@inbook{61858,
author = {{Schemel, Nele and Tenberge, Claudia}},
booktitle = {{The 42nd Pupils' Attitudes Towards Technology Conference Proceedings 2025}},
editor = {{El Fadil, Brahim and Hasni, Abdelkrim and Yazza, Younes and Brousseau, Samiana and Blanc, Martin and Chrifi, Ibtissam}},
location = {{Montreal}},
pages = {{223--237}},
title = {{{Promote technology learning using a spiral curriculum – Developing evidence-based concepts for technology education focusing on problem-solving}}},
year = {{2025}},
}
@article{61856,
author = {{Schlieper, Hendrik}},
issn = {{2772-7610}},
journal = {{Artes}},
number = {{2}},
pages = {{191--210}},
title = {{{‚Novellierungen‘ der Novellistik. Der ‚Fall‘ der Novelas ejemplares}}},
doi = {{10.30965/27727629-20250009}},
volume = {{4}},
year = {{2025}},
}
@article{61860,
author = {{Kunert, Irene Dorothea}},
journal = {{PhiN Beiheft 40: Verdichtung und Auffächerung. (Übersetzte) Literatur zwischen Präsenz und Virtualität}},
pages = {{136 -- 154}},
title = {{{Auffächerung im Spiegel der Übersetzung und darüber hinaus: La Grande Peur dans la montagne von Charles Ferdinand Ramuz und die beiden deutschen Übersetzungen dieses Romans}}},
year = {{2025}},
}
@misc{61867,
author = {{Rohde, Noëlle}},
booktitle = {{The Elgar International Encyclopedia of Sociology of Education}},
editor = {{Sidhu, Ravinder and Waters, Johanna and Cheng, Yi'En}},
title = {{{The Meritocratic Ideal and its Challenges}}},
year = {{2025}},
}
@article{61859,
author = {{Jonas-Ahrend, Gabriela and Tenberg, Ralf}},
journal = {{Journal of Education for Teaching}},
title = {{{Teacher shortage in Germany - overview and insights}}},
doi = {{https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2025.2572577}},
year = {{2025}},
}
@book{61069,
editor = {{Eke, Norbert and Elit, Stefan}},
pages = {{204}},
publisher = {{Aisthesis Verlag}},
title = {{{Was im Gedicht geschieht: Jan Wagner. Paderborn Wintersemester 2023/24. 42. Paderborner Gastdozentur für Schriftstellerinnen und Schriftsteller }}},
volume = {{2}},
year = {{2025}},
}
@article{61874,
abstract = {{
We study descriptive complexity of counting complexity classes in the range from #P to
\({\text{#}\!\cdot\!\text{NP}}\)
. The proof of Fagin’s characterization of NP by existential second-order logic generalizes to the counting setting in the following sense: The class #P can be logically described as the class of functions counting satisfying assignments to free relation variables in first-order formulae. This was first observed by Saluja et al. (1995). In this paper we extend this study to classes beyond #P and extensions of first-order logic with team semantics. These team-based logics are closely related to existential second-order logic and its fragments, hence our results also shed light on the complexity of counting for extensions of first-order logic in Tarski’s semantics. Our results show that the class
\({\text{#}\!\cdot\!\text{NP}}\)
can be logically characterized by independence logic and existential second-order logic, whereas dependence logic and inclusion logic give rise to subclasses of
\({\text{#}\!\cdot\!\text{NP}}\)
and #P , respectively. We further relate the class obtained from inclusion logic to the complexity class
\({\text{TotP}} \subseteq{\text{#P}}\)
.
}},
author = {{Haak, Anselm and Kontinen, Juha and Müller, Fabian and Vollmer, Heribert and Yang, Fan}},
issn = {{1529-3785}},
journal = {{ACM Transactions on Computational Logic}},
publisher = {{Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)}},
title = {{{Counting of Teams in First-Order Team Logics}}},
doi = {{10.1145/3771721}},
year = {{2025}},
}
@inproceedings{61873,
author = {{Khanteimouri, Payam and Campen, Marcel}},
booktitle = {{Proceedings of the 2025 SIAM International Meshing Roundtable}},
isbn = {{9781611978575}},
publisher = {{Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics}},
title = {{{C1-Smooth Parametrization of Polynomial Shapes over Polygonal Domains}}},
doi = {{10.1137/1.9781611978575.9}},
year = {{2025}},
}
@inbook{60168,
author = {{Dell, Holger and Haak, Anselm and Kallmayer, Melvin and Wennmann, Leo}},
booktitle = {{Proceedings of the 2025 Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA)}},
isbn = {{9781611978322}},
publisher = {{Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics}},
title = {{{Solving Polynomial Equations Over Finite Fields}}},
doi = {{10.1137/1.9781611978322.90}},
year = {{2025}},
}
@inbook{61877,
abstract = {{Abstract
Research indicates that anger is a prevalent emotion in human-technology interactions, often leading to frustration, rejection and reduced trust, significantly impacting user experience and acceptance of technology. Particularly in high-risk or uncertain situations, where AI explanations are intended to help users make more informed decisions, decision-making is influenced by emotional factors, impairing understanding and leading to suboptimal choices. While XAI research continues to evolve, greater consideration of users’ emotions and individual characteristics remains necessary. Broadening empirical studies in this area could foster a more comprehensive understanding of decision-making processes following explanations, especially in relation to the interaction between emotions and cognition. In response, this study seeks to contribute to this area by employing an experimental design to examine the effects of AI explanations and emotion regulation on user reliance and trust of emotional users. The results provide a foundation for future human-centered research in XAI, focusing on the impact of emotions and cognition in human-technology interactions.}},
author = {{Lammert, Olesja}},
booktitle = {{Communications in Computer and Information Science}},
isbn = {{9783032083326}},
issn = {{1865-0929}},
publisher = {{Springer Nature Switzerland}},
title = {{{Can AI Regulate Your Emotions? An Empirical Investigation of the Influence of AI Explanations and Emotion Regulation on Human Decision-Making Factors}}},
doi = {{10.1007/978-3-032-08333-3_11}},
year = {{2025}},
}
@article{61875,
abstract = {{Unintended consequences in Information Systems (IS) research are typically examined only after they have surfaced in practice, often treated as isolated instances rather than being systematically identified and understood. This reactive stance constrains our ability to anticipate risks, recognize emerging opportunities, and build cumulative insights across studies. To assess the current state of IS research on unintended consequences, we conducted a scoping review of literature in the Association for Information Systems' Senior Scholars' Basket of Journals. Our review highlights significant gaps in how unintended consequences are defined, theorized, and systematically compared. To address these gaps, we propose three foundational considerations: (1) conceptual clarity, to refine definitions and delineate boundaries; (2) relational configurations, to analyze the interplay between actors, technologies, and contexts; and (3) temporal configurations, to capture the evolving nature of consequences over time. Building on these dimensions, we introduce a set of guiding questions designed to provide shared analytical vocabulary rather than a prescriptive framework. These questions enable researchers to more systematically identify, categorize, and compare unintended consequences across contexts, thereby fostering theoretical precision, facilitating cross-contextual learning, and supporting a more anticipatory and comprehensive understanding of the phenomenon.}},
author = {{Benbya, Hind and Strich, Franz and Trieu, Van-Hau}},
issn = {{1326-2238}},
journal = {{Australasian Journal of Information Systems}},
publisher = {{Australasian Association for Information Systems}},
title = {{{Accounting for Unintended Consequences in IS Research: A Call to Action}}},
doi = {{10.3127/ajis.v29.6063}},
volume = {{29}},
year = {{2025}},
}
@misc{61879,
author = {{Anonymous, A.}},
title = {{{Overview on Threshold Signature Schemes and their Applications}}},
year = {{2025}},
}
@misc{61878,
author = {{Anonymous, A}},
title = {{{Comparison of Time-Lock Puzzle Constructions and Their Security}}},
year = {{2025}},
}
@article{61138,
author = {{Zhan, Yingjie and Caylak, Ismail and Ostwald, Richard and Barth, Enrico and Uhlmann, Eckart}},
issn = {{2520-8160}},
journal = {{Multiscale and Multidisciplinary Modeling, Experiments and Design}},
number = {{10}},
publisher = {{Springer Science and Business Media LLC}},
title = {{{Damage-incorporated four-step mean-field method for simulating CFRP machining: a novel algorithmic approach}}},
doi = {{10.1007/s41939-025-01026-4}},
volume = {{8}},
year = {{2025}},
}
@inproceedings{61884,
author = {{Güldenpenning, Iris and Schulze Freilinghaus, Lars and Böer, Nils Tobias and Weigelt, Matthias}},
booktitle = {{57. Herbsttagung experimentelle Kognitionspsychologie (HexKop)}},
editor = {{Geißler, Christoph F. and Schöpper, Lars-Michael}},
location = {{Trier}},
title = {{{Unraveling the head-fake effect: Dynamic measures of cognitive conflict in sport contexts}}},
year = {{2025}},
}
@article{61857,
author = {{Schlieper, Hendrik}},
issn = {{2772-7610}},
journal = {{Artes}},
number = {{2}},
pages = {{306--338}},
title = {{{Mercedes. Gunst und Affekt in Cervantes’ La española inglesa}}},
doi = {{10.30965/27727629-20250014}},
volume = {{4}},
year = {{2025}},
}
@inproceedings{61881,
author = {{Schmöckel, Sabrina}},
location = {{Graz}},
title = {{{Look Who's Talking: Multivoicedness in Students’ Descriptions of Their Disciplines}}},
year = {{2025}},
}
@inproceedings{61882,
author = {{Schmöckel, Sabrina}},
location = {{Groningen}},
title = {{{The Culture Quest – Students Decode Their Disciplinary Culture(s)}}},
year = {{2025}},
}
@article{61899,
abstract = {{The devastating consequences of environmental degradation are increasingly evident, necessitating both adaptation and mitigation strategies. This study investigates perceived individual responsibility, drawing upon Hans Jonas’ "The Imperative of Responsibility" as a theoretical framework. Our aim is to explore the relationship between five independent variables (perceived climate change threat, trust in technological progress, religiosity, responsibility for contemporaries impacted by natural disasters, and environmental concern) and the dependent variable of perceived environmental responsibility towards future generations. Findings reveal that approximately 77 percent of respondents in Germany are willing to sacrifice current standards of living to protect the environment for future generations. Notably, perceiving climate change as a threat, assuming responsibility for present-day impacts and environmental stewardship emerge as significant predictors of environmental responsibility towards future generations. Being religious also correlates with heightened environmental responsibility compared to non-religious individuals. Trust in technological progress only weakly correlates with intergenerational environmental responsibility, surprisingly suggesting a positive relationship. These findings provide valuable insights into determinants of perceived individual responsibility. In order to arrive at a more complete analysis, however, future research needs to complement this study of perceived individual-level responsibility with considerations on collective actors and structural factors. }},
author = {{Diekmann, Isabell and Faist, Thomas}},
issn = {{2325-1042}},
journal = {{Environmental Sociology}},
number = {{2}},
pages = {{259–272}},
publisher = {{Taylor & Francis}},
title = {{{Does the Future Have a Lobby? Environmental Degradation and Perceived Environmental Responsibility towards Future Generations}}},
doi = {{10.1080/23251042.2024.2422460}},
volume = {{11}},
year = {{2025}},
}
@inbook{61896,
abstract = {{Bu makale, Müslümanlara ve Islam’a karsi önyargi ve ayrimcilikla ilgili farkli terim ve kavramlara odaklanmaktadir. Bu bölümdeki farklilastirma öncelikle bu düsmanligin farkli muhataplariyla ilgilidir. Buradaki soru, Islam dinine yönelik düsmanca tutumlarin, Müslümanlara yönelik düsmanca tutumlarla ne ölçüde ayni oldugudur. Ayni zamanda bu makale, bireysel tutum olarak Islam/Müslüman düsmanliginin ve yapisal bir özellik olarak Müslüman karsiti irkçiligin farkli düzeylerde konumlandigi konusunda farkindalik yaratir. Makale iki arastirma geleneginin (irkçilik ve önyargi arastirmalari) farkli paradigmalarini göstermekte, fakat ayni zamanda bireysel ve yapisal düzeyler yogun bir sekilde iç içe geçtigi için kavramlarin bütünlestirici bir sekilde anlasilmasini savunmaktadir. Çalisma, Islam/Müslüman düsmanligi ve Müslüman karsiti irkçilikla mücadeleye yönelik teorik, metodolojik ve özellikle pratik çikarimlarin genis bir tartismasiyla sonuçlanir.}},
author = {{Diekmann, Isabell}},
booktitle = {{Türkisch-Deutsche Perspektiven / Türk-Alman Bakis Açilari}},
editor = {{Quintern, Detlev}},
keywords = {{Islam düsmanligi, Müslüman düsmanligi, Müslüman karsiti irkçilik, Önyargi, Ayrimcilik, Din, Birey, Yapi}},
pages = {{125–144}},
title = {{{İslam düşmanlığı, Müslüman düşmanlığı ve Müslüman karşıtı ırkçılık: Kavramsallaştırmaya yönelik farklılaştırıcı ve bütünleştirici yaklaşımlar}}},
volume = {{2}},
year = {{2025}},
}