@techreport{4918, author = {{Hinerasky, Christiane and Fahr, Rene}}, title = {{{When the early bird catches the worm: The impact of training in retail}}}, year = {{2011}}, } @inbook{4945, author = {{Ivens, Björn and Eggert, Andreas}}, booktitle = {{Handbuch Vertriebsmanagement}}, title = {{{Key Account Management}}}, year = {{2011}}, } @article{4972, author = {{Alewell, Dorothea and Hauff, Sven and Weiland, Katrin and Thommes, Kirsten}}, journal = {{International journal of manpower}}, number = {{4}}, pages = {{394----409}}, title = {{{HRM and the use of personnel services: an empirical analysis of German firms}}}, year = {{2011}}, } @article{4973, author = {{Braun, Irene and Pull, Kerstin and Alewell, Dorothea and Störmer, Susi and Thommes, Kirsten}}, issn = {{0048-3486}}, journal = {{Personnel Review}}, number = {{3}}, pages = {{364----382}}, title = {{{HR outsourcing and service quality: theoretical framework and empirical evidence}}}, volume = {{40}}, year = {{2011}}, } @article{6995, author = {{Beutner, Marc and Kremer, H.-Hugo and Zoyke, A. }}, journal = {{bwp@ Spezial 5 - Hochschultage Berufliche Bildung 2011}}, title = {{{Workshop 16 Individuelle Förderung. Konzepte und Erfahrungen zur Berufsorientierung im Übergang }}}, year = {{2011}}, } @misc{6999, booktitle = {{bwp@ Spezial 5 - Hochschultage Berufliche Bildung 2011}}, editor = {{Kremer, H.-Hugo and Tramm, T.}}, title = {{{Fachtagung 19}}}, year = {{2011}}, } @article{7049, author = {{Kremer, H.-Hugo and Tramm, T. and Tenberg, R.}}, journal = {{bwp@ Berufs- und Wirtschaftspädagogik - online}}, number = {{20}}, title = {{{Lernfeldansatz - 15 Jahre danach}}}, year = {{2011}}, } @article{7311, author = {{Soldat, Henning and Li, Mingyuan and Gerhardt, Nils C. and Hofmann, Martin R. and Ludwig, Arne and Ebbing, Astrid and Reuter, Dirk and Wieck, Andreas D. and Stromberg, Frank and Keune, Werner and Wende, Heiko}}, issn = {{0003-6951}}, journal = {{Applied Physics Letters}}, number = {{5}}, publisher = {{AIP Publishing}}, title = {{{Room temperature spin relaxation length in spin light-emitting diodes}}}, doi = {{10.1063/1.3622662}}, volume = {{99}}, year = {{2011}}, } @article{7335, author = {{Krenner, Hubert J. and Völk, Stefan and Schülein, Florian J. R. and Knall, Florian and Wixforth, Achim and Reuter, Dirk and Wieck, Andreas D. and Kim, Hyochul and Truong, Tuan A. and Petroff, Pierre M.}}, issn = {{1862-6351}}, journal = {{physica status solidi (c)}}, number = {{2}}, pages = {{407--410}}, publisher = {{Wiley}}, title = {{{Surface acoustic wave controlled carrier injection into self-assembled quantum dots and quantum posts}}}, doi = {{10.1002/pssc.201100236}}, volume = {{9}}, year = {{2011}}, } @article{7353, abstract = {{Manuelle Testerstellung verursacht hohe Kosten. Im Vergleich dazu bietet modellbasiertes Testen große Vorteile hinsichtlich Testautomatisierung, früher Fehlerfindung, Erhöhung der Testabdeckung, effizienten Testentwurfs und besserer Rückverfolgbarkeit. Die Einführung des modellbasierten Testens ist jedoch mit Investitionen verbunden, für die die Rendite häufig unklar erscheint. Dabei finden sich in der Literatur bereits etliche Erfahrungsberichte zur erfolg­reichen Einführung von modellbasiertem Testen in unterschiedlichen Anwendungsdomänen. In diesem Artikel präsentieren wir einen Überblick über einige dieser Erfahrungsberichte.}}, author = {{Weißleder, Stephan and Güldali, Baris and Mlynarski, Michael and Törsel, Arne-Michael and Faragó, David and Prester, Florian and Winter, Mario}}, journal = {{OBJEKTspektrum}}, number = {{6}}, pages = {{59--65}}, title = {{{Modellbasiertes Testen: Hype oder Realität?}}}, year = {{2011}}, } @article{7354, abstract = {{Acceptance testing is a time-consuming task for complex software systems that have to fulfill a large number of requirements. To reduce this effort, we have developed a widely automated method for deriving test plans from requirements that are expressed in natural language. It consists of three stages: annotation, clustering, and test plan specification. The general idea is to exploit redundancies and implicit relationships in requirements specifications. Multi-viewpoint techniques based on RM-ODP (Reference Model for Open Distributed Processing) are employed for specifying the requirements. We then use linguistic analysis techniques, requirements clustering algorithms, and pattern-based requirements collection to reduce the total effort of testing against the requirements specification. In particular, we use linguistic analysis for extracting and annotating the actor, process and object of a requirements statement. During clustering, a similarity function is computed as a measure for the overlap of requirements. In the test plan specification stage, our approach provides capabilities for semi-automatically deriving test plans and acceptance criteria from the clustered informal textual requirements. Two patterns are applied to compute a suitable order of test activities. The generated test plans consist of a sequence of test steps and asserts that are executed or checked in the given order. We also present the supporting prototype tool TORC, which is available open source. For the evaluation of the approach, we have conducted a case study in the field of acceptance testing of a national electronic identification system. In summary, we report on lessons learned how linguistic analysis and clustering techniques can help testers in understanding the relations between requirements and for improving test planning.}}, author = {{Güldali, Baris and Funke, Holger and Sauer, Stefan and Engels, Gregor}}, issn = {{0963-9314}}, journal = {{Software Quality Journal}}, number = {{4}}, pages = {{771--799}}, publisher = {{Springer Nature}}, title = {{{TORC: test plan optimization by requirements clustering}}}, doi = {{10.1007/s11219-011-9149-4}}, volume = {{19}}, year = {{2011}}, } @article{7355, abstract = {{Dynamic Meta Modeling (DMM) is a visual semantics specification technique targeted at languages based on a metamodel. A DMM specification consists of a runtime metamodel and operational rules which describe how instances of the runtime metamodel change over time. A known deficiency of the DMM approach is that it does not support the refinement of a DMM specification, e.g., in the case of defining the semantics for a refined and extended domain-specific language (DSL). Up to now, DMM specifications could only be reused by adding or removing DMM rules. In this paper, we enhance DMM such that DMM rules can override other DMM rules, similar to a method being overridden in a subclass, and we show how rule overriding can be realized with the graph transformation tool GROOVE. We argue that rule overriding does not only have positive impact on reusability, but also improves the intuitive understandability of DMM semantics specifications.}}, author = {{Soltenborn, Christian and Engels, Gregor}}, issn = {{1045-926X}}, journal = {{Journal of Visual Languages & Computing}}, number = {{3}}, pages = {{233--250}}, publisher = {{Elsevier BV}}, title = {{{Using rule overriding to improve reusability and understandability of Dynamic Meta Modeling specifications}}}, doi = {{10.1016/j.jvlc.2010.12.005}}, volume = {{22}}, year = {{2011}}, } @article{7476, author = {{Kremer, H.-Hugo and Frehe, Petra}}, journal = {{Beilage Schule NRW}}, number = {{05/11}}, pages = {{4--8}}, title = {{{Individuelle Förderung - aber wie? Einblicke in das Innovationsprojekt InLab}}}, year = {{2011}}, } @article{7477, author = {{Sloane, Peter F. E. and Kremer, H.-Hugo}}, journal = {{Beilage Schule NRW}}, number = {{05/11}}, pages = {{4--8}}, title = {{{Individuelle Förderung fördern. Das Wirtschaftspädagogische Graduiertenkolleg als Innovation in der Lehrkräfte- und Schulentwicklung}}}, year = {{2011}}, } @article{7483, author = {{Kremer, H.-Hugo and Sandmann, D.}}, journal = {{bwp@ Berufs- und Wirtschaftspädagogik - online}}, title = {{{Kooperationsvorhaben berufliches Gymnasium und Bachelor Wirtschaftswissenschaften. Ein Paderborner Modellprojekt zur Berufs- und Studienorientierung}}}, year = {{2011}}, } @inproceedings{7535, author = {{Böckelmann, Irina and Schenk, Daniel and Rößler, Thoralf and Adler, Simon and Senft, Björn and Grubert, Jens and Mecke, Rüdiger and Huckauf, Anke and Urbina, Mario and Tümler, Johannes and Darius, Sabine}}, title = {{{Physiologische Beanspruchungsreaktionen bei der Anwendung von kopfgetragenen AR-Displays}}}, year = {{2011}}, } @inproceedings{7536, author = {{Klompmaker, Florian and Senft, Björn and Nebe, Karsten and Busch, Clemens and Willemsen, Detlev}}, booktitle = {{{HEALTHINF} 2011 - Proceedings of the International Conference on Health Informatics, Rome, Italy, 26-29 January, 2011}}, pages = {{268--273}}, title = {{{User Centered Design Process of OSAMi-D - Developing User Interfaces for a Remote Ergometer Training Application}}}, year = {{2011}}, } @article{7604, author = {{Kremer, H.-Hugo and Tramm, T.}}, journal = {{bwp@ Berufs- und Wirtschaftspädagogik - online}}, title = {{{Berufliche Bildung 2011, Fachtagung 19}}}, year = {{2011}}, } @inproceedings{8348, author = {{Krauter, Stefan}}, booktitle = {{ Proceedings of Decentralized Power Systems (DPS) 2011, Paderborn (Deutschland), 2. September 2011.}}, title = {{{The Challenge of Renewable Energies & Decentralized Power Systems – State of the Art, Potentials & Perspectives}}}, year = {{2011}}, } @inproceedings{8471, abstract = {{Performance is an important quality attribute for business information systems. When a tester has spotted a performance error, the error is passed to the software developers to fix it. However, in component-based software development the tester has to do blame analysis first, i. e. the tester has to decide, which party is responsible to fix the error. If the error is a design or deployment issue, it can be assigned to the software architect or the system deployer. If the error is specific to a component, it needs to be assigned to the corresponding component developer. An accurate blame analysis is important, because wrong assignments of errors will cause a loss of time and money. Our approach aims at doing blame analysis for performance errors by comparing performance metrics obtained in performance testing and performance prediction. We use performance prediction values as expected values for individual components. For performance prediction we use the Palladio approach. By this means, our approach evaluates each component’s performance in a certain test case. If the component performs poorly, its component developer needs to fix the component or the architect replaces the component with a faster one. If no omponent performs poorly, we can deduce that there is a design or deployment issue and the architecture needs to be changed. In this paper, we present an exemplary blame analysis based on a web shop system. The example shows the feasibility of our approach.}}, author = {{Brüseke, Frank and Becker, Steffen and Engels, Gregor}}, booktitle = {{Proceedings of the 16th International Workshop on Component-Oriented Programming (WCOP; satellite event of the CompArch 2011), Boulder Colorado, CO (USA)}}, pages = {{25--32}}, publisher = {{ACM}}, title = {{{Palladio-based performance blame analysis}}}, doi = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2000292.2000298}}, year = {{2011}}, }