maier, Thomas and Riedel, Oliver}},
  location     = {{Stuttgart}},
  pages        = {{509--518}},
  publisher    = {{Fraunhofer IAO}},
  title        = {{{Evolving Design for Assembly, Disassembly and Reassembly into a new paradigm: Design-for-Capabilities with Hybrid Decision Support as an enabler for circular products}}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@article{58236,
  abstract     = {{<jats:p>In the engineering of complex technical systems, Systems Engineering (SE) is a key approach that is becoming increasingly relevant in more and more industries due to the ever-increasing complexity of systems. Over the decades of practical application and research, various specializations and forms of the Systems Engineering approach have developed, but there has so far been a lack of an overarching context and positioning in meaningful stages for the introduction of Systems Engineering in companies. For this reason, this research will systematize common Systems Engineering approaches and bring them together in a stage model for Systems Engineering. Based on a systematic literature review, use cases are identified for each approach and stage, which support companies in selecting an approach suitable for their own organization.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Gräßler, Iris and Grewe, Benedikt}},
  issn         = {{2079-8954}},
  journal      = {{Systems}},
  keywords     = {{Systems Engineering Transformation, maturity, Systems Engineering stages, approaches, SE}},
  number       = {{1}},
  publisher    = {{MDPI AG}},
  title        = {{{Stages of Systems Engineering: An Analysis and Characterization of Systems Engineering Approaches}}},
  doi          = {{10.3390/systems13010053}},
  volume       = {{13}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@article{62166,
  author       = {{Prüßner, Tim and Hoyer, Kay-Peter and Buitkamp, Nadine and Vieth, Pascal and Grundmeier, Guido}},
  issn         = {{0254-0584}},
  journal      = {{Materials Chemistry and Physics}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier BV}},
  title        = {{{Surface functionalisation of additively manufactured AlSi10Mg by organophosphonic acid and PDMS grafting}}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.matchemphys.2025.131758}},
  volume       = {{349}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@inproceedings{62181,
  abstract     = {{<jats:p>This research investigates how Artificial Intelligence (AI) can be systematically integrated into existing business processes by combining suitable competencies with graphical AI workflow modelling. While AI offers a high potential for automation and increased efficiency, its implementation often fails due to a lack of interdisciplinary competencies that bridge the gap between domain expertise and IT know-how. Low-code platforms and visual modelling tools are increasingly recognised as enablers, empowering non-programmers to intuitively create graphical AI- based workflows. Nevertheless, specific competencies are required to realise the full potential of AI, the domain specific knowledge and align technical understanding with AI capabilities. The paper reviews the state of the art in AI-driven business process automation and competencies for visual low-code approaches. It then presents a practical solution to identify and systematise essential competence areas. Based on this, a practical competence model is developed to support the design of user-friendly, AI-enabled workflows. This is tested in a practical application context — emergency management — where it supports critical decision-making processes and is validated through expert feedback. The study concludes by offering actionable recommendations to help organisations foster the necessary competencies and methods for competently integrating AI into their digital processes.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Gräßler, Iris and Özcan, Deniz}},
  booktitle    = {{AHFE International}},
  issn         = {{2771-0718}},
  location     = {{Split}},
  publisher    = {{AHFE International}},
  title        = {{{Graphical AI workflow modelling: Identifying relevant competencies in AI-based automation of business processes}}},
  doi          = {{10.54941/ahfe1006785}},
  volume       = {{198}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@book{62182,
  abstract     = {{<p> Executive summary Die vorliegende Zukunftsstudie „Automation 2035“ gibt einen Ausblick auf die Entwicklung der Automatisierungstechnik in den nächsten 10 Jahren. Neben der Beschreibung von Trends wie Kreislaufwirtschaft, Automatisierung der Märkte, Biologisierung, autonome Systeme und Robotik sowie IT-Sicherheit wird die zu erwartende Veränderung in der Bildung beschrieben. Dazu verwenden wir Methoden der Zukunftsforschung und arbeiten mit der Szenarientechnik, um Zukunftsperspektiven der Automation aufzuzeigen. Personas werden eingesetzt, um die zukünftigen Entwicklungen plastisch aus den Augen der Personen im Jahr 2025 und in der Zukunft im Jahr 2035 zu beschreiben. Schlüsselthemen und Trends: ... ... Inhalt Executive summary 1 1 Einführung 3 2 Zukunftsfelder für die Automatisierungstechnik 2035 4 2.1 Kreislaufwirtschaft 4 2.2 Automatisierung der Märkte 7 2.3 Biologisierung 8 2.4 Autonome Systeme und Robotik 10 2.5 Security 12 2.6 Veränderung der Ausbildung 13 3 Szenario der Automation 2035 16 4 Personas 18 4.1 Unternehmer 18 4.2 Ingenieurin 19 4.3 Schüler 20 5 Thesen und Ausblick 22 Methodik 24 Autorenteam 25 Schrifttum 26... </p>}},
  author       = {{Gräßler, Iris and Özcan, Deniz and Tusek, Alena Marie and Bilgic, Attila and Lange, Christian and Stich, Christian and Maul, Christine and Heizmann, Michael and Weyrich, Michael and Dessel,, Sascha and Miny, Torben and Jumar, Ulrich}},
  isbn         = {{9783911670180}},
  publisher    = {{VDI Verlag}},
  title        = {{{Automation 2035}}},
  doi          = {{10.51202/9783911670180}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@article{61944,
  abstract     = {{his article describes a new student-based approach to Decoding and Disrupting. This approach consists of an educational programme that works with a multidisciplinary group of undergraduate students, so-called Culture Fellows. In the programme, the students learn about theories on disciplinary cultures and their practices, Decoding the Disciplines, and communication. The programme focuses on the implicitness of disciplinary practices and how to explore them, i.e., it seeks to address the importance of making disciplinary practices, norms, and values more accessible to students. Within the programme, the Culture Fellows use a student-based variant of the Decoding the Disciplines Paradigm that we call ‘Culture Quest’. The Culture Quest supplies students with the tools to question, explore, and decode their respective disciplines and practices. Disciplinary practices often remain implicit because lecturers, with their wealth of experience and expertise in their discipline, may be operationally blind and thus no longer aware of the fact that certain practices might need to be explained. This lack of explanation or explicitness can lead to students feeling bewildered, confused or puzzled. The Culture Fellows and in particular the Culture Quest can encourage dialogue about and exploration of disciplinary cultures and their practices and can thus allow students to grasp the implicit cultural norms and expectations within their respective disciplines more clearly. The Culture Fellows and the Culture Quest provide students – and maybe even lecturers – with opportunities to engage with and reflect on teaching and learning strategies and practices.}},
  author       = {{Schmöckel, Sabrina and Scharlau, Ingrid}},
  issn         = {{1918-0853}},
  journal      = {{Transformative Dialogues: Teaching and Learning Journal}},
  number       = {{3}},
  pages        = {{98--115}},
  publisher    = {{Penn State University Libraries}},
  title        = {{{No Student Should Be an Island: A Peer-Approach to Decoding and Disrupting}}},
  doi          = {{10.59236/td2025vol18iss31913}},
  volume       = {{18}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}