@inproceedings{8035,
  author       = {{Sancar, Yavuz and Schumacher, Claudia}},
  booktitle    = {{Proceedings of the Conference on Software & Systems Engineering Essentials 2010 (SEE 2010), Köln (Germany)}},
  pages        = {{299--314}},
  publisher    = {{Technische Universität München}},
  title        = {{{Erweiterung des TPI-Modells zur Reifegradbewertung unter Berücksichtigung von projekteigenen Anforderungen}}},
  year         = {{2010}},
}

@inproceedings{8037,
  author       = {{Salger, Frank and Engels, Gregor and Hofmann, Alexander}},
  booktitle    = {{Proceedings ACM/IEEE 32nd International Conference on Software Engineering, Software Engineering in Practice Track, Cape Town, South Africa (ICSE'10)}},
  pages        = {{29--38}},
  publisher    = {{ACM New York, NY, USA}},
  title        = {{{Assessments in Global Software Development: A Tailorable Framework for Industrial Projects}}},
  doi          = {{http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1810295.1810301}},
  volume       = {{2}},
  year         = {{2010}},
}

@inproceedings{8038,
  author       = {{Chambers, Chris and Erwig, Martin and Luckey, Markus}},
  booktitle    = {{Proceedings of the 26th IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing 2010 (VL/HCC 2010)}},
  pages        = {{85--92}},
  publisher    = {{IEEE Computer Society}},
  title        = {{{SheetDiff: A Tool for Identifying Changes in Spreadsheets}}},
  year         = {{2010}},
}

@inproceedings{8039,
  author       = {{Van den Bergh, Jan and Meixner, Gerrit and Breiner, Kai and Pleuß, Andreas and Sauer, Stefan and Hussmann, Heinrich}},
  booktitle    = {{Proc. 28th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2010)}},
  pages        = {{4429--4432}},
  publisher    = {{ACM}},
  title        = {{{Model-driven Development of Advanced User Interfaces}}},
  year         = {{2010}},
}

@inproceedings{8040,
  abstract     = {{Software Quality Lab (s-lab) is an open multi-private-public partnership institute for knowledge and technology transfer. In s-lab, partners from industrial software development closely cooperate with research groups of the University of Paderborn. Together with partners from industry, s-lab develops and evaluates constructive and analytical methods and tools of software engineering for obtaining high-quality software. Testing plays an important role in analytical quality assurance within s-lab’s activities. Thereby our main focus lies on the development of testing methods, test automation tools and test management concepts for the individual needs of the industrial partners. Because of the different requirements of the university and the industry; the cooperation involves some challenges, e.g. defining projects aiming at the commercial interests of the industry and addressing interesting research questions. In this paper, we give an overview of testing activities in s-lab and address targets and challenges of the cooperative work between industry and university. We also summarize the lessons learned during the numerous testing projects especially in the domain of business information systems.}},
  author       = {{Güldali, Baris and Sauer, Stefan}},
  booktitle    = {{online Proc. of International TestIstanbul Conference 2010 (URL: www.testistanbul.org/presentations.html)}},
  publisher    = {{Turkish Testing Board}},
  title        = {{{Transfer of Testing Research from University to Industry: An Experience Report}}},
  year         = {{2010}},
}

@inproceedings{8041,
  author       = {{von der Maßen, Thomas and Wübbeke, Andreas}},
  booktitle    = {{Proceedings of Software Engineering 2010 (SE2010)}},
  pages        = {{17--18}},
  publisher    = {{Gesellschaft für Informatik (GI)}},
  title        = {{{Verteiltes Testen heterogener Systemlandschaften}}},
  volume       = {{P-159}},
  year         = {{2010}},
}

@article{805,
  author       = {{Valentin, Stefan and Karl, Holger}},
  journal      = {{European Transactions on Telecommunications}},
  number       = {{8}},
  pages        = {{714----724}},
  title        = {{{Cooperative feedback to improve capacity and error rate in multiuser diversity systems - an OFDM case study}}},
  doi          = {{10.1002/ett.1454}},
  year         = {{2010}},
}

@article{806,
  author       = {{S. Lichte, Hermann and Valentin, Stefan and Karl, Holger}},
  journal      = {{IEEE Communications Letters}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{130----132}},
  title        = {{{Expected interference in wireless networks with geometric path loss: a closed-form approximation}}},
  doi          = {{10.1109/LCOMM.2010.02.091863}},
  year         = {{2010}},
}

@article{807,
  author       = {{Simon Lichte, Hermann and Valentin, Stefan and Karl, Holger}},
  journal      = {{Mobile Networks and Applications}},
  number       = {{6}},
  pages        = {{769----785}},
  title        = {{{Automated Development of Cooperative MAC Protocols - A Compiler-Assisted Approach}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s11036-009-0210-5}},
  year         = {{2010}},
}

@inproceedings{808,
  author       = {{Andree, Matthias and Gebel, Alexander and Karl, Holger}},
  booktitle    = {{10th IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Technology, CIT 2010, Bradford, West Yorkshire, UK, June 29-July 1, 2010}},
  pages        = {{737----742}},
  title        = {{{Concept and Prototype for a Real-Time Enabled Publish/Subscribe System}}},
  doi          = {{10.1109/CIT.2010.142}},
  year         = {{2010}},
}

@inproceedings{809,
  author       = {{Birkenheuer, Georg and Brinkmann, Andre and Karl, Holger}},
  booktitle    = {{Job Scheduling Strategies for Parallel Processing - 15th International Workshop, JSSPP 2010, Atlanta, GA, USA, April 23, 2010, Revised Selected Papers}},
  pages        = {{51--76}},
  title        = {{{Risk Aware Overbooking for Commercial Grids}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/978-3-642-16505-4_4}},
  year         = {{2010}},
}

@inproceedings{810,
  author       = {{S. Lichte, Hermann and Frey, Hannes and Karl, Holger}},
  booktitle    = {{Proceedings of the 11th ACM Interational Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing, MobiHoc 2010, Chicago, IL, USA, September 20-24, 2010}},
  pages        = {{101----110}},
  title        = {{{Fading-resistant low-latency broadcasts in wireless multihop networks: the probabilistic cooperation diversity approach}}},
  doi          = {{10.1145/1860093.1860108}},
  year         = {{2010}},
}

@inproceedings{811,
  author       = {{Biermann, Thorsten and Dannewitz, Christian and Karl, Holger}},
  booktitle    = {{Testbeds and Research Infrastructures. Development of Networks and Communities - 6th International ICST Conference, TridentCom 2010, Berlin, Germany, May 18-20, 2010, Revised Selected Papers}},
  pages        = {{442----453}},
  title        = {{{FIT: Future Internet Toolbox}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/978-3-642-17851-1_34}},
  year         = {{2010}},
}

@inproceedings{812,
  author       = {{Dannewitz, Christian and Biermann, Thorsten and Dräxler, Martin and Beister, Frederic and Karl, Holger}},
  booktitle    = {{Testbeds and Research Infrastructures. Development of Networks and Communities - 6th International ICST Conference, TridentCom 2010, Berlin, Germany, May 18-20, 2010, Revised Selected Papers}},
  pages        = {{609----611}},
  title        = {{{Prototyping with the Future Internet Toolbox}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/978-3-642-17851-1_56}},
  year         = {{2010}},
}

@techreport{8219,
  abstract     = {{Modern business process modeling environments support distributed development by means of model version control, i.e., comparison and merging of two different model versions. This is a challenging task since most modeling languages support an almost arbitrary creation of process models. Thus, in multi-developer environments, process models or parts of them are often syntactically very different but semantically equivalent. Hence, the comparison of business process models must be performed on a semantic level rather then on a syntactic level. For the domain of business process modeling, this problem is yet unsolved. This paper describes an approach that allows the semantic comparison of different business process models using a normal form. For that purpose, the process models are fully automatically translated into process model terms and normalized using a term rewriting system. The resulting normal forms can be efficiently compared. Our approach enables the semantic comparison of business process models ignoring syntactic redundancies.}},
  author       = {{Gerth, Christian and Luckey, Markus and Küster, Jochen and Engels, Gregor}},
  publisher    = {{IBM Research}},
  title        = {{{Detection of Semantically Equivalent Fragments for Business Process Model Change Management}}},
  year         = {{2010}},
}

@techreport{8220,
  author       = {{Hülsbusch, Mathias and König, Barbara and Rensink, Arend and Semenyak, Maria and Soltenborn, Christian and Wehrheim, Heike}},
  publisher    = {{Centre for Telematics and Information Technology of the University of Twente}},
  title        = {{{Full Semantics Preservation in Model Transformation - A Comparison of Proof Techniques}}},
  year         = {{2010}},
}

@inproceedings{5685,
  abstract     = {{In double-sided markets for computing resources an optimal allocation schedule among job offers and requests subject to relevant capacity constraints can be determined. With increasing storage demands and emerging storage services the question how to schedule storage jobs becomes more and more interesting. Since such scheduling problems are often in the class NP-complete an exact computation is not feasible in practice. On the other hand an approximation to the optimal solution can easily be found by means of using heuristics. The problem with this attempt is that the suggested solution may not be exactly optimal and is thus less satisfying. Considering the two above mentioned solution approaches one can clearly find a trade-off between the optimality of the solution and the efficiency to get to a solution at all. This work proposes to apply and combine heuristics in optimization to gain from both of their benefits while reducing the problematic aspects. Following this method it is assumed to get closer to the optimal solution in a shorter time compared to a full optimization.}},
  author       = {{Finkbeiner, Josef and Bodenstein, Christian and Schryen, Guido and Neumann, Dirk}},
  booktitle    = {{18th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2010)}},
  keywords     = {{Decision Support System, Algorithms, Optimization, Market Engineering}},
  title        = {{{Applying heuristic methods for job scheduling in storage markets}}},
  year         = {{2010}},
}

@inproceedings{5690,
  abstract     = {{In a world, where more and more businesses seem to trade in an online market, the supply of online services to supply the ever-growing demand could quickly reach its capacity limits. Online service providers may find themselves maxed out at peak operation levels during high-traffic timeslots but too little demand during low-traffic timeslots, although the latter is becoming less frequent. At this point not only deciding which user is allocated what level of service becomes essential, but also the magnitude of the service provided, can be controlled by pricing. Pricing is an important factor when efficient and acceptable allocation of resources between individuals must be reached. Without prices, transferring or sharing goods would be impossible. In sharing information, pricing a product however is not as simple as relatively pricing an apple or a pear. Often the costs, and hence the prices are simply unknown. Backed by this scenario, the online services market could be combined with the market design mechanism of diamonds. For this we propose an ultimatum pricing strategy which effectively allows for valuations to be accounted for, but no longer a necessity when pricing in grid, cloud or other online computing environments.}},
  author       = {{Bodenstein, Christian and Schryen, Guido and Neumann, Dirk}},
  booktitle    = {{18th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2010)}},
  keywords     = {{Posted Price, Ultimatum Game, Energy Efficiency, Mechanism Design}},
  title        = {{{From "Take-it-or-leave-it" offers to "Take-it-or-be-left-out" Ultimatum - A trade mechanism for Online Services}}},
  year         = {{2010}},
}

@book{5720,
  editor       = {{Ackermann, Sebastian and Wünderlich, Nancy and Wangenheim, Florian v.}},
  isbn         = {{9783842301511}},
  publisher    = {{Books on Demand}},
  title        = {{{Geschäftsmodelle in virtuellen Spielwelten}}},
  year         = {{2010}},
}

@inproceedings{5756,
  author       = {{Brüseke, Frank and Sancar, Yavuz and Yigitbas, Enes}},
  booktitle    = {{Proceedings of the Conference on Software & Systems Engineering Essentials 2010 (SEE 2010), Köln (Germany)}},
  pages        = {{277--298}},
  publisher    = {{Technische Universität München}},
  title        = {{{Erfolgsfaktoren von Testprozessbewertungsmodellen}}},
  year         = {{2010}},
}