@inbook{30782, author = {{Kullmann, Harry}}, booktitle = {{{Erziehungswissenschaftliche Forschung – nachhaltige Bildung. Beiträge zur 5. DGfE-Sektionstagung {\textquotedbl}Empirische Bildungsforschung{\textquotedbl}/ AEPF-KBBB im Frühjahr 2009}}}, editor = {{Schwarz, Bernd and Nenniger, Peter and Jäger, Reinhold S.}}, pages = {{150–155}}, publisher = {{{Empirische Pädagogik}}}, title = {{{Unterrichtsbezogene Lehrerkooperation an Gymnasien – Fallbeispiele und Zusammenhangsanalysen im Hinblick auf Didaktik und Schülerleistungen}}}, year = {{2011}}, } @inbook{31333, author = {{Elit, Stefan}}, booktitle = {{"Das Fremde im Eigensten." Die Funktion von Übersetzungen im Prozess der deutschen Nationenbildung (Transfer 21)}}, editor = {{Kortländer, Bernd and Singh, Sikander}}, pages = {{39--58}}, title = {{{Übersetzungen antiker Klassiker als sprachästhetische Schule der Kulturnation? Positionen um 1800}}}, year = {{2011}}, } @misc{31408, author = {{Elit, Stefan}}, booktitle = {{Killy. Literaturlexikon. Autoren und Werke des deutschsprachigen Kulturraums, 2., vollst. überarb. Aufl., Bd. 11: Si-Vi}}, editor = {{Kühlmann, Wilhelm}}, pages = {{460f}}, title = {{{[überarb. u. aktualis. Verfasserart.:] Tetzner, Gerti}}}, year = {{2011}}, } @inbook{31534, author = {{Egidi, Margreth}}, booktitle = {{Aspekte einer Sprache der Liebe. Formen des Dialogischen im Minnesang (Publikationen zur ZfG, N.F. 21)}}, editor = {{Münkler, Marina}}, pages = {{107--125}}, title = {{{„Der schwierige Dritte: Zur Logik der Botenlieder vom frühen Minnesang bis Reinmar“}}}, year = {{2011}}, } @inbook{31535, author = {{Egidi, Margreth}}, booktitle = {{Sehen und Sichtbarkeit in der Literatur des deutschen Mittelalters. XXI. Anglo-German Colloquium London 2009}}, editor = {{Bauschke, Ricarda and Coxon, Sebastian and Jones, Martin H.}}, pages = {{115--128}}, title = {{{„Blick und Objekt. Die Inszenierung des Blicks im höfischen Roman“}}}, year = {{2011}}, } @article{30901, abstract = {{Der Beitrag befasst sich mit der Frage, auf welche Weise Studierende die Anforderungen von Wissenschaft und Berufspraxis aufeinander beziehen und welche Subjektiven Theorien sie hierzu entwickeln. Basierend auf einer qualitativen Befragung von Studierenden des Lehramts und der Soziologie rekonstruiert der Beitrag verschiedene Konzepte von Praxisbezug und Professionalität und analysiert mögliche Zusammenhänge zwischen diesen Konzepten. Der Beitrag macht deutlich, dass es neben der (erwartbaren) Heterogenität zwischen den Studiengängen eine erhebliche Heterogenität der entsprechenden Subjektiven Theorien innerhalb der jeweiligen Studiengänge gibt und diskutiert mögliche Schlussfolgerungen für die universitäre Lehre. }}, author = {{Oechsle, Mechthild and Scharlau, Ingrid and Hessler, Gudrun and Günnewig, Kathrin}}, isbn = {{978-3-941927-18-6}}, journal = {{Der Bologna-Prozess aus Sicht der Hochschulforschung}}, pages = {{178 -- 190}}, publisher = {{CHE}}, title = {{{Wie sehen Studierende das Verhältnis von Studium und Beruf? Praxisbezug und Professionalität in den Subjektiven Theorien Studierender}}}, year = {{2011}}, } @inproceedings{31687, author = {{Scharlau, Ingrid}}, booktitle = {{Workshop: Zum Verhältnis von Studium und Berufspraxis. Perspektiven von Lehrenden und Studierenden}}, title = {{{Self-Assessment-Instrumente: Eine Möglichkeit der Reflexion und Differenzierung von Subjektiven Theorien}}}, year = {{2011}}, } @article{6091, abstract = {{In the present article, the role of endogenous feature-specific orienting for conscious and unconscious vision is reviewed. We start with an overview of orienting. We proceed with a review of masking research, and the definition of the criteria of experimental protocols that demonstrate endogenous and exogenous orienting, respectively. Against this background of criteria, we assess studies of unconscious orienting and come to the conclusion that so far studies of unconscious orienting demonstrated endogenous feature-specific orienting. The review closes with a discussion of the role of unconscious orienting in action control. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)}}, author = {{Ansorge, Ulrich and Horstmann, Gernot and Scharlau, Ingrid}}, issn = {{1895-1171}}, journal = {{Advances in Cognitive Psychology}}, keywords = {{visual input, awareness, conscious, orientation, visual perception, Awareness, Consciousness States, Perceptual Orientation, Visual Perception, Blindsight}}, number = {{2}}, pages = {{108 -- 119}}, title = {{{Top-down contingent feature-specific orienting with and without awareness of the visual input.}}}, volume = {{7}}, year = {{2011}}, } @article{6082, abstract = {{When two targets are presented in rapid succession, the first target (T1) is usually identified, but the second target (T2) is often missed. A remarkable exception to this 'attentional blink' occurs when T2 immediately follows the first T1, at lag 1. It is then often spared but reported in the wrong order—that is, before T1. These order reversals have led to the hypothesis that 'lag 1 sparing' occurs because the two targets merge into a single episodic representation. Here, we report evidence consistent with an alternative theory: T2 receives more attention than T1, leading to prior entry into working memory. Two experiments showed that the more T2 performance exceeded that for T1, the more order reversals were made. Furthermore, precuing T1 led to a shift in performance benefits from T2 to T1 and to an equivalent reduction in order reversals. We conclude that it is not necessary to assume episodic integration to explain lag 1 sparing or the accompanying order reversals. (PsycINFO Dat}}, author = {{Olivers, Christian N. L. and Hilkenmeier, Frederic and Scharlau, Ingrid}}, issn = {{1943-3921}}, journal = {{Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics}}, keywords = {{attentional blink, order reversals, prior entry, working memory, visual attention, attentional performance, Adolescent, Adult, Attention, Attentional Blink, Color Perception, Cues, Discrimination (Psychology), Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Psychophysics, Reaction Time, Reversal Learning, Sensory Gating, Serial Learning, Young Adult, Eyeblink Reflex, Stimulus Change, Stimulus Parameters, Visual Attention, Attentional Blink, Short Term Memory}}, number = {{1}}, pages = {{53 -- 67}}, title = {{{Prior entry explains order reversals in the attentional blink.}}}, volume = {{73}}, year = {{2011}}, } @article{6084, abstract = {{Attended stimuli are perceived as occurring earlier than unattended stimuli. This phenomenon of prior entry is usually identified by a shift in the point of subjective simultaneity (PSS) in temporal order judgements (TOJs). According to its traditional psychophysical interpretation, the PSS coincides with the perception of simultaneity. This assumption is, however, questionable. Technically, the PSS represents the temporal interval between two stimuli at which the two alternative TOJs are equally likely. Thus it also seems possible that observers perceive not simultaneity, but uncertainty of temporal order. This possibility is supported by prior-entry studies, which find that perception of simultaneity is not very likely at the PSS. The present study tested the percept at the PSS in prior entry, using peripheral cues to orient attention. We found that manipulating attention caused varying temporal perceptions around the PSS. On some occasions observers perceived the two stimuli as sim}}, author = {{Weiß, Katharina and Scharlau, Ingrid}}, issn = {{1747-0218}}, journal = {{The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology}}, keywords = {{temporal order perception, simultaneity, temporal order judgment, attention, visual perception, Adolescent, Adult, Attention, Cues, Discrimination (Psychology), Female, Humans, Judgment, Male, Models, Psychological, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time, Time Factors, Uncertainty, Visual Perception, Young Adult, Attention, Judgment, Stimulus Similarity, Time Perception, Visual Discrimination, Temporal Order (Judgment)}}, number = {{2}}, pages = {{394 -- 416}}, title = {{{Simultaneity and temporal order perception: Different sides of the same coin? Evidence from a visual prior-entry study.}}}, volume = {{64}}, year = {{2011}}, }