@article{59214,
  author       = {{Jalowy, Jonas and Löwe, Matthias}},
  issn         = {{1083-589X}},
  journal      = {{Electronic Communications in Probability}},
  number       = {{none}},
  publisher    = {{Institute of Mathematical Statistics}},
  title        = {{{Reconstructing a recurrent random environment from a single trajectory of a Random Walk in Random Environment with errors}}},
  doi          = {{10.1214/21-ecp425}},
  volume       = {{26}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@inbook{59696,
  author       = {{Beverungen, Daniel and Wolf, Verena and Bartelheimer, Christian and Franke, Alena}},
  booktitle    = {{Dienstleistungsinnovationen durch Digitalisierung}},
  isbn         = {{9783662630983}},
  publisher    = {{Springer Berlin Heidelberg}},
  title        = {{{Digitale Transformation von Dienstleistungssystemen – Beidhändige Innovationen für vernetzte Wertschöpfungsszenarien}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/978-3-662-63099-0_1}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@book{55346,
  abstract     = {{In Christian theology, the teaching that Christ possessed both a human and divine will is central to the doctrine of two natures, but it also represents a logical paradox, raising questions about how a person can be both impeccable and subject to temptation. This volume explores these questions through an analytic theology approach, bringing together 15 original papers that explore the implications of a strong libertarian concept of free will for Christology. With perspectives from systematic theologians, philosophers, and biblical scholars, several chapters also offer a comparative theology approach, examining the concept of impeccability in the Muslim tradition.

Therefore, this volume will be of interest to scholars and graduate students working in analytic theology, biblical scholarship, systematic theology, and Christian-Islamic dialogue.}},
  editor       = {{Grössl, Johannes and von Stosch, Klaus}},
  publisher    = {{Routledge}},
  title        = {{{Impeccability and Temptation: Understanding Christ's Divine and Human Will}}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@article{59716,
  abstract     = {{Against the background of the increasing importance of digitization in health care, the paper examines how medical practitioners who are involved in the development of digital health technologies legitimate and criticize the implementation and use of digital health technologies. Adopting an institutional logics perspective, the study is based on qualitative interviews with persons working at the interface of medicine and digital technologies development in Switzerland. The findings indicate that the developers believe that digital health technologies could harmonize current conflicts between an increasing economization of the health care system and professional–ethical demands. At the same time, however, they show that digital technologies can undermine the demand for medical autonomy, a central element of the medical ethos. </jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Lenz, Sarah}},
  issn         = {{2053-9517}},
  journal      = {{Big Data &amp; Society}},
  number       = {{1}},
  publisher    = {{SAGE Publications}},
  title        = {{{“More like a support tool”: Ambivalences around digital health from medical developers’ perspective}}},
  doi          = {{10.1177/2053951721996733}},
  volume       = {{8}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@article{59715,
  author       = {{Lenz, Sarah}},
  journal      = {{Social Science Information}},
  title        = {{{Is digitalization a problem solver or a fire accelerator? Situating digital technologies in sustainability discourses}}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@book{59726,
  editor       = {{Lenz, Sarah and Hasenfratz, Martina}},
  title        = {{{Gesellschaft als Risiko. Soziologische Situationsanalysen zur Coronapandemie}}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@article{31667,
  author       = {{Scharlau, Ingrid and Patrzek, Justine and Schreiber, Christine}},
  journal      = {{Unterrichtsmaterial des Verbandes der Psychologielehrerinnen und –lehrer}},
  keywords     = {{Unterrichtsfach Psychologie}},
  title        = {{{ „Power-Posen“ – Fakten, frisierte Daten, Forschungslyrik? Eine Unterrichtsreihe zu Praktiken und Darstellungsformen psychologischer Forschung}}},
  volume       = {{42}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@phdthesis{59541,
  author       = {{Wüllner, Sabrina}},
  publisher    = {{Springer VS}},
  title        = {{{Mit den Augen einer Lehrperson. Zur Wahrnehmung von Schüler*innen der Sekundarstufe II}}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@misc{59831,
  author       = {{Hartwig-Manschinger , Grete}},
  publisher    = {{Das vergessene Buch}},
  title        = {{{Rendezvous in Manhattan. Amerikanischer Roman. Herausgegeben und mit einem Nachwort von Vojin Saša Vukadinović}}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@phdthesis{57315,
  author       = {{Plaksin, Anna Viktoria Katrin}},
  title        = {{{Modelle zur computergestützten Analyse von Überlieferungen der Mensuralmusik: Empirische Textforschung im Kontext phylogenetischer Verfahren}}},
  doi          = {{10.26083/tuprints-00017211}},
  volume       = {{27}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@inproceedings{45923,
  author       = {{Schwabl, Franziska}},
  location     = {{online}},
  title        = {{{Die COVID-19 Pandemie als Treiber der digitalen Professionalisierung angehender Lehrpersonen?! Analyse von Erfahrungen Lehramtsstudierender im Praxissemester während der pandemiebedingten Maßnahmen im Sommersemester 2020}}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@inproceedings{45922,
  author       = {{Schwabl, Franziska}},
  location     = {{online}},
  title        = {{{Auswirkungen der COVID-19 Pandemie auf studienbegleitende Praxisphasen im Lehramtsstudium. Symposium auf der GEBF-Thementagung}}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@inproceedings{45924,
  author       = {{Schwabl, Franziska}},
  location     = {{Wien}},
  title        = {{{Selbstnarrationen in Körperbildern}}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@book{57636,
  editor       = {{Fegter, Susann and Langer, Antje and Thon, Christine}},
  isbn         = {{9783847424840}},
  publisher    = {{Verlag Barbara Budrich}},
  title        = {{{Diskursanalytische Geschlechterforschung in der Erziehungswissenschaft.}}},
  doi          = {{10.3224/84742484}},
  volume       = {{17}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@inbook{57672,
  author       = {{Fegter, Susanne and Langer, Antje and Thon, Christine}},
  booktitle    = {{Diskursanalytische Geschlechterforschung in der Erziehungswissenschaft. Jahrbuch Erziehungswissenschaftliche Geschlechterforschung}},
  editor       = {{Fegter, Susanne and Langer, Antje and Thon, Christine}},
  isbn         = {{978-3-8474-2484-0}},
  pages        = {{11--19}},
  publisher    = {{Barbara Budrich Verlag}},
  title        = {{{Diskursanalytische Geschlechterforschung in der Erziehungswissenschaft}}},
  doi          = {{10.3224/84742484}},
  volume       = {{17}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@article{57674,
  author       = {{Richter, Sophia and Langer, Antje}},
  issn         = {{2190-6890}},
  journal      = {{Zeitschrift für Bildungsforschung}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{137--153}},
  publisher    = {{Springer Science and Business Media LLC}},
  title        = {{{Im Namen der Gerechtigkeit? Ungerechtigkeitsthematisierungen von Schüler*innen als Positionierungen}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s35834-021-00298-3}},
  volume       = {{11}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@article{59439,
  abstract     = {{<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>When physicians are asked to determine the positive predictive value from the a priori probability of a disease and the sensitivity and false positive rate of a medical test (Bayesian reasoning), it often comes to misjudgments with serious consequences. In daily clinical practice, however, it is not only important that doctors receive a tool with which they can<jats:italic>correctly</jats:italic>judge—the<jats:italic>speed</jats:italic>of these judgments is also a crucial factor. In this study, we analyzed accuracy and efficiency in medical Bayesian inferences. In an empirical study we varied information format (probabilities vs. natural frequencies) and visualization (text only vs. tree only) for four contexts. 111 medical students participated in this study by working on four Bayesian tasks with common medical problems. The correctness of their answers was coded and the time spent on task was recorded. The median time for a correct Bayesian inference is fastest in the version with a frequency tree (2:55 min) compared to the version with a probability tree (5:47 min) or to the text only versions based on natural frequencies (4:13 min) or probabilities (9:59 min).The score<jats:italic>diagnostic efficiency</jats:italic>(calculated by: median time divided by percentage of correct inferences) is best in the version with a frequency tree (4:53 min). Frequency trees allow more accurate<jats:italic>and</jats:italic>faster judgments. Improving correctness and efficiency in Bayesian tasks might help to decrease overdiagnosis in daily clinical practice, which on the one hand cause cost and on the other hand might endanger patients’ safety.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Binder, Karin and Krauss, Stefan and Schmidmaier, Ralf and Braun, Leah T.}},
  issn         = {{1382-4996}},
  journal      = {{Advances in Health Sciences Education}},
  number       = {{3}},
  pages        = {{847--863}},
  publisher    = {{Springer Science and Business Media LLC}},
  title        = {{{Natural frequency trees improve diagnostic efficiency in Bayesian reasoning}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s10459-020-10025-8}},
  volume       = {{26}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@article{59433,
  abstract     = {{<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>When physicians are asked to determine the positive predictive value from the a priori probability of a disease and the sensitivity and false positive rate of a medical test (Bayesian reasoning), it often comes to misjudgments with serious consequences. In daily clinical practice, however, it is not only important that doctors receive a tool with which they can<jats:italic>correctly</jats:italic>judge—the<jats:italic>speed</jats:italic>of these judgments is also a crucial factor. In this study, we analyzed accuracy and efficiency in medical Bayesian inferences. In an empirical study we varied information format (probabilities vs. natural frequencies) and visualization (text only vs. tree only) for four contexts. 111 medical students participated in this study by working on four Bayesian tasks with common medical problems. The correctness of their answers was coded and the time spent on task was recorded. The median time for a correct Bayesian inference is fastest in the version with a frequency tree (2:55 min) compared to the version with a probability tree (5:47 min) or to the text only versions based on natural frequencies (4:13 min) or probabilities (9:59 min).The score<jats:italic>diagnostic efficiency</jats:italic>(calculated by: median time divided by percentage of correct inferences) is best in the version with a frequency tree (4:53 min). Frequency trees allow more accurate<jats:italic>and</jats:italic>faster judgments. Improving correctness and efficiency in Bayesian tasks might help to decrease overdiagnosis in daily clinical practice, which on the one hand cause cost and on the other hand might endanger patients’ safety.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Binder, Karin and Krauss, Stefan and Schmidmaier, Ralf and Braun, Leah T.}},
  issn         = {{1382-4996}},
  journal      = {{Advances in Health Sciences Education}},
  number       = {{3}},
  pages        = {{847--863}},
  publisher    = {{Springer Science and Business Media LLC}},
  title        = {{{Natural frequency trees improve diagnostic efficiency in Bayesian reasoning}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s10459-020-10025-8}},
  volume       = {{26}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@inbook{59944,
  author       = {{Vukadinovic, Vojin Sasa and Ertugrul, Ali Tonguc and Martin, Sabri Deniz}},
  booktitle    = {{Über jeden Verdacht erhaben? Antisemitismus in Kunst und Kultur}},
  editor       = {{Leder, Stella }},
  isbn         = {{978-3-8376-5929-5}},
  pages        = {{130--142}},
  publisher    = {{Hentrich & Hentrich}},
  title        = {{{Dirk Moses und die ‚Pluralisierung‘ von Erinnerungskultur. Eine antizionistische Geschichte der Gegenwart}}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@inbook{59945,
  author       = {{Vukadinovic, Vojin Sasa}},
  booktitle    = {{Grete Hartwig-Manschinger, Rendezvous in Manhattan. Amerikanischer Roman}},
  pages        = {{261--286}},
  title        = {{{Proletarisch lieben}}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}