@misc{8799, author = {{Groh, Andreas}}, title = {{{Ideenbewertung durch die Crowd - Ein klassifizierender Literaturüberblick}}}, year = {{2019}}, } @inproceedings{8833, author = {{Jovanovikj, Ivan and Yigitbas, Enes and Gerth, Christian and Sauer, Stefan and Engels, Gregor}}, booktitle = {{Information Systems Engineering in Responsible Information Systems - CAiSE Forum 2019, Rome, Italy, June 3-7, 2019, Proceedings}}, editor = {{ Cappiello, Cinzia and Ruiz, Marcela}}, location = {{Rome}}, pages = {{145--157}}, title = {{{Detection and Resolution of Data-Flow Differences in Business Process Models}}}, volume = {{350}}, year = {{2019}}, } @inproceedings{8835, author = {{Jovanovikj, Ivan and Yigitbas, Enes and Grieger, Marvin and Sauer, Stefan and Engels, Gregor}}, booktitle = {{Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Model-Driven Engineering and Software Development - Volume 1: MODELSWARD,}}, isbn = {{978-989-758-358-2}}, location = {{Prague}}, pages = {{536--543}}, publisher = {{SciTePress}}, title = {{{Modular Construction of Context-Specific Test Case Migration Methods}}}, doi = {{10.5220/0007690205360543}}, year = {{2019}}, } @misc{8840, author = {{Fath, Jerome Louis}}, title = {{{# Fail - Ein Literaturüberblick über Online-Bewertungen zu Produkt- und Dienstleistungsfehlern}}}, year = {{2019}}, } @inproceedings{8854, author = {{Szopinski, Daniel}}, booktitle = {{3rd Business Model Conference}}, location = {{New York, USA}}, title = {{{Activate software-based business model development tools: An exploratory study}}}, year = {{2019}}, } @inproceedings{8856, author = {{Szopinski, Daniel and Schoormann, T. and Kundisch, Dennis}}, booktitle = {{Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology (DESRIST)}}, location = {{Worcester, USA}}, title = {{{The long tail of taxonomy evaluation criteria: A structured overview}}}, year = {{2019}}, } @inproceedings{8861, author = {{Anjorin, Anthony and Yigitbas, Enes and Kaindl, Hermann}}, booktitle = {{Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Bidirectional Transformations (Bx 2019)}}, location = {{Philadelphia, PA, USA}}, pages = {{61--65}}, publisher = {{CEUR-WS.org}}, title = {{{Consistent Runtime Adaptation of User Interfaces }}}, volume = {{2355}}, year = {{2019}}, } @inproceedings{8866, author = {{Jansen, Klaus and Maack, Marten and Mäcker, Alexander}}, booktitle = {{Proceedings of the 33rd IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS)}}, pages = {{145 -- 154}}, publisher = {{IEEE}}, title = {{{Scheduling on (Un-)Related Machines with Setup Times}}}, year = {{2019}}, } @inproceedings{8868, author = {{Wever, Marcel Dominik and Mohr, Felix and Hüllermeier, Eyke and Hetzer, Alexander}}, location = {{Bayreuth, Germany}}, title = {{{Towards Automated Machine Learning for Multi-Label Classification}}}, year = {{2019}}, } @inproceedings{8871, author = {{Augustine, John and Ghaffari, Mohsen and Gmyr, Robert and Hinnenthal, Kristian and Kuhn, Fabian and Li, Jason and Scheideler, Christian}}, booktitle = {{Proceedings of the 31st ACM Symposium on Parallelism in Algorithms and Architectures}}, pages = {{69----79}}, publisher = {{ACM}}, title = {{{Distributed Computation in Node-Capacitated Networks}}}, doi = {{10.1145/3323165.3323195}}, year = {{2019}}, } @article{8872, abstract = {{We consider light scattering from a new type of model particle whose shape is represented in the form of a generalized ellipsoid having N foci, where N is greater than two. Such particles can be convex as well as concave. We use the geometrical optics approximation to study the light scattering from 3-foci particles. Non-zero elements of the scattering matrix are calculated for ensembles of randomly oriented independent transparent particles, m = n + i0. Several internal reflection orders are considered separately. It was found that the transmission-transmission (TT) and transmission-reflectance-transmission (TRT) components dominate in the formation of intensity of scattered light at large and small phase angles, respectively. We found a significant role of the total internal reflections of the TRT in the middle portion of the phase angle range. The main factors in the formation of positive linear polarization are the R and TRT component. The TT component is responsible for the formation of negative polarization branch at large phase angles.}}, author = {{Stankevich, Dmitriy and Hradyska, Larissa and Shkuratov, Yuriy and Grynko, Yevgen and Videen, Gorden and Förstner, Jens}}, issn = {{0022-4073}}, journal = {{Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer}}, keywords = {{tet_topic_scattering}}, pages = {{49}}, title = {{{Light scattering by 3-Foci convex and concave particles in the geometrical optics approximation}}}, doi = {{10.1016/j.jqsrt.2019.04.016}}, volume = {{231}}, year = {{2019}}, } @techreport{8873, abstract = {{We analyze a credence goods market adapted to a health care market with regulated prices, where physicians are heterogeneous regarding their fairness concerns. The opportunistic physicians only consider monetary incentives while the fair physicians, in addition to a monetary payoff, gain an non-monetary utility from being honest towards patients. We investigate how this heterogeneity affects the physicians’ equilibrium level of overcharging and the patients’ search for second opinions (which determines overall welfare). The impact of the heterogeneity on the fraud level is ambiguous and depends on several factors such as the size of the fairness utility, the share of fair physicians, the search level and the initial fraud level. Introducing heterogeneity does not affect the fraud or the search level when the share of fair physicians is small. However, when social welfare is not at its maximum, social welfare always increases if we introduce a sufficiently large share of fair physicians.}}, author = {{Heinzel, Joachim Maria Josef}}, keywords = {{credence goods, heterogeneous experts, fairness, overcharging}}, publisher = {{CIE Working Paper Series}}, title = {{{Credence Goods Markets with Fair and Opportunistic Experts}}}, volume = {{119}}, year = {{2019}}, } @article{8880, author = {{Yigitbas, Enes and Jovanovikj, Ivan and Sauer, Stefan and Engels, Gregor}}, journal = {{Softwaretechnik-Trends, Proceedings of the 21st Workshop Software-Reengineering & Evolution (WSRE) & 10th Workshop Design for Future (DFF)}}, number = {{2}}, pages = {{39--40}}, title = {{{Towards Model-based Development of Context-aware Augmented Reality Applications }}}, volume = {{39}}, year = {{2019}}, } @article{8892, author = {{Pelster, Matthias and Breitmayer, Bastian}}, issn = {{0167-2681}}, journal = {{Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization}}, pages = {{158--179}}, title = {{{Attracting attention from peers: Excitement in social trading}}}, doi = {{10.1016/j.jebo.2019.03.010}}, volume = {{161}}, year = {{2019}}, } @inbook{9599, author = {{Daymude, Joshua J. and Hinnenthal, Kristian and Richa, Andréa W. and Scheideler, Christian}}, booktitle = {{Distributed Computing by Mobile Entities, Current Research in Moving and Computing.}}, pages = {{615--681}}, publisher = {{Springer, Cham}}, title = {{{Computing by Programmable Particles}}}, doi = {{https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11072-7_22}}, year = {{2019}}, } @inproceedings{9613, abstract = {{The ability to openly evaluate products, locations and services is an achievement of the Web 2.0. It has never been easier to inform oneself about the quality of products or services and possible alternatives. Forming one’s own opinion based on the impressions of other people can lead to better experiences. However, this presupposes trust in one’s fellows as well as in the quality of the review platforms. In previous work on physician reviews and the corresponding websites, it was observed that there occurs faulty behavior by some reviewers and there were noteworthy differences in the technical implementation of the portals and in the efforts of site operators to maintain high quality reviews. These experiences raise new questions regarding what trust means on review platforms, how trust arises and how easily it can be destroyed.}}, author = {{Kersting, Joschka and Bäumer, Frederik Simon and Geierhos, Michaela}}, booktitle = {{Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Internet of Things, Big Data and Security}}, editor = {{Ramachandran, Muthu and Walters, Robert and Wills, Gary and Méndez Muñoz, Víctor and Chang, Victor}}, isbn = {{978-989-758-369-8}}, keywords = {{Trust, Physician Reviews, Network Analysis}}, location = {{Heraklion, Greece}}, pages = {{147--155}}, publisher = {{SCITEPRESS}}, title = {{{In Reviews We Trust: But Should We? Experiences with Physician Review Websites}}}, year = {{2019}}, } @inproceedings{9617, author = {{Betzing, Jan H. and Bartelheimer, Christian and Niemann, Marco and Berendes, Carsten Ingo and Beverungen, Daniel}}, booktitle = {{Proceedings of the 27th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS)}}, location = {{Stockholm}}, title = {{{Quantifying the Impact of Geospatial Recommendations: A Field Experiment in High Street Retail}}}, year = {{2019}}, } @article{9620, author = {{Yigitbas, Enes and Hottung, André and Mansfield Rojas, Sebastian and Anjorin, Anthony and Sauer, Stefan and Engels, Gregor}}, journal = {{Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction}}, pages = {{19:1--19:20}}, title = {{{Context- and Data-driven Satisfaction Analysis of User Interface Adaptations Based on Instant User Feedback}}}, volume = {{3}}, year = {{2019}}, } @inproceedings{9635, author = {{Meyer-Scott, Evan and Prasannan, Nidhin and Montaut, Nicola and Tiedau, Johannes and Eigner, Christof and Harder, Georg and Sansoni, Linda and Nitsche, Thomas and Herrmann, Harald and Ricken, Raimund and Quiring, Viktor and Bartley, Tim and Barkhofen, Sonja and Silberhorn, Christine}}, booktitle = {{Advances in Photonics of Quantum Computing, Memory, and Communication XII}}, editor = {{Hasan, Zameer U. and Hemmer, Philip R. and Migdall, Alan L.}}, isbn = {{9781510625082}}, title = {{{Engineering integrated photon pair sources and multiplexed detectors (Conference Presentation)}}}, doi = {{10.1117/12.2513753}}, year = {{2019}}, } @inproceedings{9676, abstract = {{Employees’ acceptance and resistance of new technology and social structure are frequently examined in Information Systems research. Resistance is expressed in various forms, including a lack of cooperation, workarounds, and physical sabotage. Workarounds, in particular, have a dual nature and can refer to both, undesirable behavior that contradicts organizational struc-ture and to desired organizational innovation. While antecedents and different forms of worka-rounds have been explored, literature has remained silent on how and why workarounds of an individual employee can affect activities performed by other employees and thereby, change work routines on an organizational level. Since employees’ day-to-day performances constitute the ostensive patterns of a routine, we argue that workarounds will not only impact performanc-es of adjacent routines, but also transform the organization as a social structure. With a prelim-inary set of qualitative data from 24 interviews, we used a multiple case study design to concep-tualize six patterns that illustrate how and why workarounds can spread through an organiza-tion. The patterns are systematized by a framework that considers three types of collaboration and two types of handoffs across routines. This first evidence points at the nature of complex desired and undesired consequences that can emerge through workarounds performed in an organization.}}, author = {{Wolf, Verena and Beverungen, Daniel}}, booktitle = {{Proceedings of the 27th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS)}}, keywords = {{Resistance, Workaround, Organizational Routines, Structuration Theory}}, location = {{Stockholm-Uppsala, Sweden}}, title = {{{Conceptualizing the Impact of Workarounds – An Organizational Routines’ Perspective}}}, year = {{2019}}, }