@inbook{65167,
  abstract     = {{Through the Reformation, the Bible and education gained central importance. The Reformation principle that the Bible as Holy Scripture should be the only basis and norm for faith (sola Scriptura) emphasized the importance of reading and writing. The Reformers wanted children and laypeople to become independent church members. Teaching material was needed for school lessons, and study Bibles with pictures were produced; Martin Luther’s Little Prayer Book (1529) served as a prototype. The Lay Bible (1540) by Wendelin Rihel was a continuation of Luther’s Little Prayer Book. This innovative period laid the foundation for later children’s Bible traditions.
}},
  author       = {{Keuchen, Marion}},
  booktitle    = {{The Oxford Handbook of the Bible and the Reformation}},
  editor       = {{Powell McNutt, Jennifer and Selderhuis, Herman}},
  isbn         = {{ 9780198753186}},
  keywords     = {{Reformation children’s Bibles, Bible illustrations, lay Bible, passional, Martin Luther, Wendelin Rihel, religious education of children}},
  pages        = {{171--185}},
  publisher    = {{Oxford University Press}},
  title        = {{{Children’s Bibles in the Reformation: Martin Luther‘s „Passional“ (1529) and Wendelin Rihel‘s „Leienbibel (1540)}}},
  doi          = {{10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198753186.013.13}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@inproceedings{65172,
  abstract     = {{<jats:p>Abstract. The process of joining is used in numerous sectors of the manufacturing industry, where constructions composed of individual components or metal sheets are combined to form complex structures. A straightforward and pervasive approach for joining materials of disparate natures and coated surfaces is clinching. During the clinching process, plastic deformation, residual stresses and damage are introduced into the joint. Due to time-varying service loads cracks can initiate and propagate in the vicinity of the joint which limits the lifetime of the clinched structure. In order to prevent those damage cases, it is crucial to perform fracture mechanical evaluation of cracks in the joint region. Therefore, this publication deals with the question of how plastic deformation, residual stresses and damage need to be considered for the assessment of a crack. For this purpose, simple substitute models are employed to illustrate the principles based on the clinching application example.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Weiß, Deborah and Duffe, Tobias and Joy, Tintu David and Kullmer, Gunter}},
  booktitle    = {{Materials Research Proceedings}},
  issn         = {{2474-395X}},
  publisher    = {{Materials Research Forum LLC}},
  title        = {{{Consideration of residual stresses and damage in the fracture mechanical investigation of mechanically joined structures}}},
  doi          = {{10.21741/9781644903551-28}},
  volume       = {{52}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@article{63909,
  abstract     = {{<jats:sec><jats:title>Introduction</jats:title><jats:p>Human-machine interactions become increasingly pervasive in daily life and professional contexts, motivating research to examine how human behavior changes when individuals interact with machines rather than other humans. While most of the existing literature focused on human-machine interactions with algorithmic systems in advisory roles, research on human behavior in monitoring or verification processes that are conducted by automated systems remains largely absent. This is surprising given the growing implementation of algorithmic systems in institutions, particularly in tax enforcement and financial regulation, to help monitor and identify misreports, or in online labor platforms widely implementing algorithmic control to ensure that workers deliver high service quality. Our study examines how human dishonesty changes when verification of statements that may be untrue is performed by machines vs. humans, and how ambiguity in the verification process influences dishonest behavior.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Method</jats:title><jats:p>We design an incentivized laboratory experiment using a modified die-roll paradigm where participants privately observe a random draw and report the result, with higher reported numbers yielding greater monetary rewards. A probabilistic verification process introduces risk of identifying a lie and punishment, with treatments varying by verification entity (human vs. machine) and degree of ambiguity in the verification process (transparent vs. ambiguous).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Our results show that under transparent verification rules, cheating magnitude does not significantly differ between human and machine auditors. However, under ambiguous conditions, cheating magnitude is significantly higher when machines verify participants' reports, reducing the prevalence of partial cheating while leading to behavioral polarization manifested as either complete honesty or maximal overreporting. The same applies when comparing reports to a machine entity under ambiguous and transparent verification rules.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Discussion</jats:title><jats:p>These findings emphasize the behavioral implications of algorithmic opacity in verification contexts. While machines can serve as effective auditors under transparent conditions, their black box nature combined with ambiguous verification processes may unintentionally incentivize more severe dishonesty. These insights have practical implications for designing automated oversight systems in tax audits, compliance, and workplace monitoring.</jats:p></jats:sec>}},
  author       = {{Protte, Marius and Mir Djawadi, Behnud}},
  issn         = {{2813-5296}},
  journal      = {{Frontiers in Behavioral Economics}},
  publisher    = {{Frontiers Media SA}},
  title        = {{{Human vs. algorithmic auditors: the impact of entity type and ambiguity on human dishonesty}}},
  doi          = {{10.3389/frbhe.2025.1645749}},
  volume       = {{4}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@article{63908,
  author       = {{Mir Djawadi, Behnud and Plaß, Sabrina and Loer, Sabrina}},
  issn         = {{0014-2921}},
  journal      = {{European Economic Review}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier BV}},
  title        = {{{“I don’t believe that you believe what I believe”: an experiment on misperceptions of social norms and whistleblowing}}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.euroecorev.2025.105189}},
  volume       = {{180}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@inproceedings{65187,
  author       = {{Keuchen, Marion and Lindemeyer, Sabine}},
  booktitle    = {{Rituale und Spiritualität - auch für religiös ungebundene Menschen}},
  editor       = {{Böhme, Thomas and Kuhlmann, Birgit and Meuche, Katrin and Wenk, Anne-Kathrin and Wittmann-Stasch, Bettina}},
  isbn         = {{978-3-943410-36-5}},
  location     = {{Hamburg}},
  pages        = {{68--79}},
  publisher    = {{Comenius-Institut}},
  title        = {{{Durch Schulseelsorge Demokratiefähigkeit bilden}}},
  volume       = {{11}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@misc{65185,
  author       = {{Keuchen, Marion}},
  pages        = {{60--61}},
  publisher    = {{Evangelische Kirche im Rheinland}},
  title        = {{{Dankbarkeitskoffer. Schulseelsorge in Hochschule und Schule}}},
  volume       = {{4}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@misc{65188,
  author       = {{Fermor, Gotthard and Janssen, Wibke and Keuchen, Marion and Ruddat, David}},
  publisher    = {{Deutscher Evangelischer Kirchentag}},
  title        = {{{Mut zum Widerspruch. Bibelarbeit auf dem Weg zu Markus 7,24-30}}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@article{63911,
  author       = {{Mir Djawadi, Behnud and Plaß, Sabrina and Loer, Sabrina}},
  journal      = {{SSRN Electronic Journal}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier BV}},
  title        = {{{Social Information Interventions under Competing Norms: Evidence from a Whistleblowing Experiment}}},
  doi          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5345248}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@article{63912,
  author       = {{Mir Djawadi, Behnud and Wester, Lisa}},
  journal      = {{SSRN Electronic Journal}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier BV}},
  title        = {{{Social Interaction and Feedback-Giving Behavior in the Sharing Economy - An Experimental Analysis}}},
  doi          = {{https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5345248}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@inproceedings{65205,
  author       = {{Moritzer, Elmar and Lingnau, Kai Martin}},
  booktitle    = {{The 40th International Conference of Polymer Processing Society}},
  title        = {{{Transfer of powder-based direct coating in the injection molding process from two dimensional components to three-dimensional components}}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@inproceedings{65211,
  author       = {{Held, Christian and Moritzer, Elmar}},
  booktitle    = {{FA11 – Kunststoff-Fügen}},
  title        = {{{Werkstofflicher Ansatz zum adhäsiv-basierten Fügen für hochflexible TPE-Organobleche als Verstärkungsstruktur}}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@inproceedings{65203,
  author       = {{Held, Christian and Moritzer, Elmar}},
  booktitle    = {{the 40th International Conference of Polymer Processing Society}},
  title        = {{{Influence of the processing parameters on the mechanical strenght of injection moulded BMC components for direct screwing}}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@inproceedings{65208,
  author       = {{Rempel, Timm and Brüning, Florian}},
  booktitle    = {{ANTEC}},
  title        = {{{Investigations into the specific throughput stability of conical feed zones over the rotation speed during the direct processing of polypropylene regrind}}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@inproceedings{65209,
  author       = {{Held, Christian and Moritzer, Elmar}},
  booktitle    = {{FA11 – Kunststoff-Fügen}},
  title        = {{{Werkstoffgerechte Auslegung von Direktverschraubungen in SMC/BMC Bauteilen}}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@inproceedings{65210,
  author       = {{Held, Christian and Moritzer, Elmar}},
  booktitle    = {{FA11 – Kunststoff-Fügen}},
  title        = {{{Werkstoffgerechte Auslegung von Direktverschraubungen in SMC/BMC Bauteilen}}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@article{63662,
  abstract     = {{<jats:p>The accurate prediction of crack initiation and propagation is essential for assessing the structural integrity of mechanically joined components and other complex assemblies. To overcome the limitations of existing finite element tools, a modular Python framework has been developed to automate three-dimensional crack growth simulations. The program combines geometric reconstruction, adaptive remeshing, and the numerical evaluation of fracture mechanics parameters within a single, fully automated workflow. The framework builds on open-source components and remains solver-independent, enabling straightforward integration with commercial or research finite element codes. A dedicated sequence of modules performs all required steps, from mesh separation and crack insertion to local submodeling, stress and displacement mapping, and iterative crack-front update, without manual interaction. The methodology was verified using a mini-compact tension (Mini-CT) specimen as a benchmark case. The numerical results demonstrate the accurate reproduction of stress intensity factors and energy release rates while achieving high computational efficiency through localized refinement. The developed approach provides a robust basis for crack growth simulations of geometrically complex or residual stress-affected structures. Its high degree of automation and flexibility makes it particularly suited for analyzing cracks in clinched and riveted joints, supporting the predictive design and durability assessment of joined lightweight structures.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Krome, Sven and Duffe, Tobias and Kullmer, Gunter and Schramm, Britta and Ostwald, Richard}},
  issn         = {{2076-3417}},
  journal      = {{Applied Sciences}},
  number       = {{1}},
  publisher    = {{MDPI AG}},
  title        = {{{Validation and Verification of Novel Three-Dimensional Crack Growth Simulation Software GmshCrack3D}}},
  doi          = {{10.3390/app16010384}},
  volume       = {{16}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@misc{63764,
  author       = {{Weiß, Deborah and Krome, Sven and Duffe, Tobias and Kullmer, Gunter and Ostwald, Richard}},
  publisher    = {{LibreCat University}},
  title        = {{{Experimentelle Ermittlung von Rissablenkungswinkeln bei außerphasiger Mixed-Mode-Belastung mittels einer neuartigen Probengeometrie}}},
  doi          = {{https://doi.org/10.48447/BR-2025-490}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@article{65004,
  author       = {{Knaup, Felix and Brüning, Florian}},
  journal      = {{Extrusion}},
  keywords     = {{Aufschmelzen, extrusion, Messtechnik}},
  pages        = {{28–33}},
  title        = {{{Vergleich experimenteller Methoden zur Untersuchung des Aufschmelzprozesses in Einschneckenextrudern}}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@inproceedings{65227,
  author       = {{Tölle, Laura and Rehmer, Torben and Müller, Johann and Ruppel, Fynn and Trier, Matthias}},
  location     = {{Chemnitz, Germany}},
  title        = {{{Disentangling Negative Sentiment towards Virtual Influencers: Towards a Taxonomy of Criticism}}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@inproceedings{65229,
  author       = {{Tölle, Laura and Nolting, Max and Trier, Matthias}},
  location     = {{Dresden}},
  title        = {{{Using ChatGPT for Identifying Negative Structures in Social Media Conversations}}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}