@inproceedings{13050, author = {{Indlekofer, Thomas and Schnittger, Michael and Hellebrand, Sybille}}, booktitle = {{4. GMM/GI/ITG-Fachtagung "Zuverlässigkeit und Entwurf"}}, pages = {{17--24}}, title = {{{Robuster Selbsttest mit extremer Kompaktierung}}}, year = {{2010}}, } @inbook{31139, author = {{van Laak, Lothar}}, booktitle = {{Handbuch Gattungstheorie}}, editor = {{Zymner, Rüdiger}}, pages = {{75--77}}, publisher = {{Metzler}}, title = {{{Originalität und Gattung}}}, year = {{2010}}, } @inbook{31137, author = {{van Laak, Lothar}}, booktitle = {{Handbuch Gattungstheorie}}, editor = {{Zymner, Rüdiger}}, pages = {{69--71}}, publisher = {{Metzler}}, title = {{{Innovation und Gattung}}}, year = {{2010}}, } @inbook{31135, author = {{van Laak, Lothar}}, booktitle = {{Literaturwissenschaft – interdisziplinär}}, editor = {{van Laak, Lothar and Malsch, Katja}}, pages = {{131--142}}, publisher = {{Synchron}}, title = {{{Die Bilder der Literatur – die Bilder der Wissenschaft. Das interdisziplinäre Potenzial der Einbildungskraft bei Eichendorff und Grünbein}}}, year = {{2010}}, } @inbook{31126, author = {{van Laak, Lothar}}, booktitle = {{Gedächtnisparagone – Intermediale Konstellationen}}, editor = {{Heiser, Sabine and Holm, Christiane}}, pages = {{289--299}}, publisher = {{Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht unipress}}, title = {{{Erzeugung von Erinnerung im Widerspiel von Film und Literatur: Patrick Roth}}}, year = {{2010}}, } @inbook{31127, author = {{van Laak, Lothar}}, booktitle = {{Im Namen des anderen. Die Ethik des Zitierens}}, editor = {{Jacob, Joachim and Mayer, Mathias}}, pages = {{373--383}}, publisher = {{Wilhelm Fink Verlag}}, title = {{{Lars von Triers filmische Auseinandersetzung mit Bertolt Brechts epischem Theater}}}, year = {{2010}}, } @inbook{31130, author = {{van Laak, Lothar}}, booktitle = {{Wissen – Erzählen – Tradition. Wielands Spätwerk}}, editor = {{Erhart, Walter and van Laak, Lothar}}, pages = {{85--98}}, publisher = {{de Gruyter}}, title = {{{Wielands Konzeption aufklärerischen Philosophierens um 1800}}}, year = {{2010}}, } @inbook{31128, author = {{van Laak, Lothar and Erhart, Walter}}, booktitle = {{Wielands Spätwerk: Wissen – Erzählen – Tradition}}, editor = {{Erhart, Walter and van Laak, Lothar}}, pages = {{1--12}}, publisher = {{de Gruyter}}, title = {{{Einleitung}}}, year = {{2010}}, } @inbook{31131, author = {{van Laak, Lothar and Malsch, Katja}}, booktitle = {{Literaturwissenschaft – interdisziplinär}}, pages = {{7--12}}, publisher = {{Synchron}}, title = {{{Einleitung zum Sammelband: Literaturwissenschaft – interdisziplinär}}}, year = {{2010}}, } @book{31087, editor = {{van Laak, Lothar and Erhart, Walter}}, pages = {{390 Seiten}}, publisher = {{de Gruyter}}, title = {{{Wissen – Erzählen – Tradition. Wielands Spätwerk}}}, year = {{2010}}, } @book{31088, editor = {{van Laak, Lothar and Malsch, Katja}}, pages = {{234 Seiten}}, publisher = {{Synchron}}, title = {{{Literaturwissenschaft – interdisziplinär}}}, year = {{2010}}, } @inbook{31252, author = {{Elit, Stefan}}, booktitle = {{Antike – Lyrik – Heute. Griechisch-römische Antike in deutschsprachiger Lyrik und Altphilologie der Gegenwart (Die Antike und ihr Weiterleben 8)}}, editor = {{Elit, Stefan and Bremer, Kai and Reents, Friederike}}, pages = {{261--283}}, title = {{{Orpheus singt: von Ölbäumen und anderem. Zur Antikerezeption im Werk Uwe Kolbes}}}, year = {{2010}}, } @inbook{30765, author = {{Hirschauer, Maria and Kullmann, Harry}}, booktitle = {{{Ethnizität, Geschlecht, Familie und Schule. Heterogenität als erziehungswissenschaftliche Herausforderung}}}, editor = {{Hagedorn, Jörg and Schurt, Verena and Steber, Corinna and Waburg, Wiebke}}, pages = {{351–374}}, publisher = {{VS}}, title = {{{Lehrerprofessionalität im Zeichen von Heterogenität - Stereotype bei Lehrkräften als kollegial zu bearbeitende Herausforderung}}}, year = {{2010}}, } @misc{30779, author = {{Kullmann, Harry}}, booktitle = {{{Die Deutsche Schule}}}, number = {{2}}, pages = {{176–177}}, title = {{{Rezension zu: Kempfert, Guy & Ludwig, Marianne (2008): Kollegiale Unterrichtsbesuche. Besser und leichter unterrichten durch Kollegen-Feedback}}}, volume = {{102}}, year = {{2010}}, } @inbook{31332, author = {{Elit, Stefan}}, booktitle = {{Aufklärung und Religion. Neue Perspektiven (Bochumer Quellen und Forschungen zum 18. Jahrhundert 1)}}, editor = {{Hofmann, Michael and Zelle, Carsten}}, pages = {{85--97}}, title = {{{Im Spannungsfeld von Aufklärung, Religion und Nation – Klopstock literarhistorisch}}}, year = {{2010}}, } @misc{31406, author = {{Elit, Stefan}}, booktitle = {{Killy. Literaturlexikon. Autoren und Werke des deutschsprachigen Kulturraums, 2., vollst. überarb. Aufl., Bd. 8: Marq-Or}}, editor = {{Kühlmann, Wilhelm and Aurnhammer, Achim and Egyptien, Jürgen and Kellermann, Karina and Martus, Steffen and Sdzuj, Reimund B.}}, pages = {{558f}}, title = {{{[überarbeiteter u. aktualisierter Verfasserartikel:] Neutsch, Erik}}}, year = {{2010}}, } @inbook{31420, author = {{Elit, Stefan}}, booktitle = {{Forschungsforum Paderborn 13 }}, pages = {{6--9}}, title = {{{Transformationen der Antike. Rezeptionsformen der griechisch-römischen Literaturkultur in der Moderne: Übersetzungen – Adaptionen – Umschreibungen}}}, year = {{2010}}, } @article{6067, abstract = {{Implicit change detection demonstrates how the visual system can benefit from stored information that is not immediately available to conscious awareness. We investigated the role of motor action in this context. In the first two experiments, using a one-shot implicit change detection paradigm, participants responded to unperceived changes either with an action (jabbing the screen at the guessed location of a change) or with words (verbal report), and sat either 60 cm or 300 cm (with a laser pointer) away from the display. Our observers guessed the locations of changes at a reachable distance better with an action than with a verbal judgment. At 300 cm, beyond reach, the motor advantage disappeared. In experiment 3, this advantage was also unavailable when participants sat at a reachable distance but responded with hand-held laser pointers near their bodies. We conclude that a motor system specialized for real-time visually guided behavior has access to additional visual information. }}, author = {{Tseng, Philip and Tuennermann, Jan and Roker-Knight, Nancy and Winter, Dorina and Scharlau, Ingrid and Bridgeman, Bruce}}, issn = {{0301-0066}}, journal = {{Perception}}, keywords = {{implicit change detection, action perception, visual system, perceptual judgment, verbal fluency, Analysis of Variance, Awareness, Female, Humans, Male, Psychomotor Performance, Random Allocation, Reaction Time, Visual Perception, Visual Memory, Visual Stimulation, Implicit Memory, Judgment, Perceptual Discrimination}}, number = {{10}}, pages = {{1311 -- 1321}}, title = {{{Enhancing implicit change detection through action.}}}, volume = {{39}}, year = {{2010}}, } @inproceedings{30899, abstract = {{Temporal order judgments (TOJs) have been used for demonstrating the facilitating effect of attention on information processing - prior entry. Prior entry is a robust, often large effect. Besides attention, other factors shorten perceptual latency, for instance stimulus saliency, action affordances of an object, or threatening objects. The expectable size for these effects is far smaller than that usually obtained for prior entry. Some effects might consist of only a few milliseconds. But are TOJs sensitive enough for detecting such small effects? For answering this question, we tested whether objects highly associated with a certain color are perceived earlier. In a four-alternative TOJ, including a "simultaneous" and "uncertain" category, we found a small advantage for high color diagnostic objects. This indicates high sensitivity of the TOJ task. We also found that "simultaneous" judgements were most sensitive. This is important for the debate on the usefulness of order vs. simultaneous judgments.}}, author = {{Weiß, Katharina and Scharlau, Ingrid}}, booktitle = {{Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Psychophysics}}, editor = {{Bastianelli, Alessia and Vidotto, Giulio}}, issn = {{1010-6065}}, location = {{Padua}}, pages = {{461 -- 466}}, title = {{{Temporal order judgments: A sensitive measure for measuring perceptual latency?}}}, volume = {{26}}, year = {{2010}}, } @article{6090, abstract = {{Comments on an article by Jan Theeuwes (see record [rid]2010-20897-002[/rid]). Theeuwes summarizes an impressive number of studies demonstrating interference by irrelevant visual singletons in computer experiments with humans. Theeuwes assumes that this salience-driven capture of attention is fast and occurs within 150 ms since singleton onset, during the feed-forward phase of visual processing. In contrast to Theeuwes, we think that top–down contingent capture is the rule and explains initial and fast attention capture effects in the first feed-forward phase of visual processing. During a later phase and under some conditions exogenous capture of attention possibly follows. At the same time, we propose that the evidence presented by Theeuwes fails to support exogenous orienting because it fails to exclude a top–down contingent capture explanation. We present our arguments in two sections. One major source of evidence for top–down controlled attentional capture during the feed-forward}}, author = {{Ansorge, Ulrich and Horstmann, Gernot and Scharlau, Ingrid}}, issn = {{0001-6918}}, journal = {{Acta Psychologica}}, keywords = {{visual selection, attention, information, visual field, brain, Attention, Humans, Models, Psychological, Visual Perception, Volition, Brain, Visual Field, Visual Perception, Visual Attention, Information}}, number = {{2}}, pages = {{123 -- 126}}, title = {{{Top–down contingent attentional capture during feed-forward visual processing.}}}, volume = {{135}}, year = {{2010}}, }